Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds
- Thread starter trannyfucker
- Start date
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Best private school advertisement ever.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2020
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
Look at all those unique and beautiful snowflakes, each entirely indistinguishable from from the other.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2019
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2013
Whenever I hear Geo, I think about those cars. Why name yourself after a cheap car?
Sneed's Feed And Seed
Well you're certainly doing your job today Mr. Sun
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
I thought a Geo Neptune was somebody's "first car" choice, not an elected official.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2020
I like the ‘all sexes may identify as all genders’ lunacy.
According to these special guidelines, boring old female women can now identify as superspecialstunningandbravetranswomen.
I propose a new doctrine
Women-Women are Trans
Men-Men are Trans
Non-binary people come in over 300 subtypes and they‘s toilet facilities must be especially validating
Sizzlin
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2020
I'd gladly part with my left thumb to not meet Geo Neptune.
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2018
We coulda just wiped em from the earth and our collective history but noooooooooo.
Thanksgiving n reservations n casinos n shit.
All that superior firepower with powder guns vs bows and we couldn't exterminate a bunch of brown hippies.
Thanksgiving n reservations n casinos n shit.
All that superior firepower with powder guns vs bows and we couldn't exterminate a bunch of brown hippies.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
Literal basket weaving 
Calculus
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2018
Mepsi Pax
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
This is a weird story, basically a puff piece, and as usual it glosses over the interesting questions.
I looked up the town, and it's a literal Indian rez. The population of the entire thing is ~700. The demographic breakdown (admittedly out of date from the 2000 census) was over 85% natives. One would assume that this isn't whitey's doing for once, this freak must have had some kind of support from his tribe. At the same time, the amount of votes cast was probably absurdly small, "half" of the ballots here is almost guaranteed to be double digits. I just wonder what's going on behind the scenes. Do chugs really love trannies so much? What's the sociological story here? Was this some kind of weird backwoods political play? Is there a cabal of affirmative action Ivy League english majors grooming Indian children on the Canadian border?
Anyways the propaganda angle is retarded (as usual), this might as well have happened in Canada, it really has almost nothing to do with Maine or the regular people who live there (all six hundred thousand of them). It's a school board position on an Indian reservation, it has nothing to do with the actual US government.
Portland ME is not nearly as gay as these tranny lovers pretend it is, or want it to be. It's nowhere close to the other Portland, or a Seattle, or a San Fagsisco. Yes, it's the poz capital of Maine, but that's not saying much considering Maine is mostly small rural towns, very decentralized, and it doesn't have a million gay corporate entities shitting the place up. The population density is minimal, even Portland is a ghost town in the winter when the tourists leave. It's mostly the colleges that poz the place up, but like most urban centers (lol urban it's like 100k people) it's entirely surrounded and even infiltrated by working class stiffs with guns and Trump flags. However, Portland's been attracting shitlib Bostonians for a while now, so unfortunately Mainers are gonna be in for more assfucking sooner rather than later. At least Portland's not the state capital, so it's been much harder for the crazies to leverage the government.
I looked up the town, and it's a literal Indian rez. The population of the entire thing is ~700. The demographic breakdown (admittedly out of date from the 2000 census) was over 85% natives. One would assume that this isn't whitey's doing for once, this freak must have had some kind of support from his tribe. At the same time, the amount of votes cast was probably absurdly small, "half" of the ballots here is almost guaranteed to be double digits. I just wonder what's going on behind the scenes. Do chugs really love trannies so much? What's the sociological story here? Was this some kind of weird backwoods political play? Is there a cabal of affirmative action Ivy League english majors grooming Indian children on the Canadian border?
Anyways the propaganda angle is retarded (as usual), this might as well have happened in Canada, it really has almost nothing to do with Maine or the regular people who live there (all six hundred thousand of them). It's a school board position on an Indian reservation, it has nothing to do with the actual US government.
Portland ME is not nearly as gay as these tranny lovers pretend it is, or want it to be. It's nowhere close to the other Portland, or a Seattle, or a San Fagsisco. Yes, it's the poz capital of Maine, but that's not saying much considering Maine is mostly small rural towns, very decentralized, and it doesn't have a million gay corporate entities shitting the place up. The population density is minimal, even Portland is a ghost town in the winter when the tourists leave. It's mostly the colleges that poz the place up, but like most urban centers (lol urban it's like 100k people) it's entirely surrounded and even infiltrated by working class stiffs with guns and Trump flags. However, Portland's been attracting shitlib Bostonians for a while now, so unfortunately Mainers are gonna be in for more assfucking sooner rather than later. At least Portland's not the state capital, so it's been much harder for the crazies to leverage the government.
Last edited:
Fractal Lifeform
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Your colleagues are cowards cause they lie to themselves and others that its just student shit and means nothing and yet wouldn't dare speak against it which means in their hearts, they know its not just student politics bullshit.
Anyway, I hate this forcing of trans on everyone but I hate feminism more and feminism pushed this so all I can say is based. Hopefully women lose everything cause it all goes to trans people.
- Joined
- May 2, 2020
I can't believe Native Americans are this gay and pozzed.
No wonder Whitey colonized their land with effortless glee; they let faggots run the show.
No wonder Whitey colonized their land with effortless glee; they let faggots run the show.
JohnLenin
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2016
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2017
Reality is copying the memes again
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2019
We can all talk a big game on an anonymous internet forum but the vast majority won't be risking their career or comforts to speak up outside it and that's fact.
People don't speak out for the reason you see time and time again in this thread and the various other troon threads. The troon lobby will dog-pile them and they lose their ability to support themselves because words like transphobic have been given too much power. Most humans will protect their own backside and creature comforts over an ideology any day of the week and most people don't have Rowling money where they can say fuck all with little care to the consequences. It's why the silent majority is silent. They don't want to be involved or directly tied too something and they won't be swayed until the opposite view steps over the line that they finally deem to be too far. If you provide them with a way to support without directly drawing ire they will. See Rowling's new book which currently occupies place #3, #5, and #15 in various formats on the hot new releases for Amazon. It's only been out two days.
I imagine quite a few of the Doctors who believe in biology have tried to fight against it but met roadblocks so their idea now is that if you want to fuck around and find out by changing your sex because of your feels, go ahead. They know that biologically the sexes are different so let the idiots who are so desperate to have fantasy be reality be treated as the sex they claim and then watch as things go horribly wrong.
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2019
Interestingly the Passamaquoddy have some representation in Canada but they don't have first nations status in Canada.
It's probably a position gained by the virtue of being a small town, though. This guy didn't fly outta the womb a troon and judging by the looks of him he's pretty early into transition if he's actually going through the process at all. It took time to get to this point. So he's probably known or liked by the locals. 700 People means everyone knows everyone. My hometown was like 4000 people and was the same so 700 or so people and all natives of the same tribe means he can identify every single person he sees in a day because he's known them his whole life. They probably mostly ignore the flaming trans-ness because of that.
He's probably like that one mentally ill guy who wanders around in every small town whose basically harmless and everyone knows / looks out for.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Dear Kai,
I’m an out, proud lesbian and radical feminist who’s happily loved other women for more than four decades. (I came out in my twenties, and it was a big deal back then.) I support trans rights, but I have to admit that I am just not attracted to most transgender women, especially those who have not had surgery. I don’t mean that there is anything wrong with the way that trans women look, but it’s simply not what floats my boat. After all, I am a lesbian—not bisexual—and to come right out and say it, I just do not find penises attractive. I suppose this could be taken as offensive, but I’ve never been able to do anything except speak my mind as I know it.
Recently, I’ve heard that there is a faction of trans rights activists saying lesbians have to be attracted to trans women or else we are transphobic. This feels very wrong to me, like trying to control whom lesbians have sex with. Corrective rape and conversion therapy are forms of violence that have been used against gay and bisexual women for centuries. But then again, I recognize that I am of a “certain age” (i.e., old! ha ha), and I know I might be missing something. As a member of your generation who seems somewhat reasonable, can you help me understand?
Ornery Lesbian Dissident
Dear OLD,
Thank you for speaking your mind and asking this bold question! In my experience, it’s true that the topic of lesbian sexuality and trans women can be politically and emotionally charged. Yet I think you have brought this up in a respectful way, which I deeply appreciate. How will the queer community ever learn to get along if we don’t ask hard questions and open up deep conversations? As a member of my generation (a millennial) who strives to be somewhat reasonable, I believe that it’s especially important for queers of different ages to form respectful intergenerational connections so that we can become stronger as a movement.
Now to your question, OLD: Is it wrong for cis (that is, non-trans) lesbians to exclude trans women as potential sex and romantic partners? And on the flip side, is it wrong for trans women to advocate that lesbians should treat them as sexually and romantically equivalent to cis women?
These questions are powerful, and they have sparked no small amount of debate in recent years. They touch upon many other, deeper questions that go straight to the messy heart of discrimination, desirability and consent: Are trans women “really” women, and if so, are they equal to cis women? Is discrimination based on identity or appearance acceptable when it comes to sexual preference? Is it ever okay to tell someone whom they should or shouldn’t be attracted to?
Just reading the above paragraph sends a jolt of electricity through my body. When it comes to such hot-button—and tender—issues, it’s very easy to jump to simplistic conclusions, and to self-righteously condemn the opinions of others. Our personal histories, sacred values and political belief systems are all implicated, so the stakes are very high indeed. Our answers seem to reflect whether or not we are good people and so, naturally, we want to be right—which means that everyone else must be wrong.
I believe the most helpful and compassionate way to navigate this emotional and ethical maze is to soften our stance and take a step away from ideology (how we think the world “should” work) toward what actually works in relationships. We might think of this as a shift from a “right or wrong” approach to a “getting along” framework.
Let’s begin, in this case, with what is most obvious: That all people—cis, trans, straight and queer alike—are entitled to sovereignty over their own bodies. No one can or should tell us whom to have sex with, ever, and historic attempts to do so have resulted in terrible legacies of violence and trauma. Therefore, OLD, you are entitled to decline the sexual or romantic invitations of any person, trans women included.
With that said, I want to address your concern that a cis lesbian might be coerced or pressured to have sex with a trans woman, or else be labelled “transphobic.” I’ve seen this concern brought up a lot in the debate about whether cis lesbians “should” be attracted to trans women, and my guess is that a lot of the anger and fear that some cis lesbians have expressed about this comes from the long history of the dominant culture attempting to control and redirect lesbian sexuality. For some cis lesbians—especially those who have lived through sexual violence—being told that they “ought” to be attracted to trans women might trigger powerful, painful feelings about being coerced into unwanted sex.
Yet it is important to note that, in reality, the vast majority of sexual violence and harassment against cis women is not perpetrated by trans women. In fact, when researching this column, I could find no significant statistics at all of trans women committing violence against cisgender women, though I did find many studies reporting that trans women are at heightened risk of receiving both physical and sexualviolence, largely from cisgender men.
Based on my own experience, I would hazard to assert that the vast majority of cis women do not walk through the world in terror of being sexually harassed and assaulted by trans women. On the other hand, if you ask any handful of women (cis or trans) if they have ever been sexually harassed or assaulted by cis men, well, the answer is obvious. Men, as a category, are the primary perpetrators of sexual violence. Trans women, as a category, are most often the targets of sexual violence—just like our cisgender sisters.
Why, then, is there this idea out there that cis lesbians today are being sexually threatened or pressured by trans women who are attracted to other women? Video blogger Riley Dennis asserts that it comes from the persistent social stereotype that trans women are not really women at all, but actually men in disguise who are invading women’s spaces for predatory reasons. Yet, as mentioned above, there is literally no statistical evidence to support this idea. And while I could believe that some tiny minority of trans women are predators, that’s true of people of literally any gender.
So, OLD, I think we have established that cis lesbians are not in danger of systemic violence from trans women—in fact, cis and trans women ought perhaps to be united as partners in working against the patriarchal violence that affects us all.
But what about trans people like Dennis and writer Brynne Tannehill, who suggest that it is transphobic for cis people to not want to date trans people?
First, I would suggest spending some time with Dennis and Tannehill’s work, because they present their perspectives with intelligence and nuance. They point out that all sexual and romantic preferences are in some way shaped by cultural and political forces. We are taught, for example, that thin is attractive and fat is ugly; that young people are deserving of sex while elders are not; that white skin is more beautiful than dark skin. While we shouldn’t let this observation dictate our sexual behaviour by immediately (and tokenistically) seeking out “diverse” sexual partners in the name of political correctness, it’s worth thinking about in the long term.
Radical feminist and scholar Gayle S. Rubin observed that there is a “charmed circle” of sexuality that the dominant culture constructs, with white, heterosexual sex between married partners at its centre and sex with trans people at its farthest edge. (For the record, Rubin places cis lesbian sex just one step closer to the centre than trans sex.)
There are a lot of lessons that we can pull from this, but I think the most salient one is the issue of access to erotic love and pleasure. Both cis and trans women who love women know the pain and loneliness of being shut out of the world of erotic fulfillment. A deep and compassionate understanding of this is crucial to an understanding of desirability politics: The struggle of people who are classified as “unfuckable” by the dominant culture—or whose desires lie outside the borders of the dominant culture—to be recognized as erotic beings with erotic worth and agency.
Interestingly, my own experience is that there is great inconsistency in the world when it comes to desirability politics. Some people will immediately agree when a fat woman asserts her right to be seen as equally beautiful and desirable as a thin woman, but then will have nothing to say when Asian men complain that they are heavily desexualized in Western culture; some will argue that it’s transphobic not to date trans people but then refuse themselves to date visibly disabled individuals.
I believe this speaks to the fragmented, highly traumatized state of sexuality in our collective consciousness. Sex, eroticism and attraction are a part of our deepest selves, yet they are inextricably intertwined with violence and shame in the dominant culture. So when we talk about sexual preference, I believe that it is both possible and preferable to work towards healing our erotic selves by entering into a more mindful and intentional relationship with desire. This is decidedly not about forcing ourselves into sex with someone we aren’t attracted to, but rather about making empowered choices to experiment and expand our desire at a pace and direction that feels right.
You mention, OLD, that you are not attracted to penises or “the way that trans women look,” which I think is fair in the sense that you know your own feelings best. Yet I have to point out that not all trans women have penises, and not all trans women look the same. You also identify as someone who loves women, and I imagine that you love more than their genitalia and their outward appearance. So what does this mean for your assertion that you are not attracted to trans women?
Choosing to stay open to new possibilities while also staying grounded in empowered choice offers us a third way forward in a world where clashing ideals tell us that we can only have love for trans women or consent for cis women, not both. Yet of course, love and consent can only thrive in the presence of one another. Reclaiming control over our own bodies can sometimes open new pathways to erotic joy—throughout history, a great many cis people have discovered a deep and powerful attraction to trans people despite being taught to revile us.
So much of the dominant, colonial, patriarchal culture is about force, violence and power over others—and sex is no exception. We are taught to see each other through suspicious eyes; the patriarchy tells cis lesbians to fear trans women and vice versa. What if we made the choice to let go of the impulse to cast each other in the roles of victim and villain, to regard each other through the eyes of possibility instead? What might we see?
I see women longing for safety and love, OLD. I see women who are worthy of both. I see a sisterhood that is strong enough to heal this whole broken world and breathe a new way of love into being.
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
Don't be a bigot, suck the girlcock.