US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Billy Beer, Splinters RCVD, GenderCop and 22 others
Click to expand...
Getting tard comed said:
And this is why the right has lost all ground in culture, and academia.

>Only idiots use wikipedia as a primary source
>lives in 2020 and frequents a forum that documents how more than half of everyone in their country is an idiot

How in 2020 do people still not understand these simple causal relationships.

For the guy wondering why the right doesnt create their own fact checkers: "Hurr, Durr only idiots believe fact checkers and I and my very smart friends see through their lies!"

That's why. Because somehow in 2020 people on the right still don't understand the way influence works.
Click to expand...
The Right doesn't create their own fact checkers because it won't do anything, they will just be Memory Holed or taken out of context or any of the rest of the stuff the Mainstream Media has done to everything the right tries to create for the past 30 years (at least)
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: US Marine Hyde, Qajinima022, REGENDarySumanai and 16 others
teriyakiburns said:
Anyone using wikipedia as a primary source is a fucking idiot. At best it's a place to find a nice list of references, but the pages themselves should not be cited, or relied on in any way, for the simple reason that anyone can edit them. There are any number of instances of news articles citing "facts" from wikipedia that were inserted by paid shills, political activists, axe-grinders, or plain old trolls, that went on to become "reliably sourced", because the news article became a reference for the page that the news article was using as its source.
Click to expand...

I've told my students not to use Wikipedia, but they can use the references there for a starting point as long as they are from legit sources. Using Wikipedia as a first source for anything shows the mark of a lazy retard. All of the articles are extremely slanted, and the culture there is extremely insular and full of fucking poison. There is 0 reason to use Wikipedia for anything but a basic background and where to find better shit.

Honka Honka Burning Love said:
The Right doesn't create their own fact checkers because it won't do anything, they will just be Memory Holed or taken out of context or any of the rest of the stuff the Mainstream Media has done to everything the right tries to create for the past 30 years (at least)
Click to expand...

There's no point in conservative fact checkers, because they're instantly derided as conservative. Its really pointless.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Qajinima022, 1Tonka_Truck, REGENDarySumanai and 22 others
XYZpdq said:
in my day it was using encyclopedias that was considered some bullshit by teach
Click to expand...

There are lots of different encyclopaedias, which is the problem. Brittanica is good for super broad background, but I would never cite it in a paper. But the New Catholic Encylopedia/Catholic Encylopedia are great sources for religious academia, and I would (and have) used them to good effect.

The problem is that basic discernment of legitimate sources is left up to students to figure out on their own (or it's assumed students will already know how to discern good sources from bad). That's how you get people in major debt with ostensible "degrees" who can't discern that liberal media is biased as fuck.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Qajinima022, Parthenos, Iwasamwillbe and 3 others
X Prime said:
What are the odds of someone getting caught leaking the questions again?
Click to expand...
Pretty fucking high. Well, the leaking questions part. The dems at least have kept leaks to a minimum this year.
 
Truthboi said:
I look forward to the debate where Trump will get "fact checked" while Biden gets softball questions that he knows the answers too.
Click to expand...

Chris Wallace said he won't try and do that.


I'm #12611 in the archive.vn queue so I'll edit with an archive link when it finishes, but I'm only expecting the basic amount of anti-Trump bias to occur in the debate. Enough that it's still annoying that Biden gets softballs, but not enough that it will appease the frothing demoniac masses of lefties.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Qajinima022, Big Blue Titties and Exterminatus
Tathagata said:
Chris Wallace said he won't try and do that.


I'm #12611 in the archive.vn queue so I'll edit with an archive link when it finishes, but I'm only expecting the basic amount of anti-Trump bias to occur in the debate. Enough that it's still annoying that Biden gets softballs, but not enough that it will appease the frothing demoniac masses of lefties.
Click to expand...
Can the Jew York Slime not keep their DNC cock in their pants for 5 minutes?
The Fox News anchor will also face intense scrutiny on how he handles the evening, particularly given Mr. Trump’s tendency to hurl false and baseless claims at his opponents.
Click to expand...
Didn't Biden launch his campaign on a lie? Doesn't he have 40+ years of making false allegations? Didn't multiple presidential campaigns of his get sunk because of his lies? Yet all we get is "DRUMPF = LIAR! REPUBLICANS = LIARS! REEEEE!" I wouldn't piss on these faggots if they were burning alive.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: US Marine Hyde, Qajinima022, REGENDarySumanai and 9 others
OnMoTi said:
Can the Jew York Slime not keep their DNC cock in their pants for 5 minutes?
Click to expand...

There was that recent Pew research that showed over 90% of their readers identify as democrat/liberal, but they still act like they have any bipartisan sway. I honestly don't know who they're trying to trick with their nonsense. Only my boomer grandparents and unreachable pozzed liberal friends take the NYT as a serious source anymore. Once Trump is gone, what, do they expect people to start flooding back or something? When their breadwinning topic du jour is not president any longer, even fewer people will give a shit about them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: US Marine Hyde, Qajinima022, REGENDarySumanai and 8 others
Tathagata said:
There was that recent Pew research that showed over 90% of their readers identify as democrat/liberal, but they still act like they have any bipartisan sway. I honestly don't know who they're trying to trick with their nonsense. Only my boomer grandparents and unreachable pozzed liberal friends take the NYT as a serious source anymore. Once Trump is gone, what, do they expect people to start flooding back or something? When their breadwinning topic du jour is not president any longer, even fewer people will give a shit about them.
Click to expand...
It's not just them. It's practically every media outlet in the country. Maybe they're banking on demographic shifts (coloreds have always been overwhelmingly left) to survive in the future.
 
OnMoTi said:
It's not just them. It's practically every media outlet in the country. Maybe they're banking on demographic shifts (coloreds have always been overwhelmingly left) to survive in the future.
Click to expand...

Somehow I doubt they give a shit about the papers.

I'm pretty sure these albatrosses are kept as acceptable losses.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Qajinima022 and MidUSA
Tathagata said:
Chris Wallace said he won't try and do that.


I'm #12611 in the archive.vn queue so I'll edit with an archive link when it finishes, but I'm only expecting the basic amount of anti-Trump bias to occur in the debate. Enough that it's still annoying that Biden gets softballs, but not enough that it will appease the frothing demoniac masses of lefties.
Click to expand...

Given that Chris Wallace pulled that "he did not say that sir" and was cockwaving that he had a gotcha on trump on Fox News afterwards, I don't believe him. Especially given that Trump had the fucking tape and has now started using it in political ads.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: US Marine Hyde, Qajinima022, 1Tonka_Truck and 12 others
HTTP Error 404 said:
Given that Chris Wallace pulled that "he did not say that sir" and was cockwaving that he had a gotcha on trump on Fox News afterwards, I don't believe him. Especially given that Trump had the fucking tape and has now started using it in political ads.
Click to expand...

Yes, I don't understand why anyone believes what a politician or a network news pundit says without the evidence. They are all liars and snakes.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Qajinima022, Crinoids, Iwasamwillbe and 14 others
Biden can’t even perform with cue cards, teleprompters, ear pieces, and people finishing his sentences for him. Chris Wallace can toss him softballs all night long, it’s not going to help him.

Maybe Dr. Jill Biden will cover this one for ol’ Joe, she’s been campaigning for him while he’s in daycare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: US Marine Hyde, Qajinima022, REGENDarySumanai and 7 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back