- Joined
- Mar 11, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Funny you should say "a town built with bitcoin" as that's is exactly what multi-millionaire Akon is trying to doInteresting that they translated the bitcoin one, that showed Stone's iffy grip on economics pretty well and probably isn't one his fans would want to share. I recall that he used to be an anarcho-capitalist back in the redpanels days before he realised that didn't work.
Of course, someone could prove me wrong and build a town funded with bitcoin, but I doubt it.
Funny you should say "a town built with bitcoin" as that's is exactly what multi-millionaire Akon is trying to do
No, not a town: a Wakanda-like futuristic cityscape.
I feel like that movie gave all black people whatever the exact opposite of PTSD is.
Not his best. He's been able to both make a political point and be funny before, but this one mostly just makes a political point and isn't very funny.Today's strip:
View attachment 1585110
No, not a town: a Wakanda-like futuristic cityscape.
I feel like that movie gave all black people whatever the exact opposite of PTSD is.
"I just want to grill for God's sake?" And I'm guessing the tiki is referencing the Charlottesville riots?
Okay, I see the double entendres. Clever.
Looks like Mexican Andy. And I don't get it. Dud.Today's strip:
View attachment 1585110
South Park did it better.It's "they're taking our jobs".
South Park did a great job at taking a complex social and economic question and making an entire generation of retards ignore it completely in favour of an (admittedly funny) meme.South Park did it better.
Boo.
Here's the Redpanels: https://www.bitchute.com/video/PnetfsusiC1q/Do you have the links or video clips to share? I think someone may have shared the Stonetoss Killstream way back on the thread, but I don't think anyone has shared the Red Panels one for comparison.
Well, they're not wrong.Fresh new comic from Breadpanes.
View attachment 1589406
He's being super original, as always.
View attachment 1589407
The only people I see doing this are comedians who are like THEY'RE GONNA GET ME FOR THIS ONE.Well, they're not wrong.
Southpark mocked the idea and the people who hold it. Stonetoss is mocking the people don't hold this idea, because it's so obviously true.South Park did it better.
Boo.
Well, they're not wrong.
It's impossible to say with 100% certainty in all cases, but there is a clear logical line in how illegal immigration screws the low income worker, stemming directly from the Supply vs. Demand curve and the fact that illegal immigrants are in a worse wage bargaining position and don't need to be paid all the extra health coverage and get those pesky worker rights.Southpark mocked the idea and the people who hold it. Stonetoss is mocking the people don't hold this idea, because it's so obviously true.
Very different.
Everyone also forgets that the original episode also had a character called liberal hippie douche who kept arguing how diversity is our strength and minority cultures should be allowed to maintain their vibrant culture and not need to assimilate. The moral of that episode was to prevent immigration by helping poorer countries build their own infrastructure to make people less inclined to leave. The character and message got warped because the original line stuck.It's impossible to say with 100% certainty in all cases, but there is a clear logical line in how illegal immigration screws the low income worker, stemming directly from the Supply vs. Demand curve and the fact that illegal immigrants are in a worse wage bargaining position and don't need to be paid all the extra health coverage and get those pesky worker rights.
Of course it wouldn't be StoneToss if they put this huge paragraph in, so it's left to the viewer to understand it with a single line of text.
Meanwhile South Park just make one side to being gay and I doubt people quoting the episode even remember any argument about why illegal immigration isn't something that exists solely to increase the profit of the companies/corporations employing them (and vote illegaly for Democrats who'll perpetually dangle the carrot of "we'll give you citizenship and healthcare this time").
Who cares how inclined they are to leave if you just don't let them in?The moral of that episode was to prevent immigration by helping poorer countries build their own infrastructure to make people less inclined to leave.