Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[Corn Flakes]

The ones who manage to perform that mental jump, sure. But here's the thing... the left knows they are cheating. And so that kinda negates it. "Oh he cheated better" doesn't lead to much better lines of thought for these guys. Cause now they are OUTCLASSED by the fascists AND they didn't get the popular vote which is like a big, bullshit teddy bear.

You're overthinking this way too hard.

The left has this persistent, almost pathologic underdog mentality that's never going to go away. That's why they keep coming up with enemies out of whole cloth: they aren't the underdog, but they must feel like they are the underdog to justify their actions. Therefore they tilt at windmills and call everybody that disagrees with them a fascist, and publish articles about how America is a 100% completely fascist country with jackbooted thugs on the streets every day and night, and with concentration camps for illegals and black trans genocides happening every week.

So if they lose the popular vote, yeah... sure. Some are going to get blackpilled. But you can be damn sure the screeching harpies are going to screech even harder and those who are willing to employ violence will do so. They can't force a civil war (most of these assholes cry when they can't find toilet paper at the supermarket), but they can sure as shit make things uncomfortable for everybody else for a while. Hence, riots. Maybe even Black Panther-style bombings. "Asymmetrical warfare" bullshit. You think it's going to doom them, but it's just going to embolden the crazies.

 

[trent]

What if Trump wins the popular vote?

Sure, rate me optimistic since I don't believe it myself, but after just the past year of doommongering and riots burning cities for months on end, with "mostly peaceful" protests, with constantly shifting goalposts with regards to Wu Flu, what if Trump wins the popular vote?

"SEE!!!????!!! I told you the US was inherenetly racist! Now i have to continue my righteous crusade for the next 4 years until the populace votes for the right President! Here's my Patreon acoount details."

/goes back to protesting

 

[Flexo]

Biden will need at least ONE bipartisan thing to stave off losing Congress in 2022. Harris won't compromise but Biden will overrule her and crushing the lunatic left would be a necessary evil in a lot of ways to both remove it from being thorn in his side (by neutralizing the lunatic left) and keep moderates from finalizing their transition into GOP rank and file. Framing BLM figureheads as child rapists and rapists in general would be another, since I'm sure Biden will need to find SOME way to win back black voters who won't be happy that Trump lost and Biden has zero interest in pandering to them/demanding their loyalty and vote or else.

You assume a great deal of cognition and awareness from Biden that I sincerely question.

Unless in this case you meant Jill Biden.

What if Trump wins the popular vote?

Sure, rate me optimistic since I don't believe it myself, but after just the past year of doommongering and riots burning cities for months on end, with "mostly peaceful" protests, with constantly shifting goalposts with regards to Wu Flu, what if Trump wins the popular vote?

The one - ONE - option of a Trump loss that gives me comfort is him getting the popular vote, and Biden getting the electoral college. Sure my ideal is for Trump to run away with both, but if the former happens? I may seriously pop a motherboard with laughter. Because I have so many receipts with their words about that institution.

1: The majority of americans are the "Silent Followers". They exist soley to follow whoever is in power.
2: Those who vote are the "Attemptive Leaders", those who want to enforce their will on the Silent Followers.
3: The Silent Followers will only ever become Attemptive Leaders if they are 'convinced'of the 'right' way.
4: Ergo, whenever the Democrats win its because the Silent Followers follow them. If the Republicans win, it means the whole country follows them.
. . .
Keep in mind the line of logic, they believe the majority of Americans SUPPORT them. When they loot? The majority totally support it. When they contravene law? The Majority wants it. Its how they justify it, its how they are -able- to do the doublethink. Because their foundational premise and logic, the core of their ideology, says that the majority of Americans WANT it.

And if they don't want it, if Trump wins the popular vote, the entire foundation of their ENTIRE belief is pulled out from under them.

Been watching some Stephen Michael Davis recently. I may quibble with him about a few things, but he posts excellent arguments with receipts - in this case, confirmation of your thesis.

Basically, progressives would totally win everything - everybody loves them - if the media or the establishment or the billionaires or the special interests or...etc etc wouldn't keep deceiving the voters to vote against their interests.

It's also why Cenk getting 5% of the vote in his election will never stop being funny to me.

 

[Hard Toothbrush]

The one - ONE - option of a Trump loss that gives me comfort is him getting the popular vote, and Biden getting the electoral college. Sure my ideal is for Trump to run away with both, but if the former happens? I may seriously pop a motherboard with laughter. Because I have so many receipts with their words about that institution.

The amount of spin and backpedaling to "no no the electoral college was always good" from the left would probably cause the Earth to get thrown out of orbit.

 

[Salubrious]

You're overthinking this way too hard.

The left has this persistent, almost pathologic underdog mentality that's never going to go away. That's why they keep coming up with enemies out of whole cloth: they aren't the underdog, but they must feel like they are the underdog to justify their actions. Therefore they tilt at windmills and call everybody that disagrees with them a fascist, and publish articles about how America is a 100% completely fascist country with jackbooted thugs on the streets every day and night, and with concentration camps for illegals and black trans genocides happening every week.

So if they lose the popular vote, yeah... sure. Some are going to get blackpilled. But you can be damn sure the screeching harpies are going to screech even harder and those who are willing to employ violence will do so. They can't force a civil war (most of these assholes cry when they can't find toilet paper at the supermarket), but they can sure as shit make things uncomfortable for everybody else for a while. Hence, riots. Maybe even Black Panther-style bombings. "Asymmetrical warfare" bullshit. You think it's going to doom them, but it's just going to embolden the crazies.

It's easy to say that they got "more" deranged when Trump was elected, but that ignores the obvious part that everyone misses.

They got "MORE" deranged. They didn't "START" getting deranged.

They were already heading down this path when Obama was still president. Yes, Trump made the journey accelerate, but Trump did not START this journey.

Cancel culture didn't start in 2016.

 

[Corn Flakes]

It's easy to say that they got "more" deranged when Trump was elected, but that ignores the obvious part that everyone misses.

They got "MORE" deranged. They didn't "START" getting deranged.

They were already heading down this path when Obama was still president. Yes, Trump made the journey accelerate, but Trump did not START this journey.

Cancel culture didn't start in 2016.

Oh, absolutely. This is nothing new. Trump didn't get the ball rolling, and to be honest neither did Obama. It just got way worse in the past 12 years. Eventually it'll reach a breaking point and something will cause the cycle to reset.

I just hope that "something" doesn't involve people dying.

 

[Sekirodiealot]

 

[Moguro Fukuzou]

View attachment 1620478
View attachment 1620511

I still don't understand everyone pinning the blame for covid on Trump when it's mostly up to the state to determine how they deal with things. Federal is more dealing with things liking relief programs for federal level things, they can only involve themselves as much as the states allow. Same thing is being done in Canada with the province leadership determining the best way to deal with it, some more successful than others, with the Federal government stepping in when needed. I don't see the same level of bitching towards Trudeau for the number of deaths in different provinces, it's almost always focused on provincial leadership. Countries are right next to each other yet the perception on handling is so different.

I personally belong to the camp that is weirded out by people getting so aggressive about not wearing a mask in public, but maybe that's because where I am almost everyone would wear one when prompted at the door of businesses to please wear one. There's no need to wear one when you're just walking around outside, but most people make sure to put one on before entering any buildings (most shops also ask people to sanitize their hands when they enter). I don't see how that's much of an inconvenience unless you have a medical condition but then you're exempt from wearing a mask anyway.

 

[Salubrious]

I still don't understand everyone pinning the blame for covid on Trump when it's mostly up to the state to determine how they deal with things. Federal is more dealing with things liking relief programs for federal level things, they can only involve themselves as much as the states allow. Same thing is being done in Canada with the province leadership determining the best way to deal with it, some more successful than others, with the Federal government stepping in when needed. I don't see the same level of bitching towards Trudeau for the number of deaths in different provinces, it's almost always focused on provincial leadership. Countries are right next to each other yet the perception on handling is so different.

1) Because Trump is the boogieman. Everything bad is his fault. Anything that he does good they will ignore (notice how there were two historic Middle Eastern peace deals this month and they are already out of the newscycle.)

2) Because 200K sounds like a lot of people. Any more than ONE is too many. It's like how people will declare there to be a national crisis of hate crimes against transgender people and then say that 30 die in the entire country in the entire year. If you say that 1 in a 1000 people under 50 die of COVID, then you are dehumanizing the people that do die.

3) Because Trump is going against the mainstream narrative. COVID is bad and everyone should lockdown no matter what. We've seen reports of states actually fudging the numbers to justify people staying under lockdown.

I know people that say with a straight face that they WISHED MORE PEOPLE WOULD DIE so that people would start taking COVID more seriously. The idea that less than 150 people under the age of 17 have died of COVID in this entire year is not seen as a good thing by them because they want to be afraid and the MSM/left tells them to be afraid. Also you are dehumanizing the 150 kids that did die. never mind the fact that if you told them back in March that so few kids would have died due to COVID they would have called you a virus-denier. In fact, people still accuse me of "repeating right-wing talking points" when I literally link them to the CDC statistics. Stephen Colbert this week came right out and said that the CDC is repeating what Trump tells them to say.

The virus is US vs. THEM, the same as any political issue, and right now the left is embracing the idea that anyone that "downplays" the virus is a terrible person.

 

[Shaka Brah]

Someone forgot to censor things again.

 

[Josterman]

Here is some more of Ken Penders TDS and one of the tweets he suggested a overthrow of the government
He is so going to lose it if Trump wins again

 

[Jigglyjogglers]

>Mail-in ballouts aren't safe and secure

Little Freudian slip there, Mr. Echidna Fetishist.

 

[Corn Flakes]

I genuinely love these people talking about a "peaceful overthrow of Donald J. Trump". They can't even peacefully protest, much less remove the most powerful man in the world from his position. You know there would be violence. Lots of it.

 

[Shaka Brah]

I genuinely love these people talking about a "peaceful overthrow of Donald J. Trump". They can't even peacefully protest, much less remove the most powerful man in the world from his position. You know there would be violence. Lots of it.

Peace has never been in their vocabulary. Violent rioting and national blackmail have been their weapon of choice for all the major social changes that were pushed on us. As has been the media's attempt to rewrite history and portray violence as peace, and riots as protests.

 

[bippu_as_fuck_ls400]

Anything that he does good they will ignore (notice how there were two historic Middle Eastern peace deals this month and they are already out of the newscycle.)

Exactly. How many times have you heard it mentioned that Trump did this a week ago?

 

[CrippleThreat]

Exactly. How many times have you heard it mentioned that Trump did this a week ago?

View attachment 1621233

Or this. And they say Trump has no black supporters...

 

[WuTangClan2299]

Or this. And they say Trump has no black supporters...

here's a summary of his plans

He's seething right now

 

[Jigglyjogglers]

I genuinely love these people talking about a "peaceful overthrow of Donald J. Trump". They can't even peacefully protest, much less remove the most powerful man in the world from his position. You know there would be violence. Lots of it.

Yeah, that's what they mean. "Peaceful" overthrow like "peaceful" protests.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

here's a summary of his plans
View attachment 1621282

He's seething right now
View attachment 1621285

1. They are both Democrat ran Domestic Terrorist organizations
2. David Dorn's widow says hi

 

[Dante Alighieri]

The KKK doesn't lynch black people either since they don't exist anymore.