Netflix's "Cuties" - The Preteen Sexual Objectification Equivalent of "Funny Games"

[Ahriman]

You can imagine what /r/netflix is doing at the moment.

Their jannies are working overtime removing everything they can.

FUCK NETFLIX AND FUCK JANNIES.

 

[ToddleDoddle]

These lefties defending the film can be made to STFU with one simple thought experiment: what if you made a film where a troon gets all sorts of abuse for being trans? Would that be okay because AKSHUALLY it's art and it's showing how transphobia is wrong? And if it's not okay, why is that different from Cuties?

Those wouldn't really be comparable. In a movie like that it would be all make believe. Physical abuse would be simulated and verbal abuse would be acted and not real. Cuties however, what those girls did wasn't simulated. They really did those things, under direction from adults. They were sexually exploited by adults to make the film.

Speaking of trannys. I looked at the replies to Jack Saint's tweets and saw one person ardently defending the movie. Looked at their profile and 'shockingly' I saw the word "femboy".

 

[OmnipotentStupidity]

Jack Saint is defending this pedo bait now.

https://twitter.com/LackingSaint/status/1304812727806963713

I swear, it's all the same with these people, defending this crap in the name of "raising awareness of kids being sexualized"

Judge: Why did you kill those people?
Defendant: I was trying to raise awareness.
Judge: Okay, you can go.

Some of the replies to those Tweets are just...

Granted a majority of the responses to him otherwise seem fairly normal, aside from people like Lame Takes in the middle.

But the more you look, the worse it gets.

 

[Ahriman]

Babylon Bee dabbing on 'em

Responding To Backlash, Netflix Clarifies Its Content Is 'Mostly Pedophilia-Free'

LOS GATOS, CA—Responding to the backlash over the worse-than-you-could-have-ever-imagined film Cuties added to its library this week, Netflix clarified that its content is "mostly not pedophilia.""It's important to remember that our content is mostly pedophilia-free," the Netflix Twitter account...

babylonbee.com

They've been consistently hilarious over the last couple years, I love it.

 

[I can't imagine]

True enough. I've never really seen anything like this before. I guess Pretty Baby would qualify. But its so rare I can't really think of any other mainstream examples.

Exactly. Pretty Baby was over 40 years ago. The number of things that have come anywhere close to its content in mainstream film is pretty small. The fact that this could even be in the same conversation as it is pretty remarkable.

 

[TheProdigalStunna]

Jack Saint is defending this pedo bait now.

https://twitter.com/LackingSaint/status/1304812727806963713

I swear, it's all the same with these people, defending this crap in the name of "raising awareness of kids being sexualized"

Judge: Why did you kill those people?
Defendant: I was trying to raise awareness.
Judge: Okay, you can go.

In terms of optics, leftists should have the easiest job in the world: convince people economic liberalism doesn't work for them. That's it. Yet they continually fuck it up by being so censorious and puritanical about everything fun to an extent that would make Oliver Cromwell blush. While at the same time defending literal pedophilia. What a world.

 

[Quijibo69]

Babylon Bee dabbing on 'em

View attachment 1591308

Responding To Backlash, Netflix Clarifies Its Content Is 'Mostly Pedophilia-Free'

LOS GATOS, CA—Responding to the backlash over the worse-than-you-could-have-ever-imagined film Cuties added to its library this week, Netflix clarified that its content is "mostly not pedophilia.""It's important to remember that our content is mostly pedophilia-free," the Netflix Twitter account...

babylonbee.com

They've been consistently hilarious over the last couple years, I love it.

MOSTLY is the keyword here

 

[Overly Serious]

Sorry I am super late on this, but I dug up this Computer World article that hopefully can explain it better than I ever could.
Link

Well thank you anyway. I just read the whole thing and it was very interesting. Right up my street.

Cheers.

 

[Bread Fetishist]

Who's willing to bet that these niggas defending this movie because "it's saying child exploitation is bad" flipped their shit, or probably would have if they didn't, over Goblin Slayer for depicting rape?

 

[DumbDude42]

Who's willing to bet that these niggas defending this movie because "it's saying child exploitation is bad" flipped their shit, or probably would have if they didn't, over Goblin Slayer for depicting rape?

and even that isnt comparable at all
rape happens on screen pretty regularly, even in live-action film. but the actors just simulate it, they aren't actually getting raped for real. just like showing murder is common in movies, but actors aren't actually getting shot dead for real.

the issue with cuties isn't just what is depicted, but that the child actresses actually are doing these things. it's not AI generated deepfake video, it's not drawn cartoons, it's actual real pre teen girls being dressed up in hooker outfits and told to shake their asses in front of the camera at the direction of grown adults. that is the big sin of this movie.

 

[Xerxes IX]

Those wouldn't really be comparable. In a movie like that it would be all make believe. Physical abuse would be simulated and verbal abuse would be acted and not real. Cuties however, what those girls did wasn't simulated. They really did those things, under direction from adults. They were sexually exploited by adults to make the film.

Speaking of trannys. I looked at the replies to Jack Saint's tweets and saw one person ardently defending the movie. Looked at their profile and 'shockingly' I saw the word "femboy".

and even that isnt comparable at all
rape happens on screen pretty regularly, even in live-action film. but the actors just simulate it, they aren't actually getting raped for real. just like showing murder is common in movies, but actors aren't actually getting shot dead for real.

the issue with cuties isn't just what is depicted, but that the child actresses actually are doing these things. it's not AI generated deepfake video, it's not drawn cartoons, it's actual real pre teen girls being dressed up in hooker outfits and told to shake their asses in front of the camera at the direction of grown adults. that is the big sin of this movie.

The direction is the skeeviest part of this movie. Who knows how many takes there were for the sexualized scenes in this movie and how the girls were directed? Hell, they probably had to redo takes because "the actresses weren't dancing provocatively enough" or some sick shit like that. And that's just one part of the utterly wrong things that were probably happening behind the scenes.

And if anyone defends that with "well girls do that WITHOUT adults directing them that's kind of the point of the movie duhh" they are vile.

 

[The Jokester]

I'm reminded by a youtuber called Morgoth said when anyone asks him why he went fash "A fascist dictatorship would never of allowed this"

 

[Mr Metron666]

View attachment 1589742

Why do I keep hearing the same shit argument.

It's not even a discussion at this point.

Here's an example from a post I made on the BreadTube thread of a guy who makes this exact same shitty arguement

One more thing, he also supports Lolicon, saying it can be used as a means of stopping child sexual abuse (which totally isn't using the same logic as Roosh V's "legalize rape to stop rape" or the safe injection site's "give drugs to drugees to help get them off drugs") using a probably dubious study as evidence & using the "tHeY'rE nOt rEaL cHiLdReN" justification (as if I already didn't get pedo vibes from this guy).

Btw, does anyone know what the rest of BreadTube's take on Cuties is?

 

[Terrorist]

Slippery slope ain’t a fallacy.

 

[ToddleDoddle]

The conspiracy side of my brain is kicking in. This movie exists solely so some producer or casting director could amass a collection of 650+ videos of little girls dancing and possibly more nefarious things. They know that putting a black woman as the face of this film would cause all the progressives to defend it against all criticism. I highly doubt they had so much trouble finding the right girl that they had to keep doing auditions until the deadline. They did it because they wanted to milk it for as long as they could. The director is a pawn for the sex pests to hide behind.

 

[Ma_Hooty]

This is on the frontpage of Reddit now, everyone is pissed off

https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/ir3ug2/netflix_cuties_has_gone_too_far/

The pogging continues:
View attachment 1591015

https://twitter.com/SenTedCruz/status/1304783070353129474

>When you want to be seen as the most woke company of all, but you skip several steps and go straight to child sexual exploitation.
>Tfw you're now being investigated by the American Department of Justice.

You get what you fucking deserve.

 

[Stoneheart]

I dont understand why people want to ban this? the FBI should Raid the Netflix headquarter and the homes of everyone involved. this is a very serious crime...

 

[Stab You in the Back]

I dont understand why people want to ban this? the FBI should Raid the Netflix headquarter and the homes of everyone involved. this is a very serious crime...

If it was some random dude at the local middle school filming this, he'd already be in jail, along with everybody who downloaded and watched it. I'm not saying you should arrest everybody who subscribes to Netflix. Maybe just everybody who thumbed up "Cuties."

 

[Higgins]

Those wouldn't really be comparable. In a movie like that it would be all make believe. Physical abuse would be simulated and verbal abuse would be acted and not real. Cuties however, what those girls did wasn't simulated. They really did those things, under direction from adults. They were sexually exploited by adults to make the film.

Speaking of trannys. I looked at the replies to Jack Saint's tweets and saw one person ardently defending the movie. Looked at their profile and 'shockingly' I saw the word "femboy".

Not one of these creatures defending this crap can reasonably justified the casting of 11 year olds for the film. Why do they need to be that age in order to tell this story? I bet you could replace the kids with some young looking 18 year olds and the movie would mostly be the same. Fuck, it makes more sense to tell this story with teenagers.

The message is supposed be a critique on the oversexualization of the youth. There's undoubtedly more pressure on young teens in high school to engage in promiscuous behavior for social acceptance than preteens. The main character is doing this degenerate shit in response to her Senegalese culture and upbringing, right? That's textbook teenager behavior. You're old enough to rebel against your parents' ideals because they clash with your ideas, but you're still immature enough to not understand the ramifications of uploading nudes on the internet.

 

[Stoneheart]

If it was some random dude at the local middle school filming this, he'd already be in jail, along with everybody who downloaded and watched it. I'm not saying you should arrest everybody who subscribes to Netflix.

Thats a hard question, Pedowood argues that you are guilty of stealing their movies if you watch them on a side that says everything they host is legal.
why should the DoJ not charge you if you watch Kiddie porn on Netflix? Netflix says everything they host is legal too...

Maybe just everybody who thumbed up "Cuties."

well there are watchlists for people like that.