JK Rowling’s latest book is about a murderous cis man who dresses as a woman to kill his victims - Discuss all the JK Rowling tranny shit here

So does anyone have any advice for someone (Discarded Whopper) who has to deal with these exact people every day online and IRL, but don’t have JKR fuck you money?

What can be taken away from this situation other than people are quick to jump onto the bandwagon against something without figuring it out for themself?
 
So does anyone have any advice for someone (Discarded Whopper) who has to deal with these exact people every day online and IRL, but don’t have JKR fuck you money?

What can be taken away from this situation other than people are quick to jump onto the bandwagon against something without figuring it out for themself?
Block them. Block and ignore.
 
So does anyone have any advice for someone (Discarded Whopper) who has to deal with these exact people every day online and IRL, but don’t have JKR fuck you money?

What can be taken away from this situation other than people are quick to jump onto the bandwagon against something without figuring it out for themself?
If I'm not dealing with the troon himself I usually warm people up first by mentioning the positive things JKR has said about the trans community. Then I wedge something in to introduce the idea of sissies. Most people haven't heard of them and it opens up a doubt that most people have in common with you, that perversion is the motivator for some people. I'm not hating on the transes after all, I'm just hating on the Bad Ones that aren't "really trans," the ones the trans community doesn't even accept, so what's the harm?
And then, hey. You know. Our friend Angelica, she said something creepy to me the other day... Maybe he... I mean she... is a sissy too?
From there I usually feel like I've got enough space to not be worried. After all, whoever I talked to has thought the bad think too so we're going down together.

As far as actual troons irl... I just try not to do that. My main thing that keeps me from going nuts is that there are fundamental boundaries they can't cross without being rebuffed. I also get a lot of joy about talking about the inaccessible elements of womanhood around them- talking with confidence about menstruation or being less muscular or being a young girl is like wolf piss, it scares them off as long as you go about it correctly. Sometimes I'll throw in I guess you'd call it "alpha" behavior just to show myself as not the type to be used for anything.
 
On the other hand, when it comes to optics this is doing the TERFs' work for them. Once again - as this has been stated in the thread here dozens of times before - the TRA crowd have absolutely no footing outside of Twitter. The anti-trans interviews and such which have been all over British TV recently are doing wonders to keep it that way.
I wouldn't be so optimistic... TRA's rage successfully cancelled several women. The cancel culture is absolutely real.

Woman Fined For ‘Liking’ Facebook Comments on Transgender-Identifying Activist

Latest Chapter of Cancel Culture in Trans Activists’ Twitter War on Women

Rachel Rooney: the charity Save The Children this week removed a video of actor Gillian Anderson reading Rooney’s children’s book The Problem with Problems, because Rooney is also author of My Body is Me, whose message that all children can learn to love their bodies as themselves goes against the transgender theory of ‘being born in the wrong body’.

Stella Perrett: the cartoonist was fired by the Morning Star newspaper and Public and Commercial Services Union after one of her pieces was branded ‘transphobic’. It depicted a crocodile entering a pool of newts with the caption ‘Don’t worry your pretty little heads. I’m transitioning as a newt!’

Emma Nicholson: the Conservative peer was sacked from her honorary post as vice-chair of the Booker Prize Foundation after a Twitter spat with trans-identified model Munroe Bergdorf.

Sarah Honeychurch: fellow at the University of Glasgow’s business school was sacked as editor of the academic journal Hybrid Pedagogy, after signing a public letter by feminists questioning universities’ relationship with the LGBT+ charity Stonewall.

Maya Forstater: the tax expert’s contract was not renewed at think tank Centre for Global Studies after she tweeted: “I think that male people are not women. I dont think being a woman/female is a matter of identity or womanly feelings. It is biology.”

Kathleen Stock: Oxford University Press abandoned a book on female philosophers, because the inclusion of the gender-critical professor of philosophy at Sussex University was deemed too controversial.

Suzanne Moore: 338 of the Guardian journalist’s colleagues signed a letter demanding her resignation after she wrote: “you either protect women’s rights as sex-based or you don’t protect them at all”..

Selina Todd: the Oxford history professor was banned from speaking a conference celebrating the 50th anniversary of the first women’s liberation movement event.

Rachel Ara: the feminist artist had a talk cancelled at the last minute at Oxford Brookes University.

Julie Bindel: the journalist had a talk cancelled at St. Edward’s University, Austin, Texas, and has faced violent protests at Edinburgh University, and numerous Twitter pile-ons.

Prof Michele Moore, head of the Centre for Social Justice and Global Responsibility at London South Bank University, Stephanie Davies-Arai, Founder of Transgender Trend and Dr Shereen Benjamin, senior Lecturer in Primary Education at Edinburgh University, had their talk on transgender issues in Scottish schools cancelled.

Jenni Murray: the veteran BBC journalist was no-platformed by Oxford University History Society.

Linda Bellos: Lesbian activist and originator of Black History Month was among speakers at We Need To Talk organised by activist Venice Allen – but which was cancelled over fears of violence from transrights activists.

Karen Ingala-Smith: the founder of Counting Dead Women was refused permission to re-join the Labour Party.

Jo Phoenix: the Open University professor of criminology was cancelled from delivering a lecture at Essex University on trans rights in prisons.

Heather Brunskell-Evans: the social theorist and philosopher was sacked by the Women’s Equality Party from her post as spokesperson on violence against women.

Olivia Palmer: the former parliamentary candidate was expelled from the Green Party after taking part in the on the Channel 4 programme Genderquake.

Meghan Murphy: the founder and editor of Feminist Current has been permanently banned from Twitter.
 
So does anyone have any advice for someone (Discarded Whopper) who has to deal with these exact people every day online and IRL, but don’t have JKR fuck you money?
Vent your frustrations in Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.
Other than that, just don't interact with these people in any capacity, unless you're forced to. Pretend they don't exist, even when they're talking to you.

I also get a lot of joy about talking about the inaccessible elements of womanhood around them- talking with confidence about menstruation or being less muscular or being a young girl is like wolf piss, it scares them off as long as you go about it correctly. Sometimes I'll throw in I guess you'd call it "alpha" behavior just to show myself as not the type to be used for anything.
And talking about pregnancy, fertility, reproductive health issues, toxins in the environment causing women to develop endometriosis... You could organise a small event or a bake-off to spread awareness about endometriosis among co-workers.
 
Last edited:
1600580831920.png
 
So, are the Cormoran Strike (fucking seriously? CORMORAN STRIKE? Looks like Rowling still has her penchant for on-the-nose, absolutely retarded names) books worth a shot? From what I've heard, they feature Mary-Higgins-Clark-tier writing and a kind of irritating protagonist but OK if you just want to waste away a couple of hours on a flight. If so, that's par for the course with Rowling given Harry Potter but sans the worldbuilding and initial creativity that made the frequently shit writing bearable. And in that case, I might as well opt for an actually good mystery novel.

Also, I will never stop laughing at all the people who suddenly started posting up essays on YouTube about how "problematic" Harry Potter is? Oh fucking really? You don't say. Where were you guys when the critics were screeching about the fucked up morals of slavery, predetermination, treatment of the disabled and death in the series? I think just about the only left-wing commentator who I ever saw shit on Harry Potter for that crap was Dan Hemmens of FerretBrain.
 
Last edited:
So does anyone have any advice for someone (Discarded Whopper) who has to deal with these exact people every day online and IRL, but don’t have JKR fuck you money?

What can be taken away from this situation other than people are quick to jump onto the bandwagon against something without figuring it out for themself?
Block. If not, just go outside for a while and moon the sky. You'll feel much better.
 
Also, there is no such thing as a person without a Y chromosome who develops male reproductive organs.
XX males are a thing. And while they tend to be sterile they can appear to have normal looking genitals both inside and outside. Not in every case and most will require some kind of hormone therapy later on in life especially if they want to appear more manly, or womanly depending on their preference.

While I agree that gender is pretty much limited to what is between your legs and rarely does it clash with what's between your ears, to say it's either XX or XY is not to understand genetics or biology. There are always outliers in everything especially where biology is concerned.
 
XX males are a thing. And while they tend to be sterile they can appear to have normal looking genitals both inside and outside. Not in every case and most will require some kind of hormone therapy later on in life especially if they want to appear more manly, or womanly depending on their preference.

While I agree that gender is pretty much limited to what is between your legs and rarely does it clash with what's between your ears, to say it's either XX or XY is not to understand genetics or biology. There are always outliers in everything especially where biology is concerned.
The actual problem arises when people start to believe these "outliers" as the norm.
 
XX males are a thing. And while they tend to be sterile they can appear to have normal looking genitals both inside and outside. Not in every case and most will require some kind of hormone therapy later on in life especially if they want to appear more manly, or womanly depending on their preference.

While I agree that gender is pretty much limited to what is between your legs and rarely does it clash with what's between your ears, to say it's either XX or XY is not to understand genetics or biology. There are always outliers in everything especially where biology is concerned.

I think you still missed the point of my comment. Individuals with Klinefelter (those with an XXY genotype) are still male; they may posses more feminized features and suffer sterility, but they do not develop female reproductive organs due to the presence of the second X chromosome. A person with brown eyes may have an extra blue allele, for a simplified example, but they will still have a brown phenotype; the Y chromosome works similarly.

Again, even considering rare forms of intersex like complete AIS or Swyer, there is no human with a male genotype who possesses ovaries/produces female gonads, as those structures develop separately from the organs of the Müllerian ducts (uterus and vagina) during embryogenesis.

So yes, the fundamental takeaway is still: the presence or absence of the Y chromosome determines sex. Statistical outliers (which are not indistinguishable from genetic females, anyway) disprove that point about as much as the existence of babies born without legs disproves that humans walk upright.

Also, I'm only speaking on sex, I never said anything about gender; I don't use the terms interchangeably.

Edit: words
 
Last edited:
Back