U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Meanwhile, in Maryland:
View attachment 1605400
Today I learned that some buses have a “Call Police” ticker on them.
Not universal but pretty common. Taxicabs, too- an additional green light up top that they flip on to basically ask any cop to pull them over because they are in trouble.
It'll only cause fags to riot for that idiot, unless the shooter happens to be black.
The chances of that are very good, statistically.
 
Shots fired in Rochester.
Screenshot 2020-09-18 223822.png

Link / Archive
 
I knew that looked like a suppressed M4 with live rounds. They are NOT fucking around tonight. Looks like PPB leading the charge and taking ground.

The M4 is there to deal with shooters among BLM/Antifa, with the ambushes happening lately it's reasonable to think someone is going to start taking shots at the police line, and Portland is one of the most likely places for it to happen first.

As the RBG hysteria revs up and police ambushes escalate I think we're going to see one or two people among BLM standoff crowds start to take shots at police lines then hide among the group, hoping to martyr the people around them.
 
Again, what leftism/feminism preaches:

What is negative feminism and anti-social queer theory? My fragmentary answer: it is a queer critique that aims to decenter positivity, productivity, redemptive politics of affirmation, narratives of success, and politics that are founded on hope for an imagined future. It’s rude politics and has no interest in being polite. It embraces masochism, anti-production, self-destructiveness, abjection, forgetfulness, radical passivity, aggressive negation, unintelligibility, negativity, punk pugilism, and anti-social attitudes as a form of resistance to liberal feminist and gay politics of cohesion. It’s about not-becoming because the notion of becoming is perceived as following the capitalist logic of production and models of success that are often tied up with colonialism. It asks, why the fuck should queers be nice? And asserts that politeness is heteronormative and we should embrace our utter failure at functioning within a colonialist, heteronormative, capitalist, racist, sexist and transphobic framework. Jack “Judith” Halberstam is an academic who has probably articulated this theory most lately. I want to talk about his theories and raise some pressing questions and criticisms of his controversial ideas in the context of my limited conversations with him. This essay is largely based on Jack’s article, The Anti-Social Turn in Queer Studies (pdf).

Also, feminism preached even in the 1970s Eugenics to be rid of men.

Leftists as we have seen push for pedo acceptance and push for trans and drag kids, push for the annihilation of the family and also push for humanities death cause Earth will heal and humanity is bad cause "Muh oppression"

Its not really surprising that they push that marriage and reproduction is bad. But if you pay attention, they currently only push it on White people. Other groups can have as many kids as they want. Leftists are now paying black women $1000 so that they can have more kids. If White people did this, you would hear the cries of Nazism non-stop.

Interesting, why is that if you don't mind me asking?

And its not just BLM. All mainstream Christian sects/denominations are pretty much leftists from what I have seen in the West at any rate. You have the Anglicans wanting to put Muslim symbols in their church to wanting to get rid of Jesus Christ and then you have the Sweden Lutherans who had Gay Adam and Gay Eve mural in their church which was only taken down cause trans got offended.

No. I say what I want.

Still scum.

Thats the hilarity with the righthoids. They think that cultural relativism is why they are losing. Thats false. Leftists only do cultural relativism for other cultures or nations. Conservatives, their own nations and white people are automatically pure evil while they are the good guys.

Exactly. You are getting it. Hence why feminism and leftism must be destroyed. Especially feminism, if nothing else. It above all must be destroyed.

Leftists push for not having kids but only towards white people which they then say that you guys need migrants to make up for the non-existent future citizen so said migrants replace the non-existent future citizen and also produce more kids then the white couple would have. So their so called environmental reason is complete bullshit.

Wrong. Even in the 1970s, leftism preached for eugenics. And they preached this:

What is negative feminism and anti-social queer theory? My fragmentary answer: it is a queer critique that aims to decenter positivity, productivity, redemptive politics of affirmation, narratives of success, and politics that are founded on hope for an imagined future. It’s rude politics and has no interest in being polite. It embraces masochism, anti-production, self-destructiveness, abjection, forgetfulness, radical passivity, aggressive negation, unintelligibility, negativity, punk pugilism, and anti-social attitudes as a form of resistance to liberal feminist and gay politics of cohesion. It’s about not-becoming because the notion of becoming is perceived as following the capitalist logic of production and models of success that are often tied up with colonialism. It asks, why the fuck should queers be nice? And asserts that politeness is heteronormative and we should embrace our utter failure at functioning within a colonialist, heteronormative, capitalist, racist, sexist and transphobic framework. Jack “Judith” Halberstam is an academic who has probably articulated this theory most lately. I want to talk about his theories and raise some pressing questions and criticisms of his controversial ideas in the context of my limited conversations with him. This essay is largely based on Jack’s article, The Anti-Social Turn in Queer Studies (pdf).
This was great, just want to reply so others can see it in this fast moving thread.
 
10+ shot in Rochester, according to first on the ground reports. Curious what the situation was. No real info yet on the specifics. Praying this wasn't a Charlottesville type of situation.


Edit: Allegedly the shooting was in the Goodman and Pennsylvania area of Rochester (not sure what that means relevant to the protests in the city). If that's not close to any area being "protested" then it could just be gang violence? Still no real details.
 
Last edited:
Last edited by a moderator:
10+ shot in Rochester, according to first on the ground reports. Curious what the situation was. No real info yet on the specifics. Praying this wasn't a Charlottesville type of situation.

It seems like an actual mass shooting, but if we get Kenosha Kyle's spiritual brother, Rochester Roger, defending himself against a mob sieging his house, I might actually die from my sides flying off my body.
 
Looks like 20+ wounded now.
I'm really curious about the nature of this. I haven't been having much luck finding any streams of Rochester in the youtube stream aggregates. It's all Portland. I wanted some excitement but I sure wouldn't have wanted a mass shooting.

Also they are surprised pikachu when cops tried to arrest the wheelchair guy. I may be wrong but they might have claimed he was the one who damaged the fire hydrant?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back