Trashfire Adam Kovic & Ryan Haywood (The Dead Pixel / Koko / Pikovic, and James Ryan Haywoood / Iron Ryan / The Mad King / Vagabond) - Rooster Teeth associates who've sent horrifying nudes behind their families' backs in what looks like a gay catfish

How many accusers will there be by the 23rd?

  • 9

    Votes: 5 0.7%
  • 10 ~ 12

    Votes: 91 12.0%
  • 13 ~ 15

    Votes: 273 36.0%
  • 16 ~ 18

    Votes: 185 24.4%
  • 19 or 20

    Votes: 44 5.8%
  • More than 20

    Votes: 161 21.2%

  • Total voters
    759
  • Poll closed .
Lawrence was always a pretty regular but milquetoast internet loser with an ex-wife, and he claims to have self-image issues. I don't think he'd be one to take pictures of him stuffing anything up his shit-pipe either.

He did creep on Elyse a few times, including "accidentally" groping her during a Google Trends episode after falling over, and then a cut showed James sitting between Elyse and him. I think that's the full extent of him being an outward sexpest beyond just masturbating to weird porn. I don't see him being caught as a typical Feminist Ally any time soon. I honestly thought Jack Pattillo would be the first one from RT to get fully outed like this, but he's pleasantly surprised me in that he's an annoying feminist ally cunt but he seems to genuinely be loyal to whoever has to dig deep into that gross hairy FUPA to get his rocks off.
Link to the video?
 
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: NewFagWhore
Link to the Lawrence grope incident?
Link to the video?
I legit thought there was only one video, but my brain combined two of them
Lawrence specifically falling on Elyse (0:20)
Lawrence clearly trying to feel up Elyse using VR as an excuse, and James and her swap spots so he can't do it again (4:38 )
Sorry for the mix-up.
 
It has been pointed out several times throughout the thread that these are some, as of yet, unsubstantiated claims as far as the "underage" fans claim goes. I do not think anyone has managed to find anything that gives it substance so far.

Revenge porn? Not sure. Catfishing? More likely.
I don't really feel sorry for him because he has shared nude video and images of his wife, which well, I am not sure is done with her consent. Since it seems to be from angles where she wouldn't see the camera. Or not know it was there.

Maybe she too is into showing off, and for all we know the two of them might be getting off to this as we speak.
He does at some point, fuck what looks to be, well at first I thought it was a small gourd, but it was some sort of sextoy shaped like a very small butt. @Autistic also pointed out that in the videos some were talking spanish, a woman,a man and a child/children (?) and @I've Seen Some Shit also made some really good posts about the prelude leading up the 4chan post. It was originally released in a gay thirsting forum.

Over all, I think we are mostly enjoying some schadenfreude.
I decided to do a little research and as i believe Kovic is in Cali:
(4)(A) A person who intentionally distributes the image of the intimate body part or parts of another identifiable person, or an image of the person depicted engaged in an act of sexual intercourse, sodomy, oral copulation, sexual penetration, or an image of masturbation by the person depicted or in which the person depicted participates, under circumstances in which the persons agree or understand that the image shall remain private, the person distributing the image knows or should know that distribution of the image will cause serious emotional distress, and the person depicted suffers that distress.
Looks like revenge porn to that standard, and i don't think anyone is going to argue the 3rd criteria didn't happen.

Here is something interesting though
(D) It shall not be a violation of this paragraph to distribute an image described in subparagraph (A) if any of the following applies:

(i) The distribution is made in the course of reporting an unlawful activity.
So I'm wondering if the leaker threw in the grooming shit as an afterthought, to try and give themselves a defense if legal repercussions come.

I have no idea how US jurisdiction works though so i don't really know if the cali statute would apply or the leakers location
 
So I'm wondering if the leaker threw in the grooming shit as an afterthought, to try and give themselves a defense if legal repercussions come.
The leaker didn't throw in anything about grooming. I know we're at 20 pages now, and reading through mostly people laughing at Adam's comically sad dick isn't on most people's itineraries, and I really fucking wish @Null actually bothered to update the OP with the actual story, but the guy who posted on /pol/ was not the leaker. Those images predate the /pol/ thread, and the oldest known instance of it was by a gay guy on LPSG who was the leaker and never at any point said he was pretending to be a minor, as shown in the post you quoted.

Also, you can clearly see the girl in several of Adam's videos, and she's pretty blatantly a grown woman.
 
Maybe it's because I never really followed GG shit or really watched Rooster Tooth, but I'm not sure I really give a shit what a couple of consenting adults want to do to each other.

Fucking retarded to let your degeneracy out to the public, though. Keep your proclivities hidden in the false bottom of your closet like the rest of us do.
 
kovic.png


ahahaha
 
That has not stopped 95% of the users here thinking that means he definitely thought he was sending them to a minor, and a lot of people on twitter now spreading it as fact that it was definitely a minor who released the images and are linking to here as a source.
Yeah, the grooming accusation shit made it completely impossible to discuss literally any of this. The controversy is that Adam was jacking off in his fucking company's office space where his friends work and possibly released illegally filmed nudes of his wife. The comedy is that he has a funny-looking, disappointing wiener and is extremely degenerate for a dude who acts like a mellow normal guy on camera. He's (based on evidence presented) (probably) not a pedophile, but letting that specific grooming claim stay makes it impossible because it'll get written off for specifically that. Also could be considered libel.

Like, to emphasize on this: You can see the girl. She looks like an adult. If Adam somehow mistook or believed she was underaged (which there was no indication that the catfish ever said this because he was banned from the gay forum he leaked these posts on) and still went for it, Rooster Teeth would be vindicated because they would be seen as extremely progressive for employing and assisting the profoundly mentally retarded.
 
I don't remember all the details, but he was essentially fired over political stuff, Joel is pretty Libertarian while the rest of RT is pretty far left, so it didn't mix well.
Is there a source for this because it just doesn't scan.

I'm quickly scrubbing through old video trying to learn who these people are, Joel is the totally "not" gay one who brings up musical theatre a lot but he appears in a few videos after he left as a guest and they all seem to have a genuine friendly rapport. And not just there but on twitter as well.
 
Is there a source for this because it just doesn't scan.

I'm quickly scrubbing through old video trying to learn who these people are, Joel is the totally "not" gay one who brings up musical theatre a lot but he appears in a few videos after he left as a guest and they all seem to have a genuine friendly rapport. And not just there but on twitter as well.
That's a different Joel. FH's Joel Ruben is a gay Jew who likes musical theater, and is actually funny. He quit to work on some clickbait journo company that fell apart instantly.
RT's Joel Heyman was a founding member and was a John McAfee-tier ultra-Libertarian who basically got fired, and lots of allegations have been made as to why, ranging from him just being the e-celeb equivalent of John McAfee to him telling AH crewmember Gavin Free he should've gotten a gun to defend himself after Gavin's girlfriend and him nearly got killed by a batshit insane simp.
 
This thread getting is discussed by YouTubers. 8:20 if I goofed with the time stamp.

"So, this is what came up on Kiwi Farms, which is notorious for digging up dirt" "Are they right or not right?" "A lot of times they're right...I'm gonna be honest"
Looks like you got an endorsement Null!
 
Lawrence was always a pretty regular but milquetoast internet loser with an ex-wife, and he claims to have self-image issues. I don't think he'd be one to take pictures of him stuffing anything up his shit-pipe either.

He did creep on Elyse a few times, including "accidentally" groping her during a Google Trends episode after falling over, and then a cut showed James sitting between Elyse and him. I think that's the full extent of him being an outward sexpest beyond just masturbating to weird porn. I don't see him being caught as a typical Feminist Ally any time soon. I honestly thought Jack Pattillo would be the first one from RT to get fully outed like this, but he's pleasantly surprised me in that he's an annoying feminist ally cunt but he seems to genuinely be loyal to whoever has to dig deep into that gross hairy FUPA to get his rocks off.
You've got your deep lore mixed up m'nigger, it was the James bond VR video, and it does seem pretty accidental.
Link to the Lawrence grope incident?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qbnfk9fgwnk here you go, guy. too lazy to timestamp, sorry.
Your mistake is assuming that ecelebs behave rationally, have foresight, and think they can be caught.
I think what differentiates lawrence from a normal e-celeb is that hes not just some normalfag that jumped on to the internet content creation bandwagon to make some quick cash, he seems like the autistic weeaboo who'd spend 24 hours a day browsing several chans and boards if he didnt luck out with a machinima job. What i'm saying is, is that lawrence somewhat understands the internet more than, say James Willems does, making him less likely to send asshole pictures to random catfishes.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Dumb beast
Back