Quinton Reviews / Quinton Kyle Hoover / Q_Review / OttselSpy24 / OttselSpy25 - I KNOW WE HIT THE LIMIT FOR ME TO DO THEM, BUT THOSE THINGS TAKE TIME, NOW SHUT UP AND LET ME TALK ABOUT GARFIELD AND MCDONALDS, WHILE MOCKING OTHER YOUTUBERS!!

Is Quinton able to redeem himself?

  • YASS QUEEN SLAY

    Votes: 273 13.4%
  • Not without Caleb

    Votes: 287 14.1%
  • Only inside a bouncy castle

    Votes: 801 39.3%
  • After his love quest is over

    Votes: 648 31.8%
  • With the love of a true and honest whaman

    Votes: 567 27.8%

  • Total voters
    2,036
Quinton's feeling extra big-brained today. Claims that the US invented slavery:
1600376325585.png1600376351081.png
https://twitter.com/Q_Review/status/1306693219036655617 (Archive)
https://twitter.com/Q_Review/status/1306694855985422337 (Archive)
 
Last edited:
Since I know Q definitely lurks here due to his obsession with his own popularity, let me dumb my insult down to a pop culture reference so that he's actually able to understand it.
brains.jpg
:
"His brain is the portrait of atrophy
He ain't using it, why not give it to me?"
 
Both the person the first quote tweeted and the Quinton are pretty dumb because the founding fathers in terms of slavery were divided and even created the electoral system divided between slave states and free states.That why as one they both put in place things that kept slavery and helped end slavery simultaneously.


fgw4t35gvag.png

https://archive.vn/wip/oQNYO | ARCHIVE

They are also the reason that slavery didn't exist in half the other states. To attribute slave states to the Founding father while not attributing the free states is disingenuous.

Another thing the reason black people were seen as 3/5 is because the abolitionist, who were against slavery, could not get them to be counted as 0. You know why they wanted them to count as 0 Quinton? The states where debating taxes rates, representation, and things that were highly dependent on the populations of the state so the abolitionist knowing that the southern states would want to get black people to count as 1 to increase their political power opposed the representation of blacks as 1 person. The compromise came after non of states could come to a consensus so they compromised. This is why the argument can be made that giving even 3/5 helped keep slavery since the southern states grew to have a larger political power and therefore slavery was harder to get rid of.
 
Last edited:

This is what happens when you go to public school and the entire American History curriculum is Revolutionary War -> Slavery n sheeeeeeeit, whites bad -> Civil War -> Civil Rights movement, whites bad (again). Instead of spending ~10 years teaching kids the roughly 500 years of America's actual history they spend 10 years teaching kids about the same four decades over and over and it rots their brain, they start to see all of history through that extremely narrow window.
 
Last edited:
smh at this internalized fatphobia. all bodies are beautiful bodies, sweaty! :) Quinton needs to be more body positive :) his favourite, orange cat is a tremendous fatass absolute unit. Quinton just needs to love himself the way he loves Garfield
Quinton isn't as cute or endearing as Garfield.

Both the person the first quote tweeted and the Quinton are pretty dumb because the founding fathers in terms of slavery were divided and even created the electoral system divided between slave states and free states.That why as one they both put in place things that kept slavery and helped end slavery simultaneously.


View attachment 1603220
https://archive.vn/wip/oQNYO | ARCHIVE

They are also the reason that slavery didn't exist in half the other states. To attribute slave states to the Founding father while not attributing the free states is disingenuous.

Another thing the reason black people were seen as 3/5 is because the abolitionist, who were against slavery, could not get them to be counted as 0. You know why they wanted them to count as 0 Quinton? The states where debating taxes rates, representation, and things that were highly dependent on the populations of the state so the abolitionist knowing that the southern states would want to get black people to count as 1 to increase their political power opposed the representation of blacks as 1 person. The compromise came after non of states could come to a consensus so they compromised. This is why the argument can be made that giving even 3/5 helped keep slavery since the southern states grew to have a larger political power and therefore slavery was harder to get rid of.
The concern trolling over the 3/5ths Clause is the dumbest, most shallow lowest common denominator take. If these morons had lived back then, they would have given the slave states more political power just so they could virtue signal.

Personally I always thought counting slaves as 0 for the purpose of representation was the only position that made sense. You can't say they're property, can't vote, and have no rights, but then say politicians elected by people who own them somehow represent them.
 
Last edited:
Back