U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Vaclav, a very wise poster here (not me) said it's time to start following the BLM/Antifa types home. They live somewhere, right? Think that just maybe some of these people are being followed and tracked already? Maybe they won't get the chance to resume any life at all, in due time. Could happen. The terrorists have no corner on intelligence/reconnaissance/surveillance.

(Mods, sorry for the double post. Things don't always fit.)
You do that and you still have to deal with anarcho tyranny. Rules for thee but not for them crap.

The only reason these people thrive is they got the system backing them.

You cant fight back if that issue isnt taken care of first.
 
Nope. Have voted by mail for years now. Hmmm...for some reason conservative ladies are usually much better looking than liberal sows.

View attachment 1595918
Conservative women look better because they aren't feminists, due to ̶h̶a̶v̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶w̶o̶r̶k̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶b̶u̶l̶l̶s̶h̶i̶t̶ ̶d̶e̶t̶e̶c̶t̶o̶r̶s̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶b̶e̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶i̶n̶s̶e̶c̶u̶r̶e̶ ̶a̶b̶o̶u̶t̶ ̶h̶a̶v̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶t̶w̶o̶ ̶X̶ ̶c̶h̶r̶o̶m̶o̶s̶o̶m̶e̶s̶ internalized white male supremacy and a lack of ̶D̶a̶d̶d̶y̶ ̶i̶s̶s̶u̶e̶s̶ solidarity with the lived experience of the Sisterhood.
 
Nope. Have voted by mail for years now. Hmmm...for some reason conservative ladies are usually much better looking than liberal sows.

View attachment 1595918
Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs
Rolfe Daus Peterson, Carl L. Palmer
Abstract
Physical attractiveness is an important social factor in our daily interactions. Scholars in social psychology provide evidence that attractiveness stereotypes and the “halo effect” are prominent in affecting the traits we attribute to others. However, the interest in attractiveness has not directly filtered down to questions of political behavior beyond candidates and elites. Utilizing measures of attractiveness across multiple surveys, we examine the relationship between attractiveness and political beliefs. Controlling for socioeconomic status, we find that more attractive individuals are more likely to report higher levels of political efficacy, identify as conservative, and identify as Republican. These findings suggest an additional mechanism for political socialization that has further implications for understanding how the body intertwines with the social nature of politics.
 
From Yahoo! Front Page, "Hey you fucking Casual, Trump's Gestapo are in Amish Country now, Can't get much whiter than that, Feel bad now Racists?"

Yahoo News.png


Amish Country 1.png
 
Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs
Rolfe Daus Peterson, Carl L. Palmer
Abstract
Physical attractiveness is an important social factor in our daily interactions. Scholars in social psychology provide evidence that attractiveness stereotypes and the “halo effect” are prominent in affecting the traits we attribute to others. However, the interest in attractiveness has not directly filtered down to questions of political behavior beyond candidates and elites. Utilizing measures of attractiveness across multiple surveys, we examine the relationship between attractiveness and political beliefs. Controlling for socioeconomic status, we find that more attractive individuals are more likely to report higher levels of political efficacy, identify as conservative, and identify as Republican. These findings suggest an additional mechanism for political socialization that has further implications for understanding how the body intertwines with the social nature of politics.
Makes sense, ideally conservatism is about keeping things steady and leftism about changing things. If you've been dealt a good hand in life (i.e. being rich, attractive, have a skillset that's valued by your society) you'd lean towards keeping that gravy train rolling.
 
Vaclav, a very wise poster here (not me) said it's time to start following the BLM/Antifa types home. They live somewhere, right? Think that just maybe some of these people are being followed and tracked already? Maybe they won't get the chance to resume any life at all, in due time. Could happen. The terrorists have no corner on intelligence/reconnaissance/surveillance.

I seem to remember that the Dayton shooter was a Bernie-bro & ANTIFA wannabe and that he and his (privileged) family all lived in a white wealthy suburb.
Of course the media buried that hard.

So I imagine that tracking other BLM'ers and ANTIFA's to their homes would entail entering some wealthy suburbs and gated communities.
 
l m a o

We're fucked as a nation, aren't we?

View attachment 1595980
What’s the benefit of doing a black studies degree as opposed to a history or international studies degree? At least a history or international studies would have more application. Getting a black studies degree just sounds like a money laundering scheme.
 
Makes sense, ideally conservatism is about keeping things steady and leftism about changing things. If you've been dealt a good hand in life (i.e. being rich, attractive, have a skillset that's valued by your society) you'd lean towards keeping that gravy train rolling.

As for changing things, it's not necessary for the better. Case in point with Lena Dunham.
 
What’s the benefit of doing a black studies degree as opposed to a history or international studies degree? At least a history or international studies would have more application. Getting a black studies degree just sounds like a money laundering scheme.
It is, and it's also for people who are fucking stupid and have no real intellectual capacity and have bought into the lie that getting a degree, any degree, no matter how shit tied and mediocre, no matter what crap hole uni you go to, is a golden ticket to a good super SRS bsns job.

It's the same reason these spastics like communism. At the heart of it all they are lazy and incapable of work. So they want communism, do a shit degree they think will "open doors" for them because they want an easy ride through life.
 
I'm glad I passed the English AP tests in high school and didn't have to deal with any English college professors.

Also call me optimistic but I don't think polling centers will be seriously targeted for arson. There might be a handful of idiots though. But at least where I am, a lot of polling centers are inside public libraries and schools/universities. They're also staffed by the nicest retirees/grandparents you ever did meet. If anyone actually dares to literally burn books or try to destroy the local elementary school I went to as a kid there will be hell to pay.

It would just be bad optics unless they could flawlessly blame it on some right wing individuals. These people probably won't even vote anyway.
 
As for changing things, it's not necessary for the better. Case in point with Lena Dunham.
And that's where the rub lies: Change only matters when there's some amount of benefit to it, preferably for society at large. Therein lies the other rub that makes it dangerous: the people wanting this change just so happens to be the most vindictive and sadistic fuckers we've seen in a long time and only wants whatever change that makes their enemies suffer and they made it clear time and time again that their enemy is society at large
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back