🐱 What’s in a social justice diet? - When vegan isn’t preachy enough for you

CatParty


Billions of dollars are spent telling individuals how to eat healthy. But even if you follow EAT-Lancet’s planet-friendly diet to a T, and your dinner plate is filled with gluten-free nutrivore fare, vegan locavore leafy greens, and ovo-pescatarian (wild caught!) omega-3’s, it still might be missing something. America’s industrialized food production and the dire nature of our planetary health raise the question: How do we add climate and social justice to our diet?

This year, members of the federal Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee will convene to update their recommendations. But this effort to help guide Americans toward a “balanced” diet is also the product of lobbying by the dairy, grain, and meat industries, which have long been accused of pursuing dollars at the expense of health.

Considering the impact of environmental racism and the number of food deserts in the United States, it’s clear that food production and consumption are not just about personal decisions. It’s about politics and systems that determine who has healthy grocery options available and who does not. Existing guidelines not only ignore the needs of the climate and rely on intensive factory farming practices, but they assign blame for poor bodily health and quality of life based on “choices” that, for many people, simply do not exist.

What would it look like to be able to eat with justice—social, racial, economic, and climate—in mind?

Honor tribal treaties and food systems.
Before we talk about eating, we have to talk about the land on which our food is grown. In contrast to the American colonial prioritization of extracting resources from the ground, rivers, and oceans, Indigenous food systems are built on a relationship with the land. But when Native peoples were forced to leave their lands—along with their soils and place-based expertise—they were robbed of the healthy diets they had developed over generations.

Genocide, forced assimilation, creation of reservation territories, and continuance of anti-Native policieshave dispossessed Native people of two kinds of wealth: the ability to truly self-govern and manage their land, and the ability to build capital, which would enable individuals to make choices about how to live a healthy lifestyle.

“What we’ve noticed, and what I’ve aimed to do, is promote the simple enrichment of diets through our traditional foods, because we know that eating just one traditional food meal a week changes the blood,” says Valerie Segrest, a member of the Muckleshoot tribe and a director with the Native American Agriculture Fund. According to a 2019 U.N. report, Indigenous peoples steward 80 percent of the world’s biodiversity—plant and animal species that are essential to climate health.

But the U.S. government has an abysmal record of breaching treaties made with Native governments. And by replacing Native food systems with industrialized versions, Segrest says the U.S. harms the land and public health simultaneously. Native leaders, U.S. scientists, and public health officials say that chronic diseases, including diabetes, didn’t exist in Native communities until the mid-20th century. Now, Native people have the highest rate of diabetes of any racial and ethnic group in the U.S.

Segrest has worked with all of the tribes in Washington state to teach the importance of traditional ingredients and says that Native foods are the remedy to this health crisis: “What’s good for an Indian is good for everybody.”

Grow knowledge and anti-racist practices.
Ayanna Jones is a Black farmer, educator, and community organizer in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. She lives in a majority-Black community, which runs up against a number of institutionalized racist practices. “Food justice is huge for us,” Jones says, detailing how her community’s food options are limited to local grocery stores that often sell low-quality or spoiled produce.

The stores offering higher quality and healthier options are intentionally located in the wealthy White communities, where customers are thought to be more interested in and able to pay for them. For those who can afford to travel to these neighborhoods to shop, their dollars end up leaving their own communities.

With this in mind, Jones says she began to think about what it would look like to grow her own food, to become self-sufficient. She wanted to find a way to show young people in the community that their bodies were worthy of food that is not rotten or laden with sugar and salt.

In 2015, Jones started the Sankofa Village Community Garden to provide anti-food-apartheid education and community programs, including gardening for seniors and summer camps for youth. Here she teaches young people how to produce their own food and how their bodies feel when they eat food that’s good for them.

“I give them that mental food,” Jones says. “They’re discovering the myths they’ve been given about food and food justice.” But even when one learns that sugar-filled cereal won’t sustain a child throughout the school day, if parents aren’t paid a wage that allows them to purchase healthier options, it’s difficult to turn knowledge into action. Still, Jones believes that “information is power”—that knowing is better than not knowing. “I’m growing to educate,” she says.

Shift food policy by buying regionally.
In nearly every corner of the country, it’s cheaper to purchase a liter of soda than it is to buy a head of broccoli; a 2013 study found that a “healthy” diet cost $550 more per person per year than an “unhealthy” one. For a family of four, that’s an extra $2,200 each year. “The system is set up to feed poor people more poorly,” says fifth-generation farmer Andy Dunham, who runs an organic vegetable operation in Grinnell, Iowa. “The only reason that soda is so cheap [is because] the United States government subsidizes the hell out of those crops: sugar cane and corn.” Billions of federal dollars are disbursed annually growing Big-Ag products: corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, and rice, and to industries like big beef and big pork rather than small family farmers.

“I don’t think people have any idea about how much we spend on policy that [is] environmentally degrading,” Dunham says. To combat today’s industrial production, he calls for establishing ecologically diverse farming systems and a managed grazing system that allows soil to sequester carbon. And empowering people to know the difference. If consumers and voters understand the environmental implications of what they’re purchasing and which businesses they’re supporting through their consumption, then food policy at the federal level might look different. “Having a food literate society allows for policy to be sane,” he says.

In terms of what that translates to on the plate, Dunham says climate justice eating is about having a region-based diet. That doesn’t always mean picking plants over meat; it means taking into consideration where your food was raised and what kinds of energy, chemicals, and transport went into that process. You may need to change your approach to menu planning to reflect what’s in season, rather than relying on production somewhere that’s enjoying summer during your winter. This approach supports local farmers and keeps the carbon footprint of your food relatively low.

Support community-run collectives.
All forms of structural inequalities are made visible in the industrialized food system—from production to consumption, says Victor Brazelton, a community activist and educator with Planting Justice, an Oakland, California-based grassroots organization that works to cultivate food sovereignty, economic justice, and community healing through individual and communal empowerment. Planting Justice hires organizers, farmers, and activists who were formerly incarcerated. Part of its work is to combat current-day colonization and community displacement by building access to organic food through community gardens and educating kids about what healthy food looks and tastes like. “Food is medicine,” Brazelton says. Sustainable farming practices heal people and the planet.

“Community first starts wherever you are,” Brazelton adds, which includes acknowledging and collaborating with the people who originally stewarded the land. In the East Bay of California, the state government forced Ohlone tribes from their land through violence, but despite this, they still live and practice Ohlone culture today in what’s now called Oakland. Planting Justice developed a partnership with the Sogorea Te’ Land Trust, which works to repossess stolen Ohlone land. Planting Justice is currently working to pay off a 2-acre land parcel, and when it does, it will hand the deed over to the Land Trust.

“What’s really important is people having agency over their food,” says Molly Scalise of FRESHFARM, a D.C.-based food justice organization. FRESHFARM brings healthy food directly to communities through farmers markets, in-school programs, and gleaning programs, which distribute unsold produce to shelters. The organization also runs a farm-share through local schools, where parents can purchase produce at a subsidized rate using SNAP benefits. Scalise says this is necessarily a collaborative effort with D.C. residents to make sure it’s “not invasive or intrusive.” She says solutions arise from working with neighbors and communities.

The goal is making options more accessible to consumers in order to impact community health while ensuring that local farms remain profitable.

Develop relationship-oriented food systems.
How can we begin to talk about justice when those most impacted have the least access to decision-making tools and systems? That question is at the center of Jamie Harvie’s work. Harvie is the executive director of the Institute for a Sustainable Future, which works to build solutions for ecological health through advocacy and research. A food justice diet, he says, must mitigate climate impact, reduce poverty, and ensure that decision-making processes include those most impacted.

Ultimately, Harvie says, what’s good for the climate will be good for people too. But White, Western, colonial systems have conditioned many of us out of the understanding that food systems and communal health are connected.

Food justice must return systems to communities, Harvie explains. Organizations like Oregon Rural Actiontackle food injustice from a farming and policy perspective, by working to change state laws that allow farmers to sell directly to consumers, as well as collaborating with the state’s Department of Energy to provide low-interest loans to schools upgrading their energy systems, and building access to local farmers markets. Local food systems that are communally owned and operated allow for communal wealth creation. This means that food is not only eaten in the same region where it is produced, but the financial and public health benefits uplift the community as well.

Tying together food and climate justice isn’t an intellectual exercise, Harvie notes. Justice work, in any form, is about creating and sustaining relationships with one another, including the relationships with the Earth and our food systems. We have to do the hard work of moving from a transactional, colonial, and capitalist model of feeding ourselves to a relational model of feeding and caring for each other.
 
This is all lies. Do stupid people actually believe it?

Lots of people in the past were malnourished. A somewhat large percentage were malnourished to the point that they could not join society to work. Dirty Injuns were in really bad health before Columbus and the white man started killing them for sport. Food deserts do not exist. Poor people have just as much access to produce as rich people. Some of the discount chains that specifically target poor areas have lower prices than wealthy people pay at their fancy markets where you do not have to pay to use a shopping cart. Poor people choose other foods that cost more because they like them. So do most white people. McDonalds and Pepsi are not huge companies because they hypnotize people to buy stuff they do not want. Disgustos like hanburgers and brown sugar water.

Of course soda pop is cheaper than a number of vegetables. Soda pop is like 95% water, which costs almost nothing. Coffee and tea should cost almost nothing as well. You can make a cuppa tea for a few cents.

I cannot believe how stupid and history hating people are. It is crazy, I tell you what.
 
SO i should buy stuff at the local farmers market from people i know? thats easy...

The nearest supermarket is part of a Cooperative. the place i get my gardening stuff from is another one. my healthcare, another one. ohh and my bank is also a Cooperative.

Those idiots are stealing from nother european "nazis"...
 
“What we’ve noticed, and what I’ve aimed to do, is promote the simple enrichment of diets through our traditional foods, because we know that eating just one traditional food meal a week changes the blood,” says Valerie Segrest, a member of the Muckleshoot tribe and a director with the Native American Agriculture Fund.
Apparently the Muckleshoot traditionally mostly ate foraged plants and salmon. Go fucking figure that's healthier than what you get in an average American diet with the processed bullshit. Why is this somehow a revelation?

Yes, you will be healthier if you forage for your food or eat locally grown stuff from a farmers' market. Yes, if you eat locally raised cuts of meat or fish and not nasty imported Chinese fish farm crap or hormone-pumped cows/pigs/chickens you'll be healthier.

But hey, people are healthy at every size, right, so who cares?
According to a 2019 U.N. report, Indigenous peoples steward 80 percent of the world’s biodiversity—plant and animal species that are essential to climate health.
What the fuck does this mean, indigenous people murder the fuck out of endangered species whenever they have the chance and look at the extinction of Pleistocene megafauna or whenever Polynesians reached a new island to see what indigenous people did. To this day, if you're a Native American of a certain tribe you can go whaling or shoot eagles for "traditional reasons" but if you're any other race you can't. What great stewards, glad to see the UN continues to be a bunch of paint huffing morons.
Whut. That's retarded. Diabetes being less common when they ate corn gruel every day isn't that suspicious, but they have traditionally smoked forever naturally leading to a pretty array of chronic problems since the BC era.
Many American Indians are especially prone to diabetes because of their historic diet which was high in meat and fish and low in plants. Traditionally they ate all the fatty parts of fish and game because it was the best source of calories. Their bodies adapted around that and when the white man came and offered cheap, shitty food (and put them on the rez where they decided to drink all day instead of learning useful skills) they ended up fat and diabetic. It's a disease of poverty, just like how trailer trash whites and ghetto blacks are fat, but Indians are more susceptible to it because it's a massive shift of the diets they lived on for 10,000+ years (most Old World peoples have had thousands of years for their bodies to shift). Your average Injun isn't out hunting and gathering and fishing anymore and that lack of exercise is killing him.

Most of their health problems historically was because their idea of a doctor was a shaman who may or may not be an epileptic or schizophrenic lunatic and you better pray to the spirits he was having a good day and remembered which herbs to cure you with. And like witches in modern Africa, the shaman was liable to be lynched or chased off to another village if he fucked up so that impacted how he cared for you.
Here's what really gets me about the Amerindian thing:
Without getting caught up in exact dates, the Spanish brought old world diseases to the new world around 1500. This is well accepted to have completely decimated the local population. Exploration of the "virgin land" of north America didn't really kick off until the 1700's. That's over 200 fucking years for the woodlands and wildlife to grow back and for settlements to decay.
I remember reading somewhere (though it's a fairly obscure source and I can't be assed to hunt it down) that the injuns were such prolific deforesters that the Irish potato famine might have been caused by a global cooling effect resulting from Injuns no longer having the population that mandated constant clear cutting of forests.
It's true, the "second pulse" of the Little Ice Age in the 17th century (not the initial one in the 14th-15th century) that caused the famines that destroyed Ming China and led to the English Civil War was in part because all that forest the Indians had kept cleared grew back and the CO2 was sucked out of the air which caused global cooling.
 
“healthy” diet cost $550 more per person per year than an “unhealthy” one

This alone proves that this article is bullshit. Unless you're an alcoholic or drug addict, 550$ per year is chump chance for anyone, and complaining about such amounts of money is essentially same as saying that you're too lazy to buy healthy foodstuffs.
 
What? What was that? I couldnt read you properly, Im too invested in my delicious testosterone burger to give a shit. Its better than the nachos, they sucked
Jokes aside, all these stupid "diets" feel more like training to get used to surviving on almost nothing when communism takes over and you barely have the food scraps of the elites to eat.
 
All I can say after reading this article is that Christopher Columbus did nothing wrong.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to buy me a steak to cook tonight and a fifth of whiskey or as the indigenous noble savages call it, "firewater".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slimy Time
Pima Indians in Arizona have really high diabetes (T2) rates and a lot of it is genetic. They have a higher incidence of a gene that alters insulin secretion in utero so that babies are born larger and then they have a lower threshold for diabetes in young adulthood because their beta cells crap out earlier. Can’t remember the exact mechanism but it’s a double whammy that kind of reinforces itself from before birth. They don’t know if it’s been actively selected for in times of famine or if it’s just chance due to isolated populations (a random gene can often become more prevalent due to these founder type effects.)
Natives of Greenland have high rates too and that’s also genetic, unsurprisingly when they’ve gone from a fatty meat based diet to then introduce carbs - you can’t have both.
Places in Polynesia went from a healthy diet based on seafood and plants to shit like turkey tails and spam being dumped on them by western markets and their obesity and diabetes rates are just shocking.
The western diet is pretty bad for white westerners but it seems even worse for many non white populations.
Here in the Uk you see SO many Indian /Pakistani/Bangladeshi women who aren’t even that big with diabetes - they seem to hit the threshold much sooner than native Brits.
Anyway, there’s a lot of genetics involved in diabetes prevalence, it’s far more complex than SJW wank about food. Eat your greens, go easy on the sugar and bad fats, stay active and allow yourself to be hungry regularly. Most T2 can be sorted out with a strict diet if you catch it early enough. Your body has a set threshold for ability to cope with fatty acids and sugars. If you exceed it you’re fucked.
 
Looks like someone is getting paid by the word, it did not need to be that long to say soy and organics are expensive.
 
The thing that cheeses me off about this article is that it's a universal and apolitical message: Go to the fucking farm stand for cheap, healthy food that supports the local economy. Less processed food is healthier for you!
No it isn't. Not even close.

Pasteurization alone is a massive health benefit to society. Not to mention food preservatives, preservation techniques, and fortification. But these are mostly passive benefits. It doesn't make you more beautiful and your dick bigger. It just prevents something bad from happening and there is no bragging rights associated with not harming someone. Much easier to beat the Natural Fallacy drum to sperg about how much better(tm) your product is for consoomers to get them to pry open their wallet.

People honestly forget how common really nasty food-borne illnesses and malnutrition were and how much food science has done to fix major problems that have plagued mankind since the beginning of civilization. That we have near-universal access to affordable safe food in our society is probably the greatest misunderstanding of the modern age.
 
What the fuck does this mean
It means brownpeople good---

The western diet is pretty bad for white westerners but it seems even worse for many non white populations.
thats because alot of people eat sugar instead of meat....

That we have near-universal access to affordable safe food in our society is probably the greatest misunderstanding of the modern age.
Fritz Haber saw his mistakes and tried to fix them, by gassing the french.
 
No it isn't. Not even close.

Come on, dude. Don't be so spergy.

My point is this: Getting a raw, whole chicken and baking it yourself is better for you than eating McNuggets. Getting a raw, whole potato and cooking that yourself is better for you than eating fast food fries. Getting some tea bags and making sun tea is better for you than drinking a coke.

If you really want to rumble about the above paragraph, maybe you should put down the fortified wine and take a walk instead.
 
Come on, dude. Don't be so spergy.

My point is this: Getting a raw, whole chicken and baking it yourself is better for you than eating McNuggets. Getting a raw, whole potato and cooking that yourself is better for you than eating fast food fries. Getting some tea bags and making sun tea is better for you than drinking a coke.

If you really want to rumble about the above paragraph, maybe you should put down the fortified wine and take a walk instead.
That's an "eating like shit" problem not a "processed food" problem.

Eating a can of processed spinach is not less healthy than eating the raw stuff. Eating a frozen chicken breast is not less healthy than carving one off the bird. A freeze-dried cut up potato isn't less healthy than a whole one. Canned sugar-water is not less healthy than homemade sweet tea sugar-water.

It's a lack of balance issue not a "the food went through a machine first" issue. Stop framing it that way. Processing isn't the problem. Personal choice is. We have a HUGE problem with fatties blaming anything other than themselves and their choices for their diet and health issues.

You could go 100% all-natural raw food and still have massive problems with your health if you don't make the needed lifestyle changes to change the underlying lack of balance in your diet. Every single fad diet is a fasting diet that cuts some calorie. People adopt it, lose weight, then go right back to the shit that made them fatties. They NEVER EVER EVER just learn to love broccoli and learn to limit themselves to one scoop of mashed potatoes. Blaming the masher is far easier than taking responsibility of having the palette of a 7 year old.
 
Last edited:
Come on, dude. Don't be so spergy.

My point is this: Getting a raw, whole chicken and baking it yourself is better for you than eating McNuggets. Getting a raw, whole potato and cooking that yourself is better for you than eating fast food fries. Getting some tea bags and making sun tea is better for you than drinking a coke.

If you really want to rumble about the above paragraph, maybe you should put down the fortified wine and take a walk instead.
I was about to make this comment earlier but didn't feel it was worth the breath. I guess now's a good time for it:
"Processed" can basically mean anything. And 9 out of 10 "processes" we apply to food are a net positive. Trans fats are generally bad for you so any process that produces them is also generally bad.
What often causes the knee-jerking is the association with "natural/organic" fags who are terrified of ingredients they can't pronounce. It's funny that you mention potatoes, too. GMO potatoes are actually designed to be safer for human consumption. McDonald's doesn't use them though because they caved under pressure from activists.
 
Eating a can of processed spinach is not less healthy than eating the raw stuff. Eating a frozen chicken breast is not less healthy than carving one off the bird. A freeze-dried cut up potato isn't less healthy than a whole one. Canned sugar-water is not less healthy than homemade sweet tea sugar-water.
Because a battery cage raised chicken that grew up stewing in its own shit and being injected with all sorts of growth hormone and sketchy antibiotics is totally the same as a chicken you raised from an egg and slaughtered yourself. Low exposure to that sort of shit over peoples' entire lives is behind all sorts of medical issues we see now.
 
Back