🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon and revenge pornographer, property of the ugly failed tranny pornstar Lucas Roberts. Has quadruple titties.

[Ethan Ralphs Micro Penis]

IBS started with Spencer vs Sargon and Styx, with Spencer arguing for an ethnostate. I just listened to Spencer call Trump toxic and cry about his racist tweets. The stars are aligning, I think you guys are right something big is about to happen.

It shows that radicals swing.

Murdoch Murdoch were far left. Spencer advocated for an ethnosate but now cries about arguably racist Tweets. I never kept up with TRS but I'm pretty sure Striker and maybe Enoch were far leftists before.

I get that people's political opinions change but those swings aren't gradual. People swinging from one far end to the other are probably not right in the head. At best they're gullible, or Ethan Ralph, a grifter.

What's also telling is Sargon, who's been careful not to get caught into the extremes, has remained consistent with his positions since that debate. Spencer's taken on the positions of the cuck who punched him in the face.

 

[RalphsFailingKidneys]

I can agree that there may have been some things suspicious about some aspects about Dlive, and those may persist to this day. But what about the viewer bot thing? Where did this come from and why? That's what I'd like to know.

I've also seen a lot of posts in this thread that come across as pure cope to me, posts made as Ralph is starting his show at a lower 300-400 viewer count which continues to grow into a consistent 600-900 average depending on whether he has guests people want to see on or not.

The argument has been around long before Ralph started using Dlive after Stream.me went down.
Initially there were some weird claims about the site using viewers to mine crypto, then the botting, there's probably been some other claims as well but those are the two I remember.

You can regularly see Ralph's viewers go up or drop by a 100 in a second or by 20s in a couple of second until 100 viewers are added. It happens without reason (someone tweeting a link to the show or similar) and it is not how the site handles viewer counts.

Last night's show kind of points to the same thing, Ralph has consistently between 600-700 (unless there is a big guest), but when he's back on YouTube he gets half of that or so?
There's also the fact that the his chat is less active than streams with less than half the viewers (unless stickers are being spammed), plus he's getting and fewer fewer donations as time goes by.
Even Metokur refused to stream on Dlive because according to him they were pulling some underhanded shit on streamers/viewers.

Anyway, take it or leave it, there's no 4k drone footage of the bots, but there are a few things that make the theory likely, whether Ralph is involved or if it's just Dlive pulling this shit to keep their scam going, who knows.

 

[AltisticRight]

It shows that radicals swing.

Murdoch Murdoch were far left. Spencer advocated for an ethnosate but now cries about arguably racist Tweets. I never kept up with TRS but I'm pretty sure Striker and maybe Enoch were far leftists before.

I get that people's political opinions change but those swings aren't gradual. People swinging from one far end to the other are probably not right in the head. At best they're gullible, or Ethan Ralph, a grifter.

What's also telling is Sargon, who's been careful not to get caught into the extremes, has remained consistent with his positions since that debate. Spencer's taken on the positions of the cuck who punched him in the face.

Enoch used to be ancap, striker used to be a lolbert.
Both used to be, and still are faggots.

Spencer has always been a leftist, he's like a less radical Maoist. They call it alt-right because left wing authoritarianism is extremely unpopular anywhere. Even China and Russia doesn't back these ideologies anymore.

Spencer is also using the word toxic a lot, what a queer. Thanks to @Burger Fox for the restream. I'm off, I don't want a holocaust of my braincells.

 

[Sam Losco]

The argument has been around long before Ralph started using Dlive after Stream.me went down.
Initially there were some weird claims about the site using viewers to mine crypto, then the botting, there's probably been some other claims as well but those are the two I remember.

You can regularly see Ralph's viewers go up or drop by a 100 in a second or by 20s in a couple of second until 100 viewers are added. It happens without reason (someone tweeting a link to the show or similar) and it is not how the site handles viewer counts.

Last night's show kind of points to the same thing, Ralph has consistently between 600-700 (unless there is a big guest), but when he's back on YouTube he gets half of that or so?
There's also the fact that the his chat is less active than streams with less than half the viewers (unless stickers are being spammed), plus he's getting and fewer fewer donations as time goes by.
Even Metokur refused to stream on Dlive because according to him they were pulling some underhanded shit on streamers/viewers.

Anyway, take it or leave it, there's no 4k drone footage of the bots, but there are a few things that make the theory likely, whether Ralph is involved or if it's just Dlive pulling this shit to keep their scam going, who knows.

Ralph's chat with hundreds of viewers runs about the same speed as my chat with under 100. Give or take.

Metokur was streaming on Dlive until they suspended his account in the middle of a stream and wanted him to come on Discord to talk about it. Metokur's stance on Discord is one I share so he told them to eat shit.

 

[Circumspicious]

The argument has been around long before Ralph started using Dlive after Stream.me went down.
Initially there were some weird claims about the site using viewers to mine crypto, then the botting, there's probably been some other claims as well but those are the two I remember.

You can regularly see Ralph's viewers go up or drop by a 100 in a second or by 20s in a couple of second until 100 viewers are added. It happens without reason (someone tweeting a link to the show or similar) and it is not how the site handles viewer counts.

Last night's show kind of points to the same thing, Ralph has consistently between 600-700 (unless there is a big guest), but when he's back on YouTube he gets half of that or so?
There's also the fact that the his chat is less active than streams with less than half the viewers (unless stickers are being spammed), plus he's getting and fewer fewer donations as time goes by.
Even Metokur refused to stream on Dlive because according to him they were pulling some underhanded shit on streamers/viewers.

Anyway, take it or leave it, there's no 4k drone footage of the bots, but there are a few things that make the theory likely, whether Ralph is involved or if it's just Dlive pulling this shit to keep their scam going, who knows.

Ralph regularly gets a few hundred more viewers on a platform his audience/viewers are more familiar with than a platform/channel his viewers are less familiar with on late notice? Not a great argument in my mind, especially when even the Chillstream is showing 700 live viewers tonight with the guests he has. As far as I'm concerned, that points to nothing. I think his viewership relies on whatever guests are on more than any "bot" bullshit.

I've never seen Ralph's viewers drop by the 100's in seconds, but then again I don't watch the Killstream much (thank the lord).

The chat is actually an interesting aspect though, I'd agree. I've definitely seen more active chats with way less viewers. If I'm playing devil's advocate, maybe Ralph has more passive engagement? Also if anybody has any quotes from Metokur talking about underhanded shit from dlive re: viewers/numbers, that would be good to have on hand and archived.

 

[kiwirevolving]

Sorry for barging in, but can someone post that gunt gif that was featured on the front page a while ago?

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

As long as @Spectre_06 wasn't an "1171 Water Dog," I think he's okay by the guy who writes Terminal Lance.

I do have to ask though, are you co-signing the idea that Ralph's ban was "bullshit," or not? There is an apparent disconnect with what you said on Twitter, and your reply to me here. Is this the thing where it's "philosophically bullshit" but technically not?

View attachment 1632489

Twitter

Archive: https://archive.md/7KowT

IMO both Kiwi Farms and John Stuart Mill both agree that silencing speech is evil. E.g. Mill

..the peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth; if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth produced by its collision with error.

Meanwhile, in Kiwist ideology we'd say that getting some tard's channel nuked off the Internet would deprive the world of the memes mocking them. Apart from the fact we're all sociopathic degenerates and Mill seemed like a decent chap it's basically the same thing.

I don't want to derail from Ralph's shitshow, or make it seem like I'm shilling content (I have no designs on become e-famous; I just shitpost for fun)...

....but, if you're going to watch that video, I definitely recommend the uncensored version

America First Extreme - Nick Goes on a Date With Brittany Venti

Nicholas J. Fuentes goes on a date with Brittany Venti and ends up saving the USA. Hello? Epic Department?

www.bitchute.com

I like the way Fuentes comes across as a sympathetic antihero, somewhat like the Joker.

 

[Sam Losco]

Ralph regularly gets a few hundred more viewers on a platform his audience/viewers are more familiar with than a platform/channel his viewers are less familiar with on late notice? Not a great argument in my mind, especially when even the Chillstream is showing 700 live viewers tonight with the guests he has. As far as I'm concerned, that points to nothing. I think his viewership relies on whatever guests are on more than any "bot" bullshit.

I've never seen Ralph's viewers drop by the 100's in seconds, but then again I don't watch the Killstream much (thank the lord).

The chat is actually an interesting aspect though, I'd agree. I've definitely seen more active chats with way less viewers. If I'm playing devil's advocate, maybe Ralph has more passive engagement? Also if anybody has any quotes from Metokur talking about underhanded shit from dlive re: viewers/numbers, that would be good to have on hand and archived.

You think Ralph's viewers are less familiar with YouTube?
If I showed up to watch a stream I like and found the channel suspended, I would go looking to find out more info. Ralph has two main ways for people to do that that they all know about: his Twitter and killstream.live. If someone didn't bother to do that and follow the links to watch, then they don't care and aren't really fans.

Your argument sucks too because he had less viewers the second night off Dlive than the first. So you're telling me, more people got confused about where to watch the second night than the first?

 

[RalphsFailingKidneys]

Ralph's chat with hundreds of viewers runs about the same speed as my chat with under 100. Give or take.

Metokur was streaming on Dlive until they suspended his account in the middle of a stream and wanted him to come on Discord to talk about it. Metokur's stance on Discord is one I share so he told them to eat shit.

Huh, I didn't remember the first part, but now that you mention it, it does sound familiar.

Ralph regularly gets a few hundred more viewers on a platform his audience/viewers are more familiar with than a platform/channel his viewers are less familiar with on late notice? Not a great argument in my mind, especially when even the Chillstream is showing 700 live viewers tonight with the guests he has. As far as I'm concerned, that points to nothing. I think his viewership relies on whatever guests are on more than any "bot" bullshit.

Thing is that there are viewers who watch the Killstream every night on YouTube, and even when PO used the #Killstream (and Chillstream wasn't re-streaming) he got a bump of a few hundred viewers, so the fact that he gets less viewers using one of the biggest platform in the world is quite telling.

When it comes to the chat, he does ban a ton of people, but that usually also affects the viewership, chat is usually a good measure of engagement though.

I know Metokur has said it both on stream (a few times) and on I believe Twitter, but I think it was his previous account.

 

[2021Murder]

It shows that radicals swing.

Murdoch Murdoch were far left. Spencer advocated for an ethnosate but now cries about arguably racist Tweets. I never kept up with TRS but I'm pretty sure Striker and maybe Enoch were far leftists before.

I get that people's political opinions change but those swings aren't gradual. People swinging from one far end to the other are probably not right in the head. At best they're gullible, or Ethan Ralph, a grifter.

What's also telling is Sargon, who's been careful not to get caught into the extremes, has remained consistent with his positions since that debate. Spencer's taken on the positions of the cuck who punched him in the face.

Everyone of the people you listed were always leftist on economic issues and still are and are open about it only going more "right wing" on social issues. And its not extreme because "far-right" is a lot closer to socialist and that whole "shift between extremes" is used exclusively to discredit the far right. The "far right" is to the "far left" what gasoline is to diesel. Not complete opposites but instead more refined and less likely to be abused by abos.

Its like how enriching uranium makes it go from something that can only be used to destroy and turns it into something that can be used as a near limitless fuel source.

 

[All becomes gunt]

I wonder if Pumpkinspicy is gonna give us the rundown this time.

 

[Circumspicious]

Huh, I didn't remember the first part, but now that you mention it, it does sound familiar.


Thing is that there are viewers who watch the Killstream every night on YouTube, and even when PO used the #Killstream (and Chillstream wasn't re-streaming) he got a bump of a few hundred viewers, so the fact that he gets less viewers using one of the biggest platform in the world is quite telling.

When it comes to the chat, he does ban a ton of people, but that usually also affects the viewership, chat is usually a good measure of engagement though.

I know Metokur has said it both on stream (a few times) and on I believe Twitter, but I think it was his previous account.

He has a lot of youtube viewers tonight though, on Chillstream he has 700 which is an above-average number for him compared to his average dlive channel count. I disagree that he gets lesser too, last night on election night he streamed late notice and still managed 500-600, his average on dlive.

The chat is another story, and I'm not sure it necessarily impacts view count as much as people think. It's a good measure of chat engagement, but not viewer engagement strictly speaking. I get the feeling that the majority of the regular killstream audience are lurkers.

 

[Fslur]

Ralph regularly gets a few hundred more viewers on a platform his audience/viewers are more familiar with than a platform/channel his viewers are less familiar with on late notice? Not a great argument in my mind, especially when even the Chillstream is showing 700 live viewers tonight with the guests he has. As far as I'm concerned, that points to nothing. I think his viewership relies on whatever guests are on more than any "bot" bullshit.

I've never seen Ralph's viewers drop by the 100's in seconds, but then again I don't watch the Killstream much (thank the lord).

The chat is actually an interesting aspect though, I'd agree. I've definitely seen more active chats with way less viewers. If I'm playing devil's advocate, maybe Ralph has more passive engagement? Also if anybody has any quotes from Metokur talking about underhanded shit from dlive re: viewers/numbers, that would be good to have on hand and archived.

Ralph’s viewers are way more used to YouTube. This is also Stxy’s audience & Spencer’s audience. This is a pretty showing considering that fact. The Kumite used to get these numbers live everyone morning before going @ “Jim” fans.

Ralph is just lucky nothing else is on in the morning or else he wouldn’t have hit 2k. & someone else brought up the fact that ROTC gets these numbers nightly..

 

[GogglyGoblin]

Ralph's self worth is directly tied to his viewer count, that's why people report it below what it actually is.
It's less a wild conspiracy and more people trying to make the Gunt sperg about his shrinking viewer count. It's the same thing with the downvotes on youtube, they are literally meaningless but he's such a fragile fatass that he has to angrily command his paypigs to hit that like button several times so he can feel safe and coddled.

 

[All becomes gunt]

Ralph's self worth is directly tied to his viewer count, that's why people report it below what it actually is.
It's less a wild conspiracy and more people trying to make the Gunt sperg about his shrinking viewer count. It's the same thing with the downvotes on youtube, they are literally meaningless but he's such a fragile fatass that he has to angrily command his paypigs to hit that like button several times so he can feel safe and coddled.

Still it's weird how he pulled that many, wildly out of place tbh. Do Spencer and Styx really have that big a following to inflate the guntstream this much with their ice cold takes ? Also i am weirded out as to how they picked that platform for this in the first place. What's even weirder is that the debate wasn't even good.

 

[LordOdin]

Not to be that person, but don't give Ralph more ammo, yeah? It's bad enough he & tech guru Gator think we're DDoSing entire platforms because Entropy's servers can't handle more than 10 people at a time. It would be funny if YouTube & DLive brought the (ban)hammer down, don't get me wrong, but let Ralph self-destruct by himself.

If he does get flagged down you get a break tho.

 

[Mundane Ralph]

Enoch used to be ancap, striker used to be a lolbert.
Both used to be, and still are faggots.

Spencer has always been a leftist, he's like a less radical Maoist. They call it alt-right because left wing authoritarianism is extremely unpopular anywhere. Even China and Russia doesn't back these ideologies anymore.

Spencer is also using the word toxic a lot, what a queer. Thanks to @Burger Fox for the restream. I'm off, I don't want a holocaust of my braincells.

Striker wasn't a lolbert, he was and is a commie.

 

[TwoDollarPeePeePooPoo]

Still it's weird how he pulled that many, wildly out of place tbh. Do Spencer and Styx really have that big a following to inflate the guntstream this much with their ice cold takes ? Also i am weirded out as to how they picked that platform for this in the first place. What's even weirder is that the debate wasn't even good.

Styx's audience engagement is exceptionally high. I think he was Bitchute's first channel to hit 25k subscribers or some other similar milestone. If Styx says "I'm gonna show up on the stream of a pillpopping alcoholic and debate leader of the ethnostate Richard Spencer", they'll dutifully follow as they clank their spoons.

 

[misterduckford]

I do.

BRB fucking up your pay for tomorrow.

It's very important to look back in life bitterly and be a dick to those who made much smarter choices than oneself.
Pretty sure they should add that to 11 series creed.

Seriously though I wouldn't last 47 minutes doing your job. S2 would send my dumb ass packing with enough article 15's onboard to wear as a dress.

Edit: sorry forgot to make this about ralph; ralph you're a faggot even POGs laugh at you. you need to think through your insults more

 

[Mundane Ralph]

Everyone of the people you listed were always leftist on economic issues and still are and are open about it only going more "right wing" on social issues. And its not extreme because "far-right" is a lot closer to socialist and that whole "shift between extremes" is used exclusively to discredit the far right. The "far right" is to the "far left" what gasoline is to diesel. Not complete opposites but instead more refined and less likely to be abused by abos.

Its like how enriching uranium makes it go from something that can only be used to destroy and turns it into something that can be used as a near limitless fuel source.

Your uranium analogy is wrong. Nukes require a highly enriched uranium composed of almost entirely just one isotope of uranium (U-235). This isn't necessary if you just want to run a power plant.