- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
Yeah, I can't believe she's focusing on that instead of the shit like the Pedoshield law or the AIDS Spreader Protection law.
Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
Yeah, I can't believe she's focusing on that instead of the shit like the Pedoshield law or the AIDS Spreader Protection law.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2020
So you were willing to put a curse on a place where over 350k Jews were also evacuated, possibly lost their homes or lives? Let's say that even 10% were of your sect, then that would be 35k. All of that for one person? God forgives such behavior?Meanwhile, the county in California that I put a curse on for financially oppressing my spouse, which impacts me as well, is burning in wildfires to the point of evacuation....
View attachment 1603388
The whole state is in flames, and evacuating, like they've never seen before....
Welcome to Daily Wildfire Report
www.fire.ca.gov
I wonder if The Scorpion and her husband rolled out
WHERE YOU AT WITCH?
Where do you live? I didn't realize u
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2019
the sick disgusting, psychotic god of the torah certainly does! Ask the Canaanites, the Amalekites, etc, etc. Oh, that's right, you can't!! Because these freaks genocided them, and many other peoples, too.Supposedly blessed by their pig of a god.
Mein Kampf has nothing on the Torah by any measure.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Where is the moral principle written down that I have to supply you citations in an informal debate?
Except that:
1. I've worked as a Homeschool Co-op teacher owned by another homescooling family
2. I continue to work as a teacher in a Homeschool Co-op
3. I'v been cited in online legal news
4. I've been cited as a foundational case in other case law and;
5. I've been cited by other theological scholars
SO, yea, there's that
I bet you were a C student in High School. I can so so so tell!
Didn't read.
Another sexual fetish I have is for my female to poop in a condom and tie the condom closed. Then freeze the condom. I then want her to fuck my ass and throat with this new poo dildo I have invented.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2020
Did I see your baby Yoda smile widen from across the room as you wrote that?
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
This, to us, weird callousness when it comes to other people losing property or even their lives, really does make it seem like she doesn't fully grasp that other people, billions of them, are just as real and multifaceted (as in - with aspirations, hopes, fears, love for others) as her.
Stuff like Covid-19 happening in the US (but also globally ofc.) being somehow tied to her god looking out for her not getting evicted, or that a hurricane tearing through Null's old area being a "messenger" or something - It genuinely makes me feel like she has some personality disorder that was never diagnosed, beyond just delusional grandeur. Then again, it might have been diagnosed and she just never acknowledged it. That aside, there is an "ability" (I am not sure that can be considered the proper word though) I am just not seeing here.
There is a term known as "Mentalization" that has been adopted more and more over the past 2 decades by various schools of psychology, initially to find new ways to help people with Borderline Personality Disorder.
It's essentially our ability to understand our own feelings and those of others properly, in a social context - your level of ability to mentalize is essentially how well you can recognize and interpret the complex state of mind and consequently the motivations of others (as well as yourself) correctly. This isn't just empathy. Empathy is feeling with someone else - You see someone cry, you might feel a portion of that sadness.
Mentalization however, is recognizing and dealing with it correctly in others as well as oneself. It is an essential skill, usually developed during early childhood and honed, trained and refined through socialization as we grow up.
Obviously everyone can see how this is important - if you see a person grinning and you are poor at mentalizing, you might immediately assume wrongly, that that person is ridiculing you. You might then assume that person is laughing at you maliciously. You might then assume that this maliciousness might translate into real, malicious action against you. Consequently your reaction might negatively influence the outcome of that situation.
You might make all these assumptions, even as you observe the person looking at their phone a moment before - which means they may have just read a funny message before looking up in your general direction. This is one side of mentalization, recognizing the complex state of mind of others and then adjusting our state of mind based on it.
The other side is then, introspective. Say that all the evidence, to me, points to that person grinning at me maliciously (because I'm in a bad mood and I didn't see them checking their phone). Someone who can mentalize properly internally (or recover from lapses in mentalization), will then categorize this in a healthy way. Perhaps they will see that their assumptions could be flawed, due to their mood. Perhaps they will realize that people grin all the time and it is therefore not relevant, or related, to them. Or, even if it WAS directed at them, it is a perceived slight that can easily be overlooked and ignored (in fact, overlooking it might be the best course of action overall - who cares who grins at whom). Thus, good mentalization is a shield against paranoia, unwarranted fear and anger.
Consequently, even if one's initial assumption (malicious grinning) is wrong, one's acute mentalization can still cause a positive outcome. It is pretty much a MUST, for any long term relationship, big or small, between someone as close as a spouse or as far as a bureaucrat, to work properly. Because misinterpreting the motivations of others and thus reacting in a manner utterly surprising and unfitting (to the other party), is a basic recipe for interpersonal disaster.
Sorry for the monologue / psychsperging, but you guys can probably see why I find this concept worth mentioning here.
For a quick overview, see Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2013). Mentalization-based treatment. Psychoanalytic inquiry, 33(6), 595-613.
Or really anything by those two, 's basically the only subject they get published on.
Stuff like Covid-19 happening in the US (but also globally ofc.) being somehow tied to her god looking out for her not getting evicted, or that a hurricane tearing through Null's old area being a "messenger" or something - It genuinely makes me feel like she has some personality disorder that was never diagnosed, beyond just delusional grandeur. Then again, it might have been diagnosed and she just never acknowledged it. That aside, there is an "ability" (I am not sure that can be considered the proper word though) I am just not seeing here.
There is a term known as "Mentalization" that has been adopted more and more over the past 2 decades by various schools of psychology, initially to find new ways to help people with Borderline Personality Disorder.
It's essentially our ability to understand our own feelings and those of others properly, in a social context - your level of ability to mentalize is essentially how well you can recognize and interpret the complex state of mind and consequently the motivations of others (as well as yourself) correctly. This isn't just empathy. Empathy is feeling with someone else - You see someone cry, you might feel a portion of that sadness.
Mentalization however, is recognizing and dealing with it correctly in others as well as oneself. It is an essential skill, usually developed during early childhood and honed, trained and refined through socialization as we grow up.
Obviously everyone can see how this is important - if you see a person grinning and you are poor at mentalizing, you might immediately assume wrongly, that that person is ridiculing you. You might then assume that person is laughing at you maliciously. You might then assume that this maliciousness might translate into real, malicious action against you. Consequently your reaction might negatively influence the outcome of that situation.
You might make all these assumptions, even as you observe the person looking at their phone a moment before - which means they may have just read a funny message before looking up in your general direction. This is one side of mentalization, recognizing the complex state of mind of others and then adjusting our state of mind based on it.
The other side is then, introspective. Say that all the evidence, to me, points to that person grinning at me maliciously (because I'm in a bad mood and I didn't see them checking their phone). Someone who can mentalize properly internally (or recover from lapses in mentalization), will then categorize this in a healthy way. Perhaps they will see that their assumptions could be flawed, due to their mood. Perhaps they will realize that people grin all the time and it is therefore not relevant, or related, to them. Or, even if it WAS directed at them, it is a perceived slight that can easily be overlooked and ignored (in fact, overlooking it might be the best course of action overall - who cares who grins at whom). Thus, good mentalization is a shield against paranoia, unwarranted fear and anger.
Consequently, even if one's initial assumption (malicious grinning) is wrong, one's acute mentalization can still cause a positive outcome. It is pretty much a MUST, for any long term relationship, big or small, between someone as close as a spouse or as far as a bureaucrat, to work properly. Because misinterpreting the motivations of others and thus reacting in a manner utterly surprising and unfitting (to the other party), is a basic recipe for interpersonal disaster.
Sorry for the monologue / psychsperging, but you guys can probably see why I find this concept worth mentioning here.
For a quick overview, see Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2013). Mentalization-based treatment. Psychoanalytic inquiry, 33(6), 595-613.
Or really anything by those two, 's basically the only subject they get published on.
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2020
Psycho-babble of psychology is not more important than the Word of Elohim. Your belief that everyone has to have positive feelings toward everyone is not only HYPOCRITICAL, but also erroneous!
"Far be it from you to do such a thing — to kill the righteous along with the wicked, so that the righteous and the wicked are treated alike! Far be it from you! Shouldn’t the judge of all the earth do what is just?”" (Genesis 18:25)
If there were Righteous people left in any of those towns, Elohim would not bring disaster and calamity upon it.
"God" is a false name in violation of The Torah. Shows how little you know!
Why do you say that? Because they are MEN?
If they were right they wouldn't be losing the war in Israel for 72 years now!
Karaites and Reform Jews reject The Talmud too. You're a moron
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2017
Looks like a direct hit, @Bloitzhole.
ETA: Looks like Melinda woke up Big Mad this morning. She really doesn't like all the new users in the thread shitting on her shitty life, shitty 'religion', shitty lawsuits, and shitty personality. What a failure she is, as any sort of human being.
ETA: Looks like Melinda woke up Big Mad this morning. She really doesn't like all the new users in the thread shitting on her shitty life, shitty 'religion', shitty lawsuits, and shitty personality. What a failure she is, as any sort of human being.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
Did someone mention 'calamity'?
Honestly it's pretty funny, she was the one complaining about how it's all the same people replying to her retardation. But now that more people are discovering her thread and poking holes in her arguments and calling her out for her retarded views, it's clear by how she's typing that she is absolutely seething and I fucking love it.
Honestly it's pretty funny, she was the one complaining about how it's all the same people replying to her retardation. But now that more people are discovering her thread and poking holes in her arguments and calling her out for her retarded views, it's clear by how she's typing that she is absolutely seething and I fucking love it.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2019
LOL. No Real Scotsman argument about the genocides jews committed. Since you claim this is valid, it would be just as valid for someone to murder you and say "If she wasn't a sinful witch and whore, God wouldn't have allowed me to kill her" Hopefully this happens, and sooner than later.
As for Israel, they have been winning the war from the start, never faltering.SOme religious types even call the victory of the 6 Day War a true miracle. They may have a point.
In the face of the emnity of the majority of the whole world, merely sutviving (let alone prospering so heartily) is itself a victory.
Also, if they lose, who's to say it's the Talmud that brought them low rather than the torah? Not as if they've ever won before...
As for reform jews, it's hilarious you advocate the reform heresy as valid given it flies in the face of the torah you claim so heartily to venerate, by reinterpreting the word and the intent of the thing, blaspheming and degrading the torah by interpreting it through the cracked and filthy lens of marxist /3rd wave feminism. No surprise here, really, as you also worship the false Prophet Jesus of Nazareth breaking the 1st Commandment. The biggest sin of all. Golden Calf, much Mel?
Spare us the cope excuses of why your version isn't sinful heresy, we've heard it before and it's the rantings of a spoiled child
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2020
If science and education aren't more important than "Elohim", then why did you go to study law? Surely the law of "Elohim" is grander than the law in your eyes, so why bother wanting to study it and following US law?
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2014
Probably for the same reason as Russ Greer. To use as a cudgel to try and force people to do what she wants.
Following US law? She obviously has no interest in that. She blatantly, and poorly, lied in her filing.
I almost wish it would make it to trial to watch that tissue paper get shredded.
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
Piglinda suffers from something called "magical thinking," which leads her to believe that simply because she believes something, the legal system will be forced to do what she wants it to do as long as she has an adequate knowledge of the formula she needs for a victorious lawsuit. It's a very weird trait that she shares with Russell Greer and with the "sovereign citizen" type nutjobs. But unlike Greer, who's literally incapable of believing that his "formula" was anything less than 100% flawless, and so he decides that his failures are just a result of discrimination coming from everyone else, Melinda insists that her failures were caused by minor technicalities in her case - avoidable errors that she believes she won't repeat. So while Greer learns absolutely nothing, Melinda learns "things that didn't work."
The fact that the very most basic premises of their claims simply aren't founded in law, however, and that no combination of the "correct" legal arguments will ever make it so, is just completely lost on them.
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2017
Just for a larf, Melinda: How many copies of your 'book' have been sold?
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2014
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2020
Considering she's shut the fuck up about her book once we found out what it is, I'd guess her sales numbers are somewhere in the double digits.
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2017
I doubt it's even in double digits, as far as actual outside sales go. Dorrance Publishing does have that deal where authors can buy copies of their own books at 1/2 list price to peddle themselves, so I'd bet Melinda has bought a few copies herself to peddle at flea markets and swap meets. At 11 bucks a pop.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
Not positive by default. This is you ascribing a motive or meaning to my words that does not line up with what I was conveying.
Good mentalization merely means that you correctly gauge what another person is thinking (or what their motive is) and the way that you then deal with that information is fitting and productive - and not an under- or overreaction, be it internal (crisis) or external (lashing out). Think like..... Having the mental acuity to be diplomatic, does not mean one HAS to be "complacent" - but if the situation calls for it, one will have the option.
Imagine that you are exiting a store and you're in a bad mood because of something that happened. A store manager happens to stand in your path, initially facing another direction but then making way as they see you wishing to pass. A person with exceptionally poor mentalization might then assume that the store employee is threatening them through their presence and stance alone and whip out a can of pepper spray, using it as they walk past. They ascribed a wrong motive (external flawed mentalization) and had a strong emotional reaction (internal flawed mentalization) that caused them to behave in a manner that did not at all fit the situation.
I reckon Melinda will value her work higher than that.
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2020
I can imagine peddling a signed copy of her book at some shitty Dottera seller group at a few thousand. She's got that kind of ego.
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2017
No, the book is listed for sale online at 22 dollars for a physical copy (9 bucks on kindle). Dorrance allows authors to buy copies of their own books for half list price. It's a way for Dorrance to get rid of the few physical copies that they're obligated by contract to actually print and bind. Otherwise those few copies will sit in a warehouse for a couple of years, until Dorrance is no longer bound by the contract and can legally pulp them.
Dorrance really is a scummy little outfit. They prey on people with huge egos and not many smarts like Melinda. The only reason I don't outright call them a scam publisher is that they do fulfill their contractual obligations. If you pay them the thousands of dollars they want, they do indeed print and sell your book (online). Melinda bragged on this book for months before we found out what it really was. She was so high on herself, insisting that it was going to be sold at major chains like Barnes & Noble and Walmart.
The reality is that Melinda paid 4 figures to have a very few physical copies of her 84-page book printed, and listed for sale at a ridiculous price online with several retailers. No one is going to pay 22 dollars for her book. Melinda will never see a dime of royalties. She blew the stimulus check she got, meant for necessities during a national emergency, on a pure vanity project. Just so she could brag on a website where people make fun of her that she's a published author. Well, congratulations, Melinda. You're an author. How has it improved your life or your children's lives?
The answer is that it hasn't. They still live in poverty, Melinda's still going to be evicted, and apparently cut off from HUD housing. Her marriage is still a sham. Marshall is still an unstable and violent dullard. And she wastes her time coming here to Kiwi Farms, day after day after day. Throwing her shit around like a chimp at the zoo, while we point and laugh. Because her ego cannot take the fact that people are laughing at her, because she thinks that if she finds the right magic words she'll shut us all up, that she'll get the last word in.