Pedophiles of Sluthate AND Lookism (MRZ, Brian Peppers and many more!)

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Which user is a bigger faggot?

  • @drz

  • Marijan Siklic


Results are only viewable after voting.
Didn't one of them go out taking pictures of interracial couples one day to prove some point or other? Or am I thinking of a different creepy website?

Yeah, IIRC, said SH'er apparently got so "OMG, OUTRAGED" at what he saw that at one point he yelled at an interracial couple and rambled about how horrible they were, while the couple just stared at him, then walked away.
 
Yeah, IIRC, said SH'er apparently got so "OMG, OUTRAGED" at what he saw that at one point he yelled at an interracial couple and rambled about how horrible they were, while the couple just stared at him, then walked away.

The more I read about sluthaters, the more morbidly curious I am about it. Seems to be the only place where you can regularly get a mix of misogyny, racism, psuedoscience, and pedophilia so openly expressed...and often all from the same people.
 
The more I read about sluthaters, the more morbidly curious I am about it. Seems to be the only place where you can regularly get a mix of misogyny, racism, psuedoscience, and pedophilia so openly expressed...and often all from the same people.

Honestly,and I've said this before, I don't believe the SH stories where they say they've:
a) punched random women in the head
b) thrown food at random women
c) ranted at interracial couples about how horrible they are.

to me, they don't really have the balls to do shit like this, and even then, they just come off as huge "2EDGY4U" try hards.
 
Honestly,and I've said this before, I don't believe the SH stories where they say they've:
a) punched random women in the head
b) thrown food at random women
c) ranted at interracial couples about how horrible they are.

to me, they don't really have the balls to do shit like this, and even then, they just come off as huge "2EDGY4U" try hards.

Who was it that said they punched a random woman in the head and got chased off by a bunch of bystanders?
 
The more I read about sluthaters, the more morbidly curious I am about it. Seems to be the only place where you can regularly get a mix of misogyny, racism, psuedoscience, and pedophilia so openly expressed...and often all from the same people.
The weirdest thing about them to me is they come here and act so fucking wacky that I forget they're actually horrible people and not just amusing cartoonish caricatures.

Honestly,and I've said this before, I don't believe the SH stories where they say they've:
a) punched random women in the head
b) thrown food at random women
c) ranted at interracial couples about how horrible they are.

to me, they don't really have the balls to do shit like this, and even then, they just come off as huge "2EDGY4U" try hards.
Well, Elliot Rodger comes off like a huge pussy edgelord and he still had a fondness for throwing drinks at random people before snapping.
 
So SH does tumblr style head-cannons... with jail bait!

http://sluthate.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16404

Could Bryan Cranston get a 7+ 10 prime 18-19yo girl  - SlutHate.com  PuaHate .png

Could Bryan Cranston get a 7+ 10 prime 18-19yo girl  - SlutHate.com  PuaHate  (1).png
 
Yet another retarded cow mistaking laughing at him and mocking him for attempting to "argue" with him.

That's the delusion: people like mrz think that if they make their arguments sound legit enough, wrap it in as much scientific sounding language as they can, then they have a chance to win people over. Problem is when your central concept ("pedophilia and CP are totally okay guys") is foul and no amount of misappropriated scientific studies can overcome that. He came in here ready to earnestly argue in defense of CP and thinks we came to the thread ready to earnestly argue against it. Hence calling himself the winner by virtue of being the only one with "logical arguments".
 
Last edited:
That's the delusion: people like mrz think that if they make their arguments sound legit enough, wrap it in as much scientific sounding language as they can, then they have a chance to win people over. Problem is when your central concept ("pedophilia and CP are totally okay guys") is foul and no amount of misappropriated scientific studies can overcome that. He came in here ready to earnestly argue in defense of CP and thinks we came to the thread ready to earnestly argue against it. Hence calling himself the winner by virtue of being the only one with "logical arguments".
Don't forget how butthurt we are. LOL guise
 
Back