U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
She did not. Women (and especially black women) suffer no consequences for their insane actions. She literally wrote an email to the child’s white father that the child is/was black and she was going to raise him black. She also said that all white people are evil and racist. She somehow got 50/50 custody despite being clearly insane and trying to poison the kid against his dad because the family court system hates fathers. I think ultimately the dad ended up with the kid because the kid got burned (to the point of scarring) when he was with the mom.
Family courts are an absolute joke. Mom can be doing crack cocaine in the living room with no food in the house and not lose custody while the father can lose custody because the mom "feels" like he's a danger to people around him. Unless the child is physically harmed in a severe manner, they won't be removed from their mothers.

TLDR: family courts are a joke and be careful who you do the vertical tango with
 
The jury's verdict after evidence came out that the cops knocked, and her boyfriend shot afterwards which lead to her death. I heard Jericho Green explain it among some other youtubers. It's weird watching an NBA game afterwards and hearing them talk about Breonna in a different light than what really happened.
Yeah there is so much misinformation going around about her death. Well, basically every death, hasn't it. It's funny that the BLM activism ends up having nothing to do with how the person actually died ('hands up, don't shoot', and no-knock warrants).

That they knocked was agreed upon by both sides. However, the contentious part is whether they announced themselves. The police say they did but due to the details of the case, their claim doesn't inspire confidence. Logically, it doesn't seem that they did.

Regardless of whether they did or didn't, they still might not criminally responsible because they legally weren't required to due to the terms of the warrant. But other details about the case (e.g. why did they need to serve the warrant past midnight? why did they go at all when they already had the people they were after in custody and by their admission didn't expect him to be at the residence?) could have made it look like they recklessly put lives in danger. I don't know the law though.

It's a tragic situation and it had nothing to do with skin color, but it seems that the police should probably take some moral blame for how it played out. Cops need to take a lighter, less suspicious tack with innocent civilians who haven't broken the law.
 
Well, thet's what happens when you try to make Dr. Suess work into your meme. Probably still not as bad as the live action Cat in The Hat.

Seuss hated Nazis but he also knew to slap the Jap.

1601259908458.png
 
I come bearing whitepills since I always bring lunacy and blackpills.

First we have a black Trump supporter clowning on some self-hating whites for asking him if he believes black lives matter. He asks them if they will bow to him and kiss his feet. They flee. :story:
View attachment 1625850

Next we have a clip from Live PD (RIP) where a Hispanic man who operates large machinery and makes “big money” gets pulled over on his low rider motorcycle. He is respectful and in a great mood, joking with officers. It is almost like if you respect officer commands and are not a piece of shit career criminal, cops do not indiscriminately murder you, even if you are black or brown. Bonus: surprise appearance by a doggo wearing sunglasses during his walk!
View attachment 1625907


Kind of sounds like a threat, huh? 🤔 It is from their demands list for the city. I wasn’t aware they graffitied the threat onto a barricade until now though.


That black Trump supporter is brilliant. His while attitude made me laugh and it's so heartwarming to see a black person openly mocking these retards and laughing at them.
 
It's a tragic situation and it had nothing to do with skin color, but it seems that the police should probably take some moral blame for how it played out. Cops need to take a lighter, less suspicious tack with innocent civilians who haven't broken the law.

Not even that; the biggest problem I saw that precipitated the entire fucking incident pit, is the over-reliance on informants (especially when they're paid). The hazard liability & court challenges against undercover stings has made a lot of departments extremely wary of sending undercover officers on buys, especially into houses.

That kind of shit doesn't just promote lazy police work, it also happens to send things sideways, as we've seen.
 
I come bearing whitepills since I always bring lunacy and blackpills.

First we have a black Trump supporter clowning on some self-hating whites for asking him if he believes black lives matter. He asks them if they will bow to him and kiss his feet. They flee. :story:
View attachment 1625850

Next we have a clip from Live PD (RIP) where a Hispanic man who operates large machinery and makes “big money” gets pulled over on his low rider motorcycle. He is respectful and in a great mood, joking with officers. It is almost like if you respect officer commands and are not a piece of shit career criminal, cops do not indiscriminately murder you, even if you are black or brown. Bonus: surprise appearance by a doggo wearing sunglasses during his walk!
View attachment 1625907


Kind of sounds like a threat, huh? 🤔 It is from their demands list for the city. I wasn’t aware they graffitied the threat onto a barricade until now though.
There is something simply joyful about that Mexican. Friendlyness and legitimate happiness helps make even an uncomfortable stop be something everyone is happy about.

Yeah there is so much misinformation going around about her death. Well, basically every death, hasn't it. It's funny that the BLM activism ends up having nothing to do with how the person actually died ('hands up, don't shoot', and no-knock warrants).

That they knocked was agreed upon by both sides. However, the contentious part is whether they announced themselves. The police say they did but due to the details of the case, their claim doesn't inspire confidence. Logically, it doesn't seem that they did.

Regardless of whether they did or didn't, they still might not criminally responsible because they legally weren't required to due to the terms of the warrant. But other details about the case (e.g. why did they need to serve the warrant past midnight? why did they go at all when they already had the people they were after in custody and by their admission didn't expect him to be at the residence?) could have made it look like they recklessly put lives in danger. I don't know the law though.

It's a tragic situation and it had nothing to do with skin color, but it seems that the police should probably take some moral blame for how it played out. Cops need to take a lighter, less suspicious tack with innocent civilians who haven't broken the law.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6_QM8h_u5E&

I'd recommend you and @Pocket Dragoon to watch this. There is more behind that then both of you seem to think that gave them legitimate reason to go in like they did.
 
Like those action figures that are two or three feet tall.
Never heard of My Size Barbie?
There she is, front and center, Bill de Blasio’s daughter...

View attachment 1625490 View attachment 1625489


Reminder - her instagram account was Piss_Bucket. it is de-activated.
Pic comes from an evil image board:
View attachment 1625492
Why does she look like that? Why does she look like that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sperghetti
There is something simply joyful about that Mexican. Friendlyness and legitimate happiness helps make even an uncomfortable stop be something everyone is happy about.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6_QM8h_u5E&

I'd recommend you and @Pocket Dragoon to watch this. There is more behind that then both of you seem to think that gave them legitimate reason to go in like they did.

There's also a tactic called "blinding them with kindness", works in a lot of situations, especially with cops (and it goes both ways). Hell, you could even call it de-escalation. Lunacy.

And I'm not saying they didn't have a legitimate reason; my point is the legwork wasn't done beforehand.
 
Never heard of My Size Barbie?

Why does she look like that? Why does she look like that?
Because her father is a pathetic piece of shit who let his bitch of a wife cut his bollocks off, and who cannot raise the kid he shot into her right.

A man who will not control his family should be barred from running for anything.
 
There's also a tactic called "blinding them with kindness".

I'm not saying they didn't have a legitimate reason; my point is the legwork wasn't done beforehand.
What legwork? The video I linked details an extensive investigation, concretely linking the people in that house to the drug trade. The only time an informant is even relevent is with a bust months prior.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6_QM8h_u5E&

I'd recommend you and Pocket Dragoon to watch this. There is more behind that then both of you seem to think that gave them legitimate reason to go in like they did.
I know they entered the premises because they knew her ex-bf still had her address as his primary and she was receiving mail addressed to him, and they wanted to know if she was passing drugs delivered through the mail to him (she was not). However, they already had him in custody and they had tons of evidence against him at that location. And, the postal service had confirmed she wasn't receiving suspicious packages addressed to him. Plus, she had already cooperated with police in the past in providing information on him.

The urgency of the warrant is not only undermined by that, but also by the officers' own admission that they considered the place a soft target, and, they were warned that there may be a kid there.

I'll watch the video though.
 
Indianapolis is difficult to check up on. Protests of some kind are still going on but no one will talk about it out loud like the other places do. Broadcastify scanner for Indy Metro Police tells me that there's a shit ton of violent things happening, but that may just be 2020 getting to people. Sometimes they'll say, in a guarded tone, something like, "They're headed down (street) toward (other street) be ready to shut down traffic there" or there are about 100 cars in (place) and there shouldn't be any cars there" which makes me wonder what in the hell these big groups are doing.
 
This shit is everywhere and you cannot get rid of it.
It really has permeated all aspects of life now.

Professionally, I receive e-mails for continuing education opportunities. It seems like an on-demand webinar about "Promoting a Diverse Workplace" has been promoted a lot more over the summer, and I'm pretty sure it's probably on the same level as that mandatory diversity training Starbucks Employees had to go through that turned out to be worse than shit-tier.

Even a leisurely podcast I enjoy hasn't been immune. One particular episode where the host interviewed a black person quickly went way off topic so that the interviewee could talk about his driving while black experiences and white privilege -- topics having absolutely nothing to do with the normal theme of the podcast.

I can get current events being relevant in certain venues and contexts. However, interjecting them into everything is offputting because normies want and need some sort of escape from real life crap. I'm not surprised to see people starting to gradually push back against this crap invading their leisure activities and hobbies.

You can't mention how black people have worse health outcomes for lots of things cos dats waycist. It's fucking everywhere.
It hasn't been until recently that I've finally seen black protestors finally starting to wear masks -- something they weren't doing back in May which was about the same time they were complaining about how they were disproportiantely being impacted by both COVID cases and COVID deaths. It's not just talking about a healthy lifestyle that's racists, it's having any sort of standards or expectations that's seen as problematic, racist, or both. *sigh*

1601213971478.png

(image: SF to give $1000 a month to Black, Pacific Islander expectant moms. Will it help bridge racial health gaps?
If this were to ever happen, how much of the money would actually go towards proper prenatal care and how much would be wasted frivolously or on illicit vices? I don't see this type of program having any sort of meaningful positive impact as much as such a thing could be useful if run properly and with accountability.

Californians continue to wonder why their state is bankrupt, then SF does this.
I'm sure SF will just add yet another tax or surcharge to bankroll the idea. Still, your point is valid that a state in dire financial straits such as California really can't afford more bureaucratic programs where more of the money will be wasted than it will for the intended purpose.

All this racist nonsense going around, mixed people must be feeling like shit from all directions.
The mixed people that already replied have largely confirmed this in that they're being pulled in multiple directions that largely stem from their skin color and/or the political positions they're assumed and expected to have based on their outward appearance. Major feels for them :feels: .

On a similar note, it's already been discussed how people -- especially those living in liberal areas -- are expected to virtue signal BLM and other similar activism on their social media to avoid being cancelled even though they really have based opinions that stay secret and get shared only with their closest and most trusted confidants.

Speaking of assholes, one NBA team of assholes, run by assholes, is taking a hit in the wallet from a disgruntled suite holder. Look for others to follow.
While this largely falls back on my previous comment about normies disliking BLM and other SocJus crap invading their escape outlets, it's also telling to see how many pro athletes care more about virtue signalling than they do playing their sport and focusing on that when they should. They can be activists in their free time, but that stuff needs to stay in the locker room once it's game time.

I don't think this was posted yet. If it was, it was without the text. Apparently a blind person thought it would be a great idea to go riot in Portland yesterday.
If vision-impaired people are that intent on being part of any sort of demonstration or protest, they need to work out some sort of contingency plan for scenarios when things go south or when something happens to their guides so that they don't end up in a situation that puts them in further or permanent harm.

It's a tragic situation and it had nothing to do with skin color, but it seems that the police should probably take some moral blame for how it played out. Cops need to take a lighter, less suspicious tack with innocent civilians who haven't broken the law.
Unfortunately, there are so many people hellbent on harming cops if they get the opportunity that the latter simply can't relax even for the most routine incidents. I think that's why it's important to drill into people's heads how to properly interact with police.

Look at the recently-posted video with the guy on the motorcycle. Even though he received what looked like a ticket for excessive radio noise, he answered the questions properly and respectfully. Also, his demeanor was such that the police had no reason to assume the worst and they even responded with their own jovial comments about him and the situation when they realized it was just a guy who was a little too loud with his post-game celebratory mood.

Indianapolis is difficult to check up on. Protests of some kind are still going on but no one will talk about it out loud like the other places do. Broadcastify scanner for Indy Metro Police tells me that there's a shit ton of violent things happening, but that may just be 2020 getting to people.
Is it possible that Indianapolis is like other cities such as Detroit that keep their protest-related communications on a frequency not covered by Broadcastify? That could play a part in the apparent radio silence.

How is Sunday going for everyone?
Did some more DIY work on my car and listened to old shows on Youtube.
 
Last edited:
This isn't the first time I've seen the Lorax used in commie propaganda. I get they use children's entertainment because it's on their level, but why specifically the Lorax? He hates industry, lives in an underdeveloped shithole, and opposes any attempts to improve conditions, so it must remind them of real world communist societies.
 
I come bearing whitepills since I always bring lunacy and blackpills.

First we have a black Trump supporter clowning on some self-hating whites for asking him if he believes black lives matter. He asks them if they will bow to him and kiss his feet. They flee. :story:
View attachment 1625850

Next we have a clip from Live PD (RIP) where a Hispanic man who operates large machinery and makes “big money” gets pulled over on his low rider motorcycle. He is respectful and in a great mood, joking with officers. It is almost like if you respect officer commands and are not a piece of shit career criminal, cops do not indiscriminately murder you, even if you are black or brown. Bonus: surprise appearance by a doggo wearing sunglasses during his walk!
View attachment 1625907


Kind of sounds like a threat, huh? 🤔 It is from their demands list for the city. I wasn’t aware they graffitied the threat onto a barricade until now though.
Based MAGA bro. I hope he has a stream or something, I’d watch this gimmick for several iterations
 
( @Gehenna )

Ok I've finished the video. It's interesting that he argues for the justifiability of the no-knock warrant based on urgency, then in the next section acknowledges that they knocked. In fact, we have photos of the police whiteboard from that night where her address was listed separate from the others as knock & announce.

The very fact that they knocked and planned to knock (in addition to the considerations I mentioned before) undermines the claim for urgency that was used to justify needing a no-knock warrant. They did not need to enter as they did and their own behavior that night demonstrates the lack of necessity.

There is some critical information left out of his description of events:
• that the postal inspector had informed an agency investigating the case that Taylor was not receiving suspicious packages for Glover. This is important because it reduces the necessity of the warrant, or at least the immediacy of serving it. If there's likely no evidence to destroy, then there's no urgency

• that there were no drugs or suspicious packages or illegal weapons found at Taylor's residence. His summary of events would lead you to believe that her house was indeed a stash house and she was involved in illegal activity. She wasn't. This is incredibly important because, not only does it undermine the justification for the warrant, it also indicates that Walker and Taylor had literally no reason to attack the cops. There was nothing present at the residence that could get them put in jail. That lends credence to Walker's side of the events, which brings us to...

• MOST IMPORTANTLY: Walker's perspective. According to him, he and Taylor did not hear police announce themselves. He was not knowingly shooting at police. This is critical because the video's summary of events would lead you to believe that her house was in fact a stash house and Walker was knowingly and intentionally attacking cops. If that were the case, self-defense would seem clearcut. However, if someone is not aware you are police and they have a legal right to defend themselves, it seems clear that there is another option: take cover and announce yourself. Would Taylor have died if police had taken this measure? Would it have reduced risk to the public?

• Another consideration: police reported that they could hear movement inside the house. Yet they didn't hear and didn't respond to Taylor and Walker yelling asking "who is it?" If they could hear movement, they would definitely have been able to hear the yelling. And yet they did not respond to the yelling by announcing themselves (either the first time, or 'again'). They simply busted in. This is important because: (1) is this justifiable and reasonable and not behavior that is likely to precipitate a tragic situation? Especially considering they were advised a child might be on the premises? (2) it undermines the credibility of the police's account (3) not mentioning this critical info leads the viewer to think Walker made no effort to reduce risk before shooting. It paints him as a thug to leave this out.

• And lastly, the fact that the police adulterated evidence in the case. They changed the time recorded that the warrant was served on multiple pieces of evidence (incl. the evidence logs) and lied that the warrants were served simultaneously. This is important because it further undermines the necessity of serving the warrant when you know that a productive one was served prior, but it also undermines credibility of the police's side of the story and raises suspicion that they might be engaging in other CYA maneuvers.

EDIT: Adding another -
• If they were behaving in a reasonable fashion, why was Taylor shot 6 times and the actual shooter not once? Do you think it is reasonable for the police to shoot hostages instead of the terrorist in a hostage situation? Shouldn't police exercise caution not to shoot people beside a shooter that are not holding guns or shooting at them?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back