Snowflake shoe0nhead / June Lapine / June La Porta & Armoured Skeptic / Gregory "Greg" Fluhrer - A poor man's Boxxy: rejected by Vaush, disowned by /pol/ for burning coal, sleeps in a dog's bed surrounded by trash, and her ex-boyfriend.

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
Her way of saying shes going to support the riots but through a consoomerist lens with a twinge of irony to defend herself and a slight dog whistle to the simps that still like her.

translated it means

Okay, im done, burn it all down but know if you call me out I'll just say it's a joke.
I wish she would do something stupid and get arrested. She'd get a race redpill real fast when she runs into Saqhisha of cell block B who ain't had nothin but rachet ass bitches fo years now.
 
I wish she would do something stupid and get arrested. She'd get a race redpill real fast when she runs into Saqhisha of cell block B who ain't had nothin but rachet ass bitches fo years now.

Please. That would mean she'd have to get out of her parents' house and not be on Twitter for a couple of hours. Never gonna happen. She'll definitely be Antifa's keyboard cheerleader though ... Until the simps grow up and stop sending money to her Patreon, of course.
 
Destiny has always been a neoliberal, not a leftist, and that's presumably why he appeals to you, a neocon.
I'm not sure Destiny has ever been open enough about his own views to reveal if he's neoliberal or anything else. Typically in debates I bothered listening to he seemed to do the most effective debate technique there is, arguing as though he has no position and is some third party looking on at the idiots arguing. Though this is why I find it revealing, in that video of him posted before, that he acted like gays and trannies were lumped together. It was one of those rare moments where you get to find out someone's real views, in this case that he has dipped his toes into interesctionality by grouping trannies and gays together.
 
I'm not sure Destiny has ever been open enough about his own views to reveal if he's neoliberal or anything else. Typically in debates I bothered listening to he seemed to do the most effective debate technique there is, arguing as though he has no position and is some third party looking on at the idiots arguing. Though this is why I find it revealing, in that video of him posted before, that he acted like gays and trannies were lumped together. It was one of those rare moments where you get to find out someone's real views, in this case that he has dipped his toes into interesctionality by grouping trannies and gays together.
I think Destiny said he was a neoliberd on one of Ralph's streams.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: SageInAllFields
I think Destiny said he was a neoliberd on one of Ralph's streams.

He's usually seemed like he was trying to get a rise out of people on those streams. This is the same guy that spoke in favor of ethical child pornography and defended it by saying he had a bunch of qualifiers like "if studies showed it helped" and "it's just a sexual attraction". Even if he said he was a neolib he'd probably tack on a few hundred qualifiers the way far leftists often do to rationalize a lot of their retarded views so that they can say up is down, left is right, and socialism is capitalism or whatever else.
 
She has no self-awareness
Untit45645622led.png


Also, another "I'm not a socialist, but..."
Untit345led.png
 
Last edited:
Is she being sarcastic about the "anti-science" bit? Because otherwise, she's the one committing the crime.

Paracetamol is a pain reliever. We can affirm this. Nobody would say otherwise.... even though it probably doesn't work in a couple of people. It works for 99% of people who were tested before it was released.

But, for "science", that 99% is enough to affirm that "Paracetamol works for pain relief".

99% of the population can affirm that sex = gender, you stupid thot. That means that, indeed, your sex is your gender. To say otherwise is the real anti-science statement.

What do these people think "science" means?
 
She has no self-awareness
Untit45645622led.png
Ignoring John Money for the moment, I've always found this complaint really bizarre. Most normal people colloquially conflate the terms "sex" and "gender". The way SJWs define gender, i.e. a concept separate from sex, is exactly the same concept that normal people colloquially call "gender roles". These people consistently complain about what amounts to a simple miscommunication.
 
Ignoring John Money for the moment, I've always found this complaint really bizarre. Most normal people colloquially conflate the terms "sex" and "gender". The way SJWs define gender, i.e. a concept separate from sex, is exactly the same concept that normal people colloquially call "gender roles". These people consistently complain about what amounts to a simple miscommunication.
It's not really "miscommunication" when they think we are wrong and they are correct and want to impose their views even in a legal aspect.
 
She has no self-awareness
View attachment 1610263
Its anti-SOCIAL science to say sex=gender. Social "Science" is so cancerous and politized that it has devolved into nonsensical pop science garbage. Social science fields publish research that have scientific reviewers who don't understand statistics (and therefore give the green light to publish research where 1+1 = 3, yes this has happened), believe "personal accounts" is valid evidence, or just outright publish research that has no actual evidence and is just people making assumptions.

Real hard science unequivocally agrees with sex=gender. This has been backed up with tens if not hundreds of thousands of research articles validated by scientists who know proper statistics and had decades of REAL experience beforehand. They went over every facet of gender since the 700's to our current year. If we take philosophical accounts, we would be going back to the birth of civilization to validate sex=gender. In short, its just as insane to say that the earth is flat as it is to say sex does not equal gender.
 
"Gender" has basically just become conflated with gender roles and personality traits. There are people who genuinely feel that being a tomboyish female or effeminate man makes you a different sex and that to disagree is transphobic.
That's the biggest hypocrisy about all this gender stuff that I noticed since back when it was largely contained to tumblr. These same people would bitch endlessly about how gender roles were a social construct and all bull shit, but then they would turn around and base their gender off of these same gender roles. So you would see stuff like a biological male saying "I'm non-binary because sometimes I like to wear a dress!"
 
She has no self-awareness
View attachment 1610263

Also, another "I'm not a socialist, but..."
View attachment 1610274
JOON THE TROON GOON, AT IT AGAIN. WHITE KNIGHT FOR ALL THE TROONS~ :semperfidelis:

>Totally not anti-American haha. He normalized the socialist label!
June, we don't need to "normalize" the socialist label, the fuck? It's not "normalized" because it's a shit system, everyone with a real job knows it's shit, and most people have intentionally rejected it, on purpose. They don't want to normalize it.

I said this before, but socialism only works in countries where most people are already kind of rich, where crime is super low, and the country isn't fucked. USA has way too much bullshit going on to afford socialism, sorry. Nice idea, doesn't work.
 
That's the biggest hypocrisy about all this gender stuff that I noticed since back when it was largely contained to tumblr. These same people would bitch endlessly about how gender roles were a social construct and all bull shit, but then they would turn around and base their gender off of these same gender roles. So you would see stuff like a biological male saying "I'm non-binary because sometimes I like to wear a dress!"
The very idea of transgenderism is often based on exaggerated gender stereotypes. How many transsexuals have you seen only exhibit characteristics of their biological sex? Perhaps never. Instead, male to female transsexuals exhibit decidedly feminine traits, often to a somewhat exaggerated regard, and visa versa. This of course makes sense, but it belies their world view. Frankly, it'd probably to confusing, even for tumblr users, if it weren't this way though.
 
I remember him saying in a debate with vaush few months ago that leftists would see him as a neolib and right-wingers would see him as a socdem. I think he mostly says often that he is a neolib because he seems to love being a contrarian and everybody hates neolibs on the internet.
His views generally come off as very neoliberal, I don't think he's a socdem, he's never expressed a desire to nationalise PG&E or Comcast or anything and he's been fiercely opposed to Bernie. The only vaguely socdem position he holds is single payer healthcare but that's like a given in Europe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ged'sForth and Ayaa
Back