Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

The Singer Of Songs said:
Rekieta's Amicus Brief has officially been filed.

View attachment 1628410
Click to expand...

Took him long enough. He really should've filed first, then announced the finished product on his stream. I guess he needed content last week.

I'm hoping the eventual COA ruling positively cites his brief once, just to get some extra salt out of LawTwitter.
 
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: ThatDumbPhilosopher, Exterminatus, theworstkindofeurofag and 18 others
Harvey Danger said:
Took him long enough. He really should've filed first, then announced the finished product on his stream. I guess he needed content last week.

I'm hoping the eventual COA ruling positively cites his brief once, just to get some extra salt out of LawTwitter.
Click to expand...

I just hope they look at it out of sheer curiosity for who Nick even is and why the defendants spoke about him so much.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Demon Pimp of Razgriz, 6thRanger, Riku and 2 others

Attachments

  • Informative
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Winner
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, Exterminatus, Uranus Pink and 10 others
I'm not a Robot said:
The Certificate of Service includes them.
Click to expand...
To be honest that reads clearer and far more succinctly than anything I've seen Beard submit; even I could follow it easily, and I'm just a drunken layman. It flows nicely too, and it helps that the footnotes actually exist instead of being blank, lol. I am worried that due to it being dated the 28th it won't be considered, since the appeals started on the 22nd, but I don't know about the fine workings of any legal system, much less a foreign one.

I wonder what @AnOminous has to say about it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: SargonF00t, LawTwitter is Dumb and 6thRanger
Bender said:
To be honest that reads clearer and far more succinctly than anything I've seen Beard submit; even I could follow it easily, and I'm just a drunken layman. It flows nicely too, and it helps that the footnotes actually exist instead of being blank, lol. I am worried that due to it being dated the 28th it won't be considered, since the appeals started on the 22nd, but I don't know about the fine workings of any legal system, much less a foreign one.

I wonder what @AnOminous has to say about it.
Click to expand...

Evidently the reason for the footnote thing is that Nick does the hard work of putting in footnotes as they appear, while other lawyers - like Ty - put in filler and then come back and replace it later....but then that causes mistakes and forgotten footnotes.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: ConSluttant, SargonF00t, Uranus Pink and 6 others
TexOffender said:
Maybe they've give the brief a good looksee seeing as how Nick isn't one of the parties of the suit, yet is mentioned all over moron and jamie's filings.
Click to expand...
That would be nice, especially since Nick and the GFM have apparently become the bane of their existences and the constant center of their griping since this lawsuit started.
AnOminous said:
I heard it when he read it on his show. I'm still not a fan of amicus briefs from randos, never have been, never will be.
Click to expand...
To be fair, this does have a little merit since Ron and Monica have endlessly bitched about him and the GFM since the lawsuit started and it’s all documented. The fact that he’s given his side of the story here to the appeal judges may draw some interest. Of course, we’ll just have to see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GenericReviewerDraco, Riku and TexOffender
Jay Marshall Moleman says that Nick can't legally represent his Texas-based LLC, that he used to file his amicus brief on behalf of, in a Texas court.

1601349424808.png

https://archive.vn/ZZVDY
 
  • Lunacy
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, Exterminatus, The Demon Pimp of Razgriz and 6 others
It's good to read it without Nick whispering sweet nothings into my headphones.

I might be being autistic, but this one sentence on page 7 seems weird, namely the "...but,".
1601349761372.png


@Harvey Danger I know you're a grammar Nazi. What say you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt
Laundui_or_douchette? said:
I liked the brief. Disappointing he didn’t go down the Jordan Greenburger path and call Toye a cuck and manlet in it though.
Click to expand...
I know! The word "fat" doesn't appear once in this document. Are we sure Nick really wrote this?
Nontransferable said:
Jay Marshall Moleman says that Nick can't legally represent his Texas-based LLC, that he used to file his amicus brief on behalf of, in a Texas court.
Click to expand...
Is filing an amicus really a form of "representing" yourself in court?
 
OneHandClapping said:
It's good to read it without Nick whispering sweet nothings into my headphones.

I might be being autistic, but this one sentence on page 7 seems weird, namely the "...but,".
View attachment 1628737

@Harvey Danger I know you're a grammar Nazi. What say you?
Click to expand...

The split infinitive kind of pisses me off but I'm just that kind of weirdo.

Least Concern said:
Is filing an amicus really a form of "representing" yourself in court?
Click to expand...

No, it isn't a form of representing anyone, because it isn't a form of representation at all.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: ConSluttant, Francis York Morgan, Kosher Salt and 8 others
AnOminous said:
The split infinitive kind of pisses me off but I'm just that kind of weirdo.



No, it isn't a form of representing anyone, because it isn't a form of representation at all.
Click to expand...
Isn't it more akin to a testimony? Like a professional opinion of sorts?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back