Nick Rekieta's Weeb Wars videos & livestreams - MULTIPLE SLURS

Status
Not open for further replies.
Post it in the general Nick Rekieta thread, it'll probably belong there more than here.

Also, @5t3n0g0ph3r, @damian, fancy doing a bit of cleanup here and moving posts over to that thread too?

I've already asked them to and Sten says he can't (it's not in the subforum). I've reported both Manning's and my posts on the subject and asked them to be moved, though.

I'm still waiting on the evidence.
 
I certainly want to see your side of the story.
We may be autists here on KF but I thought that we were more tolerant and knowledgeable than Twitter.
So I thought.

I am going to make this as brief and as non spergy as possible.

On or about March 22nd of last year, I was contacted by Nick on Twitter (his old Twitter) and asked to let Kiwis know that he wanted a running archive of Renfamous' Tweets. The purpose of this was because Nick wanted Ty to wrap up Lauren in litigation somehow (he REALLY hates Ren, as do a lot of people). I submitted this to a long running DM chain that included emspex (RIP), @AnOminous, @mindlessobserver, and some other people (@damian, where you in there?).

Anybody in that DM will likely remember this. After some discussion, I was cleared by emspex to make the announcement on the general forum, which I did. As I recall, one person in that DM chain did make a "personal army" objection, but that was the minority report. I took emspex's clearance of forwarding Nick's request as gospel. She was forum mod, after all.

My post was well received and let to an uptick in the archiving of her Tweets.

I then made a second post, same day, which included a partially redacted screenshot of Nick confirming that he wanted extensive archiving of Ren, and confirming that this a request from him. I asked if I could say the request was direct from him. He said yes, but did not want the specific reason why to get out (that's the censored part in his DMs).

1553310161637.png

Please not this isn't "patebin" because the above screenshot was merely copy-pasted from what I posted on March 22nd, 2019. The post does not have an edit tag, and is unmolested. Anyone can see for themselves.

I hope this satisfies @Spectre_06. I. AM. NOT. LYING.

First off screenshots or bullshit and second, carrying water for a cow?

Done. Here and way back at the beginning of last year. This is old. I'm kinda shocked I am being challenged on this, TBH.

Nick is not classified as a cow. His thread is in Multimedia (then and still). I would not carry water for a designated cow on this site. However, I did carry water for for an e-celeb, and I am (in retrospect) ashamed. I will accept your recrimination on that basis.

I am a bit of a sperg at times, I am probably acting too emo, but I am not a liar.

I don't intend to respond to this unless anybody has specific questions I can help them with. I am going to go for a walk now and clear my head. Thank you.

I apologize to anybody who is angry at me. Please continue talking about the Vic case.

Edit: Slight additional details.
 
Last edited:
As I recall, one person in that DM chain did make a "personal army" objection, but that was the minority report.
How fucking unfortunate because this was quite literally what this was. You should've told that long nosed retard to make a kiwi-farms account himself and do all the archiving. Reiketa manipulated all of you just to do his dirty work and to make things worst he put himself in a position to disavow if he needed.

"I like kiwi-farms but I've never told them to do anything." My fucking ass. You all got played.
 
How fucking unfortunate because this was quite literally what this was. You should've told that long nosed retard to make a kiwi-farms account himself and do all the archiving. Reiketa manipulated all of you just to do his dirty work and to make things worst he put himself in a position to disavow if he needed.

"I like kiwi-farms but I've never told them to do anything." My fucking ass. You all got played.

Sucks to be you, Bitchass punk.
 
I am going to make this as brief and as non spergy as possible.

On or about March 22nd of last year, I was contacted by Nick on Twitter (his old Twitter) and asked to let Kiwis know that he wanted a running archive of Renfamous' Tweets. The purpose of this was because Nick wanted Ty to wrap up Lauren in litigation somehow (he REALLY hates Ren, as do a lot of people). I submitted this to a long running DM chain that included emspex (RIP), @AnOminous, @mindlessobserver, and some other people (@damian, where you in there?).

Anybody in that DM will likely remember this. After some discussion, I was cleared by emspex to make the announcement on the general forum, which I did. As I recall, one person in that DM chain did make a "personal army" objection, but that was the minority report. I took emspex's clearance of forwarding Nick's request as gospel. She was forum mod, after all.

My post was well received and let to an uptick in the archiving of her Tweets.

I then made a second post, same day, which included a partially redacted screenshot of Nick confirming that he wanted extensive archiving of Ren, and confirming that this a request from him. I asked if I could say the request was direct from him. He said yes, but did not want the specific reason why to get out (that's the censored part in his DMs).

View attachment 1623825

Please not this isn't "patebin" because the above screenshot was merely copy-pasted from what I posted on March 22nd, 2019. The post does not have an edit tag, and is unmolested. Anyone can see for themselves.

I hope this satisfies @Spectre_06. I. AM. NOT. LYING.



Done. Here and way back at the beginning of last year. This is old. I'm kinda shocked I am being challenged on this, TBH.

Nick is not classified as a cow. His thread is in Multimedia (then and still). I would not carry water for a designated cow on this site. However, I did carry water for for an e-celeb, and I am (in retrospect) ashamed. I will accept your recrimination on that basis.

I am a bit of a sperg at times, I am probably acting too emo, but I am not a liar.

I don't intend to respond to this unless anybody has specific questions I can help them with. I am going to go for a walk now and clear my head. Thank you.

I apologize to anybody who is angry at me. Please continue talking about the Vic case.

Edit: Slight additional details.

I'm moving my response here since Manning wants to shit up any thread he can on his little crusade against Nick (because Nick didn't disavow Dick, Ralph, and others hard enough for him) rather than contain his autism in the proper place.

This is literally the exact opposite of him "telling everybody they need to archive Renfamous' tweets". It literally says, "I'm told this is happening. If it is can you get me a copy of this?" He didn't tell you to come to the Farms to have us archive shit, you did that on your fucking own. Then you say, "I will let them know. Can I say you asked for the mor be more coy?" meaning you wanted to know if you should say Nick asked or if you should be a soy-filled bitch.

So again, you're taking something, twisting it when the fucking thing doesn't say he told you to do it. You took it on yourself. Own that.

Now, any more screenshots to validate your stated claims?
 
How fucking unfortunate because this was quite literally what this was. You should've told that long nosed retard to make a kiwi-farms account himself and do all the archiving. Reiketa manipulated all of you just to do his dirty work and to make things worst he put himself in a position to disavow if he needed.

"I like kiwi-farms but I've never told them to do anything." My fucking ass. You all got played.

First of all, thank you for reading and seeing the evidence for what it is.

I do not disagree. My thought process at the time was that emspex cleared it, so what the hell. This started a chain of me doing things for Nick. In retrospect, I was dumb for not seeing it myself, so I can't put it on the nice girl. I just know I was upfront that I was effectively functioning as his gopher to emspex and several others, and I asked if this was okay. I was dumb, but not "looking to get banned" dumb.

I think the guy who objected was Geth, but I can't remember. Those DMs were purged (and they are now all on timed self destruct) following the data breach. That's a change Null made this year.

@Spectre_06: Your challenge for proof was ill advised if you are looking to defend Nick. I might be able to dig up additional shit despite roadblocks like Nick's Twitter ban and KF DM purges. He asked me to do shit for him on KF. It's true. I have image evidence, post evidence, and the testimony of people who were here since the beginning of the Vic saga. I will wait your reply and I hope to see your objectivity.

I'll be back in like an hour.
 
First of all, thank you for reading and seeing the evidence for what it is.

I do not disagree. My thought process at the time was that emspex cleared it, so what the hell. This started a chain of me doing things for Nick. In retrospect, I was dumb for not seeing it myself, so I can't put it on the nice girl. I just know I was upfront that I was effectively functioning as his gopher to emspex and several others, and I asked if this was okay. I was dumb, but not "looking to get banned" dumb.

I think the guy who objected was Geth, but I can't remember. Those DMs were purged (and they are now all on timed self destruct) following the data breach. That's a change Null made this year.

@Spectre_06: Your challenge for proof was ill advised if you are looking to defend Nick. I might be able to dig up additional shit despite roadblocks like Nick's Twitter ban and KF DM purges. He asked me to do shit for him on KF. It's true. I have image evidence, post evidence, and the testimony of people who were here since the beginning of the Vic saga. I will wait your reply and I hope to see your objectivity.

I'll be back in like an hour.

Then fucking do it and post it in one of his threads rather than shitting up the lawsuit thread. Thanks.

Fucking Christ.
 
I'm moving my response here since Manning wants to shit up any thread he can on his little crusade against Nick (because Nick didn't disavow Dick, Ralph, and others hard enough for him) rather than contain his autism in the proper place.

This is literally the exact opposite of him "telling everybody they need to archive Renfamous' tweets". It literally says, "I'm told this is happening. If it is can you get me a copy of this?" He didn't tell you to come to the Farms to have us archive shit, you did that on your fucking own. Then you say, "I will let them know. Can I say you asked for the mor be more coy?" meaning you wanted to know if you should say Nick asked or if you should be a soy-filled bitch.

So again, you're taking something, twisting it when the fucking thing doesn't say he told you to do it. You took it on yourself. Own that.

Now, any more screenshots to validate your stated claims?

That's what I was thinking. He characterizes it now and even back then that Nick asked people to 'archive everything', but the logs themselves only show Nick saying 'you're already archiving things? Can I have the archives?' I don't know why Nick broke up with Manning, but I don't really care. If he doesn't have any legit dirt to share then it's boring to see him whine and flounce everywhere like KF should care about his break up.
 
That's what I was thinking. He characterizes it now and even back then that Nick asked people to 'archive everything', but the logs themselves only show Nick saying 'you're already archiving things? Can I have the archives?' I don't know why Nick broke up with Manning, but I don't really care. If he doesn't have any legit dirt to share then it's boring to see him whine and flounce everywhere like KF should care about his break up.

Manning is mad that Rackets hasn't completely disavowed Dick Masterson and Ethan Ralph because of Digibro, but also Ethan Ralph grooming Faith Vickers. He's absolutely livid that Nick won't do it (because everyone on Kiwi Farms, when it comes to something like this, wants that to happen but Nick isn't that type of person) and so he's on a crusade because Nick isn't dancing to his tune.
 
Manning is mad that Rackets hasn't completely disavowed Dick Masterson and Ethan Ralph because of Digibro, but also Ethan Ralph grooming Faith Vickers. He's absolutely livid that Nick won't do it (because everyone on Kiwi Farms, when it comes to something like this, wants that to happen but Nick isn't that type of person) and so he's on a crusade because Nick isn't dancing to his tune.

I recognize those names, but I don't know who any of those people are. Is Ethan Ralph the comic guy, or another guy? This still sounds like some lover's spat they should keep to themselves, not spew all over the Farms wherever Manning goes, unless there's something interesting to share about it.
 
I recognize those names, but I don't know who any of those people are. Is Ethan Ralph the comic guy, or another guy? This still sounds like some lover's spat they should keep to themselves, not spew all over the Farms wherever Manning goes, unless there's something interesting to share about it.

Ethan Ralp his a fat faggot who drinks and pops benzos.

Dick Masterson is a 40-year-old faggot who still hangs on to him being a prom king.
 
Then fucking do it and post it in one of his threads rather than shitting up the lawsuit thread. Thanks.

Fucking Christ.

Spectre,

It says volumes that when you ask for proof in this thread, and I post definitive proof, you post this and don't comment on said proof. It's obvious deflection. You asked for it here. The mods can move the posts wherever they wish. You were stupid to ask for proof. You're not doing a good job defending Nick if you invite something that peppers him with shrapnel. You just have called me a crazy faggot or whatever. But you took it one step further out of some misguided belief I'm a liar, and this would help Nick.

Here's something that I don't think is spergy:

You should not carry water for e-celebs. You should not associate with e-celebs. You should just sit back and comment (or laugh, such as the case may be) at them. That is my takeaway from this. I ask you all please accept me as an object lession. I like you enough to where I hope that sinks in. There's a lot of people on this site, to include mods, who have told me that with genuine concern, and I thank them dearly.

I'm over it. I'm calm. I haven't sperged in a while now. I just offered the evidence when asked. The post with the clear evidence was pretty level-headed, and even self-depreciating at times. I also should note I really haven't done anything KF related for Nick since mid-late 2019, when the health issues got bad.

Just start talking about the Vic case. DM if there's any questions you want answered, but you're concerned with it crapping up the thread.

Hopefully we all get good news about Vic in the coming months. I think there is universal agreement on that.
 
This thread is in the Lolcow & Lolcow LLP subforum.
We have no moderation powers here.
It'd be up to @Ride or some other mod.

That reply to Spectre's deflection is my last post on the matter. Ride can do what he wants. Further comments on the issue, made in this thread, will be ignored. If Ride doubts this, I wouldn't complain about a thread ban to put his mind at ease. It seems reasonable and perhaps more palatable than just my word. I'll answer DMs if anybody has any curiosity.

I unequivocally agree that this is off topic here. Hell, I wrote the fucking topicality parameters in the OP of this thread well over a year ago.
 
Spectre,

It says volumes that when you ask for proof in this thread, and I post definitive proof, you post this and don't comment on said proof. It's obvious deflection. You asked for it here. The mods can move the posts wherever they wish. You were stupid to ask for proof. You're not doing a good job defending Nick if you invite something that peppers him with shrapnel. You just have called me a crazy faggot or whatever. But you took it one step further out of some misguided belief I'm a liar, and this would help Nick.

Here's something that I don't think is spergy:

You should not carry water for e-celebs. You should not associate with e-celebs. You should just sit back and comment (or laugh, such as the case may be) at them. That is my takeaway from this. I ask you all please accept me as an object lession. I like you enough to where I hope that sinks in. There's a lot of people on this site, to include mods, who have told me that with genuine concern, and I thank them dearly.

I'm over it. I'm calm. I haven't sperged in a while now. I just offered the evidence when asked. The post with the clear evidence was pretty level-headed, and even self-depreciating at times. I also should note I really haven't done anything KF related for Nick since mid-late 2019, when the health issues got bad.

Just start talking about the Vic case. DM if there's any questions you want answered, but you're concerned with it crapping up the thread.

Hopefully we all get good news about Vic in the coming months. I think there is universal agreement on that.

He responded to you in the appropriate thread, actually. And you didn't post proof.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6thRanger
@Captain Manning alright, you jilted sperg, let's read the initial message together: Nick heard that the Farms was archiving Ren's tweet and requested said archive.

You turned that into a request, which Nick didn't seem to care if you asked or not. Nick wasn't trying to go "personal army" with KF. You did that. Fuck off with your personal vendetta, users normally get yeeted for the gay shit you've been pulling lately.

snip.png
 
@Captain Manning alright, you jilted sperg, let's read the initial message together: Nick heard that the Farms was archiving Ren's tweet and requested said archive.

You turned that into a request, which Nick didn't seem to care if you asked or not. Nick wasn't trying to go "personal army" with KF. You did that. Fuck off with your personal vendetta, users normally get yeeted for the gay shit you've been pulling lately.

View attachment 1624071
Yea gotta agree with @DeadFry and the crayon eating douchecanoe, this is someone just asking for links to the archive and thats it. Did you show this to Emspex and company when you asked them about posting about "Nick wanting Ren archived"?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back