Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

Why not submit it pro se representing himself personally? I hadn't read this and thought that was what he was doing but he starts out with this:

"Amicus Curiae is Rekieta Media, LLC, a Texas small business developing multimedia content for internet distribution." The amicus isn't Nick, it's a Texas corporation, which he can't represent. It looks like you may still be required as an out of state lawyer to comply with the rule cited but you definitely can't represent a corporation as a non-lawyer. This is kind of basic stuff.

Looks like that's what he's doing next.

Screenshot 2020-10-01 at 3.00.33 PM.png

link / archive
 
He did it this way on purpose, don’t think he cares that he got dunked on he really wanted them to oppose the brief so it could be asked why and they would maybe read it.
Now he can just refile and have it ignored normally.
He’ll get what he wants the other way instead which is to have lemon Fürer waste more time in trial court saying he’s now an interested party when COA doesn’t affirm.
 
Nick's only option now is to apply to be admitted Pro Hac Vice to the case. He'd need a local attorney to sponsor him, pay a fee and wait for the court to rule on his motion. It would take weeks to finish.

The defendants could file counter briefs to argue against him.
 
The court will be just fine. She's a strong independent woman who don't need no man.

It's clear that Nick's fumblings have triggered you very hard. So much so that you even admitted a couple pages ago you didn't even bother reading the filings. I think you should take a break.

That has to be the dumbest response I've seen in this thread. Nothing I've said is wrong.

Nick's only option now is to apply to be admitted Pro Hac Vice to the case. He'd need a local attorney to sponsor him, pay a fee and wait for the court to rule on his motion. It would take weeks to finish.

Or a better idea, he could quit bothering the court with absolute nonsense.
 
That has to be the dumbest response I've seen in this thread. Nothing I've said is wrong.
I could say that when you were suggesting he filed pro se, Nick was already doing that. And that still got rejected. But I'm not trying to be petty with dumb gotchas challenging your legal knowledge.

It's not about being "wrong." It's that every other response is you whining about the court's tacit virginity. In the rest of this very post I'm responding to you're whining about it. We get it, you hate amicus briefs cause you think they're dumb and if you were Nick you wouldn't be doing it so he's stupid. And you're probably right, it's just getting kinda old.
 
I could say that when you were suggesting he filed pro se, Nick was already doing that. And that still got rejected. But I'm not trying to be petty with dumb gotchas challenging your legal knowledge.

It's not about being "wrong." It's that every other response is you whining about the court's tacit virginity. In the rest of this very post I'm responding to you're whining about it. We get it, you hate amicus briefs cause you think they're dumb and if you were Nick you wouldn't be doing it so he's stupid. And you're probably right, it's just getting kinda old.

Okay I'll stop doing it then. But I'm completely right about it. They're just dumb, they're not useful, they will never be useful, and ok, I'll quit belaboring the point, even though I'm completely right about it, as I'll point out one last time.
 
Back