U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ironic, because xkcd 1357 has become a thought-terminating cliche when it comes to discussing free speech online.


BONUS: because, of course ..
View attachment 1595284
What they say:
AFA766DD-64B6-49B7-ACF8-C0BD53863182.jpeg


What they mean:
115C0369-0FBE-4759-BF28-B0503A718185.jpeg
 
One of the unspoken things they're pushing is that blacks should NEVER, EVER have to face consequences of their actions. They're trying to set up some sort of weird Intersectionality system (read: Cultural Marxism) where blacks are higher on the progressive stack than everyone else, so they can just do shit and you have to just take it, oppressor.
They want to abolish cops. Without police there is no one to enforce the law (i.e. the Constitution of the United States). That leaves them free to set up their own little commie black-supremacist unconstitutional government outside of the law.

What the people want high up pulling the strings in politics and in the corporate world is another matter.
 
One thing not pointed out in these vids is that the bolas use a very sharp metal hook at the end to make the whole thing stick, and it's likely to go through flesh if the clothing is too thin (or just not there). Imagine having a fishhook embedded in your legs and ripped out since you were running at the time...
Pictures to further emphasize your point.

maxresdefault.jpg


5d55af44f017e.image.jpg
 

Attachments

  • maxresdefault.jpg
    maxresdefault.jpg
    229.7 KB · Views: 26
Last edited:
Does anybody know if Kyle is still in jail? Or has he made bail?
In jail, and with a million dollar bond. I SUSPECT that it was put that high not as a punishment, but to give an excuse for him to stay in jail.

Might seem oxymoronic, but if the cops determined (rightfully so) that if he was out of jail he is in SERIOUS danger they could have arranged something for it. The fact you have heard nothing from his lawyers about it makes me dead certain this was a deal to keep up appearances, and Kyle is probably fairly comfortable right now.

Edit: A bit of elucidation for why. They can't just keep him there, its against his rights and WOULD be challenged. Additionally, if they merely set it to a low bond then a lot of well meaning idiots would likely get together to help pay it. The result is that they need to set it high to dissuade the alter, while providing a legally sufficient cover.

So, why do this? And why overcharge him? My longstanding stance, based off the DA UTTERLY making Kyle's own case for him, is that the DA knows Kyle did self defense, but is both satiating the mob AND trying to keep Kyle well away from them.
 
Last edited:
Gotta love how BLM have spent the entire year hyping up instances of 'police brutality', spreading awareness and so on, yet almost every. single. instance. the police action is totally justified?
When its a case like Blake or the Wendy's Drive Thru? They still riot, even when the criminals' actions are indefensible.
Even cases like Floyd and Breonna, where the edited initial story appears sympathetic, we later get the full context and realise the world is a better place without them.

I'm sorry if this is giving off MOTI vibes, or even if I'm late to this realization, but its really absurd how white people would get lethal force in all these cases too, and likely far earlier into the confrontations. Because white people generally co-operate with the police, if they happen upon an unco-operative white person there isn't a lot of tolerance there. Whereas black people are trained by their sub-culture to be stand-offish and police certainly factor this in when doing their jobs. This is baked into the interactions, whereas the only white people who would shout and swear at police and take a fraction of an hour to garner the most basic info out of are either tweakers or communists
BLM organisers know deep down their real grievance is any police getting in the way of any black person for any reason. That's the only real criteria, and before body cams were normalised they had the ambiguity to paint the likes of Mike Brown and Trayvon Martin as saintly angels. Now? The depraved lunacy is laid bare for all to see-- which is probably why they've (seemingly) nonsensically began advocating body cams be banned.

If the discrimination isn't borne out statistically, and you can't even produce a decent case anecdotally (literal feels over reals) then your movement's a sham.
I concur with whoever said earlier that activists in the vein of BLM are the single biggest recruiter for white nationalism. Instead of confronting the shit home life, gang culture, lack of respect for education, etc etc. Instead of turning inward to improve, black leaders blame all their problems on white people, all the time, no matter what. It leads to the obvious side effect of some white people rejecting the guilt-trip and concluding this race of people are physically incapable of self-improvement. That's not white people proposing so on TV, thats Shaun King and assorted fat women with megaphones saying its unfair that blacks have to put up with the same kind of policing that everybody else does. Going inb4 Gangs & Drugs before every conversation means you're saying those things are instinsic to being black-- which you don't want to do if the goal is winning over soccer moms
 
Last edited:
Gotta love how BLM have spent the entire year hyping up instances of 'police brutality', spreading awareness and so on, yet almost every. single. instance. the police action is totally justified?
When its a case like Blake or the Wendy's Drive Thru? They still riot, even when the criminals' actions are indefensible.
Even cases like Floyd and Breonna, where the edited initial story appears sympathetic, we later get the full context and realise the world is a better place without them.

I'm sorry if this is giving off MOTI vibes, or even if I'm late to this realization, but its really absurd how white people would get lethal force in all these cases too, and likely far earlier into the confrontations. Because white people generally co-operate with the police, if they happen upon an unco-operative white person there isn't a lot of tolerance there. Whereas black people are trained by their sub-culture to be stand-offish and police certainly factor this in when doing their jobs. This is baked into the interactions, whereas the only white people who would shout and swear at police and take a fraction of an hour to garner the most basic info out of are either tweakers or communists
BLM organisers know deep down their real grievance is any police getting in the way of any black person for any reason. That's the only real criteria, and before body cams were normalised they had the ambiguity to paint the likes of Mike Brown and Trayvon Martin as saintly angels. Now? The depraved lunacy is laid bare for all to see-- which is probably why they've (seemingly) nonsensically began advocating body cams be banned.

If the discrimination isn't borne out statistically, and you can't even produce a decent case anecdotally (literal feels over reals) then your movement's a sham.
I concur with whoever said earlier that activists in the vein of BLM are the single biggest recruiter for white nationalism. Instead of confronting the shit home life, gang culture, lack of respect for education, etc etc. Instead of turning inward to improve, black leaders blame all their problems on white people, all the time, no matter what. It leads to the obvious side effect of some white people rejecting the guilt-trip and concluding this race of people are physically incapable of self-improvement. That's not white people proposing so on TV, thats Shaun King and assorted fat women with megaphones saying its unfair that blacks have to put up with the same kind of policing that everybody else does. Going inb4 Gangs & Drugs before every conversation means you're saying those things are instinsic to being black-- which you don't want to do if the goal is winning over soccer moms
The officer involved shootings or deaths they are defending keep getting even less defensible. In a sliding scale from floyd to lancaster.
This latest shooting is so obviously indefensible but the hot topic communists over at reddit think that rushing a police officer with a knife is heroic martyrdom that shouldn't actually result in a martyr.
 
Gotta love how BLM have spent the entire year hyping up instances of 'police brutality', spreading awareness and so on, yet almost every. single. instance. the police action is totally justified?
When its a case like Blake or the Wendy's Drive Thru? They still riot, even when the criminals' actions are indefensible.
Even cases like Floyd and Breonna, where the edited initial story appears sympathetic, we later get the full context and realise the world is a better place without them.

I'm sorry if this is giving off MOTI vibes, or even if I'm late to this realization, but its really absurd how white people would get lethal force in all these cases too, and likely far earlier into the confrontations. Because white people generally co-operate with the police, if they happen upon an unco-operative white person there isn't a lot of tolerance there. Whereas black people are trained by their sub-culture to be stand-offish and police certainly factor this in when doing their jobs. This is baked into the interactions, whereas the only white people who would shout and swear at police and take a fraction of an hour to garner the most basic info out of are either tweakers or communists
BLM organisers know deep down their real grievance is any police getting in the way of any black person for any reason. That's the only real criteria, and before body cams were normalised they had the ambiguity to paint the likes of Mike Brown and Trayvon Martin as saintly angels. Now? The depraved lunacy is laid bare for all to see-- which is probably why they've (seemingly) nonsensically began advocating body cams be banned.

If the discrimination isn't borne out statistically, and you can't even produce a decent case anecdotally (literal feels over reals) then your movement's a sham.
I concur with whoever said earlier that activists in the vein of BLM are the single biggest recruiter for white nationalism. Instead of confronting the shit home life, gang culture, lack of respect for education, etc etc. Instead of turning inward to improve, black leaders blame all their problems on white people, all the time, no matter what. It leads to the obvious side effect of some white people rejecting the guilt-trip and concluding this race of people are physically incapable of self-improvement. That's not white people proposing so on TV, thats Shaun King and assorted fat women with megaphones saying its unfair that blacks have to put up with the same kind of policing that everybody else does. Going inb4 Gangs & Drugs before every conversation means you're saying those things are instinsic to being black-- which you don't want to do if the goal is winning over soccer moms
What new info came out about Breonna Taylor?
 
Michael Tracey is tweeting how the NYT and other MSM are reporting on the arsonists. Nearly all replies agree and the Antifag simps are getting BTFO. Good.

View attachment 1588173

https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1304245092207783939?s=20

He was once a darling of the Never Trumpers until he poked holes in their Muh Russia narrative then they did their best to cancel him. Now he's in IDGAF mode

Tracey has been better than most leftists on this but still nothing special. To hear him tell it, the riots are all rich white grad students and wine moms burning down the businesses of angelic Somali immigrants (btw not gonna seek solidarity with the JV jihadists of Minneapolis just bc antifa looted their shit, enemy of my enemy isn’t my friend), when most footage of actual *looting* indicates that isn’t the case.

It’s the same “white agitator” shit you heard from the useful idiots on MSNBC to hide the big black elephant in the burned out Gucci store (and picked up by conservatives because they would also like to avoid discussing racial realities). He’s only transgressive by the standards of insane left Twitter echo chambers.
 
Good job Antifa I now don't feel bad for people getting hit in the groin.
I don't know if this is the right place to put this example of more blm/antifa/sjw authoritarian bullshit. Mods can feel free to move or delete if it should go elsewhere.

Students Demand Skidmore College Fire an Art Professor for Observing a Pro-Cop Rally
David and Andrea Peterson didn't even participate in the rally—they just watched it. The students don't care.

full article
And this is why Tenure is a thing in academia, I hope the professor has tenure.

"Hey this guy is accused of trying to start another wildfire, what should we do?"
"herp derp release with out bail!"

At this point PDX is just asking to be burnt down

IRL

















Shot in butt...
"Stupid is as stupid does"
Blame Canada!
In jail, and with a million dollar bond. I SUSPECT that it was put that high not as a punishment, but to give an excuse for him to stay in jail.

Might seem oxymoronic, but if the cops determined (rightfully so) that if he was out of jail he is in SERIOUS danger they could have arranged something for it. The fact you have heard nothing from his lawyers about it makes me dead certain this was a deal to keep up appearances, and Kyle is probably fairly comfortable right now.

Edit: A bit of elucidation for why. They can't just keep him there, its against his rights and WOULD be challenged. Additionally, if they merely set it to a low bond then a lot of well meaning idiots would likely get together to help pay it. The result is that they need to set it high to dissuade the alter, while providing a legally sufficient cover.

So, why do this? And why overcharge him? My longstanding stance, based off the DA UTTERLY making Kyle's own case for him, is that the DA knows Kyle did self defense, but is both satiating the mob AND trying to keep Kyle well away from them.
Protective Custody could have been an option, but as you said the 1mil is most likely only for "appearance" to prevent the insurrectionists from acting out more.
 
I don't see the White House Siege as something that will pan out. At a minimum, even the TDS riddled Daily Beast is skeptical.




The White House Siege Brought to you by Adbusters (TM) may in fact be a nothingburger :(
Sounds more like they’re trying to duck the idea of being charged with terroristic threats with their White House on fire shit. They knew exactly what they were doing with that imagery, they just didn’t expect the blowback.
 
"Hey this guy is accused of trying to start another wildfire, what should we do?"
"herp derp release with out bail!"

At this point PDX is just asking to be burnt down
Unfortunately cities, with their building codes, are more difficult to burn than overgrown wilderness.

The fires are pretty much all in unimproved areas way out in the country. There will be no gutter-punk troon antifa bbq.
 
Gotta love how BLM have spent the entire year hyping up instances of 'police brutality', spreading awareness and so on, yet almost every. single. instance. the police action is totally justified?
When its a case like Blake or the Wendy's Drive Thru? They still riot, even when the criminals' actions are indefensible.
Even cases like Floyd and Breonna, where the edited initial story appears sympathetic, we later get the full context and realise the world is a better place without them.

I'm sorry if this is giving off MOTI vibes, or even if I'm late to this realization, but its really absurd how white people would get lethal force in all these cases too, and likely far earlier into the confrontations. Because white people generally co-operate with the police, if they happen upon an unco-operative white person there isn't a lot of tolerance there. Whereas black people are trained by their sub-culture to be stand-offish and police certainly factor this in when doing their jobs. This is baked into the interactions, whereas the only white people who would shout and swear at police and take a fraction of an hour to garner the most basic info out of are either tweakers or communists
BLM organisers know deep down their real grievance is any police getting in the way of any black person for any reason. That's the only real criteria, and before body cams were normalised they had the ambiguity to paint the likes of Mike Brown and Trayvon Martin as saintly angels. Now? The depraved lunacy is laid bare for all to see-- which is probably why they've (seemingly) nonsensically began advocating body cams be banned.

If the discrimination isn't borne out statistically, and you can't even produce a decent case anecdotally (literal feels over reals) then your movement's a sham.
I concur with whoever said earlier that activists in the vein of BLM are the single biggest recruiter for white nationalism. Instead of confronting the shit home life, gang culture, lack of respect for education, etc etc. Instead of turning inward to improve, black leaders blame all their problems on white people, all the time, no matter what. It leads to the obvious side effect of some white people rejecting the guilt-trip and concluding this race of people are physically incapable of self-improvement. That's not white people proposing so on TV, thats Shaun King and assorted fat women with megaphones saying its unfair that blacks have to put up with the same kind of policing that everybody else does. Going inb4 Gangs & Drugs before every conversation means you're saying those things are instinsic to being black-- which you don't want to do if the goal is winning over soccer moms
People don’t want justice, they want to fight and be mad.

If everyone’s on the same page about a perceived injustice, then there’s no way to make it divisive, which is the real goal. It’s the reason why no one remembers who Andrew Finch is but everyone and their mom is sick of the name “George Floyd” by now.
 
People don’t want justice, they want to fight and be mad.

If everyone’s on the same page about a perceived injustice, then there’s no way to make it divisive, which is the real goal. It’s the reason why no one remembers who Andrew Finch is but everyone and their mom is sick of the name “George Floyd” by now.
This is clear; though the BLM idiots very likely don't have control of the riot faction at the beginning or anymore - had the Floyd stuff ONLY resulted in actual protests and not burning down half of Minneapolis, basically EVERYONE would have been onboard with "cops are bastards" - but they ruined that, and now people are actually taking the time to learn the details.
 
The officer involved shootings or deaths they are defending keep getting even less defensible. In a sliding scale from floyd to lancaster.
This latest shooting is so obviously indefensible but the hot topic communists over at reddit think that rushing a police officer with a knife is heroic martyrdom that shouldn't actually result in a martyr.

I've already seen shitlibs chalking this up as "police brutality" because the nog only had a knife, not a gun, and, therefore, the cop was not justified in shooting him.

Which is example #569,789 as to why shitlibs are so fucking dumb: because knife attacks are often just as lethal. If someone is coming at you with a knife with the intent to completely fuck you up, he can easily hit a major artery or plunge that blade into your heart...and...you will bleed out in seconds and you're dead. And if someone is as dangerously unhinged to go after a cop with a knife, that fucker probably needs to be put down for society's sake.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back