Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

MrJokerRager said:
One of the biggest mind gymnastics has been turning this man, who is called "zion don" by real deal nazis and /pol/ tards, into Hitler.
Click to expand...

It never stops.

4224.png
Eh_QmneX0AgLg6q.jpeg
Eh_QqZ7WkAAOhHD.png
Eh_Qr9cX0AQAnuI.png
https://twitter.com/IfNotNowOrg/status/1305992217341820928 (https://archive.vn/FJ2vN)
 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Qajinima022, Adamska and 9 others
mandatorylurk said:
View attachment 1601048
















I didn't realize the TDS was so strong they didn't ask the press secretary anything about the peace deal yesterday, so she puts them on blast. What cunts.

Stay tuned to the end for a bitchy little soyboy reporter screaming out "Kayleigh, if he's a law and order President why does he keep breaking the law????"
Click to expand...


God damn, I bet she is great in bed. Fucking fiesty.
 
  • Feels
  • Deviant
  • Agree
Reactions: Exterminate Leftists, Dracula's Spirit Animal, Ebonic Tutor and 11 others
Getting tard comed said:
If that's true doesnt that imply something is wrong with vaccines? I mean.. apply that to cars, or refrigeration, or airplane manufacturers. Would buy a car from a company that was not liable? Not to say nobody should ever take a vaccine but any sensible person has to see why that set up could possibly raise concerns.
Click to expand...

Every vaccine can cause side effects. Every single one. As long as the potential side effects are known and disclosed to the recipient, as they are, the manufacturer is blameless. Not to mention, no one's forcing you to get vaccinated. You're making a choice. You acknowledge the risks when you sign that piece of paper listing all of the vaccine info (including known possible side effects!) before they give you the shot.

Let me elaborate a bit more about vaccine manufacturing and development. Vaccines take huge amounts of time and money to research, test, and manufacture. Most vaccine development fails. All that money is pissed away. Vaccine researchers work on very tight margins, hoping for the one hit that will finance the next thing down the line. It's an enormous effort to bring a vaccine to market.

So say you take away the manufacturers' indemnity? Every single person who gets the vaccine, chooses to get the vaccine, can now sue for experiencing side effects. Guess what? You've got millions of lawsuits on our hands. Every class action shark in America would want in on that action. Some of those lawsuits would inevitably succeed, some of the awards would be huge, legal bills for defending against these lawsuits would suck up even more money.

The result is simple to see. No one would bother to research vaccines because no one would manufacture them. There would be zero money in it.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Exterminate Leftists, Bibendum, spiritofamermaid and 11 others
 
  • Like
Reactions: Exterminate Leftists, Burned Man, spiritofamermaid and 9 others
Karl_der_Grosse said:
Every vaccine can cause side effects. Every single one. As long as the potential side effects are known and disclosed to the recipient, as they are, the manufacturer is blameless. Not to mention, no one's forcing you to get vaccinated. You're making a choice. You acknowledge the risks when you sign that piece of paper listing all of the vaccine info (including known possible side effects!) before they give you the shot.

Let me elaborate a bit more about vaccine manufacturing and development. Vaccines take huge amounts of time and money to research, test, and manufacture. Most vaccine development fails. All that money is pissed away. Vaccine researchers work on very tight margins, hoping for the one hit that will finance the next thing down the line. It's an enormous effort to bring a vaccine to market.

So say you take away the manufacturers' indemnity? Every single person who gets the vaccine, chooses to get the vaccine, can now sue for experiencing side effects. Guess what? You've got millions of lawsuits on our hands. Every class action shark in America would want in on that action. Some of those lawsuits would inevitably succeed, some of the awards would be huge, legal bills for defending against these lawsuits would suck up even more money.

The result is simple to see. No one would bother to research vaccines because no one would manufacture them. There would be zero money in it.
Click to expand...
Can we continue this in pms? I don't want to derail the thread but I have questions about this. Theres conflicting information in this very thread about development time and costs of vaccines. There are pushes for mandatory vaccines children have to get in order to go to school. Again, I'm not saying all vaccines are bad but it's a very reasonable position to not be OK with the only way people can get recourse for actual damages that happen being removed from them. If a side effect happens that isn't reported or the people/parents weren't made aware of that is separate from the ones they are made aware of that should be open to liability imo.

As I said would love to continue you this in pms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Flaming Insignias, Shaka Brah and 3 others
Wulfpack Legend said:
Click to expand...
Thumbed to the 4 min mark and it looks like a news story with the sound off. Isn't this supposed be comedy? Also, Triump looks like a Hartley Hooligan in the thumbnail.

I know comedy, and pretty much every other form of media, is an extension of DNC propaganda.
 
Last edited:
Looks like an early attempt at an October surprise.

Screenshot 2020-09-17 at 12.12.59 PM.png


Article here, archive here, though you already know the drill. Nobody saw it, never reported it, she continued hanging out with Trump for days afterwards, but now she suddenly feels brave and supported by all the other women's stories, so now she's coming forward, etc.

Screenshot 2020-09-17 at 12.14.55 PM.png


The Guardian apparently had this story for 15 months, but only now it the correct time to release it. Yeah, sure.

The Guardian first heard about Dorris’s accusation against Trump via a model agent she had worked with in Chicago, in whom she had confided. Dorris first shared her allegation with the Guardian in confidence 15 months ago, but was unsure about going public. She recently decided she was ready to take that step, in part to be a role model to her daughters, who are now in their teens.
Click to expand...
 
  • Lunacy
  • Agree
Reactions: A Friendly Hoovy, madethistocomment, AnitaSarsleezian and 16 others
Harvey Danger said:
Looks like an early attempt at an October surprise.

View attachment 1602547

Article here, archive here, though you already know the drill. Nobody saw it, never reported it, she continued hanging out with Trump for days afterwards, but now she suddenly feels brave and supported by all the other women's stories, so now she's coming forward, etc.

View attachment 1602554

The Guardian apparently had this story for 15 months, but only now it the correct time to release it. Yeah, sure.
Click to expand...

How long before it's become another nothingburger like the others? I stopped counting all these nothingburgers.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: madethistocomment, US Marine Hyde, spiritofamermaid and 10 others
Harvey Danger said:
Looks like an early attempt at an October surprise.

View attachment 1602547

Article here, archive here, though you already know the drill. Nobody saw it, never reported it, she continued hanging out with Trump for days afterwards, but now she suddenly feels brave and supported by all the other women's stories, so now she's coming forward, etc.

View attachment 1602554

The Guardian apparently had this story for 15 months, but only now it the correct time to release it. Yeah, sure.
Click to expand...
I like how they've tried to pull this specific sort of scandal so many times with an absolutely 0% rate of success that when I see a new person pop up with allegations of sexual assault against Donald Trump, my brain doesn't even register it enough to make it to the "I don't believe them" stage. It automatically rejects it as white noise like I just skimmed past some article about which shoes to buy for the autumn season or some bullshit.

I don't even remember how many of these people have alleged this stuff, anymore. All I can remember for sure is that E. Jean Carrol got thrown under the bus so fast and so hard that you can still make out the Carrol-shaped dent in the pavement. I really just don't care, anymore. They've lied about these so many times that I don't consider any of these allegations worth even listening to. They need to front some actual, legitimate evidence or I'm just automatically going to ignore anything that they say.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Exterminate Leftists, Jub-Jub, Dededon't and 31 others
It's HK-47 said:
I don't even remember how many of these people have alleged this stuff, anymore. All I can remember for sure is that E. Jean Carrol got thrown under the bus so fast and so hard that you can still make out the Carrol-shaped dent in the pavement.
Click to expand...

The funniest part of that was when a few months ago they quietly got out the spatula and pried her out of that dent to do a bit of moderate shilling of her (inevitable) book, hoping that everyone had forgotten how batshit and obviously lying she was.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: BIG BILL HELL'S, spiritofamermaid, Adamska and 7 others
It's HK-47 said:
I like how they've tried to pull this specific sort of scandal so many times with an absolutely 0% rate of success that when I see a new person pop up with allegations of sexual assault against Donald Trump, my brain doesn't even register it enough to make it to the "I don't believe them" stage. It automatically rejects it as white noise like I just skimmed past some article about which shoes to buy for the autumn season or some bullshit.

I don't even remember how many of these people have alleged this stuff, anymore. All I can remember for sure is that E. Jean Carrol got thrown under the bus so fast and so hard that you can still make out the Carrol-shaped dent in the pavement. I really just don't care, anymore. They've lied about these so many times that I don't consider any of these allegations worth even listening to. They need to front some actual, legitimate evidence or I'm just automatically going to ignore anything that they say.
Click to expand...

Not only does it never work, it just gets more publicity for the accused, same with Clinton and Broaddrick. Doesn't work for any political party.

You can almost hear the squishyness of the global audience eye roll each time one of these shameless news sensations break.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: US Marine Hyde, spiritofamermaid and Adamska
It's HK-47 said:
I like how they've tried to pull this specific sort of scandal so many times with an absolutely 0% rate of success that when I see a new person pop up with allegations of sexual assault against Donald Trump, my brain doesn't even register it enough to make it to the "I don't believe them" stage. It automatically rejects it as white noise like I just skimmed past some article about which shoes to buy for the autumn season or some bullshit.

I don't even remember how many of these people have alleged this stuff, anymore. All I can remember for sure is that E. Jean Carrol got thrown under the bus so fast and so hard that you can still make out the Carrol-shaped dent in the pavement. I really just don't care, anymore. They've lied about these so many times that I don't consider any of these allegations worth even listening to. They need to front some actual, legitimate evidence or I'm just automatically going to ignore anything that they say.
Click to expand...
This is the 33rd.
 
  • DRINK!
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Exterminate Leftists, Kane Lives, ForTheHoard and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back