- Joined
- Jan 2, 2016
Linux works just fine without systemd. The reason it's "system-critical" is because poettering and his cronies captured and integrated a bunch of formerly independent subsystems (like udev and DBus), whilst redhat used their influence over Gnome's development to create an unecessary dependency on systemd.
It's a bloated, unstable mess that solves problems nobody actually cared about, written largely because poettering got butthurt at Linus for calling his shit code shit and decided to make the kernel irrelevant by wrapping it in a blanket of impenetrable, over-connected, terribly-engineered, badly specced, badly written, crash-prone, mission-creeping, fundamentally broken bullshit.
I have no systemd on my systems at home. They work just fine, just like they have for the last twenty years.
Oh no, how awful it must be for the Linux ecosystem to have standardized system libraries and protocols instead of everything depending on a dozen different independent solutions. Why can't it be like the old Unix days where we had no standards and everything broke everything else.
It's strange, everything depending on it, it's almost like developers enjoy having standard system libraries, instead of some grand conspiracy theory.