Netflix's "Cuties" - The Preteen Sexual Objectification Equivalent of "Funny Games"

There's no sense of humanity within her. She's just some little girl and that's it and we're just supposed to see the events that she goes through that sort of make her devolve into this bitchy sorta character, even bitchier than the people she's inspired to fit in with.
It's hard to stay likeable after the hollywood execs get their way with you a couple of times. Lindsay Lohan could do it for a while, but most kids just kinda tune out, like the poltergeist girl.
 
The phrase 'child sexuality' disturbs me greatly.

Of course children have an understanding of physical sensation. Babies enjoy breastfeeding because it feels good to them, children enjoy using the bathroom because peeing and evacuating their bowels feels pleasurable, little boys play with their pee pees and little girls inspect their private parts. None of this is wrong, it's totally natural, however it's not sexuality. It's the exploration of their bodies and learning how their bodies function. It's curiosity as children establish greater autonomy.

Children become fascinated by their private parts at a young age, and they may play games like Kiss Chase or doctors and nurses. A large part of these games is the mimicry of what they think mother's or father's do. It's recognised that children have a dormant sexuality which awakens as they approach their teenage years. Subconsciously all living beings understand on some level what sex is, but this can't be acquainted to children being sexual beings. Children are not physically, mentally or emotionally ready to process actual sexual activity. Even some teenagers aren't mentally and emotionally able to process sexual activity. Little boys may have crushes on teachers, little girls may 'flirt with' aka try to manipulate their fathers. This does not equate to sexuality.

As a child I used to love putting on lipstick, dressing up and singing along to provocative song lyrics. I also loved to run around my house naked. I didn't really understand what any of this meant. If a grown man decided my wearing lipstick, a feather boa and singing along to Britney meant I was up for it he'd be totally wrong. I'd have been terrified and traumatised and wouldn't have understood how my behaviour correlated to his response to me.

Children mimic, copy and explore their bodies. This is part of childhood. It is not for adults to call this normal behaviour a sexuality and try to involve themselves in the process. Even if children flirt, kiss, play, be silly and explore what all these concepts mean, this behaviour is same-age related, not adult related. Besides it's a whole other thing to put a camera/male gaze/voyeuristic lens on this behaviour for people to watch.

Edit to add: this is how nonces induce shame in children as they groom them. They tell them that their curiosity about their bodies, even their ability to feel pleasure from touching their bodies (as all humans do) means they are ready for sex, and therefore brought the abuse on themselves, as they must have wanted it and should feel dirty and ashamed for leading on the nonce in the first place. Children get very damaged by this message and start to feel that the whole mess was their fault.
 
Last edited:
"Hello ratio, my old friend."

Our girls see that the more a woman is overly sexualized on social media, the more successful she is. And the children just imitate what they see, trying to achieve the same result without understanding the meaning. And yeah, that’s dangerous.
AKA "I made a movie which sexualizes young girls in order to own the people sexualizing young girls or encouraging them to do it".
On tomorrow's news: "I burgled someone's house in order to prove burglary is wrong"
 
1599832191055.png

If any NPCs or normies are still delusional about this movie, this is all the proof you need short of watching it that the film is literally child porn.

"A pair of tight leather pants on an 11 year old are forcefully pulled down"
In what jurisdiction in the civilized world is this not hands on sexual abuse?
 
I have to ask, who would even want to watch this? It's so clearly a peodo movie to me. What adult has any interest in watching a Netflix show about little girls called cuties? I'm a female adult and have no interest in it.

So what year year do you guys think the first mainstream film to have an 11 year old laying on a bed nude and spreading will be released? At this rate of fucking degeneracy I'd say 2031.

Pretty Baby and Lolita were both pretty close to the line.

I've always had an issue even with adult nudity in film because so many of the actresses speak out against wanting to do it but it's expected of you now if you want to make it as an actress.

Bette Davis talked about it way back then, and said she was glad she came up before she needed to take her clothes off for the movies and she wouldn't have done it.

Emilia Clarke hated having to do nudity for GOT but was told that she needed to so she didn't cause viewer numbers to plummet. Most nudity these days is shamelessly unnecessary. Nobody enjoys doing it. It's just a jerk off for the directors and producers.

It's so touted that nudity is 'empowering' and 'not a big deal' that if you have natural human feelings of embarrassment, fear, shame or discomfort around taking your clothes off you're considered a weirdo.
 
Last edited:
I have to ask, who would even want to watch this? It's so clearly a peodo movie to me. What adult has any interest in watching a Netflix show about little girls called cuties? I'm a female adult and have no interest in it.

SJWs and pedos, really.

it's just like how some pedophiles will comb through vacation photos for their wank fuel.
 
I've always had an issue even with adult nudity in film because so many of the actresses speak out against wanting to do it but it's expected of you now if you want to make it as an actress.
English Renaissance era had it right. No female actresses, it only leads to them becoming prostitutes. It's the same now with movies. It's the same with Japanese Geisha, which were originally male artists (Geisha means "art person").

Besides, it allows troons to have some job prospects.
 
English Renaissance era had it right. No female actresses, it only leads to them becoming prostitutes. It's the same now with movies. It's the same with Japanese Geisha, which were originally male artists (Geisha means "art person").

Besides, it allows troons to have some job prospects.

Probably still rife even when it was an all male scene. Humans bring their depravity everywhere they go.
 
Back