Netflix's "Cuties" - The Preteen Sexual Objectification Equivalent of "Funny Games"

The conspiracy side of my brain is kicking in. This movie exists solely so some producer or casting director could amass a collection of 650+ videos of little girls dancing and possibly more nefarious things. They know that putting a black woman as the face of this film would cause all the progressives to defend it against all criticism. I highly doubt they had so much trouble finding the right girl that they had to keep doing auditions until the deadline. They did it because they wanted to milk it for as long as they could. The director is a pawn for the sex pests to hide behind.

Reminds me of a story about Roman Polanski(?) filming a minor taking a bath and one of the skeleton crew(nude scenes) asked about how it fit into the movie and got the answer that it's not part of the movie.

The idea and concept of Cuties could be good if done in the right way or approached in a different way.
Here's two different approaches to something with two vastly different results.
cutleries0.jpg
cutleries1.jpg
 
Babylon Bee dabbing on 'em

View attachment 1591308

They've been consistently hilarious over the last couple years, I love it.

93% pedo free? Coincidentally the "peaceful protests" have been 93% violence free. It's almost like the same group that is defending Cuties also defends the BLM protests.
 
“The backlash to Cuties is just like GloomerGoot!”

View attachment 1591578
View attachment 1591579
Progressive types are the biggest pawns to those in power. The masses taking issue with massive wealth gap? Manipulate the progressives into blaming white people as a whole and cause mass infighting and division. Pedos in these powerful positions getting outed? Manipulate the progressives into defending the sexual exploitation of children so it can be normalized. Chu and Bob are the exact sort of people I pointed out in my conspiracy theory post. If this movie was made beat for beat by a white male they would probably be condemning the film too, but the film industry pedos put a black woman at the forefront and people like these two will defend anything they do.
 

These are always the strangest sorts of arguments. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that most parents would like their children to not be sexually exploited and not have their lungs scarred from smoke inhalation. As a rule, parents worry about more than one bad thing potentially happening to their kids at any given time.
 
These are always the strangest sorts of arguments. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that most parents would like their children to not be sexually exploited and not have their lungs scarred from smoke inhalation. As a rule, parents worry about more than one bad thing potentially happening to their kids at any given time.
Let's not forget this other hot take

1599947324496.png


1599947353184.png



>You don't like gays? well you must secretly want to take it up the ass!
>If you hate something so much, you secretly want to fuck it!

1599947859016.png
 
Babylon Bee dabbing on 'em

They've been consistently hilarious over the last couple years, I love it.

They're running into some of the same problems as the Onion, i.e. people don't recognize it as parody because it is hard to be more over the top fucking retarded than reality currently is.

Exactly. Pretty Baby was over 40 years ago. The number of things that have come anywhere close to its content in mainstream film is pretty small. The fact that this could even be in the same conversation as it is pretty remarkable.

There's also Larry Clark's Kids and things like that. I don't think they're quite comparable although there's some questionable shit there. Still, you really have to go back to Pretty Baby for worse. While I don't think Louis Malle took much flak as he had a pretty creditable history of not just being some predatory weirdo as well as artistic merit, and he was certainly not prosecuted, the consensus was ultimately that whether or not he could have done that, probably he shouldn't have. Nobody did quite that again.
 
Meanwhile on ResetEra...

View attachment 1589395
Says the person with an animal crossing character as their avatar.
I love how it's either one or the other with these assholes. "Yeah, well pedophilia isn't as bad as X, so check mate." then they'll smuggly sit there and get ass pats on twitter for being so 'brave' and intellectual for speaking out on a platform that cultivates this drivel/group think.

Most sane adults deal with multiple things that cause distress on a daily basis, just because I'm worrying about the health of my family doesn't mean I have to stop going to work.
 
Gotta love all those genius rebuttals on how "Hey, you can't call it sexual unless you're a pedo getting off on it". I forgot that all of PornHub's videos aren't sexual because asexual people exist.

"Sure, they're in hot pants and there's a close up of their buttocks while thrusting their pelvis, but how do you know that was meant to be arousing if it didn't turn you on?"

There's also Larry Clark's Kids and things like that. I don't think they're quite comparable although there's some questionable shit there. Still, you really have to go back to Pretty Baby for worse. While I don't think Louis Malle took much flak as he had a pretty creditable history of not just being some predatory weirdo as well as artistic merit, and he was certainly not prosecuted, the consensus was ultimately that whether or not he could have done that, probably he shouldn't have. Nobody did quite that again.

I will say that Pretty Baby was a very beautifully photographed and acted film, though it's content is obviously pretty repugnant. Malle had some legitimate talent. Once the controversy faded, most everyone agreed the story wasn't terribly good even setting aside the sexual content, and the movie was mostly just kinda meh because of it (I'd agree with this assessment personally). But at the time, it had a lot of the same sort of things you're seeing now, a lot of outrage, a lot of high-minded "intellectual" types praising it's bravery, etc.

I assume it's probably getting some good views for Netflix, so in that respect I suppose they won, but I doubt it's being terribly well-received by the people watching it.
 
Reminds me of a story about Roman Polanski(?) filming a minor taking a bath and one of the skeleton crew(nude scenes) asked about how it fit into the movie and got the answer that it's not part of the movie.
Roman was framed, thats well known by now... also it was a photoshot in the pool of the only good joker.
so should we only watch the bad batman movies now?
 
They're running into some of the same problems as the Onion, i.e. people don't recognize it as parody because it is hard to be more over the top fucking retarded than reality currently is.
This is a problem they are aware of

 
Back