🐱 What’s in a social justice diet? - When vegan isn’t preachy enough for you

CatParty


Billions of dollars are spent telling individuals how to eat healthy. But even if you follow EAT-Lancet’s planet-friendly diet to a T, and your dinner plate is filled with gluten-free nutrivore fare, vegan locavore leafy greens, and ovo-pescatarian (wild caught!) omega-3’s, it still might be missing something. America’s industrialized food production and the dire nature of our planetary health raise the question: How do we add climate and social justice to our diet?

This year, members of the federal Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee will convene to update their recommendations. But this effort to help guide Americans toward a “balanced” diet is also the product of lobbying by the dairy, grain, and meat industries, which have long been accused of pursuing dollars at the expense of health.

Considering the impact of environmental racism and the number of food deserts in the United States, it’s clear that food production and consumption are not just about personal decisions. It’s about politics and systems that determine who has healthy grocery options available and who does not. Existing guidelines not only ignore the needs of the climate and rely on intensive factory farming practices, but they assign blame for poor bodily health and quality of life based on “choices” that, for many people, simply do not exist.

What would it look like to be able to eat with justice—social, racial, economic, and climate—in mind?

Honor tribal treaties and food systems.
Before we talk about eating, we have to talk about the land on which our food is grown. In contrast to the American colonial prioritization of extracting resources from the ground, rivers, and oceans, Indigenous food systems are built on a relationship with the land. But when Native peoples were forced to leave their lands—along with their soils and place-based expertise—they were robbed of the healthy diets they had developed over generations.

Genocide, forced assimilation, creation of reservation territories, and continuance of anti-Native policieshave dispossessed Native people of two kinds of wealth: the ability to truly self-govern and manage their land, and the ability to build capital, which would enable individuals to make choices about how to live a healthy lifestyle.

“What we’ve noticed, and what I’ve aimed to do, is promote the simple enrichment of diets through our traditional foods, because we know that eating just one traditional food meal a week changes the blood,” says Valerie Segrest, a member of the Muckleshoot tribe and a director with the Native American Agriculture Fund. According to a 2019 U.N. report, Indigenous peoples steward 80 percent of the world’s biodiversity—plant and animal species that are essential to climate health.

But the U.S. government has an abysmal record of breaching treaties made with Native governments. And by replacing Native food systems with industrialized versions, Segrest says the U.S. harms the land and public health simultaneously. Native leaders, U.S. scientists, and public health officials say that chronic diseases, including diabetes, didn’t exist in Native communities until the mid-20th century. Now, Native people have the highest rate of diabetes of any racial and ethnic group in the U.S.

Segrest has worked with all of the tribes in Washington state to teach the importance of traditional ingredients and says that Native foods are the remedy to this health crisis: “What’s good for an Indian is good for everybody.”

Grow knowledge and anti-racist practices.
Ayanna Jones is a Black farmer, educator, and community organizer in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. She lives in a majority-Black community, which runs up against a number of institutionalized racist practices. “Food justice is huge for us,” Jones says, detailing how her community’s food options are limited to local grocery stores that often sell low-quality or spoiled produce.

The stores offering higher quality and healthier options are intentionally located in the wealthy White communities, where customers are thought to be more interested in and able to pay for them. For those who can afford to travel to these neighborhoods to shop, their dollars end up leaving their own communities.

With this in mind, Jones says she began to think about what it would look like to grow her own food, to become self-sufficient. She wanted to find a way to show young people in the community that their bodies were worthy of food that is not rotten or laden with sugar and salt.

In 2015, Jones started the Sankofa Village Community Garden to provide anti-food-apartheid education and community programs, including gardening for seniors and summer camps for youth. Here she teaches young people how to produce their own food and how their bodies feel when they eat food that’s good for them.

“I give them that mental food,” Jones says. “They’re discovering the myths they’ve been given about food and food justice.” But even when one learns that sugar-filled cereal won’t sustain a child throughout the school day, if parents aren’t paid a wage that allows them to purchase healthier options, it’s difficult to turn knowledge into action. Still, Jones believes that “information is power”—that knowing is better than not knowing. “I’m growing to educate,” she says.

Shift food policy by buying regionally.
In nearly every corner of the country, it’s cheaper to purchase a liter of soda than it is to buy a head of broccoli; a 2013 study found that a “healthy” diet cost $550 more per person per year than an “unhealthy” one. For a family of four, that’s an extra $2,200 each year. “The system is set up to feed poor people more poorly,” says fifth-generation farmer Andy Dunham, who runs an organic vegetable operation in Grinnell, Iowa. “The only reason that soda is so cheap [is because] the United States government subsidizes the hell out of those crops: sugar cane and corn.” Billions of federal dollars are disbursed annually growing Big-Ag products: corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, and rice, and to industries like big beef and big pork rather than small family farmers.

“I don’t think people have any idea about how much we spend on policy that [is] environmentally degrading,” Dunham says. To combat today’s industrial production, he calls for establishing ecologically diverse farming systems and a managed grazing system that allows soil to sequester carbon. And empowering people to know the difference. If consumers and voters understand the environmental implications of what they’re purchasing and which businesses they’re supporting through their consumption, then food policy at the federal level might look different. “Having a food literate society allows for policy to be sane,” he says.

In terms of what that translates to on the plate, Dunham says climate justice eating is about having a region-based diet. That doesn’t always mean picking plants over meat; it means taking into consideration where your food was raised and what kinds of energy, chemicals, and transport went into that process. You may need to change your approach to menu planning to reflect what’s in season, rather than relying on production somewhere that’s enjoying summer during your winter. This approach supports local farmers and keeps the carbon footprint of your food relatively low.

Support community-run collectives.
All forms of structural inequalities are made visible in the industrialized food system—from production to consumption, says Victor Brazelton, a community activist and educator with Planting Justice, an Oakland, California-based grassroots organization that works to cultivate food sovereignty, economic justice, and community healing through individual and communal empowerment. Planting Justice hires organizers, farmers, and activists who were formerly incarcerated. Part of its work is to combat current-day colonization and community displacement by building access to organic food through community gardens and educating kids about what healthy food looks and tastes like. “Food is medicine,” Brazelton says. Sustainable farming practices heal people and the planet.

“Community first starts wherever you are,” Brazelton adds, which includes acknowledging and collaborating with the people who originally stewarded the land. In the East Bay of California, the state government forced Ohlone tribes from their land through violence, but despite this, they still live and practice Ohlone culture today in what’s now called Oakland. Planting Justice developed a partnership with the Sogorea Te’ Land Trust, which works to repossess stolen Ohlone land. Planting Justice is currently working to pay off a 2-acre land parcel, and when it does, it will hand the deed over to the Land Trust.

“What’s really important is people having agency over their food,” says Molly Scalise of FRESHFARM, a D.C.-based food justice organization. FRESHFARM brings healthy food directly to communities through farmers markets, in-school programs, and gleaning programs, which distribute unsold produce to shelters. The organization also runs a farm-share through local schools, where parents can purchase produce at a subsidized rate using SNAP benefits. Scalise says this is necessarily a collaborative effort with D.C. residents to make sure it’s “not invasive or intrusive.” She says solutions arise from working with neighbors and communities.

The goal is making options more accessible to consumers in order to impact community health while ensuring that local farms remain profitable.

Develop relationship-oriented food systems.
How can we begin to talk about justice when those most impacted have the least access to decision-making tools and systems? That question is at the center of Jamie Harvie’s work. Harvie is the executive director of the Institute for a Sustainable Future, which works to build solutions for ecological health through advocacy and research. A food justice diet, he says, must mitigate climate impact, reduce poverty, and ensure that decision-making processes include those most impacted.

Ultimately, Harvie says, what’s good for the climate will be good for people too. But White, Western, colonial systems have conditioned many of us out of the understanding that food systems and communal health are connected.

Food justice must return systems to communities, Harvie explains. Organizations like Oregon Rural Actiontackle food injustice from a farming and policy perspective, by working to change state laws that allow farmers to sell directly to consumers, as well as collaborating with the state’s Department of Energy to provide low-interest loans to schools upgrading their energy systems, and building access to local farmers markets. Local food systems that are communally owned and operated allow for communal wealth creation. This means that food is not only eaten in the same region where it is produced, but the financial and public health benefits uplift the community as well.

Tying together food and climate justice isn’t an intellectual exercise, Harvie notes. Justice work, in any form, is about creating and sustaining relationships with one another, including the relationships with the Earth and our food systems. We have to do the hard work of moving from a transactional, colonial, and capitalist model of feeding ourselves to a relational model of feeding and caring for each other.
 
Thats a bunch of bullshit to just say "buy local".
Amazingly, even though I already do that, the author is such a soy brained subhuman I almost want to stop out of spite.
Buying local is a dumb meme anyway. The food isn't any better (it's often worse) so paying extra is basically charity. You might as well buy real food and just hand them the difference if it makes you feel better about yourself.
 
Can't wait to subsist on a locally grown diet of barley, wheat, canola corn, potatoes, tomatoes, cukes and and precious little else. Not to mention eating the abovementioned crops in various pickled and fermented forms 8 months of the year. Sign me the fuck up and make sure you carve "died of scurvy but felt sanctimonious the whole time" on my gravestone.
 
Man, they really bought into the noble savage bit didn't they?

I wonder how their minds would handle the real history of the Cree, Sioux and Blackfoot tribes. Not to even mention the Comanche and other southern tribes...

Bitch...Native Americans are just like any other society on Earth. They took everything they could from the "sacred" land to feed themselves based on the limits of their technology and techniques. They didn't spare mother earth because they are "more in tune with nature" but because they lacked the tools necessary to fully utilize it like Europeans and Asians. Otherwise a good 30% of their population wouldnt have died if the winter was harder then average.

Seriously, this liberal upper middle class white people worship of primitive culture is messed up. And totally undeserved.

While Native Americans were "peacefully living in the tune with Mother Earth" Europeans were building farms and towns that could house 10,000 people each.

While the noble savages were "stewarding the resources of the Earth" Shakespeare was writing his sonnets, Michelangelo was creating his grand works, Magellan was taking a small wooden boat around the world and Newton was finding out the fundamental rules that govern the universe.

I'll take progress and culture over the nobility of grubbing in the dirt for my daily bread and praying to nameless spirits that winter won't kill half my family.

Noble Savages? No thanks.
 
I swear, if these people are just left alone for a few more years they're going to be speaking a completely different language. More than half of this article doesn't even feel like someone's trying to communicate an idea to me, it just feels like they're ripping random words out of a book and throwing them in my face.
 
Man, they really bought into the noble savage bit didn't they?

I wonder how their minds would handle the real history of the Cree, Sioux and Blackfoot tribes. Not to even mention the Comanche and other southern tribes...

Bitch...Native Americans are just like any other society on Earth. They took everything they could from the "sacred" land to feed themselves based on the limits of their technology and techniques. They didn't spare mother earth because they are "more in tune with nature" but because they lacked the tools necessary to fully utilize it like Europeans and Asians. Otherwise a good 30% of their population wouldnt have died if the winter was harder then average.

Seriously, this liberal upper middle class white people worship of primitive culture is messed up. And totally undeserved.

While Native Americans were "peacefully living in the tune with Mother Earth" Europeans were building farms and towns that could house 10,000 people each.

While the noble savages were "stewarding the resources of the Earth" Shakespeare was writing his sonnets, Michelangelo was creating his grand works, Magellan was taking a small wooden boat around the world and Newton was finding out the fundamental rules that govern the universe.

I'll take progress and culture over the nobility of grubbing in the dirt for my daily bread and praying to nameless spirits that winter won't kill half my family.

Noble Savages? No thanks.
Yeah. The Dakotas are littered with old village/city sites because the Mandan and precursors would move into an area along a river and rape the land until it couldn't support them anymore and then move on.

Most of the Americas were full of people with one simple flowchart dictating life. 1) Move into an area, if it's inhabited fight until a new power equilibrium is established, use up all the resources, repeat. Didn't matter if they were city builders or migrants.

The big groups with long term permanent settlements required conquest and slavery to continue on, just like everywhere else in the world.

But muh noble savage
 
Man, they really bought into the noble savage bit didn't they?

I wonder how their minds would handle the real history of the Cree, Sioux and Blackfoot tribes. Not to even mention the Comanche and other southern tribes...

Bitch...Native Americans are just like any other society on Earth. They took everything they could from the "sacred" land to feed themselves based on the limits of their technology and techniques. They didn't spare mother earth because they are "more in tune with nature" but because they lacked the tools necessary to fully utilize it like Europeans and Asians. Otherwise a good 30% of their population wouldnt have died if the winter was harder then average.

Seriously, this liberal upper middle class white people worship of primitive culture is messed up. And totally undeserved.

While Native Americans were "peacefully living in the tune with Mother Earth" Europeans were building farms and towns that could house 10,000 people each.

While the noble savages were "stewarding the resources of the Earth" Shakespeare was writing his sonnets, Michelangelo was creating his grand works, Magellan was taking a small wooden boat around the world and Newton was finding out the fundamental rules that govern the universe.

I'll take progress and culture over the nobility of grubbing in the dirt for my daily bread and praying to nameless spirits that winter won't kill half my family.

Noble Savages? No thanks.
Here's what really gets me about the Amerindian thing:
Without getting caught up in exact dates, the Spanish brought old world diseases to the new world around 1500. This is well accepted to have completely decimated the local population. Exploration of the "virgin land" of north America didn't really kick off until the 1700's. That's over 200 fucking years for the woodlands and wildlife to grow back and for settlements to decay.
I remember reading somewhere (though it's a fairly obscure source and I can't be assed to hunt it down) that the injuns were such prolific deforesters that the Irish potato famine might have been caused by a global cooling effect resulting from Injuns no longer having the population that mandated constant clear cutting of forests.
 
I swear, if these people are just left alone for a few more years they're going to be speaking a completely different language. More than half of this article doesn't even feel like someone's trying to communicate an idea to me, it just feels like they're ripping random words out of a book and throwing them in my face.

Orwell wrote a natty little piece about this.


The thing that cheeses me off about this article is that it's a universal and apolitical message: Go to the fucking farm stand for cheap, healthy food that supports the local economy. Less processed food is healthier for you!

I live in a very Red area and the farm stands, farmer's markets, hippie food store, all that shit are thronged with QAnons, Quiverfullers, antivaxers, chemtrail nuts, and so forth.

But all the SJW shit makes people want to eat white bread, Velveeta, and bologna sammies for dinner to stick it to the man.

This article was probably underwritten by ConAgra.
 
Can't wait to subsist on a locally grown diet of barley, wheat, canola corn, potatoes, tomatoes, cukes and and precious little else. Not to mention eating the abovementioned crops in various pickled and fermented forms 8 months of the year. Sign me the fuck up and make sure you carve "died of scurvy but felt sanctimonious the whole time" on my gravestone.

Shouldn't the tomatoes prevent scurvy?

Man, they really bought into the noble savage bit didn't they?

I wonder how their minds would handle the real history of the Cree, Sioux and Blackfoot tribes. Not to even mention the Comanche and other southern tribes...

Bitch...Native Americans are just like any other society on Earth. They took everything they could from the "sacred" land to feed themselves based on the limits of their technology and techniques. They didn't spare mother earth because they are "more in tune with nature" but because they lacked the tools necessary to fully utilize it like Europeans and Asians. Otherwise a good 30% of their population wouldnt have died if the winter was harder then average.

Seriously, this liberal upper middle class white people worship of primitive culture is messed up. And totally undeserved.

While Native Americans were "peacefully living in the tune with Mother Earth" Europeans were building farms and towns that could house 10,000 people each.

While the noble savages were "stewarding the resources of the Earth" Shakespeare was writing his sonnets, Michelangelo was creating his grand works, Magellan was taking a small wooden boat around the world and Newton was finding out the fundamental rules that govern the universe.

I'll take progress and culture over the nobility of grubbing in the dirt for my daily bread and praying to nameless spirits that winter won't kill half my family.

Noble Savages? No thanks.

There where cities with 10k+ people in pre-columbian America. They weren't too stupid to farm and there where plenty of efficient techniques that, while they couldn't compete with those from societies with more advanced metalworking and animal labor, where good enough for them to not need to be hunter-gatherers.

Or maybe the Aztec and Inca where just Not Real Injuns
 
No mention of jizz 🤔
I think that is a dietary supplement. Pic related.

images.jpg
 
Aztec and Inca where just Not Real Injuns
Yeah, pretty much. They can't really apply for "noble savage" status what with all the slash and burn agriculture and whatnot. Aztecs in particular basically terraformed swampland and built cities of stone atop it. There wasn't even the illusion of "oneness with nature" or sustainability.
I think it's pretty well understood that we're talking about north American Indians here.
 
I'm not bashing the Native population of the America's here. They did the best they could with what they had, some of the earlier cultures developed amazing cities and technology for the time period. Look into early Mississippian culture for some amazing early building of cities and giant earthen mounds. Truely on the same level as Stonehenge. But because it was made of dirt it didn't last long enough for modern history to appreciate it.

I am bashing the typical progressive attitude of infantilism of minorities. Anybody who not white is stereotyped as a poor helpers person who need the big strong SJW to make sure the big baddies don't take advantage of those poor darkies...it's pure bullshit.

Africans, Native Americans, South Americans, East Asians and Central Asians all are human. Sure they didn't evolve societies like Europe did but then again no where else did either.

They loved, they fought, they invented,the created art, they massacred their enemies when they could and they made peace when they couldn't . These were human societies doing human things just like every other human society since the dawn of man but the SJWs reduce them to base stereotypes and thus deny them their agency.

The progressive need to carry forward the white man's burden is the telling trait of the far lefts attitude towards minorities True racism is denying your targets humanity thus agency in their decisions and outcomes. They reduce everything to a simple reductionist view because it all their black and white belief structure can tolerate.

Thus we get the white man bad, dark man good schitck that absolutely permeates their core beliefs.

In short...fuck em.
 
There's a hubbub right now in the great white north because Noble Savages are using their harvester licenses that would allow them to trap lobster for ceremonial and sustenance purposes and instead decimating spawning grounds to sell undersized, oversized and pregnant lobsters on the free market. They're also known for the massacre migrating caribou. Stewards of the earth my ass.
 
Here's the hideous, hyphenated Latinx gremlin who wrote this garbage and who deserves to be ground into Soylent Green and fed to the hungry.

Levy-Uyeda_Ray-web.jpg
 
Back