Currently on reddit's frontpage.
It baffles me how they even think this is an argument, if sex =/= gender. In fact, I cannot imagine people still think transsexualism is an actual biological issue and not a psychological/social/philosophical one.
I don't really want to link the comments as they all say the same bullshit; there's a tiny bit of sanity that has been downvoted to oblivion.
Further shooting themselves to the foot.
Regarding Blanchardism, which we were discussing late night, I haven't seen any scientifical evidence against his categorization; if anything, the only real criticism is that his methodology is wonky and that we can't jump to those conclusions. Julia Serrano, the biologist tranny, actually has some papers on the subject, and they are bad, like really bad.
Here's a write up, but his claim wouldn't even stand as a philosophical paper, basically boils down to 'in blanchard real then why am i not AGP'. It's honestly pathetic. I respect Judith Butler and believe she is a very smart woman, I don't think many of us (especially trannies) understand her writings, but she cannot make any scientifical claims because 1) that's not her area of expertise, 2) even if she were to spit this bullshit, she knows that would be a philosophical suicide. She can be all about big thunk and open the debate, but there's simply no way they either she or any serious postmodern philosopher can claim what trannies do because even the 'ambiguous' scientific data (usually inclusive studies or studies about intersexual humans) cannot proof that there's a biological basis for transsexualism. The biological brain studies are often debunked and, if anything, would just further proof the sexual dymorphism.
Edit: back on my phone, but I can't believe this shit is controversial now.