Charles isn't exactly to blame, but he's an idiot for getting in a committed relationship with someone who clearly isn't capable of thinking of anyone but themselves or interested in any sort of stable life built on shared values. It is pretty funny how women like conservatives if you aren't too spergy about it though. Always makes me laugh when they get heated but also very interested over hearing an answer to a question they don't like
IDK, are the jurors in the Zimmerman case or the grand jurors in the Wilson case still under the crosshairs, or has everyone forgotten about them to move on to the newest, shiniest outrage?
Just imagine being a woke liberal guy and finding out the love of your life is cheating on you with a fucking Trump supporter at Trader Joe’s. “He wants to take away your right to your body and your right to vote!” She didn’t need to pro choice with him, they have a 2 year old together.
Lol no. An officer cannot justify what would otherwise be considered an unlawful or improper use of force because a crowd was demanding that he stop doing that very thing. I don't even know where to begin explaining how ridiculous this is. I am sure that's exactly the sort of 'thinking' that went through Chauvin's mind- and that's why he, and not every cop in America, is behind bars. Cops have to deal with 'hostile crowds' all the time.
Yes, and while Floyd was resisting it was reasonable to use that force to stop him. But the reasonableness of that force is proportional to the resistance that must be overcome. When someone is laying on the ground, not moving (or breathing) the same amount of force is no longer reasonable. Knowing when force is no longer reasonable is just as important as knowing when to apply it. At the end of a use of force report, these are the words you want to see: "Once (active\passive) resistance was overcome, force was ceased." Here there was no resistance for minutes on end. They were no longer trying to get him in the car, he was handcuffed and was not trying to get up. He was literally just laying there. There was nothing he could have done at that point to be any more compliant. And yet he was still being knelt on.
I would interested in seeing the case citation on that. Sounds like it's a complicated subject.
Where is this from? I needed a laugh today and this fit the bill perfectly. It should be sad, but somehow it's not.
They're all lawyers, so I hope they top this off by slow death from the burning drizzles.
That's a very good point. But they might dox the jurors and go "these people are evil whitey that said not guilty, kill them"
It’s probably these parts. I can’t feel bad for a guy this pathetic. Your ex is a fucking whore, be happy you didn’t get married when she did this. Not trying to powerlevel, but I had an ex exactly like this with her weird af best friend who likes godzilla shit at 27. It hit me in the feels for a month or so, but I eventually found it hilarious she would pick a guy that pathetic. There will always be another, unless you convince yourself you lost the only woman you’re worthy of, then she’ll be the last. “Trader Fucking Joe’s!!!”Where is this from? I needed a laugh today and this fit the bill perfectly. It should be sad, but somehow it's not.
Special Agent Loren Cannon? The first thing that popped into my head reading that is Laurel Canyon, which I was just thinking about earlier today. Huh. Guess that's my cue for what rabbit hole I want to revisit tonight. (Don't mind me, just bored lol).
They literally are larping... do they have to say “magic missile” when they’re using their magic?
It was not a unlawful or improper use of force, his department policy stated that knee on neck is safe and to use it in similar circumstances.
Ted Wheeler is a textboox example of why the term "faggot" is still around. What a spineless joke of a man.
Note how they say they investigated "several" such reports, not all the reports. Wonder if they're trying to cover their ass, or if it's just weird phrasing.
