Law Justice Amy Coney Barrett Megathread

So the announcer at the rose garden announced her as she walked out with the president.

will find an article soon.

e: he official announced her as his third pick.

e2:

---------------------------------------------
Article Start

The long-term academic, appeals court judge and mother of seven was the hot favourite for the Supreme Court seat.

Donald Trump - who as sitting president gets to select nominees - reportedly once said he was "saving her" for this moment: when elderly Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died and a vacancy on the nine-member court arose.

It took the president just over a week to fast-track the 48-year-old conservative intellectual into the wings. This is his chance to tip the court make-up even further to the right ahead of the presidential election, when he could lose power.

Barrett's record on gun rights and immigration cases imply she would be as reliable a vote on the right of the court, as Ginsburg was on the left, according to Jonathan Turley, a professor of law at George Washington University.

"Ginsburg maintained one of the most consistent liberal voting records in the history of the court. Barrett has the same consistency and commitment," he adds. "She is not a work-in-progress like some nominees. She is the ultimate 'deliverable' for conservative votes."

And her vote, alongside a conservative majority, could make the difference for decades ahead, especially on divisive issues such as abortion rights and the Affordable Care Act (the Obama-era health insurance provider).

Barrett's legal opinions and remarks on abortion and gay marriage have made her popular with the religious right, but earned vehement opposition from liberals.

But as a devout Catholic, she has repeatedly insisted her faith does not compromise her work.

Barrett lives in South Bend, Indiana, with her husband, Jesse, a former federal prosecutor who is now with a private firm. The couple have seven children, including two adopted from Haiti. She is the oldest of seven children herself.

Known for her sharp intellect, she studied at the University of Notre Dame's Law School, graduating first in her class, and was a clerk to Justice Antonin Scalia, who, in her words, was the "staunchest conservative" on the Supreme Court at the time.

Like her mentor Scalia, she is an originalist, which is a belief that judges should attempt to interpret the words of the Constitution as the authors intended when they were written.

Many liberals oppose that strict approach, saying there must be scope for moving with the times.

Barrett has spent much of her career as a professor at her alma mater, Notre Dame, where she was voted professor of the year multiple times. One of students, Deion Kathawa, who took a class with her earlier this year, told the BBC she was popular because she involved everyone in discussions. He found her "collegial, civil, fair-minded, intellectually sharp, and devoted to the rule of law secured by our Constitution".

Another student told the WBEZ new site: "I feel somewhat conflicted because … she's a great professor. She never brought up politics in her classroom... But I do not agree with her ideologies at all. I don't think she would be good for this country and the Supreme Court."

Barrett was selected by President Trump to serve as a federal appeals court judge in 2017, sitting on the Seventh Circuit, based in Chicago. She regularly commutes to the court from her home - more than an hour and half away. The South Bend Tribune once carried an interview from a friend saying she was an early riser, getting up between 04:00 and 05:00. "It's true," says Paolo Carozza, a professor at Notre Dame. "I see her at the gym shortly after then."

Carozza has watched Barrett go from student to teacher to leading judge, and speaks about her effusively. "It's a small, tight-knit community, so I know her socially too. She is ordinary, warm, kind."

A religious man himself, he thinks it is reasonable to question a candidate about whether their beliefs would interfere with their work. "But she has answered those questions forcefully... I fear she is now being reduced to an ideological caricature, and that pains me, knowing what a rich and thoughtful person she is."

Her confirmation hearing for the appeals court seat featured a now-infamous encounter with Senator Dianne Feinstein, who voiced concerns about how her faith could affect her thinking on the law. "The dogma lives loudly within you," said Mrs Feinstein in an accusatory tone. Defiant Catholics adopted the phrase as a tongue-in-cheek slogan on mugs.

Barrett has defended herself on multiple occasions. "I would stress that my personal church affiliation or my religious belief would not bear in the discharge of my duties as a judge," she once said.

However, her links to a particularly conservative Christian faith group, People of Praise, have been much discussed in the US press. LGBT groups have flagged the group's network of schools, which have guidelines stating a belief that sexual relations should only happen between heterosexual married couples.

LGBTQ advocacy group Human Rights Campaign has voiced strong opposition to Barrett's confirmation, declaring her an "absolute threat to LGBTQ rights".

The Guttmacher Institute, a pro-choice research organisation, declined comment on Barrett specifically, but said appointing any new conservative Supreme Court justice would "be devastating for sexual and reproductive health and rights".

To secure the position on the Supreme Court - a lifelong job - Barrett will still have to pass a gruelling confirmation hearing, where Democratic senators are likely to take a tough line, bringing up many of their voters' concerns.

Professor Turley thinks she will take it her stride, due to the "civil and unflappable disposition" she showed during the hostile questioning for the appeals court position.

"She is someone who showed incredible poise and control… her [appeals court] confirmation hearing was a dry run for a Supreme Court confirmation. She has already played in the World Series."

article end
---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------
Article Start

President Trump on Saturday announced he has chosen Amy Coney Barrett as his pick to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated by the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg -- a move that could significantly shift the nation's highest court to the right if she's confirmed by the Senate.

“Today it is my honor to nominate one of our nation's most brilliant and gifted legal minds to the Supreme Court," Trump said in the Rose Garden alongside Barrett. "She is a woman of unparalleled achievement, towering intellect, sterling credentials and unyielding loyalty to the Constitution -- Judge Amy Coney Barrett.”

Trump announced Barrett, a judge on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, who had been considered by Trump for the vacancy left by the retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy in 2018. Trump eventually chose now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh instead.

Ginsburg, a liberal trailblazer who was a consistent vote on the court’s liberal wing, died last week at 87. The announcement sets up what is likely to be a fierce confirmation battle as Republicans attempt to confirm Barrett before the election on Nov. 3.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has promised to put the nominee up for a vote, despite the objections of Senate Democrats -- who cite McConnell’s refusal to give Obama nominee Merrick Garland a hearing in 2016.

A source familiar with the process told Fox News that Oct. 12 is the target date for the beginning of confirmation hearings. This means that Barrett, 48, could potentially be confirmed by the end of the month and just days before the election.

Barrett, a former Notre Dame professor and a mother of seven, is a devout Catholic and pro-life -- beliefs that were raised as a problem by Democrats during her 2017 confirmation hearing to her seat on the 7th Circuit.

"The dogma lives loudly within you, and that's of concern," Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., told Barrett. She was eventually confirmed 55-43.

Trump was also believed to have been considering candidates including 11th Circuit Judge Barbara Lagoa. Trump had said publicly that he had five potential picks he was considering.

A source told Fox News that Trump had taken note of how “tough” Barrett was when she faced the tough confirmation fight in 2017 and had kept her very much at the front of his mind since then.

The source said Trump met her during the considerations on who to replace Kennedy in 2018, talked to a lot of people about her and wanted to keep her in place through the Kavanaugh vetting process in case there was an issue. Kavanaugh did face hurdles in his confirmation battle, but that came after his nomination was announced.

The source said that after Ginsburg died, Barrett was the only candidate he met and spoke with at length, although he made a few calls to Lagoa because some people were pushing him very hard to do so. But ultimately Barrett was always at the front of Trump’s mind to fill a Ginsburg vacancy.

Should she be confirmed, Barrett would be Trump’s third Supreme Court confirmation. That’s more than two-term Presidents Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush -- who each put two justices on the court.

Democrats have vowed to oppose the pick, but the Senate math does not appear to be in their favor. Republicans have 53 Senate seats and Barrett only needs 50 to be confirmed -- with Vice President Mike Pence acting as a tie breaker in such a case.

So far, only Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and Susan Collins, R-Maine, have indicated they oppose moving forward with a confirmation before the election. Murkowski has since suggested she still may vote for the nominee.

Fox News' John Roberts, Mike Emanuel and Tyler Olson contributed to this report.

article end
---------------------------------------------
 
Last edited:
All this talk about White people not helping minorities, when somebody adopts one, it's a problem.

Reminder that de Blasio has a Black (adopted?) daughter and she's raising hell. Nobody said anything then.

I get the argument, but poorly executed. And quite unfair to be honest.

I told my husband about the adoption outrage, and the only thing he said was 'So they're being racist?'



His wife is black. Bebop is his flesh and blood.

Its really like: "We don't care about the darkies. We can say whatever we want and they will keep voting for us." Critical race theory allows them to be as racist as they fucking want. Too bad nobody actually believes that dumb shit and they're actually bleeding the black vote. Can you imagine people disparaging her adopted kids on national TV on CNN and MSNBC? It'd be a fucking disaster.

Amy's a good wholesome American gal candidate. Hard not to like her. She'll get voted in. And the Donald pulls a brilliant move. Gotta hand it to him, he works miracles under the gun.

To be honest, with RBG's ten thousand health scares, he already had a list of vetted candidates ready to go. They were very prepared for this exact moment. Democrats were too busy embalming RBG into a Lich and turning her into a cult icon. They did the exact same thing with RBG they're doing to Biden, only with less cult-like status. Once her health started to decline they massively built her up. Putting her on Colbert, bragging about her workout routine and how super healthy she was.

They really did not fucking expect her to die until later on or until the next presidential cycle. It shows how little prepared they were for this. Now any momentum of voter turnout is going to be destroyed and they're going to be demoralized because she is going to 100% be confirmed.
 
Once her health started to decline they massively built her up. Putting her on Colbert, bragging about her workout routine and how super healthy she was.

They really did not fucking expect her to die until later on or until the next presidential cycle. It shows how little prepared they were for this.
How do you not expect an 87 year old woman with pancreatic cancer to eventually pass away? It's like they're trying to play God or are oblivious to the fact that you cannot stop inevitable death. That's the most selfish act of indecency I've ever seen.

She should've been retired, spending her final years with family, relaxing, enjoying life. Not used as a political pawn. Well, it's too late for her now. That's her legacy: trying to cheat death just to keep a seat. Disgusting.
 
d6349e010eed2fa6d937ba4c69046bf7.png


Blumenthal is the reanimated skinwalker politician who signed a letter demanding that they stop Kavanaugh's hearing because Michael Avenatti accused Kavanaugh of being a serial gang-rapist. Not only has he never made an effort to fucking apologize for that, but he's demonstrated that what he believes to be 'legitimate' has no bearing on reality.

You were never going to vote for Trump's nominee anyways, Danang Dick, no one gives a shit. Be as childish as you want.
 
How do you not expect an 87 year old woman with pancreatic cancer to eventually pass away? It's like they're trying to play God or are oblivious to the fact that you cannot stop inevitable death. That's the most selfish act of indecency I've ever seen.

She should've been retired, spending her final years with family, relaxing, enjoying life. Not used as a political pawn. Well, it's too late for her now. That's her legacy: trying to cheat death just to keep a seat. Disgusting.


That Hilary Clinton politics in action right there. Impractical in every way. That's how Donald wins.
 
How do you not expect an 87 year old woman with pancreatic cancer to eventually pass away? It's like they're trying to play God or are oblivious to the fact that you cannot stop inevitable death. That's the most selfish act of indecency I've ever seen.

She should've been retired, spending her final years with family, relaxing, enjoying life. Not used as a political pawn. Well, it's too late for her now. That's her legacy: trying to cheat death just to keep a seat. Disgusting.

I think all the "RBG IS SUPER HEALTHY GUYS SHE CAN DO 10,000 PUSH-UPS AND RUN 50 MILES A DAY" talk actually got to their heads and they legit believed that she was going to live to at least be 100 years old despite the glaring problems with her health so at least some of them were legitimately blindsided when she suddenly was announced to have passed away then it went from shock to anger once it dawned on them that Trump is still President at least until January 20th 2021 regardless of the outcome of November 3rd. The anger quickly became rage and now we have people screaming in their cars on TikTok like they've lost their goddamn minds and then willingly sharing said TikTok video with millions of potential viewers to witness them being insane over the death of some old Jewess that didn't even know they existed.

She definitely should've stepped down when she had the chance, hell during Obama's first term when he initially had a supermajority in Congress she should've called it a day and the Dems could've gotten her replacement in without much fuss but she waited and waited and then Obama's supermajority was gone after people were pissed off enough at Obamacare. Then suddenly you've got the Republicans doing a filibuster and shutting the Dems shit down left and right, she truly fucked herself trying to play politics and banking on Hillary winning in 2016 just like the Dems did with the nuclear option.
 
I think all the "RBG IS SUPER HEALTHY GUYS SHE CAN DO 10,000 PUSH-UPS AND RUN 50 MILES A DAY" talk actually got to their heads and they legit believed that she was going to live to at least be 100 years old despite the glaring problems with her health so at least some of them were legitimately blindsided when she suddenly was announced to have passed away then it went from shock to anger once it dawned on them that Trump is still President at least until January 20th 2021 regardless of the outcome of November 3rd. The anger quickly became rage and now we have people screaming in their cars on TikTok like they've lost their goddamn minds and then willingly sharing said TikTok video with millions of potential viewers to witness them being insane over the death of some old Jewess that didn't even know they existed.

She definitely should've stepped down when she had the chance, hell during Obama's first term when he initially had a supermajority in Congress she should've called it a day and the Dems could've gotten her replacement in without much fuss but she waited and waited and then Obama's supermajority was gone after people were pissed off enough at Obamacare. Then suddenly you've got the Republicans doing a filibuster and shutting the Dems shit down left and right, she truly fucked herself trying to play politics and banking on Hillary winning in 2016 just like the Dems did with the nuclear option.

That poor woman was on strong cancer and pain meds, her hypothalamus and hippocampus was irreparably damaged. She was not the same woman that was confirmed in the 90's. She was tricked into staying in the seat. It's a travesty. Just a shame.
 
But make no mistake, the Religious Right is America. Secular Democrats are New York/California fringe. Biden would need to court the religious right heavily to be elected president. That's what's been the Dems problem, they refuse to budge on Abortion. And the Religious right slaps them down everytime. Run an Anti Abortion goat against the best Democrat you've got.....they'll vote in the goat.
Bold of you to assume there aren't plenty of secularists on the right.
 
Gay marriage is a dead issue. Perhaps a few exemptions for cake shops not wanting to make a cake for a gay wedding but that's about it. Honestly, gay marriage is somewhat easy to understand from a conservative position. You just want to share your life with another person with legal protection.

Abortion is a different animal. While gay marriage is in essence bringing two people together, abortion is the termination of human life.
No. I said if abortion is banned then more homo is going happen.
 
I will say this election might be differentt than 2016...IF Biden can connect to the religious people in America.
Biden is banned from receiving Communion due to his stance on abortion and keeps trying to receive it only to continually get BTFO by priests who refuse him.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/29/poli...ion-south-carolina-catholic-church/index.html

Father Robert Morey, the pastor at Saint Anthony Catholic Church in Florence, told the Florence Morning News that he had denied Biden communion because "any public figure who advocates for abortion places himself or herself outside of Church teaching."
"Holy Communion signifies we are one with God, each other and the Church. Our actions should reflect that," Morey said in an email to the newspaper. He said that "as a priest, it is my responsibility to minister to those souls entrusted to my care, and I must do so even in the most difficult situations. I will keep Mr. Biden in my prayers.

Catholic Democratic presidential and vice-presidential candidates have been denied communion over their support for abortion rights several times in recent decades -- at times exposing deep cultural rifts between conservative and moderate Catholics in the church's hierarchy.


In 2004, Cardinal Raymond Burke, the former St. Louis archbishop, said he would not give communion to Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry. He said his view, which was controversial at the time, was that the sacrament must be protected from someone "who knows that he or she is unworthy and yet presumes to come forward and to take the Holy Eucharist."
In 2008, Bishop Joseph Francis Martino of Biden's hometown of Scranton, Pennsylvania, said Biden would be denied communion in the Scranton diocese over his support for abortion rights.
In 2016, Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine, then the Democratic vice presidential nominee, faced criticism from individual priests over his positions on abortion, same-sex marriage and gender equality.

Any self respecting Catholic isnt going to vote for a guy who goes against a central church teaching and refuses to repent.
 
Back