Weppers
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2018
The book is called "Bias" not "Biased".
Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿
- Thread starter Randall Fragg
- Start date
Jarolleon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
They literally think this because there was some story a while back about Trump's EPA guy muzzling some climate data or something.It's so dumb. Does anyone really think the last 4 years have been dark time for "science" because of Trump?It's ludicrous. "I have a dick but I'm a woman" is way more damaging to science than anything Trump did or advocated.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
Yeah, found that after a bit more searching. Still, interesting what books Amazon is choosing to sponsor. It's always interesting to see companies like Amazon being so slavishly loyal to the leftist cause when the left is so over-the-top about hating them and wanting to destroy them, Amazon in particular being a popular target lately. Makes you wonder if it's some sort of kicked dog syndrome or if the backroom deals are just that good.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2019
Kamala Harris, and now Joe Biden, have both referred to their admin as the "Harris/Biden" Administration over the past few days.
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
I guess they really want to lose if they're that blatant about forcing the "first woman president" as a case of not being voted herself, but being promoted after the other schmuck dies.
Great way to kill any enthusiasm you criminally retarded apes.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
Joe's dementia would be responsible for his accidental honesty, since I'm sure he's had it explained to him that he won't actually be President, wonder what Harris's excuse is? Sheer ego that she can't help but openly brag about how she'll really be President?
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2018
"BUT THEY'RE BRINGING BACK DECENCY AND LIGHT TO END THE DARKNESS OF tRUMP'S AMERICA"
This fucking take is one I see from Blind Democrat Supporters who think Biden being elected means America will go back to being normal when in reality the media will just not bother covering bad shit as much and be more positive.
At this rate, might as well get Kamala to debate Trump if they are being this blatant, would be better than getting a senile old man to do it.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Who would become the left's convenient scapegoat when Trump isn't around anymore? I know they'll just find another Republican to hate, but I get the feeling that no one in the near future will ever drive the left crazy the same way Trump does.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
Fox News, most likely. They were the left's punching bag/voodoo doll/whipping boy during Obama's reign, since they were a larger, more visible target than any particular Republican politician outside of election season.
Then again, they might just stick with Trump. You know he's not going to sit down and shut up once he's out of office, so most likely the left will rediscover their belief that former Presidents need to be silent unless they're supporting the current (read: Democrat) President. Every time he tweets they'll continue to announce it as an attack on the soul of the nation.
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2018
Well it depends
If Trump loses 2020, then Trump will be the scapegoat for awhile and any republican presidential candidate after him will be the scapegoat if Trump becomes irrelevant by then by saying "OMG EVEN TRUMP ISN'T THAT BAD" or "TRUMP'S AMERICA WILL COME BACK IF X IS ELECTED!"
If Trump wins 2020, he'll be blamed for awhile by the inevitable Democratic President that comes after him (unless some crazy shit happens since usually with a two term president, the candidate of the opposite party is usually president after him). In that case any Republican who has a chance of winning the presidency post-Trump will be treated worse while Trump will be treated same way Dubya was treated after he became president.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2019
I wouldn't be surprised if the Twitter admins kept the algorithmic Trump dissenters activated after his presidency just out of spite.
Imagine, Trump talks about his return to The Apprentice, and the replies are a bunch of #TRUMPFAILED and #TRUMPCHAOS from bots. And TrumpUwU is still a thing.
WuTangClan2299
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2019
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
I feel like if Trump is reelected we have a really good chance at going three terms, honestly. Not because I imagine that whatever Republican might come after Trump would be so compelling to vote for, but rather that if Trump is reelected the Democrats/left are really going to ramp up the hateful rhetoric and violence in retaliation, and start getting even more honest about all the vengeance they plan to wreak when they're back in power. I think people might vote for a third Republican term in office (or at least not vote enough to prevent it) just because they're scared of how batshit wild-eyed crazy the Democrats will be during Trump's second term.
I mean, maybe not. Maybe the Democrats will calm their asses down, slow their mad dash to the far left, appeal to moderates again, remind themselves the youth vote is folly, and run a decent campaign where-
Nah, three terms.
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2018
Well we would what happens, for all we know, the Democrats will end up having their own Trump like candidate in 2024 if Biden/Harris lose this election, and it really depends on which republican is the nominee in 2024.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
They tried that this year with Fake Feet Bloomberg, didn't go over so well. The problem with the idea is that every Trump-like figure on the left has been subject to heavy vilification as part of their pro-socialist-but-we-don't-call-it-that agenda, so they'd have to do an even sharper 180 than usual and be like "I know we spent the last decade telling you that Jeff Bezos is literally Capitalist Satan incarnate, but actually he's super good and you are now really excited to vote for him."
They'd have to go with some gimmick candidate like an actual actor, and on that they're rolling the dice on whether their candidate will get party vanned in mid election.
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2018
The difference between Bloomberg and Trump is that Bloomberg just wanted power and has a track record of being very establishment with what I meant by a Trump-like figure is someone whose anti-establishment enough to be popular within the party. It also didn’t help Bloomberg was a shitty candidate and had no charisma to him at all since it was blatantly clear he just wanted the power and while all politicians want this, they try to not make it obvious and talk about the issues
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2016
On today's episode of "Things that totally happened"
I wonder if "My therapist" will replace "My 8 year old."
Can't imagine why "she" needs a psychiatrist
I wonder if "My therapist" will replace "My 8 year old."
Can't imagine why "she" needs a psychiatrist
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
"I'd like to talk some more about your narcissistic personality disorder today and how that's affecting your life."
"But you hate Trump, right?"
"My beliefs aren't under discussion here."
"Yeah you hate Trump, I'm gonna tell all of my followers who love hearing everything about me about how you told me to vote for Biden."
"... Look, I think maybe it's time you found another psychiatrist, this really isn't working."