Orbiter Ashton Joel Parks / People's Populist Press / PPP - Ethan Ralph and Nicholas J Fuentes' professional a-log, fat, churchless, starfish exhibitionist and abortionist, has a diet of potato chips and allegedly killed a cat, he is FATTTTT. 🕯️🐱🕯️

[High Tea]

So there is a crusade for Rekieta, Jim, etc to call out their friends for bad behavior. Doesn't mean you have to cut ties, but everyone wants them to.
PPP calls out people for behavior, but they aren't on the approved list, so people have an issue.
Someone just needs to put out a list of untouchables

Clip channels do provide a service, but PPP and Godwinson's schtick is non monetization. If you know that's their thing, why wouldn't you just turn off the monetization for those vids? Someone like Xyllon puts up clips without monetization. Or just ask the creator, 'Do you care if I make money off your clips?"

 

[AnOminous]

So there is a crusade for Rekieta, Jim, etc to call out their friends for bad behavior. Doesn't mean you have to cut ties, but everyone wants them to.

I don't really care about guilt by association bullshit and I'm not going to dislike Nick personally for not just dumping a friend, but the active gunt guarding and dick shielding is getting cringy. Ralph's behavior is disgusting, even if his child bride is legally old enough to be responsible for the incredibly poor choice to birth Ralph's retard baby who will probably be autistic as shit from his alcohol destroyed sperm, not to mention her own white trash genes and his white trash genes. That kid has a life of hurt ahead of him.

 

[High Tea]

Guess PPP won

Edit - Zoom is back apparently. Phantom just pulled him on.

 

[JewBacca]

Clip channels do provide a service, but PPP and Godwinson's schtick is non monetization. If you know that's their thing, why wouldn't you just turn off the monetization for those vids? Someone like Xyllon puts up clips without monetization. Or just ask the creator, 'Do you care if I make money off your clips?"

If I ran a clipping channel, I would l not ask, for three reasons:

A) It is transformative, so appropriate to do under fair use.

B) The original channel cannot have suffered any loss or monetary damages, due to it being unmonitized to begin with.

C) The way the Youtube algorithm works is non monetized streams are not promoted and actively hidden many times.

 

[Buffalo Chicken Sandwich]

PPP just ran from Zoom

 

[Fools Idol]

PPP just ran from Zoom

To be fair, literally no one wants to talk to or have any interaction with Zoom.

 

[Fslur]

So there is a crusade for Rekieta, Jim, etc to call out their friends for bad behavior. Doesn't mean you have to cut ties, but everyone wants them to.
PPP calls out people for behavior, but they aren't on the approved list, so people have an issue.
Someone just needs to put out a list of untouchables

Clip channels do provide a service, but PPP and Godwinson's schtick is non monetization. If you know that's their thing, why wouldn't you just turn off the monetization for those vids? Someone like Xyllon puts up clips without monetization. Or just ask the creator, 'Do you care if I make money off your clips?"

They could ask to turn off monetization for sure but to pretend they don’t ask for money when they did clearly with the lemon heist? &Then PPP is with the game.

Then act like Tea clips taking time out to do Godwinson a favor by uploading a video which this Video was uploaded exclusively on Tea Clip’s channel by request of Godwinson. Then later Godwinson asks her again
Warns about a copyright strike so it went on Kraut’s small channel


she later posts the video w/o the copyright music to a larger viewer audience “butchered” however most of the videos are edited in one way or another.
The monetization criticism comes only to deflect PPP’s own grifting

archive of tweet

 

[MeganDodgedABullet]

JM Autist getting twink tag-teamed by PO and Godwinson. What a DISASTER!!!

 

[Bob Barker]

You shouldn't put ads on it unless you get the ok.

I can't bring myself to care. She said she wouldn't clip anymore anyway, which shows they could have literally just asked her to stop.

They could ask to turn off monetization for sure but to pretend they don’t ask for money when they did clearly with the lemon heist? &Then PPP is with the game.

Then act like Tea clips taking time out to do Godwinson a favor by uploading a video which this Video was uploaded exclusively on Tea Clip’s channel by request of Godwinson. Then later Godwinson asks her again
Warns about a copyright strike so it went on Kraut’s small channel

View attachment 1636813
she later posts the video w/o the copyright music to a larger viewer audience “butchered” however most of the videos are edited in one way or another.
The monetization criticism comes only to deflect PPP’s own grifting
View attachment 1636817
archive of tweet

So godwinson told her it was ok to do exactly what PPP is mad about?

 

[AnOminous]

PPP just ran from Zoom

It's generally the best thing to treat that fucker like the walking cancer he is.

 

[No dignity]

Guess PPP won

Edit - Zoom is back apparently. Phantom just pulled him on.

Of course that thirsty faggot comes back afer claiming he's done with this sphere of the Internet. He can't help but try to crawl back and beg for attention.

JM Autist getting twink tag-teamed by PO and Godwinson. What a DISASTER!!!

Where is this happening at?

 

[Vetti]

PPP has always told Rekieta he'd jump if Zoom was allowed on. No surprise he'd do it here.

 

[MeganDodgedABullet]

Of course that thirsty faggot comes back afer claiming he's done with this sphere of the Internet. He can't help but try to crawl back and beg for attention.

Where is this happening at?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-rd7rCumUY

 

[High Tea]

If I ran a clipping channel, I would l not ask, for three reasons:
A) It is transformative, so appropriate to do under fair use.
B) The original channel cannot have suffered any loss or monetary damages, due to it being unmonitized to begin with.
C) The way the Youtube algorithm works is non monetized streams are not promoted and actively hidden many times.

If the original creator does not want the views or money, then the only point of monetization is for the clip channel to get views and money. Are they not then a content creator of sorts and therefore open for scrutiny? As long as they don't flag it or copyright strike it, is the original creator allowed to have an opinion about their clipped content?

They could ask to turn off monetization for sure but to pretend they don’t ask for money when they did clearly with the lemon heist? &Then PPP is with the game.

Then act like Tea clips taking time out to do Godwinson a favor by uploading a video which this Video was uploaded exclusively on Tea Clip’s channel by request of Godwinson. Then later Godwinson asks her again
Warns about a copyright strike so it went on Kraut’s small channel

View attachment 1636813
she later posts the video w/o the copyright music to a larger viewer audience “butchered” however most of the videos are edited in one way or another.
The monetization criticism comes only to deflect PPP’s own grifting
View attachment 1636817
archive of tweet

Most people knew what the lemon thing was about. As to the game, PPP has used that as a bit in his streams for years, to hype up the stream, make people rabid for it, pro wrestling. I wish his older content still existed and more people had seen it. He would say things like, 'Send $100 here and I'll do this'. Virtually no one would. It was a running gag. People these days however, are sending him the money. There have to be more people who remember he would do that.

 

[4str4staleatherbelt]

I dislike that TeaClips started uploading full shows/audio instead of clips because it takes away views from the original video, sometimes making a event out of it by premiering the videos, but if the creator gives the okay it's whatever I guess and Gator is definitely right about her in a few ways. There may be some genuine trollshielding afoot on her part. Stop defending m'lady's honor!

 

[JewBacca]

If the original creator does not want the views or money, then the only point of monetization is for the clip channel to get views and money. Are they not then a content creator of sorts and therefore open for scrutiny? As long as they don't flag it or copyright strike it, is the original creator allowed to have an opinion about their clipped content?

People can critique anything for any reason, I see nothing wrong with the throwing of shade. It provides entertainment. I was just arguing the point, I would not ask permission, and gave my reasons for not doing so.

Clip channels have been around a long time, they are usually viewed as beneficial to the main content as any larger audience is usually viewed as good. I don't even care if PPP starts flagging/striking down channels. It would stir up even more of a shit storm and that is what entertains me. I don't agree with striking channels and do not do so myself, but the shit it stirs up, provides entertainment.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

JMK vs Phantom Organization, Godwinson, and PPP, PPP vs Zoom. I thought it was funny, but then I'm easily amused

0:00 JMK vs PO
30:32 Godwinson vs JMK
1:39:55 Godwinson leaves
1:40:16 PPP vs JMK
2:29:40 JMK leaves
2:32:52 Zoom vs PPP

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-rd7rCumUY
https://archive.vn/XMGBp

 

[Fslur]

If the original creator does not want the views or money, then the only point of monetization is for the clip channel to get views and money. Are they not then a content creator of sorts and therefore open for scrutiny? As long as they don't flag it or copyright strike it, is the original creator allowed to have an opinion about their clipped content?

Most people knew what the lemon thing was about. As to the game, PPP has used that as a bit in his streams for years, to hype up the stream, make people rabid for it, pro wrestling. I wish his older content still existed and more people had seen it. He would say things like, 'Send $100 here and I'll do this'. Virtually no one would. It was a running gag. People these days however, are sending him the money. There have to be more people who remember he would do that.

My point is he streamed about Tea Clip and the issue of monetization weeks, if not almost a month later, than the actual occurrence. It wasn’t until his grift was pointed out that he started making a fuss. A really dumb one that people aren’t actually enjoying. So tf is the point other than he’s being petty about $4?

He’s free to criticize all he wants but the events just happened to coincide with Mundane Matt having a big stream because of Keemstar & Boogie being on, also pointed out PPP’s claim in his stream that it was his audience not Matt’s. Fine.. but saying people are only PPP’s & Godwinson’s audience is gay.

All of this too spergy and a waste of time tbh.
Who cares about a clip channel? They need to go back to the content idea board and find something else.

 

[Faalbian]

I thought Zoom attacking PPP was very entertaining tbh

 

[Bob Barker]

the events just happened to coincide with Mundane Matt having a big stream because of Keemstar & Boogie being on, also pointed out PPP’s claim in his stream that it was his audience not Matt’s. Fine.. but saying people are only PPP’s & Godwinson’s audience is gay.

That seems like it might be the bigger story tbh. The matt and boogie stream really had nothing to do with PPP, I watched it because boogie had just shot at a guy. Apparently they are saying that boogie destroyed matt or something too, which was not the case at all. Boogie looked HORRIBLE in that stream and matt came off as being too nice for anyone's good. Either way though, I personally watched it because matt put on a relevant show that was entertaining, not because PPP said matt was good or anything.

If PPP really sees matt getting a lot of views with the boogie stream as "Matt got views because my loyal viewers watched him due to his association with me" instead of "matt had an entertaining stream for once" then he's going to be in for a rude awakening.

I don't want to make assumptions though, and going after the "my audience" quote too much is reading into things that might not be there.