War Navy SEALs change official ethos to be gender neutral, remove ‘brotherhood’ and more

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

1601575282198.png

Members assigned to Naval Special Warfare Group 2 conduct dive operations during Exercise TRIDENT (TD) 20-2. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Russell Rhodes Jr.)

The U.S. Navy SEALs and the Navy Special Warfare Combatant-craft Crewmen (SWCC) recently changed their ethos and creed statements to reflect a gender-neutral presentation of the elite Navy outfits, doing away with gendered terms like “brotherhood.”

One change to the SEAL ethos was to alter a sentence in the first paragraph of the ethos to say, “Common citizens with uncommon desire to succeed” instead of the original, “A common man with uncommon desire to succeed.”

Naval Special Warfare spokesman Lt. Cmdr. Matthew Stroup confirmed the changes to the ethos and creed statements in an emailed statement to American Military News.

“Naval Special Warfare continues to deliberately develop a culture of tactical and ethical excellence that reflects the nation we represent, and that draws upon the talents of the all-volunteer force who meet the standards of qualification as a SEAL or SWCC,” Stroup said.

Stroup said the changes to the ethos and creed statements were made to comply with changes in law opening the potential for women to join the elite military units.

“The previous versions of the SEAL Ethos and SWCC Creed were written prior to the law allowing women to serve as operators in Naval Special Warfare. The changes do not in any way reflect lowering standards of entry, rather they ensure that all those who meet the requirements to train to become a SEAL or SWCC are represented in the ethos or creed they live out. This improves the posture of the NSW force by ensuring we draw from the greatest pool of talent available.

Stroup confirmed, “To date, no women completed the SEAL or SWCC qualification training pipelines.”

The current version of the SEAL ethos, shared on the Naval Special Warfare Command’s official website, reflects the gender-neutral changes. An archived version of the same link shows an older version ethos statement without the new gender-neutral phrasing.

Another alteration to the first paragraph changes the phrase “I am that man” to “I am that warrior.”

In the fourth paragraph, the sentence, “The ability to control my emotions and my actions, regardless of circumstance, sets me apart from other men” is changed to “The ability to control my emotions and my actions, regardless of circumstance, sets me apart from others” in the new version of the SEAL ethos.

In the final paragraph of the ethos statement, the prior sentence states, “Brave men have fought and died building the proud tradition and feared reputation that I am bound to uphold.” The sentence is now changed with the reference to “Brave men” changed to “Brave SEALs.”

The memo also calls for the SWCC creed to change the term “Brotherhood” in the first paragraph to “group of maritime warriors.” Additionally, the memo states the sentence “I challenge my brothers to perform, as I expect them to challenge me” is to be changed to “I challenge them to perform, as I expect them to challenge me.”

The new version of the SWCC creed has also been published on the Naval Special Warfare Command website. An older version of the SWCC creed, visible on the U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) official website, shows the creed statement without the gender-neutral revisions.

The changes come despite the fact that there have been no women to successfully complete SEAL or SWCC training and enter the elite units.

Retired SEAL Eddie Gallagher drew attention to changed ethos statements in a Friday Instagram post. Gallagher shared a screenshot of an image showing an apparent August 3rd memo in which Rear Adm. Collin P. Green, the commander of the Naval Special Warfare Command, shown in the document as “C.P. Green,” signed off on the changes. Green said the changes were made “to better reflect our ranks now and into the future.”

1601575483065.png

1601575637930.png
Gallagher, who was cleared last year of charges alleging he murdered an ISIS fighter in Syria, criticized the changes in his Friday Instagram post. Gallagher, who has since retired from the Navy, also criticized Green’s apparent role in the decision.

“What a joke,” Gallagher wrote. “Note the names that signed off at the bottom. Adm. Colin Green (part of the hierarchy that tried to use the system to put me away)~ let’s remove all male pronouns & BROTHERHOOD from the SEAL ethos.”

“To be honest I thought the ethos was always BS,” Gallagher added. “Now I know it is. A creed or ethos is supposed to be written in stone, obviously ours is not and will sway to whatever political agenda is being put out.”

---


Well we all know that there's such a yuuuge number of female SEALs in their ranks... right?
 
Start over, the experimental didn't work.

Trump needs to make some heads roll over this shit like yesterday. Pretty sure the older military farmers will explain why this shit is no bueno.
 
I'd like to hear @Jet Fuel Johnny and @JosephStalin 's opinion on the matter. Get in here, guys.

Premature, to say the least. Believe there are no female SEALs. Should there actually be a qualified female SEAL(s) out performing missions, then I could see changing "men" to "men and women", "brothers" to "brothers and sisters", and "brotherhood" to "brother and sister-hood". It's only right to make those changes should that state of affairs come to pass.

It isn't a motto that motivates people to perform missions. You do the mission because that's your job. You fight alongside others, of any race/sex, just like they fight alongside of you. You don't let a teammate down, period. You don't like one of your teammates? That's for back at the base, afterward. Out there in the fight, you're all brothers and sisters. And if you can't handle that, you need to do something else.
 
I don't 100% disagree with this simply because it eliminates unnecessary specific language. Saying "I am that warrior" is technically better than "I am that man". Both statements serve the same function, but one is future-proofed for when we have terrifying female gene soldiers who are indistinguishable from men without a genetic test.

What I would disagree with is if they changed past tense language, such as "in honor of the however many men who died doing whatever" plaques. The fact that 99.999% of people who've died fighting for our (or any) country are men should not be forgotten, and in fact should be emphasized whenever possible. We already spend hundreds of millions of dollars making a completely fictionalized movie whenever a woman does anything remotely competent, so men should at least be recognized for being the ones who suffer and die so women can take credit for the moon landing because they were in the same room as a computer once.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: PorkLord
Care to put your money where your mouth is, faggot?
2200 EST, 10/04/2020, 4210 Wolfetown Rd, Cherokee, NC 28719
Bring as many of your cowardly friends as you want; I'll go to prison, but all of you will go to the morgue.

Enough. Don't post angry, don't threaten. You know as well as I they'll never show up. Someone - ANYONE - pisses you off that much, put them on "Ignore". I do. Don't play anyone's games, don't give them the pleasure of getting your goat. You're better than that. If need be, report post(s) to Null/mods. He/mods seems to act on such reports.
 
Premature, to say the least. Believe there are no female SEALs. Should there actually be a qualified female SEAL(s) out performing missions, then I could see changing "men" to "men and women", "brothers" to "brothers and sisters", and "brotherhood" to "brother and sister-hood". It's only right to make those changes should that state of affairs come to pass.

It isn't a motto that motivates people to perform missions. You do the mission because that's your job. You fight alongside others, of any race/sex, just like they fight alongside of you. You don't let a teammate down, period. You don't like one of your teammates? That's for back at the base, afterward. Out there in the fight, you're all brothers and sisters. And if you can't handle that, you need to do something else.
100% agree with you, teamwork is everything. My only concern is them lowering entry standards, while other countries not only don't change them, but raise them slightly higher. However, if they have consistent results across the board, then I'm all for it.

If (a pretty big if) there are women out there that can be turned into a legit death walking terror, then bring them on.
 
They'll probably lower the standards to get a few in. The men will have to cover for them and officers will be instructed to shower them with commendation. Half will get pregnant to avoid service.

Sadly, a lot of truth here. Can never forget the US Army "paratrooper" I saw in the last few months of the active-duty career. She was short, overweight, and smoked. Please...
 
To my knowledge, zero. Just like there are zero female German KSK operators, or zero female Russian Spetznaz operators, or zero female Danish Frogman corps.

Or zero female Gurkhas.

They already do well enough weeding out the weakling dudes, it'd be an absolute waste of time to try to cater women.
You just know they’re going to change that too. Honestly when the robots rise up to slaughter us all it will be almost a relief.
 
Enough. Don't post angry, don't threaten. You know as well as I they'll never show up. Someone - ANYONE - pisses you off that much, put them on "Ignore". I do. Don't play anyone's games, don't give them the pleasure of getting your goat. You're better than that. If need be, report post(s) to Null/mods. He/mods seems to act on such reports.
It's a clone spaghetti
 
  • Agree
Reactions: LurkTrawl
Back