- Joined
- Feb 8, 2020
Livestream it faggot.i am going to go out shooting the people involved in this kind of thing in a few years time
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Livestream it faggot.i am going to go out shooting the people involved in this kind of thing in a few years time
Because they very likely are. For circumstantial evidence, see the Baby Burlesks films of the 1930s (Shirley Temple stars as an 'exotic dancer' at the ripe old age of five). Hollywood has been trying sneak pedophilia into acceptable mainstream consciousness for decades (Lolita, Blue Lagoon, Leon the Professional, etc.)
Because it is. It is pretty much always been ruthless and logical socio-economic calculus that a woman can live more comfortably being one of the king's concubines than she can by being a soldier's wife. Always has been so.
How dare the mob not want pedobait! How absolutely dare they! Don't they know that when a black female pedobaits people, it's progressive and daring?
How do you say "Fuck NO" in French?
The IMDB page says the film features bare 11 year old breasts and brief rear nudity.
There goes the "It's just a movie about dancing" argument.
The clip I saw a few seconds of induced a feeling of Lovecraftian wrongness. It was like my brain couldn't reconcile the fact that a little girl was doing a dance intended to be sexual with the fact that kids shouldn't be sexual.There were clips on Twitter of the movie. I felt dirty just from seeing a couple seconds of it while scrolling past.
That just sounds like Social media and early 2000s forumsI watched the movie, because everyone was freaking out over it. Honestly, it’s fine. It’s the downward spiral of a young girl trying to feel like she belongs, which leads to her falling into a group of other girls desperately trying to gain popularity and acceptance.
From the same twitter user:Okay..so...not sure how to link tweets other than lonking tweets but ...no. way.
This is pedo.
If you think this scene is fine youre a pedo.
True, but Nabokov wrote the screenplay for Kubrick's film. I mentioned Lolita only because that's the reliable go-to that everybody instantly recognizes, but in the book, Nabokov doesn't glorify Humbert or Dolores. If anything, he points out that Humbert, who imagines himself a clever literati is a manipulative, jealous, and petty man who needs to ply Dolores with bribes for her 'attention' due to his arrested desire for the love of 'nymphets.'Tbf, Lolita was a book first, but I see where you’re going-and I agree
Can't wait for the ScreenRants pitch meeting video on this one.The IMDB page says the film features bare 11 year old breasts and brief rear nudity.
There goes the "It's just a movie about dancing" argument.
I don’t see how you can tell a story like this without actually forcing the viewer to SEE this stuff. If you’re not seeing it, if you’re not uncomfortable, the movie isn’t doing what it is setting out to do.
>Shaven Crew-Cut HairHere's the hideous bull dyke and literal pedophile apologist who penned this trash.
View attachment 1585225