Dax Herrera / Dick Masterson / Daxipad / Juju The Cow / Wolfie / The Dick Show (TDS), The Biggest Problem in the Universe (TBPITU) / New Project 2 - Balding least funny contrarian paedophile defender in the universe, "women are fat" jokes virtuoso, e-daddy of Sektards, chaser and cross-species roleplay sodomy enthusiast. Roleplays as a cow named Juju while he gets fucked in the anus by women. Fat.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How many pushups can Juju do?

  • 0

    Votes: 62 50.4%
  • 1

    Votes: 33 26.8%
  • >1

    Votes: 28 22.8%

  • Total voters
    123
“Why are you concerned about X when Y is a bigger issue” is one of those arguments that’s often true, but not realistic. Sure, people getting fired up about this but not Dance Moms isn’t consistent. I might even go so far as to call it silly. But it’s still people being fired up about child sexualizatuon.

Not to defend a trash show all that much, but I think the main difference is that, while stuff like Dance Moms is clearly exploitative (it's literally the point of the show), it doesn't really have a lot of close-up shots of pre-teen ass and crotch, and many of the dance routines aren't sexual at all. The show's still bad, to be sure, but I don't think it's nearly as pointed in it's use of the girls' sexuality as Cuties. Granted, there's a whole lot of space between "as bad as Cuties" and "generally morally acceptable", but I'd say it's still "less bad" than Cuties.

That said, most of the people bringing up "But what about Dance Moms?" have probably never seen a minute of the show anyway, and are only using it to deflect.

The honest answer is that a lot of people hadn't really considered the fact that material like this was used by pedos for their own purposes before Cuties unleashed that promo image and trailer. Dance Moms was mildly controversial, but largely ignored since it's one of those types of reality shows that nobody outside of the core audience even notices exist. It's on Lifetime and it's about dance competitions. It screams that this show is for nobody but wine moms and gay dance nerds; who else would even bother tuning in? Well, obviously the answer is pedos, but nobody really thought of that.
 
“Why are you concerned about X when Y is a bigger issue” is one of those arguments that’s often true, but not realistic. Sure, people getting fired up about this but not Dance Moms isn’t consistent. I might even go so far as to call it silly. But it’s still people being fired up about child sexualizatuon.

It’s like pointing out that breast cancer awareness gets the most attention when other cancers are deadlier. Sure, that’s not wrong, but tits are marketable - eyes on the issue is always better than the alternative.
True, but maybe I’m just a lot more nihilistic about the whole thing. I don’t approve of Cuties at all, I think the whole thing’s fucked up and wrong for many reasons. But it makes me more sad than angry.
Because, really, no matter how many people complain about Cuties, little Suzy down the block is still getting touched by her foster parents, Jimmy is still getting abused by the babysitter, Mandy is still being fucked by her cousin, and John is still getting blown by his English teacher.
No matter how many people write Netflix letters, no matter how much debate is had over this film, not a single kid is being saved from what is happening everywhere.
 
Last edited:
1600233564737.png


jesus fucking christ
 
“Why are you concerned about X when Y is a bigger issue” is one of those arguments that’s often true, but not realistic. Sure, people getting fired up about this but not Dance Moms isn’t consistent. I might even go so far as to call it silly. But it’s still people being fired up about child sexualizatuon.
I’ve not seen a single person defend Dance Moms. I’ve seen a lot of people defend Cuties. Who is there to argue about Dance Moms with?

Another problem with Cuties is that even if you cede the apologist narrative it still seems to be saying that children should be free to explore sexual exploitation on their own because they’re smart enough to figure out that it’s bad on their own. They’re not and in real life the film ends with the little black girl on a dirty mattress in a dirty room.
 
“Why are you concerned about X when Y is a bigger issue” is one of those arguments that’s often true, but not realistic. Sure, people getting fired up about this but not Dance Moms isn’t consistent. I might even go so far as to call it silly. But it’s still people being fired up about child sexualizatuon.

It’s like pointing out that breast cancer awareness gets the most attention when other cancers are deadlier. Sure, that’s not wrong, but tits are marketable - eyes on the issue is always better than the alternative.
If we had to solve every problem in order of importance then nothing would ever get solved.

Dick always comes up with these bullshit nonsense arguments because his positions are always so shit and it's tiring.
 
True, but maybe I’m just a lot more nihilistic about the whole thing. I don’t approve of Cuties at all, I think the whole thing’s fucked up and wrong for many reasons. But it makes me more sad than angry.
Because, really, no matter how many people complain about Cuties, little Suzy down the block is still getting touched by her foster parents, Jimmy is still getting abused by the babysitter, Mandy is still being fucked by her cousin, and John is still getting blown by his English teacher.
No matter how many people write Netflix letters, no matter how much debate is had over this film, not a single kid is being saved from what is happening everywhere.
That's the part I disagree with, by rolling over and conceding the point to MadDax that abuse is happening everywhere is missing the point. The children making that film were abused by making it and likely diddled too. I doubt there is a realistic plan to end all child abuse everywhere, but that's a retarded reason to ignore the obvious shit (an attempt to turn a profit on child abuse!) being put on Netflix.
 
That's the part I disagree with, by rolling over and conceding the point to MadDax that abuse is happening everywhere is missing the point. The children making that film were abused by making it and likely diddled too. I doubt there is a realistic plan to end all child abuse everywhere, but that's a retarded reason to ignore the obvious shit (an attempt to turn a profit on child abuse!) being put on Netflix.
If we can prevent Cuties 2 where another 60 girls have to twerk for film producers at an "audition", then it was worth it.
 
This fucker looks like someone combined Mundane Matt and Quarterpounder into one severely obnoxious person.
Funny, but I don't see that duo blend accounting for Vito. To me he's the Los Angeles Anthony Logatto.

Fat:agree:
Italian:agree:
Glasses:agree:
Calls himself a comedian but is painfully unfunny:agree:
Desperate for attention online:agree:
Turns out is into some deviant shit:agree:

When you analyze it Vito is just a younger, gayer, inferior California version of the original A-log. Just like when you analyze it Dick is just a younger, gayer, inferior Yiddish Mexican version of Adam Carolla.
 
Funny, but I don't see that duo blend accounting for Vito. To me he's the Los Angeles Anthony Logatto.

Fat:agree:
Italian:agree:
Glasses:agree:
Calls himself a comedian but is painfully unfunny:agree:
Desperate for attention online:agree:
Turns out is into some deviant shit:agree:

When you analyze it Vito is just a younger, gayer, inferior California version of the original A-log. Just like when you analyze it Dick is just a younger, gayer, inferior Yiddish Mexican version of Adam Carolla.

Vito actually explained he’s not Italian but his family is from Spain & Jewish.
He’s deleted a few tweets stating he was Jewish.
D6C6D8B5-1131-45ED-8661-8CAEAE1CFAEF.jpegBAA397E5-2773-4439-9D93-6FAFCE47CFC4.jpeg31B8FD1F-C4DE-4A71-BD2C-C38D39A6101D.jpeg
 
Vito actually explained he’s not Italian but his family is from Spain & Jewish.
He’s deleted a few tweets stating he was Jewish.
View attachment 1599608View attachment 1599609View attachment 1599610
>Gesualdi
>Jewish

I sorta find that hard to believe since Gesù is Italian for Jesus although stranger things have happened. Either way, he’s a morbidly obese disgrace of a human being who lives on negative attention. It’s the kind of problem that will never be solved unless he tries it on the wrong kind of person.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Fslur
Vito actually explained he’s not Italian but his family is from Spain & Jewish.
He’s deleted a few tweets stating he was Jewish.
View attachment 1599608View attachment 1599609View attachment 1599610
Gesualdi is a name that originates from Basilicata Italy. Seven families of that name immigrated from Basilicata to the U.S. meaning Vito (having the name Gesualdi) is decended from one of those, making him decended from Italians. Given that he is called Vito, an Italian name, rather than Moishe (a Jewish name) or a more anglisized name that comes from more intergrated Italian families, it is a safe bet to say you cut this guy he bleeds ragu. Vito is Jewish in exactly the same way Peter Coffin is Jewish, which is fictionally Jewish due to convenience. If he wants to convince me and others he needs to change his name to Vito Gesualdiberg.

Edit: It is also possible he is descended from a Gesualdi family that moved to Argentina before moving to the U.S. as a means of escaping fascism from first Mussolini then the Perons but that would still make him Italian and not fucking Spanish. If you're going to bullshit about your origins don't have such a specific last name from an ethnic group that keeps meticulous records of family origins and what corner of the globe they buggered off to.
 
Last edited:
Gesualdi is a name that originates from Basilicata Italy. Seven families of that name immigrated from Basilicata to the U.S. meaning Vito (having the name Gesualdi) is decended from one of those, making him decended from Italians. Given that he is called Vito, an Italian name, rather than Moishe (a Jewish name) or a more anglisized name that comes from more intergrated Italian families, it is a safe bet to say you cut this guy he bleeds ragu. Vito is Jewish in exactly the same way Peter Coffin is Jewish, which is fictionally Jewish due to convenience. If he wants to convince me and others he needs to change his name to Vito Gesualdiberg.

Edit: It is also possible he is descended from a Gesualdi family that moved to Argentina before moving to the U.S. as a means of escaping fascism from first Mussolini then the Perons but that would still make him Italian and not fucking Spanish. If you're going to bullshit about your origins don't have such a specific last name from an ethnic group that keeps meticulous records of family origins and what corner of the globe they buggered off to.

Only on this site do I learn such fascinating yet hilarious tidbits of historical information related to whether or not someone's a kike.

No wonder he deleted the tweets claiming he's jewish. Not exactly something to want to be caught out lying about as a defense against criticism.
 
Only on this site do I learn such fascinating yet hilarious tidbits of historical information related to whether or not someone's a kike.

No wonder he deleted the tweets claiming he's jewish. Not exactly something to want to be caught out lying about as a defense against criticism.
Lying your ass off that you're part of the tribe is a common tactic for a hack who's trying to break into the entertainment industry. Just as lying your ass off about the fact that you're actually part of the tribe is a common tactic for hacks who are trying to grift the right. I don't buy into the anti-semite stuff, to me they wear funny hats, do funny dances and are weird, but for some reason whether or not you wear that funny hat (and whether you need to hide it) becomes a big thing depending which audience you're trying to fleece.

Edit: I misspelled one of the uses of the word ass and I cannot let that mispelling go uncorrected.
 
Last edited:
I don't buy into the anti-semite stuff, to me they wear funny hats, do funny dances and are weird, but for some reason whether or not you wear that funny hat (and whether you need to hide it) becomes a big thing depending which audience you're trying to fleece.

Well, I mean some idiots think all jews = the power hungry rich and some idiots think Jesus was jew so all jews = sacred or some such drivel.

I think the funnier thing is him obviously pretending to be gay. I don't believe for one second that he's gay, and it's such a stupid thing to fake that I'm not really surprised he's lying about being a jew.
 
Back