U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
How many of these teachers are pedos?
Looks like a majority could be. I wouldn't be surprised after that one "teacher" took great offense to the parents of his students could possibly hear his lessons and that it was harmful for his students to have their parents listen in (he was a self proclaimed MAP in case any wanted to know)
 
1599851933261.png

1599851961973.png

if does death treat or molitovie going to hs house :story: :optimistic:
1599852028416.png
 
They're a hundred times more likely to be kiddly fiddlers than Catholic priests. That's a fact the DoJ found.

And the MSM was and still are, a bunch of hypocrites. They denounced in big headlines Catholic priests but when it's a regular teacher, they do a quick cover of it, rub it under the carpet and don't talk about it anymore.
 
Floyd playing the blubbering baby more than once when apprehended by police is called reasonable doubt. My money is that Chauvin will be found guilty of some lesser charge, probably something related to improper holds or excessive force.

It's only relevant if Chauvin or the other officers had prior knowledge that Floyd had a habit of catching jailitis. Information that they did not know at the time cannot be introduced to justify actions. And even if they did know Floyd plays games, Chauvin is still fucked because he was kneeling on a suspect that was not physically resisting and eventually even after he became unresponsive (i.e. dying). The other officer asking if they shouldn't roll Floyd on his side is going to be a big part, too (and it's why the defense for the other officers are trying to separate the trials- they're assuming Chauvin is going down and are going to make him out to be the villian). Charging all the other officers in the first place was a stretch.

I do agree that they have overcharged everyone because there's no reason to think it was an intentional homicide. Lesser charge is most likely.

What annoys me about all this stupid shit is that almost EVERYBODY looked at that video and said "that's fucked up." Conservatives, libertarians, democrats, cops, almost everyone. But even though the involved police were fired and charged within days, we still have this commies trying to burn down cities. And now we're getting a counter-narrative building that the cops were right to keep a guy compressed against the ground while he was dying (of whatever cause) because everyone is so tired of the bullshit being peddled by the far left.

One of relatively few in-custody deaths where almost everyone agreed and it had to get divided by wingnuts and over-zealous prosecutors trying to appease them.
 
I've been wondering how in the hell do they select a jury for such a high profile case as this? Surely everyone called in is going to be aware of various details of the case already and in this case probably have a strong bias in either direction.
there's actually a LOT of people that don't live on social media. twitter only reaches like, 10% of the US, if that. couple that with general disinterest in mainstream media and there's still a fair number of americans that have no fucking clue that several cities across the US have committed suicide.

And the MSM was and still are, a bunch of hypocrites. They denounced in big headlines Catholic priests but when it's a regular teacher, they do a quick cover of it, rub it under the carpet and don't talk about it anymore.
teachers tend to be on their ideological side, while christians are the enemy regardless of denomination, and delegitimatizing and destroying them is a laudable goal in their eyes.

just like how muslims can do no wrong, ever, and any muslim that does will suddenly no longer be a muslim, just an asian male.
 
I've been wondering how in the hell do they select a jury for such a high profile case as this? Surely everyone called in is going to be aware of various details of the case already and in this case probably have a strong bias in either direction.

Nah, nigga. Just get like, ten odd-looking Malaysian and Indian people who just got citizenship. You can't get a bias stance with that and ain't no one going to ID those peeps for vigi's.
 
I've been wondering how in the hell do they select a jury for such a high profile case as this? Surely everyone called in is going to be aware of various details of the case already and in this case probably have a strong bias in either direction.

It's 100% going to be a heavily sequestered and names not available to the public jury.

The defense already has ample video evidence of Antifa already saying they would go and intimidate jurors at their homes and places of work once they were named. Every single juror also has a reasonable fear for their life/property, especially if they acquit.
 
I skimmed the article and I think this is my favorite quote...

"I never fired my gun," Grosskreutz said. "I was there to help people. Not hurt people."

Right, you had your gun drawn and aimed at Kyle just to help him...

Didn’t he also say his only regret was not “killing the kid when he had the chance”. Or something of the sort?

I can’t believe people buy this crap.

Is there a time limit for bringing charges in a case like this? Are the authorities allowed to leave him out to incriminate himself?
 
“Do you go to the gym and, if so, how likely are you to be careless with a barbell to the point of it killing you?”
Have you ever been in constant fear of attack from the more lawless elements of American society? If not, would you like to?

Have you ever heard of the wittness protection program? Would you be interested in learning more about said program if the need were to ever arise?

Do you have any living friends or relatives you care about?

How well versed are you in faking your own death?
 
Last edited:
And even if they did know Floyd plays games, Chauvin is still fucked because he was kneeling on a suspect that was not physically resisting and eventually even after he became unresponsive (i.e. dying)
An officer is required to keep control of the scene, the scene was quickly turning hostile by the peanut gallery, if Chauvin gave in to the demands of the crowd (who didn't know what the fuck was going on), it risked getting the mob to be more daring "Hey we can 'de-arrest' Floyd" type thinking that poses an even greater risk to the Officers and Floyd.
Floyd was resisting in the videos and as such can be seen as a flight/fight risk such as him fighting to try not be put in the police car.
 
An officer is required to keep control of the scene, the scene was quickly turning hostile by the peanut gallery, if Chauvin gave in to the demands of the crowd (who didn't know what the fuck was going on), it risked getting the mob to be more daring "Hey we can 'de-arrest' Floyd" type thinking that poses an even greater risk to the Officers and Floyd.
Floyd was resisting in the videos and as such can be seen as a flight/fight risk such as him fighting to try not be put in the police car.
I said it at the time it happened to people IRL, the crowd yelling at the officers probably have done more to ensure Chauvin gets off, if he gets off, than anything or anybody else.
 
Bogota is rioting. It's hard to assess how rational they are without being familiar with their culture, though. Many South American countries have terrible, terrible, terrible cops.
pic snip
It is worth remembering that Colombia has been at war with FARC for decades and that after "disarming" in 2017 FARC started a political party.

One of the primary motivating reasons for the disarmament and ceasefire was FARC asking for one, specifically because they were getting absolutely brutalized. In the far off days of the 2000s, the Colombians started modernizing the AC-47 Spooky (precursor to the AC-130), outfitted them with FLIR, designated them as the AC-47T Fantasma, adopted a policy of telling "all honest men to stay in their homes at night" in rural areas, and unleashed a rain of hot lead on any human heat signatures they found outside in those areas after a certain time at night.

Even as of 2019 the Colombian government had engaged in anti-FARC operations since of course the commies claimed the government violated some aspect of the peace accord and rumblings about rearming brought down the hammer. Also of note there is still a small (sub 3000 people allegedly) group of dissents that are oldschool FARC and haven't changed a thing about their operations.

I can't say I know anything more than that, but I find it a thunk-provoking coincidence that suddenly Colombia, a country that has been at war with narco-commies for decades, suddenly has a police brutality riot on their hands, given who we know is rioting in the USA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back