So the Rust Belt poll is coming out later today at The Epoch Times. Keep an eye on Richard Baris's Twitter when he releases the results.
These polls seem to favor the Orange Man, but I wouldn't be so sure unless I get a full amount of the people surveyed and not just percentages.
The Rasmussen poll polled 2500 people that are considered to be likely voters. The sampling error is +/-2% with a 95% level of confidence. It's like what Baris is saying, Biden needs those unlikely voters to win and he only gets them through unsolicited mail-in ballot.
Not to say that I don't have my own issues with the poll itself - there's no reason why Hispanics should not at least be its own category and Jo Jorgensen warrants her own category since she will grab at least 1% of the vote. But at the same time, they could be closer to the final result than we think. Trump needs to improve his margin with white voters even if I think they're better than what Rasmussen is showing here.
Baris keeps insisting that Trump is blowing out northern MN and the Iron range. They say he is also going betterin Twin Cities/ Minneapolis. He said Barnes is right that all Iron Range countys could flip. MN might be the path to Trump's win because of these mail-in ballots due to MN's extremely high voter turnout and low fraud culture.
I want to see the results for myself but if that is true, I may file Minnesota under Likely Trump. I don't agree with Baris that Pennsyvlania is Trump's 3rd best state in the Rust Belt since Minnesota has a higher percentage of white voters and what he has hinted are increased turnouts for him in Minnesota. Plus low fraud culture makes me think Trump will flip the state at a higher percentage than Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, possibly combined.
IMO, the order is Ohio, Iowa, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan.
I do agree that Trump has few paths to victory without Minnesota. If that state falls, so does Wisconsin and Michigan and Trump has to keep Pennsylvania and grab either New Hampshire or Arizona.
View attachment 1602543
...I swear to god, if there's not a reckoning for Twitter after this election...
Edit: Sorry did I say "Twitter?" I meant "Twitter and Facebook and Google and..."
View attachment 1602545
When did a bunch of autistic soy filled faggots in the deepest blue part of California decide they had the right to decide our elections more than we do, and why haven't we hung them for it yet?
I'll echo the sentiment someone else expressed here, but I hate this election so much. We have never seen such a brazen election interference in this country's history and it's obvious why. The moment Trump leaves office, they are going to come for us.
Honest to God, I wonder why Trump doesn't just sick Pajeet Pai on their asses. Maybe because it would open a can of worms that you can't open. Still, there has to be something he can do to fix this obvious one way biased shit and not just "closely moniter" it.
It really fucking sucks that Trump has to depend on his Pennsylvania numbers to exceed the fraud they produce in Philly in 3 days, Minnesota, a state that hasn't voted Republican in half a century, and Arizona and NH, two states that we are currently in the dark about. This election really might come down to the debates + the vaccine coming before November.
Less dooming, more info.
View attachment 1602580
Vaccines, maybe. The debates, no outside possibly the Harris vs. Pence VP debate no one pays attention to. Everyone hoping for a Trump blowout in what will be rigged up and down for Sleepy Joe will be disappointed. We're not going to get Biden saying "Nigger", we're not going to get a meltdown. We just have to hope Trump doesn't fall for a kafka trap during those three debates.
Good thing Trump is beating Biden when it comes to who they trust with the economy more though. Trump lost that to Clinton and he still won the election.