- Joined
- Feb 13, 2017
Looks like salted cope and a side of seethe are on the menu tonight, boys. Anyone know if that's considered kosher?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have 21 days to file my Response. It's actually going in the mail tomorrow. Stay tuned!![]()
It doesn't matter because Piglinda is a fake Jew. She's the world's only member of the Church of Melinda Scott.Looks like salted cope and a side of seethe are on the menu tonight, boys. Anyone know if that's considered kosher?
I suspect it's like having brisket and gouda in the same buffet restaurant. If the steam from the seethe doesnt waft over towards the cheesy cope, it's all halalLooks like salted cope and a side of seethe are on the menu tonight, boys. Anyone know if that's considered kosher?
I have 21 days to file my Response. It's actually going in the mail tomorrow. Stay tuned!
They couched their entire argument on Eleventh Amendment Immunity. I got something good and juicy to say about that
You might as well not bother tbh, I expect it to be dismissed just like the others, especially if you've made the same mistake 4 times in a row now
I'm so sorry, I'm here to let you know that this is a broken hard drive from 1983. I need to notify you that you've been trying to give me different commands, but I can't respond, because I keep giving the same action. Beep...beep...beep. Blue screen of death is imminent.Looks more like they couched their argument on you not making a fucking claim. Lmao.
Any way we can see the docs? Was the motion ruled on yet? Also, what is a negative corporate whatchmadoo? @AnOminous would you know, Frendo?
They couched their entire argument on Eleventh Amendment Immunity. I got something dumb and stupid to say about that that will lose utterly like usual
You might as well not bother tbh, I expect it to be dismissed just like the others, especially if you've made the same mistake 4 times in a row now
And we’ll all laugh at you because you’re a moron and it will be something stupid and will promptly be tossed. Don’t worry Linda - someday you’ll be a winner.
It's a federal court case, the documents are public:
Docket for Scott v. Wise County Department of Social Services, 2:20-cv-00014 - CourtListener.com
Docket for Scott v. Wise County Department of Social Services, 2:20-cv-00014 — Brought to you by the RECAP Initiative and Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.www.courtlistener.com
FTFY you dumb whore.
Also the court can just dismiss the entire case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). You know, like they did with your other frivolous lunatic suits filed in forma pauperis because you're a fucking loser.
Except they didn't. Did you not read their secondary defense that they are non sui juris?I have 21 days to file my Response. It's actually going in the mail tomorrow. Stay tuned!
They couched their entire argument on Eleventh Amendment Immunity. I got something good and juicy to say about that
Wow!! That non sui juris thing is a great angle. Quite a catch22 Melinda has found herself in.LMAO. Though I'm sure between her beloved Skyfairy scroll, curses, and Sesame St reruns she can find a way to foil their nefarious Goy plot.It's a federal court case, the documents are public:
Docket for Scott v. Wise County Department of Social Services, 2:20-cv-00014 - CourtListener.com
Docket for Scott v. Wise County Department of Social Services, 2:20-cv-00014 — Brought to you by the RECAP Initiative and Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.www.courtlistener.com
FTFY you dumb whore.
Also the court can just dismiss the entire case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). You know, like they did with your other frivolous lunatic suits filed in forma pauperis because you're a fucking loser.
Except they didn't. Did you not read their secondary defense that they are non sui juris?
It's interesting how much Melinda seems to think the law functions in the same way as magic. She thinks that if she gets the magic incantation just right, this time the result will be different, this time her wishes will be granted and her enemies vanquished. So she keeps trying slightly different versions. Of course, Melinda understands jack shit about the law or legal processes, so she continually makes the same basic elemental flaws, like her continual failure to state a claim. It's not only the law, either. Her religious TORAH! stuff is much the same thing.
ETA: I just read the motion to dismiss in its entirety. They didn't even break a sweat or spend more than a tiny amount of time drafting it.
It's interesting how much Melinda seems to think the law functions in the same way as magic. She thinks that if she gets the magic incantation just right, this time the result will be different, this time her wishes will be granted and her enemies vanquished. So she keeps trying slightly different versions. Of course, Melinda understands jack shit about the law or legal processes, so she continually makes the same basic elemental flaws, like her continual failure to state a claim. It's not only the law, either. Her religious TORAH! stuff is much the same thing.
ETA: I just read the motion to dismiss in its entirety. They didn't even break a sweat or spend more than a tiny amount of time drafting it.
Meanwhile in Florida. @Null --isn't this you hometown? Haha, Elohim's Messengers paid you a little visit huh?
View attachment 1601107
That is just another form of Sovereign Immunity, same difference.
I responded to that in my Response. They actually can be sued directly. But I'm not giving you any snipets from my Response. You will have to wait and see it!
Have you ever considered that it's not sexism, and that you're just retarded and can't figure out how to state a claim? Because I can promise you it's because you're retarded and can't figure out how to state a claim.Except that I haven't repeated a signal technical error in any of my pleadings. So, yeah, there's that
Not necessarily. Women are more often than not discriminated against in all forms of government. There is a lot of sexism against women that has not been torn down. The world is still largely in a Patriarchal mindset. If I'm up against a male in a lawsuit in front of a male judge, they will take the side of the male.
I've seen it with my own eyes watching cases in court rooms with female lawyer. The way the male judges favor the male lawyers and bend the rules for them, and also disrespect they disrespect female lawyers. I barely see female judges.
The USA has never had a female president. Shocking, considering that the USA thinks its such a "progressive" nation.
So basically, in the USA, if you're a woman, or black, or hispanic, or poor, or not a Free Mason, you might as well just keep fighting for the inherent moral principle that it stands for, because you really have a slim change to win unless you're a white Anglo rich male. Just sayin' it like it is. The USA creates an illusion in elementary schools that we are the land of equal opportunity but that's not really true.
But like I told Marshall last night, I would rather lose a lawsuit speaking up, then sit down like a Pacifist and say nothing.
Win, lose, whatever. I'm not getting my hopes up, but I did write a damn good response.
You seem butt hurt like a sexist.
They dismissed because of specific reasons. You must have me confused with someone else.
COME AT ME AGAIN FOOL!
Not necessarily. Women are more often than not discriminated against in all forms of government. There is a lot of sexism against women that has not been torn down. The world is still largely in a Patriarchal mindset. If I'm up against a male in a lawsuit in front of a male judge, they will take the side of the male.
I've seen it with my own eyes watching cases in court rooms with female lawyer. The way the male judges favor the male lawyers and bend the rules for them, and also disrespect they disrespect female lawyers. I barely see female judges.
The USA has never had a female president. Shocking, considering that the USA thinks its such a "progressive" nation.
So basically, in the USA, if you're a woman, or black, or hispanic, or poor, or not a Free Mason, you might as well just keep fighting for the inherent moral principle that it stands for, because you really have a slim change to win unless you're a white Anglo rich male. Just sayin' it like it is. The USA creates an illusion in elementary schools that we are the land of equal opportunity but that's not really true.
But like I told Marshall last night, I would rather lose a lawsuit speaking up, then sit down like a Pacifist and say nothing.
Win, lose, whatever. I'm not getting my hopes up, but I did write a damn good response.
You seem butt hurt like a sexist.
They dismissed because of specific reasons. You must have me confused with someone else.
COME AT ME AGAIN FOOL!