Cultcow Russell Greer / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,448 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 607 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,593
I don't have much knowledge about US laws, so can anyone explain to me why didn't he just stick to no contest plea? It seemed a better deal than this.
I'm not totally sure but I think a no contest plea isn't always available, and can sometimes be rescinded.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Da Dude123
I'm not totally sure but I think a no contest plea isn't always available, and can sometimes be rescinded.
The problem wasn’t that he couldn’t plead no contest anymore, it’s that the deal with the prosecutor that was offered was available for him to plead no contest at the start. Prosecutors do this to get things through the system faster and get closure for all parties. Russ, in typical idiot Russ fashion, decided the if the deal included a mental health evaluation he would rather go to trial. That ended the deal for pleading.
Something changed since the last hearing and Russ decided to plead guilty, but now without a deal, the judge gave Russ what the judge thought was appropriate.

So in short, Russ is a fucking moron who shot himself in the dick for no reason.
 
Russ: listen to my side of the story before you judge

Russ's side of the story: it should be illegal to not suck me my pp

it's astonishing that he thinks that revealing his TRUE AND HONEST intentions will cause people to feel empathy/think Erika's a piece of shit?

Russhole's side is that he should get his way always because his face is busted and he hasn't gotten what he wants yet. He would gussy it up with colorful language about victimhood and pity fishing, but that's what it boils down to.

In this particular story, Russ' side is that he wanted to be with Erika and she shut him down and wouldn't "talk it out". Erika's side is that he became obsessive, possessive, and threatening. He made her feel uncomfortable and told him to stop contacting her. He continued to pursue her after he had been told SEVERAL times not to, and Erika had to get the legal system involved so she can have the peace in her life that she has every right to. The court looked at both sides and agreed that Erika is the victim in this story. Russ loses...again.
 
Regarding who the evaluation must be completed by and who decides:
Since he has been ordered to receive a third-party evaluation that means he does not get to use his prior providers or a DOC contracted psychologist. Probation has a list of providers and agencies with whom they recognize provide assessments meeting minimum court standards and he will be told to choose one of those. If he wants to choose his own person outside of that he can certainly go to someone else and have the evaluation completed but he will have to justify the reasoning for the outside evaluator. He could have all the evaluations he wants until he finds one he likes, but for any to be accepted, they’d have to include collateral from the courts. And so I doubt it would do much good and he cannot afford to eval shop. But...Technically, if it came down to it and he had managed to get an evaluation from someone new who said what Russell wanted, judge would bring in the evaluator and question them on their credentials and expertise and the attorneys could go so far as to question them on their findings and have their own expert witnesses to impeach testimony or dispute evaluation.

I highly doubt it will ever get that far for a B misdemeanor. Most of the shrinks who can be bought off to say whatever are too expensive for him to afford and the rest would see how impossible it would be to justify anything but a recommendation for intense therapy and wouldn’t risk their license over Russell.


Do you know if whoever does the psych assessment would be given any information regarding what charges Russhole plead guilty to? Would they possibly be given any of the evidence submitted by the prosecution/Erika's attorney on the case? I hope so, because the latter in particular would nuke any chance Russhole might have to try to convince the doctor that he's not a creepy stalker and sex pest. Can you imagine Russhole being put on the spot by a psychologist asking him why he was threatening poor Erika with going to her home and committing suicide outside it? I know we'd never hear about the true results of his eval, but it would still be nice to know if the evaluator would have those sorts of background details and documents to help make their judgment call.
 
Those of us who have been here from the start will remember when Russ disabled his Facebook regularly. We called it “rage quitting” but it usually wasn’t about rage, but control.

I just thought of it because now, instead, he does vaguebooking, like that “listen to both sides” post. Russ won’t chimp, he’ll just vaguebook and we’ll have to read between the lines. When things go bad for him, he rarely mentions it until he makes up a good story about why he was wronged. He has been silent before.

So he got probation-but what does that mean, exactly? He has to go to therapy, and he has to leave Erika alone? Can he still contact other women? Even if not, He may, although he may lay off the “I sent you an awesome DM” for a while. He’ll still send the DM, but may be hesitant to make it public. He may stop his reviews-or not, since he doesn’t connect them with women, but companies. I don’t think he will have any issues leaving Erika alone now, but there is no way he won’t contact other women. Is that considered a probation violation? I’m thinking no, unless he starts stalking them-and then, most importantly, she’ll have to report it.

We all say Russ has learned nothing and it’s true. But he doesn’t have to rage quit on FB anymore, and I think he can harass a woman without anybody knowing. Unless she comes forward (and most don’t) who would know?

Maybe I’m misunderstanding what his probation entails, but I thought it was solely about electronically harassing Erica. Maybe it encompasses all females but again...they would have to say something. I don’t think the Court can say “You can never speak to a woman again.”

It will be interesting as time goes on, what slips. I’m not as certain or as enthusiastic that we’ll get more info on this, or hear what the psych says. I think we’ll see lots of posts about national donut day, or whatever, and maybe some songs about celebrities. Back in his fantasy hollywood dream world until the 18 months is up, Covid is over, and brothels let him in again.
 
So he got probation-but what does that mean, exactly? He has to go to therapy, and he has to leave Erika alone? Can he still contact other women?
Yes. I don't think it's even possible for circumstances to exist that would give a court the power to tell someone that they can't have contact with any adult women. That's an extremely broad restriction on someone's right to speech and association. If someone had offended against a child they might be ordered to have no contact with minors, but that's about as close as it gets. Literal serial rapist killers are still allowed to receive and respond to mail from women while they're in prison.
 
Those of us who have been here from the start will remember when Russ disabled his Facebook regularly. We called it “rage quitting” but it usually wasn’t about rage, but control.

He slowly stopped doing that. It really goes to show how many people he has driven away that he doesn't have to worry about 'friends' responding to his posts anymore when he's not around.
 
Do you know if whoever does the psych assessment would be given any information regarding what charges Russhole plead guilty to? Would they possibly be given any of the evidence submitted by the prosecution/Erika's attorney on the case? I hope so, because the latter in particular would nuke any chance Russhole might have to try to convince the doctor that he's not a creepy stalker and sex pest. Can you imagine Russhole being put on the spot by a psychologist asking him why he was threatening poor Erika with going to her home and committing suicide outside it? I know we'd never hear about the true results of his eval, but it would still be nice to know if the evaluator would have those sorts of background details and documents to help make their judgment call.

I'm sure the situation regarding why Russ has been court ordered to undergo a psych eval will be provided for the head shrinker conducting the evaluation so they can focus on the pertinent aspects of Shit-lips' psyche. I don’t know if the shrink will be privy to every little detail and minutiae of the case, but they will be informed that he was convicted of a crime regarding criminal harassment of a woman and will likely be informed of his obsessive and possessive behavior. It would be pretty difficult for a psychoanalyst to properly psychoanalyze someone and offer the court conclusive results if the analyst goes in completely blind.

Those of us who have been here from the start will remember when Russ disabled his Facebook regularly. We called it “rage quitting” but it usually wasn’t about rage, but control.

I just thought of it because now, instead, he does vaguebooking, like that “listen to both sides” post. Russ won’t chimp, he’ll just vaguebook and we’ll have to read between the lines. When things go bad for him, he rarely mentions it until he makes up a good story about why he was wronged. He has been silent before.

So he got probation-but what does that mean, exactly? He has to go to therapy, and he has to leave Erika alone? Can he still contact other women? Even if not, He may, although he may lay off the “I sent you an awesome DM” for a while. He’ll still send the DM, but may be hesitant to make it public. He may stop his reviews-or not, since he doesn’t connect them with women, but companies. I don’t think he will have any issues leaving Erika alone now, but there is no way he won’t contact other women. Is that considered a probation violation? I’m thinking no, unless he starts stalking them-and then, most importantly, she’ll have to report it.

We all say Russ has learned nothing and it’s true. But he doesn’t have to rage quit on FB anymore, and I think he can harass a woman without anybody knowing. Unless she comes forward (and most don’t) who would know?

Maybe I’m misunderstanding what his probation entails, but I thought it was solely about electronically harassing Erica. Maybe it encompasses all females but again...they would have to say something. I don’t think the Court can say “You can never speak to a woman again.”

It will be interesting as time goes on, what slips. I’m not as certain or as enthusiastic that we’ll get more info on this, or hear what the psych says. I think we’ll see lots of posts about national donut day, or whatever, and maybe some songs about celebrities. Back in his fantasy hollywood dream world until the 18 months is up, Covid is over, and brothels let him in again.

Right, the court does not have the authority to tell Russ he is verboten from contacting ALL women. Just Erika in this case since she has the right to tell Russ to fuck off and leave her alone and have Russ comply. Now, if Russ pulls this shit with another woman (and he absolutely will eventually) and she tells him to go pound sand, and Russhole being Russhole continues to harass her...if that happens in the next 18mos and she files criminal charges against him then it absolutely will be a violation of his parole conditions, which will mean the 180 days in jail will need to be served (along with everything else), and he may be required to undergo the psycho-sexual evaluation as well. If Rat-mouth gets arrested for ANY reason it will be a violation of his parole, not just contacting Erika or some other woman pressing charges against him for harassment.

And I will not be surprised if well-meaning weens start warning any woman Russ contacts on social media about his shiny new criminal conviction, urging them to contact law enforcement and press charges against him for harassment. We aren't the only ones keeping an eye on Russ, and other sites keeping tabs on him don't have the same rules against fondling the fecal matter that we do.

He slowly stopped doing that. It really goes to show how many people he has driven away that he doesn't have to worry about 'friends' responding to his posts anymore when he's not around.

Does he still lock down his FB profile by temporarily deactivating it whenever he's not able to keep an eye on it? Or has he totally driven away anyone who might try to make him come to his senses by voicing their "dissenting views" (read: trying to reason with Russ) or "hating on Russ" (read: not humoring his delusions) to where he's comfortable just leaving it active all the time?
 
Russ Vegas.png
 
Back