2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[Extremist Frank]

Having trouble getting a local archive, but Robert Barnes was on Infowars today talking about Barrett and Lagoa. Barnes thinks Barrett is a huge mistake because she is a pro-lockdown judge who voted to allow Illinois lockdowns to continue. She cited the Jacobson case as the law of the land as Barr and others are denouncing that case publicly.

I don't understand why kf boosts Robert Barnes so much. He seems like a grifter trying to get national attention, no different than the people he calls out. The Rittenhouse case is a great example. He's been extremely critical over Pierce's apparent delay, yet he wants to waste another six months fighting extradition (his time frame, and extradition is inevitable) to coerce the prosecution into lowering the bail amount in Wisconsin rather than challenging the bail amt at arraignment or a bail hearing once Rittenhouse is in WI. Today's hearings and Barnes' response are also pretty revealing:

https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1309507769469288451

The hearing Barnes links notes the habeas process involves 1) the IL Govt serves an extradition warrant on Rittenhouse -> 2) Rittenhouse is then entitled to review the IL extradition warrant, WI extradition request, and supporting evidence -> 3) Rittenhouse's team prepares a habeas petition. IL's prosecutor mentions that the extradition warrant was just served today. Pierce mentions he hasn't received extradition docs from either IL or WI, which is because the warrant was just served, and asks the judge to ensure proper procedures are followed for him and his team to receive and have adequate time to review them and to prepare a petition.

Meanwhile Barnes is bitching about Pierce not already having the extradition docs, which he couldn't yet have because the extradition warrant was only served a few hours ago.

Why is this guy popular here?[/QUOTE]

 

[Maamtis]

I've never thought a landslide was possible -- too much opposition. It would be great if he were able to keep the 2016 electoral map, and then maybe grab Minnesota too.

Honestly that's the way I see it going down. Will really drum it into certain people's heads that it wasn't a fluke.

 

[CrippleThreat]

I dont see why people are talking about a landslide for trump? i cant get him above 350, even with very favourable turnout in some states. thats good but not a landslide.

I've never thought a landslide was possible -- too much opposition. It would be great if he were able to keep the 2016 electoral map, and then maybe grab Minnesota too.

The '"landslide" is at best ~320-330, but the fraud / Dems shitting themselves will be epic, so it will be a Dubya-Hayes tier (at the very worst) 271. And I know from history, Hayes-Tilden pissed people off, and Dubya-Gore brought out the protests. Trump-Biden will be the stuff of legends.

Also, Trump's out in Atlanta with that economic plan for blacks. Hell, I'd call it a "Blacks for Trump" event.

 

[Puff]

I've only seen one Biden 2020 sticker in recent memory, on a car's back window. I may have seen one or 2 more but the memory of that 1 sticker is burned into my brain so badly I feel like it's safe to assume it's just the 1. Granted, I live in the Bible Belt.

Something else to note: I currently attend a university that is liberal-leaning like many unis, and the city it's in is also that way because college town. We have BLM rain dances here despite being hours away from the latest BLM martyr death. However, I've seen more Trump stickers and signs. As of today, the only election stickers I've seen on campus are old, fading, peeling Bernie stickers that are in very odd places. It's interesting. I've seen 1 sign for a lefty senator. There are 30x as many signs for mayor than anything else.

I'm in a deep blue area in a swing state and there are FAR more signs for the Dem senator than Biden. Even if they show and vote Biden, they're not happy about it.

 

[MrJokerRager]

Just been listening to P.J. O’Rourke on the Chris Stigall podcast (based Pennsylvania radio talk show host) and it was weird - P.J. thinks the Dems will win the House, Senate AND Presidency.

Now it’s one thing hearing the crazy Leftists mutter their insane election predictions but it’s quite another hearing someone you quite like and enjoy talk complete shite. I know PJ’s politics, he’s a Washington Post columnist ffs but there was just something about hearing the words come from his mouth, knowing he believed in it and my astonishment at how anyone could be so retarded. And because he’s someone I like and believe is politically informed (if mistaken) there’s now a tiny part of me questioning myself and wondering if he might be right..

I want back in my bubble.

A Biden win will set the blueprint for elections around the world and revolutionize American politics into a grotesque direction.

As Joe Rogan said a while ago that If Biden was a Republican running against Democrat Harris, the media would tearing Biden to shreds hard over his mental health.

That you can win an election while sitting in the basement the whole time. If Biden does win by legitimate means the clear winner with little to no fucks ups. Then America maybe does deserve to die out. Like fuck, you win an election by literally sitting on your ass. That fear works and Karens are the new commissars. Its a lot of consequences that dipshit commentators are missing out on because Orange Man Bad.

I also would like to add that many Obama voters switched to Trump and there was a trend that the Democrats were losing these voters. Bernie Sanders in 2020 dropped appealing to the remaining White working class and loss states to Biden that he beat Hillary in. So any Obama level support would be from niggers and millennials. Both groups who have shitty voting records and don't care about Biden or Harris.

 

[legalkochi]

Just been listening to P.J. O’Rourke on the Chris Stigall podcast (based Pennsylvania radio talk show host) and it was weird - P.J. thinks the Dems will win the House, Senate AND Presidency.

Now it’s one thing hearing the crazy Leftists mutter their insane election predictions but it’s quite another hearing someone you quite like and enjoy talk complete shite. I know PJ’s politics, he’s a Washington Post columnist ffs but there was just something about hearing the words come from his mouth, knowing he believed in it and my astonishment at how anyone could be so retarded. And because he’s someone I like and believe is politically informed (if mistaken) there’s now a tiny part of me questioning myself and wondering if he might be right..

I want back in my bubble.

P.J. O'Rourke is an idiot (and he's a Washington Post columnist).

The Democrats aren't winning shit.

 

[RockPaper]

P.J. O'Rourke is an idiot (and he's a Washington Post columnist).

The Democrats aren't winning shit.

The Dems might win, but O'Rourke thinking so is orthogonal to it and shouldn't give anyone pause one way or the other. He's just as much a bow-tied and ossified establishment clown as anyone else at the Post, despite any past bona fides of being "conservative".

 

[Notgoodwithusernames]

A friend of mine on a discord described Biden and Harriss as Forest and Jenny: He's a retard and she's a bitch

 

[RumblyTumbly]

Saw this on my Facebook news feed today:

A friend of mine explained that Biden's gaffes are the result of a stutter he's been fighting his whole life, so if you pass around the "You know, the thing" meme or mock him for his slip ups, you're an asshole.

That's all good and everything, but I highly doubt that she'd care if it was Trump with the stutter and saying this stuff. Also, I doubt a stutter accounts for idiotic statements like "If you don't vote for me, you ain't black" and the like.

 

[Exterminatus]

I've never thought a landslide was possible -- too much opposition. It would be great if he were able to keep the 2016 electoral map, and then maybe grab Minnesota too.

He came close in Minnesota in 2016, he only lost by around 45,000 votes and he flipped 19 counties red in the state. Percentage wise he's the closest Republicans have come to winning the state since Reagan narrowly lost to Mondale there in 1984 when he had his massive landslide victory, Reagan lost in the state by around 4,000 votes. So him flipping the state isn't entirely out of the question, it'll be interesting to look at though.

 

[Harvey Danger]

I dont see why people are talking about a landslide for trump? i cant get him above 350, even with very favourable turnout in some states. thats good but not a landslide.

I don't think it's very likely. The anti-Trump side from 2016 hasn't really flipped, it's meta-stasized and became even worse. I think Trump picks up some votes on the margins, but not enough in the big states/cities that always hated him.

What I really want is him to hold 2016 levels plus a clear gain somewhere. For those too young to remember, when Bush won in 2000, he lost the popular vote by 500k and people regarded it as a fluke. They figured the country would "correct" itself in 2004... then when Bush won the first actual majority since Reagan, the left's heads fucking exploded. BDS was muted during his first term, but went full psycho in his 2nd. The only thing that calmed the left down was Obama's win.

TDS right now is crazier than BDS was post-2004, and that's before the election. If Trump wins with a higher vote, if he manages a popular vote win, or if he somehow manages an actual 50%+ majority, the screams on the left will be priceless. Like nothing you've ever witnessed before.

 

[Meat Target]

I'm in a deep blue area in a swing state and there are FAR more signs for the Dem senator than Biden. Even if they show and vote Biden, they're not happy about it.

I'm in a kinda-purple part of a deep red state, and am seeing more state-level election signs.

 

[GuntPunt]

Look at Nate Wood's simulation results. He has Trump losing Ohio yet winning Iowa in the model, but with simulations like this showing how Biden can win, I started laughing. Texas, MONTANA and KANSAS are fucking swing states.

How does this tard have a job?

 

[break these cuffs]

Why is this guy popular here?

People love e-celebs and the regular names were getting shit on so badly that new ones people weren't already pissed at had to be found.

 

[Dr. Geronimo]

Look at Nate Wood's simulation results. He has Trump losing Ohio yet winning Iowa in the model, but with simulations like this showing how Biden can win, I started laughing. Texas, MONTANA and KANSAS are fucking swing states.
View attachment 1620941
How does this tard have a job?

Imagine looking at this and thinking "Yes, Biden truly is America's candidate."

 

[tehpope]

How does this tard have a job?

Disney is footing the bill. And they think people respect him enough to flip votes or prevent people from voting. If Trump wins, I wouldn't be surprised to hear Disney selling 538 to the highest bidder.

 

[RockPaper]

View attachment 1620998

Imagine looking at this and thinking "Yes, Biden truly is America's candidate."

I'll win Florida before Biden does.

 

[Syaoran Li]

I don't know anything about her. That might actually be a plus in her favor.

I think the left spent a lot of time building up oppo research against the Christian lady and the like. But at the same time, she's probably ready to go, and they do need someone fast fast fast.

The brown lady checks IdPol boxes.

Reading TheDonald.win, they seem to be split on the Christian. Lots of bullet point lists about why she's good, followed by bullet point lists as to why she's another Roberts.

Rushing actually is in real life what the Left thinks Barret is like.

She's more or less a genuine traditionalist neocon who wants to ban same-sex marriage despite being a Millennial (she was born the same year Chris was) and I honestly think she's only on the short list because she's a woman and could serve as one of those red herrings for someone like Lagoa or Barrett.

Allison Jones Rushing is far less experienced than Lagoa and is far more hardcore than Barrett since she's more or less a traditionalist Protestant whore as opposed to being a vaguely pro-life Charismatic Catholic Karen.

The only way Rushing gets in is if Clarence Thomas retires and is replaced by Barrett and then Breyer dies while Trump is in office. Even then, Breyer's more likely to get replaced by a White male judge or even Ted Cruz than Goody Rushing unless Trump really wants to trigger and own the libs one last time.

I don't think it's very likely. The anti-Trump side from 2016 hasn't really flipped, it's meta-stasized and became even worse. I think Trump picks up some votes on the margins, but not enough in the big states/cities that always hated him.

What I really want is him to hold 2016 levels plus a clear gain somewhere. For those too young to remember, when Bush won in 2000, he lost the popular vote by 500k and people regarded it as a fluke. They figured the country would "correct" itself in 2004... then when Bush won the first actual majority since Reagan, the left's heads fucking exploded. BDS was muted during his first term, but went full psycho in his 2nd. The only thing that calmed the left down was Obama's win.

TDS right now is crazier than BDS was post-2004, and that's before the election. If Trump wins with a higher vote, if he manages a popular vote win, or if he somehow manages an actual 50%+ majority, the screams on the left will be priceless. Like nothing you've ever witnessed before.

Agreed. If Trump wins all the states he did in 2016 plus Minnesota, that's the kind of kick in the balls that lets them know it's not a fluke and they need to change course. With Bush, a lot of the muted derangement was because 9/11 happened early in his first term while his second term was marred by the War on Terror and because Bush was the last of the old guard "fundies and neocons" Republican presidents.

By 2004, the Democrats figured out the playbook of the Religious Right and they were hated by the majority of Americans but John Kerry was an absolute dud of a candidate and the War on Terror hadn't quite gone completely pear-shaped in 2004 (well, it did but the average American didn't fully realize it at the time) plus Bush really pandered to the fundies to get higher turnouts while the majority of Dem and independent voters stayed home because Kerry was a boring dud of a candidate with no real game outside of "I'm not the other guy"

Trump is not part of that clique at all and the Dems have more or less used every trick in the book by now. If Trump wins a second term and gains Minnesota (a state so blue that even Mondale won it) in addition to the states he won in 2016 then there's a good chance that we'll see that Seventh Party System realignment happen.

If we get that one-in-a-million chance of a best-case scenario "golden ending" outcome where he wins with both the popular vote and managing to flip both Minnesota and either Virginia or New Hampshire, then the DNC will definitely clean house.

 

[CrippleThreat]

View attachment 1620998

Imagine looking at this and thinking "Yes, Biden truly is America's candidate."

How did California go from 13 EVs to 55 EVs, and why is it no longer a red stronghold?

 

[X Prime]

How did California go from 13 EVs to 55 EVs, and why is it no longer a red stronghold?

Reagan granted amnesty to illegal immigrants in the state.

That's pretty much it.