U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd laugh my ass off if somebody published and maintained such a blacklist on a separate site that's compatible with uBlock and friends.

We do have git.kiwifarms.net, so it would be pretty easy to create and maintain a block list that wouldn't get shoah'd like it would on GitHub.

edit: maybe create a thread in the tech forum with the idea and people may volunteer to help with it
 
The "hot summer night" was 64 degrees according to weather reports on the day it happens.

Aurora is over 5,000 feet above sea level, summer there especially when the sun goes down can be cold.

The police had zero probable cause to stop Elijah McClain their official reason for stopping him was "being suspicious" which isn't actually a crime.

There's no evidence he tried to grab anyone's gun.

The officer's own statement was they choked him unconscious then some how he was awake again when the EMT showed up except he was then braindead again by the time he got to the hospital.

Then these same cops then went back to the scene to stage a photo op with one officer choking another so they're totally remorseful that they killed this kid.


64 degrees is not balaclava weather, unless you're someone who is used to constant hot temperatures, like a Californian. If your point is that Aurora is colder than Southern California, then they are going to be more used to a New England / Upper Midwest temperature range, and that's still ridiculous clothing for that temperature.

64 isn't coat weather or balaclava weather for average people. That's still suspicious. The call didn't say they knew he was dangerous, just that a masked man spaz dancing around and that was suspicious. It sounds like a really common disguise before a burglary at a time of year where it would be strange to be dressed like that. They just wanted to talk at first, but he decided to act with hostility, which will make you look more suspicious.

I have had white friends who have been in the same situation. All they did was stay calm, answer a couple of questions and were ordered to go home, even though you would think in a free country going for a run at 3 AM before your 5 AM shift shouldn't be illegal. Elijah could have had the same result if he didn't antagonize the situation at the start. It's a matter of pick your battles.

The cops were callous assholes, but recognizing where Elijah made a bad call is important too. Smart animals learn to avoid situations they see get another one of their kind killed.

I absolutely believe Elijah was a sperg. He said spergy things and acted in spergy ways. His dying words ended up being "Ow, you are really strong! Teamwork makes the dream work!"

All he had left to do was call on his electric pokemon to zap the jerkop to the extreme to rescue him.

Someone failed him with coaching on how to control your behavior around officers, which is something spergs and high functioning autists can learn because it's a uniform they can remember and a behavior they can train. Plus, they kind of like situations that they can be taught to act without nuance.
 
Last edited:
yes, the argument against no-knock warrants and their dubious propensity to have lawful gun owners fire upon intruders who don't announce themselves as the popo is definitely mired in the muh racism argument. Or it could be that the retards screaming race are retards, but that there is still a tremendous amount of things that are dubious both as regards no-knocks and as regards the bungling of this case.




The whole argument hinges on whether you would just bend over and take it if someone broke your door down and busted into your home when you had a gun on hand OR whether they did shout that they were police. Because if it's the former case, the cops intentionally introduced hazards both to themselves, to everyone in the homes, and to the neighbors by not announcing themselves as po-leece. You would then need to have a mighty good explanation for why you felt the need to introduce that hazard. Or why you would mark Taylor as "no injuries" on the report. Or why there's conflicting testimonies about how long she was alive after she was ventilated, or why EMS was abnormally not prepared to be on-scene as is normally the case for the issuance of these kinds of warrants.

If you're viewing this from any other lens, stop using social media as a basis for any reflection of reality.

Looking at this debate you guys are forgetting one very important detail, the footage for this incident is not public. Hold off on your opinions until body cam footage and court documents reach the public. The fact the initial hearing went the way it did means there is more to the story none of us are privy to yet. Your current conclusions means nothing when everything is getting based on two parties pointing fingers at each other with neither potentially telling the truth.
 
Let's imagine that Breonna Taylor situation but instead of cops, it was a rival gang. Would the outrage be the same?
Nope. If a bunch of niggers gun down another nigger no other nigger gives a fuck. Black people kill each other at a much higher rate than any other group in America and none of them care. But a white person or a cop kills a nigger and suddenly every nigger in the fucking country chimps the fuck out.
 
Let's imagine that Breonna Taylor situation but instead of cops, it was a rival gang. Would the outrage be the same?

More than likely, no-one would care at all in that case, given what's going on in Chicago: 50 people shot, 8 fatally, over last weekend. I'd wager the majority of these events were gang violence.

The media doesn't give a shit about black-on-black crime, generally speaking, because there's no political implications to hone in on unless it's their tired old shit about "gun violence".
And if they wanted to [in bizarro world, let's say] focus on black-on-black crime, they might have to answer some difficult questions and compile some troubling statistics.

But when someone gets yeeted by a cop, especially a white cop, or some lanky white kid walks into a public place with a shotgun, it's wall-to-wall coverage.
 
Last edited:
More than likely, no-one would care at all in that case, given what's going on in Chicago: 50 people shot, 8 fatally, over last weekend. I'd wager the majority of these events were gang violence.

The media doesn't give a shit about black-on-black crime, generally speaking, because there's no political implications to hone in on unless it's their tired old shit about "gun violence".

But when someone gets yeeted by a cop, especially a white cop, or some lanky white kid walks into a public place with a shotgun, it's wall-to-wall coverage.

The media's job is not to inform, but to inflame. They want to keep your eyes glued to their show or to get you to click their links, so they have to create controversy to get their bullshit to go viral.
 
Let's imagine that Breonna Taylor situation but instead of cops, it was a rival gang. Would the outrage be the same?
Anyone (or any group) who will bring about the Stalinist regime is seen as anti racist. Any group who has a track record of resisting is seen as racist. If you support the party then you can go
On a GTA style rape, loot and murder rampage and get called "misunderstood".

If you are against or question the party then just breathing will get you labeled as a racist pig who yearns to go on a crusade against blacks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allakazam223
More than likely, no-one would care at all in that case, given what's going on in Chicago: 50 people shot, 8 fatally, over last weekend. I'd wager the majority of these events were gang violence.

The media doesn't give a shit about black-on-black crime, generally speaking, because there's no political implications to hone in on unless it's their tired old shit about "gun violence".

But when someone gets yeeted by a cop, especially a white cop, or some lanky white kid walks into a public place with a shotgun, it's wall-to-wall coverage.

Yeah, if they really cared about black lives, they would prioritize solving the issue that takes the most of them, but instead they worry about a minor loss.

It's like mopping up a spill in your kitchen as your house is burning down.
 
You know what they say about fools and their money.

Creator of bogus BLM charity used $200,000 in donations to buy home, suits, FBI says


4cc82354b3f2d652d21083ff9d29826f.png
 
Yeah, if they really cared about black lives, they would prioritize solving the issue that takes the most of them, but instead they worry about a minor loss.

It's like mopping up a spill in your kitchen as your house is burning down.

I heard someone put it this way on a recent podcast. Imagine calling a plumber because you've got a burst pipe in your bathroom. It's spraying out gallons per minute and ruining your house. As you're taking the plumber to the bathroom, he sees the kitchen sink faucet has a bad gasket and has a drip. He drops everything and insists on fixing the sink.

BLM is the plumber. It is insanity to focus on such a small problem when the house is flooding.
 
Nope. If a bunch of niggers gun down another nigger no other nigger gives a fuck. Black people kill each other at a much higher rate than any other group in America and none of them care. But a white person or a cop kills a nigger and suddenly every nigger in the fucking country chimps the fuck out.
Fyi - 2019 numbers are not complete yet so showing those of 2018.
- In total 2925blacks were murdered, 2600 (89%) of them by other blacks and 234 (8%) of them by white people.
So yeah, if BLM would care so much about black people as they say then they would have other priorities.

Edit: In total 2925 were killed not 3177 as I first stated.

MurderStats2018.jpg


ESk11pqWkAAq9x7.jpg 65293929_2395198210531430_2099668855130423296_n.jpg 1598714331171.jpg DCnro5pVoAA2gVt.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back