Netflix's "Cuties" - The Preteen Sexual Objectification Equivalent of "Funny Games"

Therealhomor said:
I'm less concerned with what we saw on camera than I am what happened during the filming, audition and general production of the film. I'm deeply concerned some Epstein/Weinstein shit went on behind the scenes.
Click to expand...

Exactly this. We already know that they casted 600+ little girls for the main role. And what do people think is the reason they allowed a sheboon to direct this movie? The degenerates on ResetEra got quiet very quickly when they heard a female black muslim is reponsible for this abomination.

Bottom line: perverted producers behind the scenes know what they are doing.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: ScenarioOfTLoU2, spiritofamermaid, BlackBallz and 9 others
Ma_Hooty said:
I'm probably going to get gassed for this, but-
As someone who has arted all their life, I have a very difficult time on deciding where I stand with the loli/shota deal, to the point where I spent years trying to pick a side. You can't stop people from drawing/consuming the shit and honestly, I wonder how slippery the slope can be when it comes to banning art and entertainment, because then you get Patreon cracking down on lewd anime artists (doe-eyed, big titty women = little girls, I assume) and nothing good ever came from people/government cracking down on expressive media.
Plus, there's no actual child being harmed, it's fictional, and sorry, but I'd rather have the feds go after child trafficking rings, rapists and CP distributors than dudes who jerk it to the drawn porn they get monthly for $10 from some degenerate Onlyfans artist.

...But then there's the fact that art and media can affect a person's mind; can make someone sad, happy, angry- and it seems that it's getting easier to find people who can't separate fantasy from reality these days. Like I'm already disgusted by furfaggots who think zoo and cub is fine, because more often than not, they've already made the leap to the real world - why shouldn't that apply to drawn loli/shota, too? But then, animals are still seen as property and not things that can be exploited for money, so it's easier to harm a dog than harm a kid - until they don't get that rush anymore. But do pedos even care about the fictional shit? It's not what they want, they want the real deal, right?

It's really difficult, like I seem to be less skeeved out with people who say, "Yeah, I draw/write degenerate shit, but that doesn't mean I condone it" and don't rock the boat with their politics, compared to artists who use their art to push their degenerate agendas and gender politics. Those types of artists - the Shadmans and PK/GlitchedPuppets of the community -who draw fucked up shit and say equally fucked up shit while still having a fanbase that will hunt you down if you make trouble for their senpais, are the types I not only stay clear of, but will make their lives no easier by telling every newcomer to their circle that "Did you know Shad drew irl child pron" or "PK's explicitly said corrupting little boys with her degenerate furry art is a kink of hers".

I could go on with the internal back-and-forth I have whenever this topic comes up, but this post is getting a little too long for me lol.
TL;DR: As an artist, I believe in a person's freedom of expression when it comes to art and I don't try and call out those who draw questionable things if they don't rock the boat and keep it behind restrictions (as much as I frown upon what they draw), but once you get egotistical and loud about it while there's some real shady shit being thrown around about you (PurpleKecleon/GlitchedPuppet and Shadman are the go-to examples I use), that's when I say, "Nah man, I ain't associating with you just because you got thousands of followers or your art is pretty decent, impale yourself with a railroad spike."
Click to expand...

If we let the retards who can't distinguish reality from fiction dictate everything, we as a species would have nothing: no hobbies, no interests, no convictions, no beliefs, nothing to talk about, literally nothing.
There will always be those people in every facet of life. Don't let the retards ruin it for everyone else.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: ScenarioOfTLoU2, spiritofamermaid, obliviousbeard and 10 others
AnOminous said:
I doubt the movie in its entirety would count, whether because "muh artistic merit" or something else, but I wouldn't be surprised if a supercut of pedobear's favorite moments would.
Click to expand...

No, the movie itself wouldn't count as child porn because artistic merit (there are clauses for this in child porn laws). But yeah, the pedo supercut certainly would, yeah. That's the problem. I've not actually seen artistic merit be able to be edited down into actual child porn. Guess there's a first time for everything.
 
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Cowboy Kim, BlackBallz and 5 others
I can't imagine said:
I think a case could be made for Pretty Baby, though it's been many years since I saw that film.
Click to expand...

AnOminous said:
I'm pretty sure a supercut of Brooke Shields's "greatest underage hits" could conceivably qualify.
Click to expand...

True enough. I've never really seen anything like this before. I guess Pretty Baby would qualify. But its so rare I can't really think of any other mainstream examples.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Uncanny Valley and Pissmaster
The Fresh Maker said:
Jack Saint is defending this pedo bait now.


I swear, it's all the same with these people, defending this crap in the name of "raising awareness of kids being sexualized"

Judge: Why did you kill those people?
Defendant: I was trying to raise awareness.
Judge: Okay, you can go.
Click to expand...
These lefties defending the film can be made to STFU with one simple thought experiment: what if you made a film where a troon gets all sorts of abuse for being trans? Would that be okay because AKSHUALLY it's art and it's showing how transphobia is wrong? And if it's not okay, why is that different from Cuties?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Nguyen Van Phuoc, Parthenos and 4 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back