GogglyGoblin
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2019
That's wild. This is the first time I hear scientists using Excel sheets instead of endless .dat text files.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm a Leaf, and I check the numbers on the Health Canada site about every day, and run the calculations for myself. Based on the equation, Recovered Cases / (Total cases - currently active cases), I get the number 0.93. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that means out of all cases, excluding those that currently have it, 93% have recovered. But with the way people talk, it sounds like there are bodies piled up in the streets, and people dropping like flies. I still have family members afraid to leave their houses. But then, I don't pay attention to what the talking heads on the television tell me I should think of all this; I find the numbers, and try to figure it all out for myself, which is probably why I'm really not afraid of itbecause it wasn't, USA is actually doing better than Canada, Germany and on par with Norway and Japan
Percentage of coronavirus cases which lead to deaths
View attachment 1642106
![]()
Coronavirus: Is the US the worst-hit country for deaths?
President Trump says the death rate in the US is lower than elsewhere - what does the data show?www.bbc.com
if Obama or any other Dem was a president, media would use covid per capita numbers to spin it as a great success, but since Trump is responsible, they use total numbers (omiting the fact that countries they compare US to are several times smaller by population) to spin it as terrible
Excel spreadsheets are basically the de facto standard within British governmentThat's wild. This is the first time I hear scientists using Excel sheets instead of endless .dat text files.
Lol so basically this is the result of ongoing efforts to break up the NHS.
The David Cameron regime created 'Public Health England' some years ago as a separate agency to take over NHS responsibilities, with the intention that it would cause chaos and help enable privitization as 'it couldn't be worse'. Then this dodgy 'test and trace' operation was created this year with plenty of 'private-public partnerships' included.
As one can see, this has successfully created a problem, because instead of the NHS having a single database that would be used for epidemiological reporting and contact tracing, there are a bunch of Excel files floating around, in some dodgy workflow created by some Hindoo IT contractors without any oversight by health experts or business analysts.
From the point of view of preventing old people from dying, this is a failure. From the point of view of the Conservative party, and the neoliberal ascendancy of the Labour party, this is a stunning success.
October 5, 2020
Why Big Names Are Getting COVID-19
By Pete McArdle
It's a common belief that our well heeled betters live in a different world than we do.
If they wish to, people of power and means can enjoy the very best nutrition, housing, and health care available. When it comes to buying personal protective equipment, money's simply no object to them.
So why are luminaries like the president, members of the Senate, White House correspondents, and NFL stars coming down with COVID-19?
Because the measures the so-called experts keep blathering about, wearing face masks and social distancing, are next to useless. COVID-19 is simply working its way through the population, regardless of catchy slogans like "New York Tough" and "A small ask, wear a mask!
As I mentioned in a previous article, a properly trained dentist enters a room; washes his hands thoroughly with warm water and soap; puts on a mask, gloves, and eye protection; and then contaminates them by treating the patient. Upon completion of treatment, the dentist takes off his eyewear for later disinfection, throws away his contaminated mask and gloves, and then washes his hands thoroughly before leaving the operatory.
He does this again and again and again, going through boxes of gloves and masks every day. In the time of coronavirus, is any lay person doing anything remotely close to this? Nope.
Let's be real: no one can. And what dentists do pales in comparison to the sterile technique used in operating rooms. Yet even in the best O.R.s in America, there are occasional breakdowns in infection control. Perfect infection control is certainly a goal, but it's a goal no health provider ever attains.
And while the fatality rate of COVID-19 is similar to past influenzas — and it mainly kills the elderly and medically compromised — this bug sure is contagious! By not killing most hosts, the COVID-19 virus spreads easily as infected people with little or no symptoms interact with others, and so on and so on.
Do face masks lessen the aerosol an infected individual expels? Yes, if worn properly and changed frequently. Are most people wearing masks correctly and changing them frequently during the day? Um, no, that's a big negatory, good buddy.
Are folks wearing medical-grade gloves and changing them frequently? Wearing proper eye protection and disinfecting it after every exposure to germs? Is six feet some magical distance that fully protects you from a potentially-infected person?
No, non, and nein!
It's all good! Here's what we do: you remember a couple months back when Excel was reading gene names as dates, so the scientists just up and fucking decided to rename the genes? We can do a similar thing here and warp reality to fit with Excel's idiosyncrasies: just rule that all of the coronavirus cases that got cut off of the Excel spreadsheet just didn't happen. Easy!Fuck Excel.
There can be a strange level of tactical acumen in doing nothing and letting dumb people shit the bed. If we want democracy then let's not ponce about with trying to embed an ideal within reality, they intended for this to happen as they are the politicians and consultants that have (((navigated))) the landscape of the elite under "pressure" from the people.I dunno if either party is smart enough for all that mate. Seems more like a regular old cock up tbh.
as a brit i can tell you for a fact the conservatives are not competent enough to mount a conspiracy to topple the local greggsThere can be a strange level of tactical acumen in doing nothing and letting dumb people shit the bed. If we want democracy then let's not ponce about with trying to embed an ideal within reality, they intended for this to happen as they are the politicians and consultants that have (((navigated))) the landscape of the elite under "pressure" from the people.
ArchiveIt's all good! Here's what we do: you remember a couple months back when Excel was reading gene names as dates, so the scientists just up and fucking decided to rename the genes? We can do a similar thing here and warp reality to fit with Excel's idiosyncrasies: just rule that all of the coronavirus cases that got cut off of the Excel spreadsheet just didn't happen. Easy!
But with the way people talk, it sounds like there are bodies piled up in the streets, and people dropping like flies.
I see that drop at the end.It's because the media set the perception of the situation. They say "200k people have DIED and it's a DISASTER, truly an apocalyptic, abysmall death toll" etc, and people hear it every day from numerous outlets, and go with that.
But if you show it differently, that in USA, at the peak of 'rona the biggest bump in mortality was 75k deaths a week instead of more normal 60k, and this 15k extra is spread across cunt of 330 million people, this paints a different picture
View attachment 1642327
they also always use the raw number of deaths (200k), not per capita of infected, because per capita of infected USA is doing surprisingly well, even if hospitals pump those numbers artificially. But "USA had 200k deaths while Sweden had 6k" sounds way more alarmist, and most people do not realize that Sweden has 12 million people total.
But in stats where USA is not doing so hot, like percentage of population being infected, they often cite per capite numbers
tl;dr media are biased and use unethical tactics to spin a narrative.
Interesting how China's not portrayed on any statistics and journalists keep insisting that they're doing "better" than the US.because it wasn't, USA is actually doing better than Canada, Germany and on par with Norway and Japan
Percentage of coronavirus cases which lead to deaths
View attachment 1642106
![]()
Coronavirus: Is the US the worst-hit country for deaths?
President Trump says the death rate in the US is lower than elsewhere - what does the data show?www.bbc.com
if Obama or any other Dem was a president, media would use covid per capita numbers to spin it as a great success, but since Trump is responsible, they use total numbers (omiting the fact that countries they compare US to are several times smaller by population) to spin it as terrible
It's ridiculous the level of abuse you'll see in any given Excel sheet coming out of any big company and the fuckups that happen as a result. The worst part is when you ask for relational/tabular data and it still comes back in the form of a screenshot embedded into a .docx.A lot of people, especially in office jobs, abuse the FUCK out of Excel spreadsheets when it comes to keeping track of records within the company. They will do shit like have a bajillion pages on one spreadsheet for every department rather than make a separate Excel doc for each department, and then make it shareable so everyone is adding shit to it at the same time. And then when (not if, it's ALWAYS a matter of when) the document crashes and craps out or get's corrupted, they freak the fuck out and say shit like "HOW COULD HAVE THIS EVER HAPPENED?!?!"
Common Sense is not a common thing in the work force these days.
It's because the media set the perception of the situation. They say "200k people have DIED and it's a DISASTER, truly an apocalyptic, abysmall death toll" etc, and people hear it every day from numerous outlets, and go with that.
But if you show it differently, that in USA, at the peak of 'rona the biggest bump in mortality was 75k deaths a week instead of more normal 60k, and this 15k extra is spread across cunt of 330 million people, this paints a different picture
View attachment 1642327
they also always use the raw number of deaths (200k), not per capita of infected, because per capita of infected USA is doing surprisingly well, even if hospitals pump those numbers artificially. But "USA had 200k deaths while Sweden had 6k" sounds way more alarmist, and most people do not realize that Sweden has 12 million people total.
But in stats where USA is not doing so hot, like percentage of population being infected, they often cite per capite numbers
tl;dr media are biased and use unethical tactics to spin a narrative.