U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Read the article, I believe it's mostly for horseshit laws like marijuana and shit. Most notably, "assaultive crimes" are not covered. This might be a victory primarily pushed by the left but honestly I think it's a good thing.

I feel like on the surface this is a good thing, but this is also the type of thing that a year down the line starts to turn ugly as people either find a way to abuse it or use it as a launching point to a more sinister law.

My beef with the right is they think "law and order" and "being tough on crime" is simply getting as much arrests as possible and harsh sentencing, with little respect for proportionality of the crime or the justice of the law.

I can't prove this, but this feels more like 10-15 years ago than today. There's always going to be the "lock them up and throw away the key" types, but I think as you wrote later the minor offenses are seen less harshly.

There's also my bias as I've seen the left be the ones pushing to destroy people's lives for wrongthink in the last 5 years. Say what you will about the tough on crime right, but they've never called for people to lose their jobs over being a soft liberal panzy.
 
Generally, when I went to school, I was told not to attract unnecessary attention. Kids can be cruel.

You do what you have to do, make some friends, go about with your business and go home.

You'd think students are more accepting now with the times, but I'd argue it's worse now because of social media and smartphones. Not even with "I have an iPhone, you don't," with everybody sharing anything and everything about their lives and posting it online. Once you put something on the Internet, it's there forever. Another form of bullying or intimidation.

I don't condone bullying; that can really mess with people. It's more or less how it's being handled. The supposed "bullied" are becoming the bullies themselves with their holier than thou attitude towards the average.

Nothing is being solved; the tables have turned.
Women have more power. I was popular in high school, and the progressive popular girls were nasty, they bullied one teacher whose kid had cancer and another who lost a baby and got divorced because of it among other more specific things.

The popular guys might taunt the weird/creepy kids, but the girls are absolutely psychotic.
 
My granddad is convinced some kind of civil war is brewing. He said "I lived through the '60s. This is gonna be worse. We are in the beginnings of it. People on both sides will start shooting."

Maybe a fantasy but I don't think he's entirely off-base, honestly.
Remind your Granddad people are much softer than the 60's, but every asshole has what would have been professional grade photography and cinematography equipment by 60's standars in their pockets. The real problem is the people in power are just allowing this to happen.

I don't which is worse: having a manageable threat that elites do not wish to put down; or having a threat elites are trying to put down, but it's hard to contain.
 
Read the article, I believe it's mostly for horseshit laws like marijuana and shit. Most notably, "assaultive crimes" are not covered. This might be a victory primarily pushed by the left but honestly I think it's a good thing.

My beef with the right is they think "law and order" and "being tough on crime" is simply getting as much arrests as possible and harsh sentencing, with little respect for proportionality of the crime or the justice of the law. Joe Arpiao was cheerleeded on Fox, by Trump, and others, but like so many sociopaths, he used "law and order" as a guise for his fetish for power. Ignoring his corruption, merely being arrested by Arpaio--merely being accused, and not convicted, would net you the exact same treatment as the real criminals in his tent cities as you awaited trial, this is not rule of law or justice and conservatives need to figure out that "rule of law," "justice," and "punishment" are not synonymous. Meanwhile dangerous neighborhoods stay run-down shitholes because they know retarded braindead "boomers' with their bovine intelligence will eat it all up. Far from defunding the police, we should increase police funding and police presence in dangerous areas, protect local businesses so the economies can thrive, crack down on gangs and vandalism, and better integrate the police with local communities so people trust the police, don't live in fear of getting arrested for incredibly minor crimes (possession of marijuana), and feel open to report crimes and not that "snitches get stitches."

Kind of an aside, but related to this topic at its core so not really off topic, is that when the cops arrest people for victimless crimes for shit everyone participates in (marijuana--again, nearly EVERYONE does pot, conservative politicians included) it erodes trust. The drug war, or at least how its been waged, as set citizens against the police. There's a reason people speak of Al Capone with a strange reverence despite him being a crime lord. It's absolutely ridiculous the left is putting forth both Biden and Harris as their nominees when they both have been the exact sort of politicians that helped lead us down the road to BLM shit.

Ah, but make the local communities safe, then that might gentrify them and we can't have that. The left's favorite catch-22: Shitty rundown neighborhoods are due to lack of opportunity and capitalistic excess; but if you fix that, the now-nice neighborhoods are gentrified and taken from the poor inhabits which is also a sign of capitalistic excess.
Its far better to get a group of people together who take care of you and you take care of them.

What you say is nice and all but as we seen not everyone wants to be saved. Or worth saving
 
Last edited:
They aren't worth it. The fat friend always ruins everything. Trust me.

Kind of jumping on a soapbox, but goths don't really exist anymore. Goth was an outgrowth of DIY punk, darker moodier punks that didn't focus on politics. Siouxsie Sioux is the best example; she, like all the other first-wave "goths" and "goth bands," reject the label, even though nobody contributed to the goth look more than Siouxsie did. The first "true" goths were what came right after after this music and style had become "a thing." The earlier "goth" (what we sometimes call "goth", anyway) music was much more diverse, thoughtful, interesting, and experimental than whatever calls itself "goth" today. Using my waifu Siouxsie again, her songs lyrically ranged all over the place: criticism of Middle-eastern savagery, the treatment of women, particularly in the pornography industry, Shostakovitch being oppressed by the Soviets, most famously a song about what happened at Pompeii, and even a song about quack remedies. (But she was never really all that political and even stated such). Nowadays? It's fucking EBM, parodies of B-horror movies, and women in long black dresses trying to recreate the famous "Ophelia" painting. If you talk to a goth they will listen to all the same kinds of bands and don't deviate from what you'd expect because they're truly about image over anything else.

Modern goth is all paint-by-numbers, with a very limited set of paints. They're all about image and perception. "Get Out of My House" by Kate Bush is a song you'd think goths would love, based on their aesthetic, but nope, Kate Bush doesn't give them that goth street cred. Leonard Cohen and Johnny Cash are more goth than modern goths are today.

Best to just avoid modern "goths." Goths girls are either fat and mentally ill or just plain mentally ill, they're attention whores looking to give off an image and they have no creativity, not in themselves or in general.

The modern world in general is like this. I don't know where the creativity went.
 
Last edited:
The concept of hyperinflation is lost on him.

Or the fact that if everyone is rich, then nobody is rich. Giving everyone $1,000,000 doesn't make the country all millionaires; it's just creates levels of Venezulean instablity of the currency.

Also, where is this money coming from? I guess if you only think you need $300M, then taxing a billionaire like Jeff Bezos doesn't seem quite as insane. The problem is that you need slightly more than $300M. You would need $300T.

Nigga....sheeeiiiit:

160504154606-one-trillion-dollar-exlarge-169.jpg
 
Women have more power. I was popular in high school, and the progressive popular girls were nasty, they bullied one teacher whose kid had cancer and another who lost a baby and got divorced because of it among other more specific things.

The popular guys might taunt the weird/creepy kids, but the girls are absolutely psychotic.
The kids at my school took pride in driving the school bus driver insane.

My favorite story is when the bus arrived at school and the kids were getting off. One guy was trying to a watch to another guy when the bus driver screamed "hey, thats my watch!"

Turns out the kid pick pocketed the watch off the drivers wrist.

Good times
 
This is literally the point of Intersectionality in a nutshell.

My favorite is that they literally changed POC (person of color) to BIPOC (black indigenous person of color) because black people being racist to white people wasn't enough; black people got sick of Latinos and Asians stealing their thunder too.
 
Two reasons.

1) The Democrats rely on the black vote to get elected. Trump only got 8% of the black vote when he won in 2016. If Republicans started getting even 20% of the black vote, they'd win every swing state for the forseeable future.

2) More conspiracy level, but there is an idea that by giving black people all these benefits, you make them MORE dependent on the system they are seemingly fighting against. If you make more in unemployment and food stamps (WIC) than working, why would you work? Most people don't see the long-term planning and focus on short-term cash.

3. Hyper mega conspiracy (Seriously. Drape me in autism or dumb for this.) Coordinated by a bunch of secret Democrat racists, by constantly showering blacks with adoration and gibs, racial tensions will continue to rise. Leading to blacks suffering without having to lift a finger directly at them and have deniability.
 
I feel like on the surface this is a good thing, but this is also the type of thing that a year down the line starts to turn ugly as people either find a way to abuse it or use it as a launching point to a more sinister law.

I think this is more of a liberal thing than an outright commie thing. These laws are passed by people that want to work within the system. BLM, etc want to overthrow it. If they were a huge part of this I feel like they'd have let assaultive crimes be wiped out. Maybe I'm just trying to look on the bright side, I dunno.

I can't prove this, but this feels more like 10-15 years ago than today. There's always going to be the "lock them up and throw away the key" types, but I think as you wrote later the minor offenses are seen less harshly.

Yeah, but the point is the attitudes persist. And I'd say, not even too long ago Trump, etc were cheering on Joe Arpiao. In no way is subjecting people merely accused of a crime to tough and uncomfortable treatment justice; Arpaio used this to deal with critics or people that pissed him off. He knew the court would throw out charges, but he still fucked with people's lives and would ruin their day/week. And that's what I mean by justice, we should be very tough on crime, but only for CRIME, and crime we ought to be tough on, crimes with a clear victim whose rights were violated by a perpetrator. Social stability needs law enforcement that the regular people feel like they are on their side. Now, this isn't all the sole fault of the right AT ALL, the left has massively exaggerated police abuse and usually outright lies about supposed police abuse cases, and in cases where heavy police force is used they only show when the accused/arrested party is black, leading to an abuse of the "availability heuristic" in human reasoning in order to make people afraid, all so they can try to take down Trump.

This irresponsible way of policing (combined with a focus on revenue generation through fines and speeding tickets) has set people off against the police and this helped allow BLM to thrive with "cops are targeting black people" conspiracy theories.

There's also my bias as I've seen the left be the ones pushing to destroy people's lives for wrongthink in the last 5 years. Say what you will about the tough on crime right, but they've never called for people to lose their jobs over being a soft liberal panzy.

My beef isn't with the right intrinsically, it's the right wing boomer types that let the religious right control the Republican party and passed bad policies all the while doing nothing about good ones (like actually lowering taxes or protecting gun rights).
 
Last edited:
3. Hyper mega conspiracy (Seriously. Drape me in autism or dumb for this.) Coordinated by a bunch of secret Democrat racists, by constantly showering blacks with adoration and gibs, racial tensions will continue to rise. Leading to blacks suffering without having to lift a finger directly at them and have deniability.

Sure, let's fly off the rails because it's fun. Like how Justin Herbert paid off the Chargers team doctor to stab Tyrod Taylor in the lung.

Remember two months ago when Oprah said that a poor homeless white man still had more privilege than the richest black woman on the planet?

It could be a conspiracy to turn working class whites (and Latinos and Asians) against the blacks. They see all these blacks getting handouts and think "what about us?"
 
Sure, let's fly off the rails because it's fun. Like how Justin Herbert paid off the Chargers team doctor to stab Tyrod Taylor in the lung.

Remember two months ago when Oprah said that a poor homeless white man still had more privilege than the richest black woman on the planet?

It could be a conspiracy to turn working class whites (and Latinos and Asians) against the blacks. They see all these blacks getting handouts and think "what about us?"
It absolutely could. It's the same logic of punishing the class for the actions of one asshole and expecting the class to handle the punishment from there.

But I also don't treat this as anything but conspiracy when it can also be explained by:
A. People being completely brainless and insulated from reality
B. People feeling way too comfortable being this damn racist in public
C. People making money off saying "White people bad"
D. All of the above.
 
Kyle Rittenhouse is going to fight extradition, probably because he’s safer in juvie than adult prison. That story is actually the less interesting one to me. This one is even better. There are protestors demanding “justice” for 2 white people with one of them being wife beater and the other a literal child rapist. I’m a little confused as it seems to me that the Kenosha Kommando already issued justice to them.

I’m super disappointed the journalist didn’t ask the protesters if they were aware of the kind of people they were protesting for. Best part is that there are 2 signs for the child rapist and 1 for skate or die. One wonders why BLM isn’t demanding justice for the business owners who were attacked and had their lives destroyed by the riots their organization caused.
2B9AE750-6EFA-4663-A7CE-40AEB2224438.jpeg54E3B0FD-198F-4B1D-A738-BD820138921C.jpeg
85F1774E-4AB8-4D98-B2DC-834A399665C4.jpeg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back