Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died at 87. - 🦀

pylosurf said:
Graft is a part of power in general. You see the same spontaneous patronage hierarchies anywhere there is something worth giving/having/taking.
Click to expand...
Which once again why I said make an official position regulating it. Use greed to curb corruption not try restrict it. Yes its a silly idea but trying to stamp out corruption has Proven fruitless. So yeah....
 
  • Optimistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: frozenrunner and Homegrown Homophobia
Anti Pedo Action said:
It'll be fine, bro. Some naive pair of tits just thoughtlessly opining on every case exactly how she thinks the Republicans would want her to is everything we should want in a Supreme Court justice.
I see no way this could go wrong.
Click to expand...
The tits will need to expert enough not to be assimilated as some previous GOP appointees were, and also, possess a basic cunning which would allow her to hold the line, and perhaps be able to manipulate other Justices.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: AnotherPleb
DeadFish said:
Which once again why I said make an official position regulating it. Use greed to curb corruption not try restrict it. Yes its a silly idea but trying to stamp out corruption has Proven fruitless. So yeah....
Click to expand...
All that would happen with that idea is that there would be new unofficial positions for grafting the guy who controls the graft.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ShinyStar and Exigent Circumcisions
It's HK-47 said:
View attachment 1614960

Woodrow Wilson, Harry Truman, Bill Clinton, and John Kennedy were all Democrats who won their elections without winning a majority of the popular vote (IE they won it, but the total sum of voters for other candidates were higher). Woodrow appointed 3 Justices, Clinton appointed 2, Kennedy appointed 2, and Truman appointed 4. Between them, they appointed a total of 11 Justices, but according to you they should all just be thrown off the bench.

Well, one just was, but Breyer is still there. We could always throw him off the court if you'd like, since he doesn't fit your criteria.

If you really want to talk about the biggest mistake that America ever made when it came to Democracy, then you'd need to talk about how we're a bunch of fucking idiots who thought that it would be a good idea to directly elect our Senators into office and expect them to properly represent all of the millions of people in their states, instead of using the system prior that was made-up of local assemblyman and representatives.

Senators used to be chosen by state legislators. The House had districts and you used to be able to look at your local assemblyman and go, "Hey why is that fucking asshole in office?" if the dude that you sent to D.C. wasn't doing anything to benefit you or represent you. You weren't one vote in a sea of millions, you were one vote in a sea of thousands, so if your Senator was fucking up and your local politician wasn't helping, you got to go vote his ass out in two years and shove in a new guy who wouldn't vote for the other guy, ousting your Senator in as little as two years if he's being a cunt.

That was one of the key features of the original Constitution, and then someone lied to us. Someone told us that cutting out the middle man and using a direct Democracy to elect our Senators was a good idea. We believed them, and on April 8, 1913, we ratified the 17th Amendment. It was probably one of the biggest mistakes that America's Republic had ever made, and almost no one knows that it even happened, anymore.

We're not getting less Democratic, we're getting more Democratic, and that's the problem. Direct Democracy does not work. It completely abolishes the government's ability to even see the individual, let alone work in a way that benefits them. I am not the slightest bit interested in a tyranny of the majority.
Click to expand...
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Knyttet, Useless Magost Berry and 14 others
Maybe off topic, but if yall have not seen the democrats (Naddler) are now literaly shitting themselves on live television now...

Someone with more knowledge than me can post the video clip that is all over right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Syaoran Li and DeadFish
HandsomeDan said:
Maybe off topic, but if yall have not seen the democrats (Naddler) are now literaly shitting themselves on live television now...

Someone with more knowledge than me can post the video clip that is all over right now.
Click to expand...

Seriously did he just shit himself, what is he fucking doing
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Granola Grenadine, WangOfDamocles and 49 others
Quixotic Man said:
So Democrat reasons as to why we can't have any ballot security include:

Blacks are too stupid to get an ID.
Blacks are too stupid to file change of address forms.
Blacks scare easily and won't go to a ballot site if a cop is nearby.

What next?
Click to expand...
Blacks are just too stupid. There.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Granola Grenadine, Knyttet, Useless Magost Berry and 7 others
It's HK-47 said:
View attachment 1616176
Seriously did he just shit himself, what is he fucking doing
Click to expand...
I love how the camera so helpfully pans out to keep him in frame. It's very thoughtful.

Also, I love the Dems trying to argue for "restoring checks and balances". Bitch, your entire plan hinges on there being no checks and balances. Don't pretend Obama's terms didn't see a massive increase in presidential power, and that's after very large increases in the Bush era. Why didn't you restore checks and balances then? Oh, right. Because you thought you'd be in power forever but your grab failed in 2016 and you've been throwing a tantrum and having the media running damage control and interference for you for the past 4 years.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Granola Grenadine, Knyttet and 11 others
Looks like an ad for a porno.

1600885513203.jpg


Elvia may have been tacky but I doubt he'd be this tasteless.

1600885744409.jpg
 
  • Islamic Content
  • Horrifying
  • Winner
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Honzou, Useless Magost Berry and 22 others
Syaoran Li said:
I find it telling that the only meme of theirs that caught on in recent years was the "OK Boomer" meme, which was pretentious and insufferable but it was succinct and not just a preachy wall of text. Plus you also had enough Millennials and Zoomers on the right who like to A-Log the Boomers as well, although not to the extent that the Woke Left does.

Part of me wonders if OK Boomer would've been able to catch on in 2019 to the extent that it did if it weren't for the popularity of the "Boomer Wojak" meme in 2018 and early 2019.

The other big leftist meme of theirs before OK Boomer that caught on was the "fedora neckbeard man" but a lot of that worked because the left always projects and most leftist men are actual neckbeards (the soy boy has the beard and glasses for a reason) and it was probably one of the last major leftist memes that caught widespread traction back in 2010-2013. And to be honest, if it weren't for Sargon and Ethan Ralph (along with The Amazing Atheist and Boogie to a lesser extent, though they both lean left) I don't think it'd stick to the Right to the extent it did.

There's also the incel meme from around the same time, while there is a small community of self-identified incel nutjobs and the incel meme is starting to border on Satanic Panic/Reefer Madness levels of played out hysterics at this point thanks to astroturfing. It's become the leftist version of "cuck" at this point
Click to expand...
That wasn't their meme though, it was a gen z meme that had been around for a while, but once they got ahold of it, it was dead in less than 24 hours.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Useless Magost Berry, Toolbox, Exterminatus and 4 others
Standardized Profile said:
Was her entire life shaped by this one event, by her penis envy and rejection of God?
Click to expand...
Yes.

To prevent this from being a one word reply (and at the risk of sounding like E. Michael Jones), the core of Jewish identity is retaliatory narcissism. The original retaliation was against Jesus Christ, but any social norm will work as an adequate proxy--even their own.

In this regard, Jewishness doesn't need God; He would just be another target in their unceasing vendetta against everything.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Autistic
  • Like
Reactions: Knyttet, Toolbox, Coffee Shits and 13 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back