homewayhalf
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2018
Malcolm Clark is based af.
Damn, this thread is a lot better with the majority of its posters on ignore.
Damn, this thread is a lot better with the majority of its posters on ignore.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have little interest dickless Tony , why not ask the balding gimp yourself?? lolz
Don't forget your prison stories/videos now. I'm sure there must be an audience for those, at the very least lolz
oh and how old was your little male friend in the birkbeck video. You would be about 42/43, he looks to still be a teenager
must be old habits
Ooh fun!I wonder what the good doctor is talking about here? Do you have any idea @fatsteph ? Lolz lolz xxxxxxxx
View attachment 1585498
Ooh fun!
Another 6 months of tough talk followed by a settlement, yawn.
Harrops excitement suggests its a woman, but then again Tony is obviously too scared of them to turn up at their door with his platinum service so it might not be a woman. Gnasher Yalland has just destroyed him in court so it's unlikely to be him.
Latest Ladbrokes odds.
Sarah Fillmore 3/2
Harry "the owl" Miller 5/2
Caroline Farrow 7/2
Gnasher Yalland 10/1
JK rowling 100/1
An actual criminal 10000000/1
I wonder what the good doctor is talking about here? Do you have any idea @fatsteph ? Lolz lolz xxxxxxxx
View attachment 1585498
Sex offending, violent, fraudulent thug Uncle Tony has had a day out at the Queens residence Sandringham.
https://archive.vn/Nf9lv
![]()
That picture looks off, has he tried to photoshop it? I'm not expert but the proprotions seem wierd, and there's some sort of artifact under his chin(s)
I don't think it's photoshopped. I think the hedge is slightly curved and the shadow reflects this. If the photoshopping was intended to make him look better, there's a whole lot more he could have done.Yeah I've looked again and you're correct. The shadow between his legs is curved but the hedge is straight which is a tell tale sign of photoshopping. The neck thing is probably make up to hide his stubble.
Which begs the question of just how bad did he look before, if that's the doctored version?
My life hasn't gotten quite so bad that I'm going to spend my day drawing lines on the pic to prove my point. However,I don't think it's photoshopped. I think the hedge is slightly curved and the shadow reflects this. If the photoshopping was intended to make him look better, there's a whole lot more he could have done.
Which he's incompetent to do. The hedge is uneven, but not to the extent the shadow suggests, plus the ground is also strange in that area.[...]there's a whole lot more he could have done.
Tests like this are fairly easy to beat. They are a tool, but I wouldn't consider it conclusive.Cameras exaggerate shadows. It wouldn't look like that to the naked eye. Anyway, I've run it through photo forensic software, which confirms no editing. Here's a free online if anyone would care to do the same. http://imageedited.com/
I'm just laughing imagining what his ass looks like in those pants. We all know those fat guys who have asses so flat that they look like a 2D character from behind. I'm pretty sure that's what his ass looks like in these pants.Tests like this are fairly easy to beat. They are a tool, but I wouldn't consider it conclusive.
View attachment 1600176
View attachment 1600175
Janice Turner puts her finger on the problem perfectly and convincing. LGBTs have no intention to monitor themselves and regards all outside monitors and critics as evil bigots.
To paraphrase “Bill Cosby: Himself,“ which remains a great American work: some children simply cannot rest until they have had their beating.If they can't monitor themselves they will just fucking well have to be monitored by others. They can scream about bigotry all they like, but they can pretty much fuck off, protecting children from them is more important than their "right" to be a bunch of child molesters.