BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
He acts as if this is the first time he's come across him & there's nothing to imply he has any sort of familiarity with Brooks prior to this video.
Also, does he even mention the part where he used to be a christian? Or has he dropped that & now claims he just a plain Anti-SJW?

He says that he listened to youtube on earpiece, while he worked at a deli, and No BS is one of the people who he listened to, but didn't engage with much, and yes he does say that Armored Skeptic, Thunderfoot and others were part of his deconversion from young earth creationism.
 
He says that he listened to youtube on earpiece, while he worked at a deli, and No BS is one of the people who he listened to, but didn't engage with much, and yes he does say that Armored Skeptic, Thunderfoot and others were part of his deconversion from young earth creationism.
Right. Though my other points about him only seeing cult-like behaviour in Anti-SJWs & not in the modern SJW left & ignoring the stupidity & craziness of the modern SJW left in general still stand. I do wonder how one " ethically cooms". The only thing I can think of is not to jack off to kiddie porn.
 
Twitter squirrel, known for advocating for deplatforming literally everyone who doesn't aline exactly with her crazy hyper woke ideals doesn't see a problem with the film that has half naked children in it and seems to be defending it similar to the way Dick Masterson was defending it. As well as shitting on Tulsi Gabbard for her heavy criticism of it.

resvwrgrfgrg.PNG

fyjyjytjtyjjty.PNG


Oh and of course Jack Saint thought it would be a good idea to defend it as well because Jack of to kids Saint is the dumbest retard breadtube has to offer.

vsrsvrsrv.PNG


This is all really hilarious because alot of breadtubers are now defending this garbage and just a few weeks ago they were getting really pissed with tweets that made this comparison saying "No one defends cuties u incel".

sfdegfegswdrwfgefegwr.PNG

 
Last edited:
Twitter squirrel, known for advocating for deplatforming literally everyone who doesn't aline exactly with her crazy hyper woke ideals doesn't see a problem with the film that has half naked children in it and seems to be defending it similar to the way Dick Masterson was defending it. As well as shitting on Tulsi Gabbard for her heavy criticism of it.

View attachment 1592296
View attachment 1592307

Oh and of course Jack Saint thought it would be a good idea to defend it as well because Jack of to kids Saint is the dumbest retard breadtube has to offer.

View attachment 1592353
Intentional or not, at least this Cuties shit is letting us know who all the freaks are. It's like a bugle call for them to come out and line up.
 
Twitter squirrel, known for advocating for deplatforming literally everyone who doesn't aline exactly with her crazy hyper woke ideals doesn't see a problem with the film that has half naked children in it and seems to be defending it similar to the way Dick Masterson was defending it. As well as shitting on Tulsi Gabbard for her heavy criticism of it.

View attachment 1592296
View attachment 1592307

Oh and of course Jack Saint thought it would be a good idea to defend it as well because Jack of to kids Saint is the dumbest retard breadtube has to offer.

View attachment 1592353

This is all really hilarious because alot of breadtubers are now defending this garbage and just a few weeks ago they were getting really pissed with tweets that made this comparison saying "No one defends cuties u incel".

View attachment 1592380
Defending and justifying softcore child pornography to own the chuds
 
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Qajinima022 and Hal
Radical Reviewer comes out with a video about Right Wing Violence. Of course when bringing up the death stats on right vs left violence, he omits Michael Reinoehl's murder of a patriot prayer member. For the right he bring up several mass shooters and their manifesto from the abyss of the ADL. Of course the retards in the comment section say stuff like " The Right puts property over human lives. So in there case. "It's worth of pointing out, that to many right-wing people the private property is worth more, than human life. To them, destruction of infrastructure and property is much more egregious, than killing people. Which, to us, is obviously ridiculous, but that's what they believe in. They are by definition anti-humanists. ." " You're so right that right wingers don't understand sociology. I'm a sociology student and it would be impossible for me to be a right winger now. Sociology poked holes all through capitalist ideology and individualism, for me anyway It's funny, historically in my country the more left leaning groups were the ones commiting political violence (Irish republican groups). But it was fighting imperialism and an oppressive colonial state. I'm glad they did" or "Butbutbutbutbut antifa hit someone with a bike lock once!" Now here is one of the few comments that displays some common sense. " The Left is able to avoid identifying with its lumpenprol, POC, race murderers, like Jayvon Hatchett - who stabbed a random white while yelling “black lives matter”, and murdered his white cell mate about a week latter, because everyone senses that deep down, people like him are just too stupid to have any political agency. It’s incredibly dangerous and cynical to appeal to the interests of people with no agency, though, because it’s ultimately a recipe for divorcing power from accountability."

rr.jpg
 
Twitter squirrel, known for advocating for deplatforming literally everyone who doesn't aline exactly with her crazy hyper woke ideals doesn't see a problem with the film that has half naked children in it and seems to be defending it similar to the way Dick Masterson was defending it. As well as shitting on Tulsi Gabbard for her heavy criticism of it.

View attachment 1592296
View attachment 1592307

Oh and of course Jack Saint thought it would be a good idea to defend it as well because Jack of to kids Saint is the dumbest retard breadtube has to offer.

View attachment 1592353

This is all really hilarious because alot of breadtubers are now defending this garbage and just a few weeks ago they were getting really pissed with tweets that made this comparison saying "No one defends cuties u incel".

View attachment 1592380
Me: (Shoots someone in the head while yelling that murder is bad.)

Breadtube: (applauds.)
 
Twitter squirrel, known for advocating for deplatforming literally everyone who doesn't aline exactly with her crazy hyper woke ideals doesn't see a problem with the film that has half naked children in it and seems to be defending it similar to the way Dick Masterson was defending it. As well as shitting on Tulsi Gabbard for her heavy criticism of it.

View attachment 1592296
View attachment 1592307

Oh and of course Jack Saint thought it would be a good idea to defend it as well because Jack of to kids Saint is the dumbest retard breadtube has to offer.

View attachment 1592353

This is all really hilarious because alot of breadtubers are now defending this garbage and just a few weeks ago they were getting really pissed with tweets that made this comparison saying "No one defends cuties u incel".

View attachment 1592380
Oh yeah weve been mocking him pretty hard on Mauler's discord
 
Radical Reviewer comes out with a video about Right Wing Violence. Of course when bringing up the death stats on right vs left violence, he omits Michael Reinoehl's murder of a patriot prayer member. For the right he bring up several mass shooters and their manifesto from the abyss of the ADL. Of course the retards in the comment section say stuff like " The Right puts property over human lives. So in there case. "It's worth of pointing out, that to many right-wing people the private property is worth more, than human life. To them, destruction of infrastructure and property is much more egregious, than killing people. Which, to us, is obviously ridiculous, but that's what they believe in. They are by definition anti-humanists. ." " You're so right that right wingers don't understand sociology. I'm a sociology student and it would be impossible for me to be a right winger now. Sociology poked holes all through capitalist ideology and individualism, for me anyway It's funny, historically in my country the more left leaning groups were the ones commiting political violence (Irish republican groups). But it was fighting imperialism and an oppressive colonial state. I'm glad they did" or "Butbutbutbutbut antifa hit someone with a bike lock once!" Now here is one of the few comments that displays some common sense. " The Left is able to avoid identifying with its lumpenprol, POC, race murderers, like Jayvon Hatchett - who stabbed a random white while yelling “black lives matter”, and murdered his white cell mate about a week latter, because everyone senses that deep down, people like him are just too stupid to have any political agency. It’s incredibly dangerous and cynical to appeal to the interests of people with no agency, though, because it’s ultimately a recipe for divorcing power from accountability."

View attachment 1592785
Amazing how you can point out Leftists atrocities and the response is either nothing or "They're just fringe extremists" or "Well, those were tankies, we're not like them!!!" but "The Right" is some unanimous force that is only made up of immoral people that must be stopped by the the supposed heroes in black clad.
 
"The Right" is some unanimous force that is only made up of immoral people that must be stopped by the the supposed heroes in black clad.

A good test would be to see if people in the breadtube crowd can define fascism, conservatism, traditionalism, and libertarianism, ethno-nationalism, and centrism, in such a way that people who identify with those labels would feel like their beliefs are being described fairly accurately. I doubt more than half of them could.
 
A good test would be to see if people in the breadtube crowd can define fascism, conservatism, traditionalism, and libertarianism, ethno-nationalism, and centrism, in such a way that people who identify with those labels would feel like their beliefs are being described fairly accurately. I doubt more than half of them could.
That would just basically be that "They're the same picture" meme when it comes to them
 
Amazing how you can point out Leftists atrocities and the response is either nothing or "They're just fringe extremists" or "Well, those were tankies, we're not like them!!!" but "The Right" is some unanimous force that is only made up of immoral people that must be stopped by the the supposed heroes in black clad.
I need to make a meme for moments like this, where it's a guy pointing to a sign, but all the sign says is this:
1600046740830.png
 

Jack's understanding of the situation is so bad because you can make a film about that, without doing the very thing you are critiquing. It would be like me making a movie going to condemning exotic animal poaching, while doing that very thing in the film. It is also worth nothing that the RT score of Cuties sits around 88% for critics and a whooping 3% for audiences, so make of that what you will.
 
Jack's understanding of the situation is so bad because you can make a film about that, without doing the very thing you are critiquing. It would be like me making a movie going to condemning exotic animal poaching, while doing that very thing in the film. It is also worth nothing that the RT score of Cuties sits around 88% for critics and a whooping 3% for audiences, so make of that what you will.

Yep. If you make a film about how awful it is to sexualise children but that film can be used as paedo-wank-fodder just by turning the sound off, then you are very much part of the problem.
 
Back