NeoGAF & ResetERA - The Hilarious N̶e̶v̶e̶r̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ Splintering "Gaming" Forum Circus

DriveByTrolling said:
View attachment 1606974

At least the real hero keeps on providing for his people.


Oh wait, he's drinking and crying on twitter again

:story:
Click to expand...
hecht3.png

hecht.png

hecht2.png

hecht4.png

The man is a complete wreck lmao, as they say archive everything:
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: moocow, Sir Wesley Tailpipe, UnclePhil and 9 others
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Sir Wesley Tailpipe, Leonard Helplessness, Fevur and 1 other person
Why is everything wrong with this forum?

Was Lola bunny the awakening of the furries?

For everyone who watched Space Jam, it introduced us to Lola Bunny and well.... Someone at WB was thirsty and I'm not sure who they were targeting when they made her but due to her design, I'm certain this contributed to the popularity of the furry movement and was possibly the first...
www.resetera.com www.resetera.com
YepJustSquirrels.png

JustALion.png

StillJustSquirrels.png

JustSquirrels.png
 
  • Islamic Content
  • Lunacy
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Bush did USS Maine, Neil, Sir Wesley Tailpipe and 15 others
RetardEra said:
Why is everything wrong with this forum?

Was Lola bunny the awakening of the furries?

For everyone who watched Space Jam, it introduced us to Lola Bunny and well.... Someone at WB was thirsty and I'm not sure who they were targeting when they made her but due to her design, I'm certain this contributed to the popularity of the furry movement and was possibly the first...
www.resetera.com www.resetera.com
View attachment 1607265
View attachment 1607266
View attachment 1607267
View attachment 1607268
Click to expand...

Thinking you are an animal? Fine.

Wanting to be transracial? REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

RIP Enzom21, we remember you fam.

edit - Hecht has protected his tweets again, such a little bitch.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: UnclePhil, Judge Dredd and Denmark Mafia
  • Winner
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Elwood P. Dowd, moocow, UnclePhil and 10 others
I didn't really have a problem with rgb other than the fact that I thought she was retarded for staying on the court like she was going to live forever lol, but I have to say that as dark as it is I'm glad she died when it would create the largest avalanche of salt and tears.

People are fucking losing it and I'm just sitting here like :story: .


1600477520345.png
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: UnclePhil, BadTakeCrucifier, White Devil and 1 other person
1600558624415.png


I'm pretty sure that if mandatory retirement or term limits for SCOTUS members were introduced (and they should be) they would not apply to the currently serving Justices, only to those who were appointed after the legislation passed.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Elwood P. Dowd, moocow, Judge Dredd and 2 others
repentance said:
View attachment 1608440

I'm pretty sure that if mandatory retirement or term limits for SCOTUS members were introduced (and they should be) they would not apply to the currently serving Justices, only to those who were appointed after the legislation passed.
Click to expand...

I love how they think voter fraud is a voting right.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: George Floyd Sneed, Elwood P. Dowd, moocow and 3 others
repentance said:
View attachment 1608440

I'm pretty sure that if mandatory retirement or term limits for SCOTUS members were introduced (and they should be) they would not apply to the currently serving Justices, only to those who were appointed after the legislation passed.
Click to expand...

They only ever cry about wanting this shit when their side loses.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: moocow, Sir Wesley Tailpipe, UnclePhil and 7 others
repentance said:
View attachment 1608440

I'm pretty sure that if mandatory retirement or term limits for SCOTUS members were introduced (and they should be) they would not apply to the currently serving Justices, only to those who were appointed after the legislation passed.
Click to expand...

Good luck amending Article III to eliminate one of its core provisions.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Sir Wesley Tailpipe and BadTakeCrucifier
repentance said:
I've always thought that equating "during good behaviour" with lifetime tenure was a strange interpretation.
Click to expand...

It's fairly obvious that's what they intended, though. First, it would have been entirely possible to assign a term of years, as other offices like the Presidency and Congress have fixed terms. Second, much of Article III was drafted with the Federalist Papers in mind, and Hamilton in Federalist No. 79 vigorously resisted arguments in favor of age limits for Article III judges.

It is intended to avoid radical changes in the law based on whoever morons elect to the other branches.
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
Reactions: Buttigieg2020, Elwood P. Dowd, Sir Wesley Tailpipe and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back