Snowflake shoe0nhead / June Lapine / June La Porta & Armoured Skeptic / Gregory "Greg" Fluhrer - A poor man's Boxxy: rejected by Vaush, disowned by /pol/ for burning coal, sleeps in a dog's bed surrounded by trash, and her ex-boyfriend.

[bixbycr]

Despite all positive appearances, the reaction of the 'socdem' left (much like most of the rest of the left) is one of feeling dispirited right now. As we've seen, they don't really want to vote for Biden but they're trying to lift themselves up into believing that he's better than he is. They're going all over with planning their pep rally streams and pep rally podcasts for Biden. Yet, deep down, they still know that the Democratic Party isn't supportive of them or any of them scatterbrained views and stances. That the Democratic Party just sees them as another useful-for-the-moment grouping. That's on top of Biden's chances of winning being exaggerated by the same tainted media that is doubling down on their 2016 strategy.

Leftists like shoe and that same out-of-touch, circle (jerk) of 'all-knowing' dullards really think they have something with TrUmP DIDN'T CoNdEMN WHiTE SuPreMAcY. Meanwhile, that attempt is falling flat and they have no clue that people see right through what the media is trying to do. It is good for some laughs at the left's expense though.

 

[Robert James]

I wonder why is it aways june's thread that this autist decides to spam on with his socks

Simps gonna simp. Plain and simple

Despite all positive appearances, the reaction of the 'socdem' left (much like most of the rest of the left) is one of feeling dispirited right now. As we've seen, they don't really want to vote for Biden but they're trying to lift themselves up into believing that he's better than he is. They're going all over with planning their pep rally streams and pep rally podcasts for Biden. Yet, deep down, they still know that the Democratic Party isn't supportive of them or any of them scatterbrained views and stances. That the Democratic Party just sees them as another useful-for-the-moment grouping. That's on top of Biden's chances of winning being exaggerated by the same tainted media that is doubling down on their 2016 strategy.

Leftists like shoe and that same out-of-touch, circle (jerk) of 'all-knowing' dullards really think they have something with TrUmP DIDN'T CoNdEMN WHiTE SuPreMAcY. Meanwhile, that attempt is falling flat and they have no clue that people see right through what the media is trying to do. It is good for some laughs at the left's expense though.

Or and hear me out here, they just like being disappointed. This is the side that claims Bernie "no refunds" Sanders is a principled politician and fall for grift after grift. Even the whole "Late Stage Capitalism" bullshit comes off as someone who knows shit is fucked but they refuse to change. They want to feel like their oppressed, their life is on the line, and they are fighting for the greater good so they don't realize how pointless their life is. If they bothered to do anything they'd realize that the world isn't burning and if they solve any of their problems they won't have anything left to bitch about.

That being said I find it fucking hilarious that they keep referring to the proud boys as white supremacist when their leader is clearly not white.

 

[BR55]

This is an amazing story. Also good on you for dumping that trash bag of a "friend."

And you know what? Absolutely accurate story, I've met people like this, seen already hundreds of examples of the CONSOOOOOOOMER who preaches socialism, communism, or anti-capitalism... then they turn around and are the most capitalism-loving fuck you ever saw. Only buys major brands, only mainstream news and stories, only processed food, massive debt, always playing games or some shit, so on and so forth.

These people just fascinate me for how utterly stupid and self-contradicting they are. This is why most people absolutely don't take hard leftists or communists seriously: They're the BIGGEST hypocrites you will ever meet. It's not that they're against capitalism or whatever, so much as the fact that they're clearly addicted to capitalist products but won't fucking shut up about how special and smart they are.

The "ideology" of these people makes sense when you realize that they're not really Marxists/socialists/commies but are in fact just basic bitch Neoliberals parroting what's trendy at the moment.
Radical politics fill empty lives after all.
What better way to dull the monotony of your soulless suburban/metropolitan existence than with edgy snark about wanting burn it all down?
Once the current fad dies down they'll move on to whatever new ideological grift is in at the moment.
Considering that this commie shit is four weeks away from electoral disaster the next gravy train will probably be going full circle and returning to bog-standard Neoliberal "both sides are wrong here's a Third Way" trash.

 

[shuv it up ya cervix]

June is only a "libertarian" in the sense that she doesn't want anyone telling her what to do. Just like she's only "socialist" in the sense that she thinks it would be great if everyone just, like, shared and was taken care of by social programs if they needed anything. She's literally that joke about how left wing libertarianism is a lazy five year old's description of an ideal society.

As for the Libertarian Party being a fed gay op to destroy libertarianism in America, that's completely unsurprising given the way it's run. There's a reason most libertarians stopped bothering with it and became Republicans or Independents years ago.

"Libertarians" are such insufferable people. Don't matter if it's left or right leaning libertarianism. It's all the same to me. It only exists on the internet, because no one takes libertarianism seriously. Like, what is this? The 1770s? If someone told me they were a libertarian, I'd laugh at them because they follow a DEAD and memey ideology.

Biggest/notorious interweb libertarians are Count Dankula, Lilith Lovett and of course Shoe. Of course, Shoe started out as libertarian, I do believe she still is but currently grifts for communism because it's the cool thing to do in current year.

 

[Ged!]

Like, what is this? The 1770s?

No, it's America.

 

[Crosswalk]

How many of these grifters even take the first step to remove themselves from unethical systems like, I don't know, planting a little garden to grow some of your own food? It's always hilarious when someone tries to agitate for communistic authoritarianism as if the only other possibility is to live your life as a wage cuck addicted to Amazon products made by Muslim children enslaved in China.

Tell them that and they'll just spam the Bors comic at you. The real conversation between those two characters at the end should be:

"We should violently overthrow society."
"Yet you indulge in the vapid luxury consumerism that you say created this problem in the first place. Curious."

 

[Bad Take Crucifier]

Leftists like shoe and that same out-of-touch, circle (jerk) of 'all-knowing' dullards really think they have something with TrUmP DIDN'T CoNdEMN WHiTE SuPreMAcY.

Trump also didn't condemn them ("The Proud Boys") because they literally aren't white supremacist BTW

archive

Behold this black white-supremacist leader

 

[Sage In All Fields]

Trump also didn't condemn them ("The Proud Boys") because they literally aren't white supremacist BTW
View attachment 1636013
archive

Behold this black white-supremacist leader
View attachment 1636014

I'm pretty sure he just doesn't know what The Proud Boys are, but the 'stand back and standby' comment is still pretty alarming.

 

[Bad Take Crucifier]

I'm pretty sure he just doesn't know what The Proud Boys are, but the 'stand back and standby' comment is still pretty alarming.

I'm not gonna get too into it here because there are other threads here for the topic, but calling the Proud Boys "White Supremacist" has been debunked many times simply because they are a multi-racial organization and more "down home conservative" than anything else. Oh man, there was one hilarious news article that got debunked, where the photos the MSM chose for their "Proud Boys is raycists!" article literally showed a bunch of Proud Boy Hispanics and even PB blacks facing off against white antifa. It's the biggest fucking joke.

It's kind of similar with the "boogaloo boi's" a while back where they were clearly trying to drum up a scary boogeyman that didn't actually exist based on some flimsy "evidence." The whole concept is a joke, anyway, since it's antifa that's been causing literally billions of dollars of damage, and getting people killed in the process with their "peaceful protests" and the peaceful arsons and the peaceful lootings. The real question obviously is: Why does the MSM (along with people like Shoe0nHead and Vaush) want us to be scared of the proud group trying to protect businesses from rioters, while they run defense for antifa and BLM?

 

[Chris_Stuckmann]

I'm pretty sure he just doesn't know what The Proud Boys are, but the 'stand back and standby' comment is still pretty alarming.

The proud boys are literally just a bunch of gay blacks with a fetish for orgasm denial who decided to let Gavin McInnis control their masturbation schedule. They're not white supremacists.

 

[Sage In All Fields]

I'm not gonna get too into it here because there are other threads here for the topic, but calling the Proud Boys "White Supremacist" has been debunked many times simply because they are a multi-racial organization and more "down home conservative" than anything else.

I did think they were a few days back cus I knew they were Gavin MccInnes thoughtchild and hadn't kept up with them. I'm not saying that now, I'm just saying it's still an alarming thing to say on national TV.

 

[Bad Take Crucifier]

I did think they were a few days back cus I knew they were Gavin MccInnes thoughtchild and hadn't kept up with them. I'm not saying that now, I'm just saying it's still an alarming thing to say on national TV.

It's alarming because that's what we've been conditioned into, to be honest. The evidence for the notion simply doesn't exist, while we're told it's evil to question the "mostly peaceful narrative" so it all just doesn't add up.

 

[Sage In All Fields]

It's alarming because that's what we've been conditioned into, to be honest. The evidence for the notion simply doesn't exist

What I'm saying is that the phrase 'stand back and standby' in a literal sense isn't an ordinary thing you say, it sounds like a command, especially in the context he was asked it and with current tensions and even ignoring that, if you hear the phrase 'stand back and standby' from a senior government official you have every reason to be alarmed cus it's like 'wait, what? Is something going to happen?'

 

[Tasty Tatty]

I'm not gonna get too into it here because there are other threads here for the topic, but calling the Proud Boys "White Supremacist" has been debunked many times simply because they are a multi-racial organization and more "down home conservative" than anything else. Oh man, there was one hilarious news article that got debunked, where the photos the MSM chose for their "Proud Boys is raycists!" article literally showed a bunch of Proud Boy Hispanics and even PB blacks facing off against white antifa. It's the biggest fucking joke.

It is a joke for you, me, and the entire normal humans of the world. But it's not for progressive people who believe in Critical Race Theory. Like Queer Theory or Feminism, CRT denies race (or whatever you wanna call the biological differences between human groups) being something biological and calls it a "social construct". Hence, a black Cuban can be a white supremacist if he's not an anti-system, looting jogger who actually has a job. He's participating in the system that "oppresses" fellow blacks and benefiting from it like a white man. So, he's a white man who supports the "white world".

The same thing can also be applied to trasngender views, as "woman" is just a social construct based on perception rather than the biological characteristics of being a woman, and that's something that Shoe believes. I don't know if she believes in queer theory, but she's quite soft on many lgbt lunatics who've been saying very stupid shit like Lindsay Amer, the creepy pedo ukulele lady who, according to Shoe, her heart is in the right place.

 

[Bad Take Crucifier]

Hence, a black Cuban can be a white supremacist if he's not an anti-system, looting jogger who actually has a job. He's participating in the system that "oppresses" fellow blacks and benefiting from it like a white man. So, he's a white man who supports the "white world".

Also it's a Trojan Horse. It's Marxist anti-capitalist rhetoric in a different dress that they hope () people won't reject. They inverted the previous "intersectional" arguments of "capitalism contributes to raycism and muh soggy knee" when they finally realized it's so easy to debunk by simply pointing to women and blacks who own their own businesses.

People were rejecting a lot of these concepts for years due to being blatant Cultural Marxism (i.e. anti-capitalism masquerading as social justice). So now the latest thing is they just say everything they don't like is part of the "concept" of "white supremacy" and being rich makes you "white" but apparently being a poor Caucasian redneck in a meth-trailerpark doesn't make you black (because you still have white privilege or something).

It's all the same shitty rhetoric being repackaged over and over again.

 

[areanvs]

Why does the MSM (along with people like Shoe0nHead and Vaush) want us to be scared of the proud group trying to protect businesses from rioters, while they run defense for antifa and BLM?

Schmitt's friend-enemy dichotomy in action. Antifa opposes Trump, so they are friends whilst the Proud Boys are pro-trump so they are enemies. You run cover for your friends, and try and slander your enemies as much as possible. Very useful concept for understanding why so many people act pants-on-head retarded when it comes to politics.

 

[SBG]

What I'm saying is that the phrase 'stand back and standby' in a literal sense isn't an ordinary thing you say, it sounds like a command, especially in the context he was asked it and with current tensions and even ignoring that, if you hear the phrase 'stand back and standby' from a senior government official you have every reason to be alarmed cus it's like 'wait, what? Is something going to happen?'

That's fair to say it wasn't ordinary to say, but it also was a hectic debate with a moderator wanting in on the action. Also may not have been 100% in the thinking department given he was getting sick.

 

[Tasty Tatty]

That's fair to say it wasn't ordinary to say, but it also was a hectic debate with a moderator wanting in on the action. Also may not have been 100% in the thinking department given he was getting sick.

I think he didn't know well who the PB are or, I personally think, he had some idea and knew they were not white supremacists. That's why he didn't just condemned them as such.
Trump, overall, is a person who knows more than he lets us know. He knows they are RW groups and, aren't militias somehow legal there?

 

[Cowboy Kim]

Shocked nobody posted this threads theme song yet:

 

[Ged!]

the 'stand back and standby' comment is still pretty alarming.

Not to pull a whataboutism, but is it any more alarming than saying "antifa is just an idea"? I mean, it's not white nationalists, boogaloo boys, or prouds that have been rioting, looting, and burning down buildings for five months.