Interesting, Genentech...that name is forever emblazoned on my mind because they seemed to sponsor every second program on KQED (bay area public TV) back when I was there, and that was a recurring theme for every year I remember watching public TV. What a coincidence.
Well the kernel of truth here is that communism can be sold successfully to criminals, I mean look at who all Kyle tagged, every single one a criminal record and I'm pretty sure those records weren't acquired in the pursuit of instituting Full Communism (TM).
The commies can't recruit muscle from their spindly intelligentsia after all and commie regimes are well known for their muscle to enforce the state's will. That said I don't think the spindly intelligentsia's version of communism which is what is being pushed appeals to criminals if how things went in "successful" revolutions is any indication.
It does change some things, yes! The warrant would still be applied, but it'd be focused more on Taylor than walker given that the cars were still ferrying between them. I'll cop to misremembering this element, and you are right it is a flaw and does make Walker a bit more reliable.
My end conclusions do remain the same, there was still enough for it to be a lawful warrant, but I will retract the end segment there.
I don't deny that it's worth searching the house and interviewing her. But the facts that:
(A) the postal inspector responded to an inquiry that no suspicious packages were being delivered to her address
(B) the police had suspected the mode-of-entry of the drugs to the house to be by mail and had not observed Glover delivering anything to the residence
(C) the police themselves stated that they considered the house to be a soft target - not a priority, not a danger, and with no interest in arresting Breonna Taylor in connection with drug-dealing
(D) they already had plentiful evidence against their targets and all necessary arrests before they entered Taylor's residence (which is something the police took effort to cover up)
(E) they were warned that there might be a child in the apartment
(F) police wrote on the whiteboard that they had no intention of going in without knocking like the other addresses, indicating they didn't think it was critical to catch her by surprise as they needed to with the other individuals
... put together indicate that the police should not have gone about serving the warrant in the way they did. It could have waited, or they could have taken more caution. They acted recklessly. They didn't need to collect evidence from that apartment - they aleady had enough to convict their men and they had no intention of arresting Breonna and charging her in connection. Not to mention, a lot of doubt was cast on there even being drug packages in the house already.
I also didn't mention before that the police seem to have been caught in another lie when Mattingly claimed to have been inside the apartment when shot in the leg. According to an attorney during the grand jury, crime scene photos show no blood in the area that Mattingly indicated he was at when shot. Yet the bullet struck his femoral artery and he nearly bled to death, according to police. How did he nearly bleed to death with no blood loss? He must not have been where he indicated he was.
Why is that detail important and why would a police officer lie? Because if he wasn't inside the apartment yet, he could have easily taken cover at the door instead of returning fire in fear for his life. It mitigates urgency. The officer who was indicted was done so because he had fired blindly from outside the apartment. If Mattingly was also outside the apartment and fired in, he could be just as guilty. And the lack of accurate targeting does seem to also be in line with officers who didn't take enough caution and blind-fired from outside.
Ultimately, we are left with two options and we need to decide which is more believable:
(1) police didn't announce themselves because their warrant didn't require them to do so before entering. They did not respond to repeated screams of "who's there!" from inside the apartment because they were not required to by law. Walker retrieved the gun he legally owned because he feared for his safety and the safety of his girlfriend - it was a bad neighborhood full of drug addicts who may commit break-ins after all. As soon as the door was broken down, he shot 1x at what he thought was an intruder. He ceased shooting after that 1 shot, realizing the situation wasn't as expected. Police then lied about announcing themselves and also altered the times recorded for the warrant execution, all to mitigate the impression that they acted recklessly and needlessly, risking public safety.
(2) police did announce themselves. Walker, who has no criminal history, no involvement in the drug operation police were investigating, no incriminating evidence around him, and no reason to suspect he would be arrested, heard the police announce themselves and decided to grab his gun and lay in wait to shoot police, with his unarmed girlfriend at his side. He does not respond to the police announcements and does not open the door as he lays in wait, premeditating blue murder. When the police break down the door, he decides to wait a few moments for an officer to enter the apartment, then decides to shoot him. In this one-man premeditated attack against a large group of armed police, Walker decides to fire only one bullet. Walker, an innocent civilian with no involvement in criminal enterprises, wanted to kill police... so he fired one bullet and stopped. Then, he lies that he never heard them announce themselves. Police decided to alter evidence about when they executed the warrant for no reason at all.
Proud boys confirmed for being a club of fudgepackers.
Edit: actually I'm not finding any source for an Australian gaggle of gays calling themselves that, so it might not be true. Oh well.
There seems to be nearly nothing happening tonight, btw. Very strange.
Proud boys confirmed for being a club of fudgepackers. View attachment 1626721View attachment 1626720
Edit: actually I'm not finding any source for an Australian gaggle of gays calling themselves that, so it might not be true. Oh well.
There seems to be nearly nothing happening tonight, btw. Very strange.
As someone who lives in Australia, I have no idea what this faggot is on about, there is no group down here called the Proud Boys. Unless, of course, they are some underground antifa butt-fucking club
Ah, very irritating. @selfdeclaredref deactivated the Twitter account, it had a huge backlog of riot media attached to the Twitter account dating back to the first nights
We're already losing content to the void. Fortunately this site archives everything but I'm positive a lot of stuff was missed.
Just bricks and mortar though, right Jacob Frey? Every one of these fucking politicians, from Frey to the city council to Walz, need to be hung and quartered for what they have done to the citizens. In Minecraft. Archive
But... he lost. His "skills" entailed a single parry, which didn't matter because the very next second, he let the cop get inside his range and overpower him.
Dear God, these LARPers can't even LARP correctly. At least Star Wars Kid put some energetic movement into his attempt.
Just bricks and mortar though, right Jacob Frey? Every one of these fucking politicians, from Frey to the city council to Walz, need to be hung and quartered for what they have done to the citizens. In Minecraft. View attachment 1626759 View attachment 1626760 Archive
Last night was a big happening in PDX, chances are those not arrested are licking their wounds.
Alternatively, I have a pet theory if you want some tinfoil.
Specifically, that there were orders to keep the weekend "peaceful" in PDX, because someone else, my suspicion is BLM leadership of some sort (as opposed to the usual suspects), seemed to be running things yesterday.
Things I noticed, all as compared to the everyday PDX happenings
I haven't heard that "clap if you're aware" shit with any regularity in PDX as I heard it last night.
The "REPARASHUNS TO MAH CASHAPP AN VENMO" which was hilariously transparent and also not the most common thing that I've seen in speeches.
Repeated speeches about black women, not new per se but the quantity proportional to other topics and activities was.
Speeches about not breaking or burning things.
Thinly veiled "if a BLM person tells you to stop, stop", to take from the gigantic speech snipped post: "Not everybody protests the same" and "when a black body tells you they can't take it, be okay"
Less property damage at least as far as I could tell, though I missed some of the earlier evening festivities.
That's off the top of my head, there might be more if I rewatched the tape.
Of course Arex and Kevin David Williams among others screamed obscenities at the cops for hours at night unchecked, but by BLM's definition that's "peaceful" so I don't see that as inconsistent.
Something tells me BLM leadership is looking at the support BLM polling numbers and is trying to turn the image of them linked at the hip with Antifa around. Rightly or wrongly, I'd guess they see scapegoating antifa as the way forward, albeit they aren't going with a hard denunciation as I think they're hoping they can reign in the breaking shit in without making waves. The "don't break or burn things" coming up multiple times during different times of the day yesterday in PDX is probably my best evidence, as I don't know if I recall ever hearing in PDX before.
And it was telling to me that among the streamers, I believe it was Adam of Pepperspray, during that very speech (or very close to it) mentioned being bored and wanting to march.
Last night was a big happening in PDX, chances are those not arrested are licking their wounds.
Alternatively, I have a pet theory if you want some tinfoil.
Specifically, that there were orders to keep the weekend "peaceful" in PDX, because someone else, my suspicion is BLM leadership of some sort (as opposed to the usual suspects), seemed to be running things yesterday.
Things I noticed, all as compared to the everyday PDX happenings
I haven't heard that "clap if you're aware" shit with any regularity in PDX as I heard it last night.
The "REPARASHUNS TO MAH CASHAPP AN VENMO" which was hilariously transparent and also not the most common thing that I've seen in speeches.
Repeated speeches about black women, not new per se but the quantity proportional to other topics and activities was.
Speeches about not breaking or burning things.
Thinly veiled "if a BLM person tells you to stop, stop", to take from the gigantic speech snipped post: "Not everybody protests the same" and "when a black body tells you they can't take it, be okay"
Less property damage at least as far as I could tell, though I missed some of the earlier evening festivities.
That's off the top of my head, there might be more if I rewatched the tape.
Of course Arex and Kevin David Williams among others screamed obscenities at the cops for hours at night unchecked, but by BLM's definition that's "peaceful" so I don't see that as inconsistent.
Something tells me BLM leadership is looking at the support BLM polling numbers and is trying to turn the image of them linked at the hip with Antifa around. Rightly or wrongly, I'd guess they see scapegoating antifa as the way forward, albeit they aren't going with a hard denunciation as I think they're hoping they can reign in the breaking shit in without making waves. The "don't break or burn things" coming up multiple times during different times of the day yesterday in PDX is probably my best evidence, as I don't know if I recall ever hearing in PDX before.
And it was telling to me that among the streamers, I believe it was Adam of Pepperspray, during that very speech (or very close to it) mentioned being bored and wanting to march.
The crowd telling people to stop burning things might have been those the regular rioters call the "swoopers". They arrived a month or two ago and they've been trying to get the rioters to calm down with little results. Some info about them:
Proud boys confirmed for being a club of fudgepackers. View attachment 1626721View attachment 1626720
Edit: actually I'm not finding any source for an Australian gaggle of gays calling themselves that, so it might not be true. Oh well.
There seems to be nearly nothing happening tonight, btw. Very strange.
Yeah, no.
This Syrian sack of STDs is once again being disingenuous. That's a photograph from the Sydney Mardi Gras. In Sydney, faggots don't call themselves "proud" boys. I guess the "friend" she spoke to was trying to be economic with the truth by linking Pride Parades with Proud boys.
It's kinda cute how she thinks she'd be tolerated here. She'd be thrown in jail in 2 seconds. Her brand of agitation and using dumb, angry niggers as warm bodies to fight her war wouldn't work so well here. Our political climate would not be her cup of tea at all.
I was willing to write this off as a big fat coincidence, that on the one night antifa had nothing else to do and was nursing a big fat booboo about having been spurned by the proud boys and beaten by the cops yesterday, a church went up in flames near their stomping grounds, at their stomping times, so to speak.
And then I saw this picture of the crowd.
Yeah it was them. Yep.
That church hasn't really been used as a church in a few years. Used to be Korean Methodist. Has been rented out to various tenants. Has hobos eating beans on the steps most of the time now.
Last night was a big happening in PDX, chances are those not arrested are licking their wounds.
Alternatively, I have a pet theory if you want some tinfoil.
Specifically, that there were orders to keep the weekend "peaceful" in PDX, because someone else, my suspicion is BLM leadership of some sort (as opposed to the usual suspects), seemed to be running things yesterday.
Things I noticed, all as compared to the everyday PDX happenings
I haven't heard that "clap if you're aware" shit with any regularity in PDX as I heard it last night.
The "REPARASHUNS TO MAH CASHAPP AN VENMO" which was hilariously transparent and also not the most common thing that I've seen in speeches.
Repeated speeches about black women, not new per se but the quantity proportional to other topics and activities was.
Speeches about not breaking or burning things.
Thinly veiled "if a BLM person tells you to stop, stop", to take from the gigantic speech snipped post: "Not everybody protests the same" and "when a black body tells you they can't take it, be okay"
Less property damage at least as far as I could tell, though I missed some of the earlier evening festivities.
That's off the top of my head, there might be more if I rewatched the tape.
Of course Arex and Kevin David Williams among others screamed obscenities at the cops for hours at night unchecked, but by BLM's definition that's "peaceful" so I don't see that as inconsistent.
Something tells me BLM leadership is looking at the support BLM polling numbers and is trying to turn the image of them linked at the hip with Antifa around. Rightly or wrongly, I'd guess they see scapegoating antifa as the way forward, albeit they aren't going with a hard denunciation as I think they're hoping they can reign in the breaking shit in without making waves. The "don't break or burn things" coming up multiple times during different times of the day yesterday in PDX is probably my best evidence, as I don't know if I recall ever hearing in PDX before.
And it was telling to me that among the streamers, I believe it was Adam of Pepperspray, during that very speech (or very close to it) mentioned being bored and wanting to march.
The crowd telling people to stop burning things might have been those the regular rioters call the "swoopers". They arrived a month or two ago and they've been trying to get the rioters to calm down with little results. Some info about them: View attachment 1626799
Yeah my sense is that the "swoopers" aka "JUICE" formerly "Portland Protest Bureau" had the run of things yesterday. All the hallmarks of their involvement (for instance the cashapp grifting mentioned above) were there, especially the standing around on the justice center screeching about muh black bodies.
The crowd telling people to stop burning things might have been those the regular rioters call the "swoopers". They arrived a month or two ago and they've been trying to get the rioters to calm down with little results. Some info about them: View attachment 1626799
Gotta love how the clarification to what they meant by "Swoopers" was basically saying it's a made up word that some other people may use to mean something else but when WE say it you should KNOW it means THIS ONE SPECIFIC GROUP!
Bitch, just use the group's name instead of being vague about it then. It's not hard to not make up words.
Easily debunked, Elijah Mcclain was one of the few cases that have a leg to stand on since he is not a violent criminal. Most other cases don't hold up, even with Breonna I changed my mind as soon as more details were released. That's why race hustlers like Tariq Nasheed, and Black Authority/Prof Black truth can be just as dangerous as BLM in spreading a narrative that riles up the black community to anger. Of course any black that isn't pulled into group think is seen as a traitor. There have been cases where innocent blacks have been brutalized by cops but most of those happened way before BLM existed. Any good investigator can find the right cases, plus what about the times when cops have been violent on whites and Mexicans? That is never pushed to the forefront by the woke mob or ACAB types even what happened to Tony Timpah was way more horrifying than what happened to Fentanyl Floyd, he was dead meat even if an ambulance rushed him into the hospital.
Elijah McClain wasn't killed by the police but by EMT's who gave him way too much ketamine. They had to give him ketamine because the guy kept acting like an idiot
and wouldn't calm down.
On a hot summer night he was walking around wearing a jacket and a ski mask. Someone called the police because he
saw someone dressed and acting suspicious in his street. The person was also yelling and waving with his arms.
When police arrived he refused to stop and comply; he refused to identify himself. He friendly told them they couldn't do anything to him and decided to walk away.
That's when troubles started, they had to try and calm him down and if I remember correctly he even tried to grab a gun from one of the officers.
Because of that cops decided to call an ambulance and when they arrived EMTs gave him ketamine to calm him down.
In all these cases, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, George Floyd, Rayshard Brooks, Jacob Blake, Elijah McClain, and whoever I forgot, ... it comes down to one and the same thing:
But... he lost. His "skills" entailed a single parry, which didn't matter because the very next second, he let the cop get inside his range and overpower him.
Dear God, these LARPers can't even LARP correctly. At least Star Wars Kid put some energetic movement into his attempt.
With out getting in to the specifics of the Taylor case
If there are multiple warrants for the same case for multiple locations you hit them at the same time/minutes apart to prevent the other locations being notified, this is done to preserve any evidence and to catch the people at the place off guard/ surprise them (i.e. they have less time to destroy evidence/set up defenses) knock warrant or no-knock.
He was not given too much ketamine. McCain was 140-150 pounds (63.5 - 68.0 kg)
Everything I have read on McClain states he was giving it via injection (IM Route),
McClain was given 500mg of ketamine, 63.5*6.5 = 400.05mg. 68*6.5=428.4mg
McCain was given the lower end of a correct dosage for his weight.
