- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
Shhhhhhhhh you will make Law Twitter & KV look like the moronic idiots they are.
Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread
- Thread starter mindlessobserver
- Start date
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2016
They never have a case. That's why they're always on Twitter.
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2015
What's really sad is that these people openly despise Nick Ricotta, and fail at every turn to own him. The absolute best they can do is misquote law at him and call him "Screech" like it's some big gotcha.
We, generally speaking, support nick in this subforum and do a better job of making fun of the him. Here I'll do it rn:
Nick says he didn't get asked to pay a fee when he filed the brief but we all really know he just didn't grift enough super chats this weekend to pay for the Whiskey Fund
and pay for the brief, let's be real.Short, sweet and personal.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
Dont forget it was Law Twatter who shit their pants and reeeeeeeeeeeeeed for a week over Nick writing such a document.So they and Ron are very scared things will turn around for Vic in appeals and they will reeeeee reeeeee reeee all the way to the buffet table because..They Are FAT & have NO Life.
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2016
We, generally speaking, support nick in this subforum and do a better job of making fun of the him. Here I'll do it rn:
Nick says he didn't get asked to pay a fee when he filed the brief but we all really know he just didn't grift enough super chats this weekend to pay for the Whiskey Fund
Nick is a fag and all of his kids are actually Drexel's
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2019
Congrats on the HIV after Jamal and Tyrone bit you.
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2019
Remember everyone, this is between Vic and Rial and everyone who have been actively engaging themselves in this shitfest. Do not stir things up and do not meddle outside of this site. I'm not a mod but another subrule of No Trolling Plans: No starting shit off site and offline. Do not influence, do not represent, and do not interfere. We do not know you if you do.
Maraschino
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
He's "responsible" for the "trolling and harassment" because he was supposed to go kill himself and he didn't. Because Vic is always responsible for the actions of other people. Because they're fucking lunatics.
- Joined
- May 13, 2019
Vic's never had hair plugs, not sure about plastic surgery (I don't think so tho) and so what about botox? His ex fiance raved about botox. Your personal fucking fiance probably does it. You probably do it. So what?
Vic had every right to be mad at people telling kids they would go to hell just for being themselves and having innocent fun. Do you know how many "Christian" people tell kids they'll go to hell just from watching anime? Vic was told growing up that Star Wars was demonic and he had to sneak around to watch it. I've dealt with that myself.
Turning one of the best videos of Vic I've seen into something negative. Fuck you, Ron.
Yeah yeah tophats
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
Vic is a good man.
Ron is a disgusting man
Vic has very gay pants
Ron has a horrible backstabbing whale.
Vic tries to make peoples lives more positive
Ron tries to ruin anyone who isn't a cuck like him.
Who would you rather be?
Ron is a disgusting man
Vic has very gay pants
Ron has a horrible backstabbing whale.
Vic tries to make peoples lives more positive
Ron tries to ruin anyone who isn't a cuck like him.
Who would you rather be?
HighwayStar
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2019
Nick's brief got rejected because of lack of PHV admission (or "Pro Has Vice"), so he's going to try again. Also, note the highlighted portion and how the defendants spelled Vic as "Vig". I don't know what's sadder: their pathetic attempt at a potshot or their continuing belief that Nick is somehow Vic's agent.
Archive is acting up for some reason. If anyone could archive this before me, greatly appreciate it.
Archive is acting up for some reason. If anyone could archive this before me, greatly appreciate it.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
Everyone gets frustrated with those people, especially other Christians. Vic tried to connect to them Christian-to-Christian, and speak reason, and then he got frustrated when the street preachers were absolutely unreasonable and didn't consider him a Christian because he didn't fall in line. It's amazing that Ron doesn't know the kickvic line is 'Vic did it for the camera' and tried to make up his own deranged hit spin on it instead.
@Ron Toye you have no room, ever, to talk about other people having 'anger problems'. Until you have video of Vic beating his wife with a remote in a fit of rage, you don't get to talk.
That preacher wouldn't listen to Ron and wouldn't be on his side. That preacher would hate him for living with Monica while they're not and never will be married.
Incidentally, if the lawtwitter worms have come in here to try to accuse Nick of a crime, I wonder what's coming down the pipe? Did someone hear a little bird suggest the Appeals might be making a decision soon? Is another scandal about Ron about to pop up? Did Monica get passed over for a role?
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2018
To back up a whole bunch, it seems to me the relevance of Nick being licensed to practice law in Texas is predicated on the filing of an amicus brief being an act of "practicing law." Is that the case?
That strikes me as absurd, and I thought we agreed earlier in some other thread that that wouldn't be the case, but perhaps it was after all?
That strikes me as absurd, and I thought we agreed earlier in some other thread that that wouldn't be the case, but perhaps it was after all?
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
Nick filed the brief representing his company, which requires you to be a Texan lawyer. Filing as himself/pro se doesn't require you to be a Texan lawyer, which is why he refiled it pro se.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Pretty much this. If you feel you must "do the right thing" or some other moralfag bullshit, go do it. Under another identity. Don't come back here and expect asspats for it. If it really is the right thing that should be its own reward, don't beg for approval.
He should have done that in the first place and distracting from the case in this way is not useful. It invites motion practice from the other side in which they can pull bullshit themselves. This is the last thing anyone should want. It is obvious Nick is not a friend of the court, he is a friend of one of the parties, putting this brief into he category of inimical amicus briefs that aren't anything that amicus curiae implies.
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2019
Felonious Monk
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2019
Nick has already confirmed that his amended filing was also rejected for failure to apply for PHV. While it is true that the rules allow non-attorneys to file amicus briefs the rule for PHV, Texas Government Code § 82.0361, doesn't distinguish between amicus briefs and any other type of submission - if you are licensed in another state you have to apply for PHV status to file anything. It is ironic that out of state attorney status actually has higher requirements than anyone else filing, but that is the way the appellate court is interpreting the rules.
So now he can either apply for PHV and pay the $250 fee or he can get a real attorney with a Texas license to file it for him.
- Joined
- May 13, 2019
I'm sorry but why is Nick sticking anything into this? Why is it even needed?
Felonious Monk
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2019
The only answer that makes sense is that even he thinks Ty's briefing on certain key issues was balls; bad enough that it warrants his interference.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I would say best move is not to fuck with the appellate court and quit annoying them with bullshit.