Wasn't Abel charged with a crime and found mentally deficient that they decided to drop said charges? If so then wouldn't that mean he is Mentally deficient "as a matter of law"....?
27 Likes, 4 Comments - Abel Wyndom (@keikuncosplay) on Instagram: “Went to see #sailormoonrmovie in theaters and got some great bonuses! I cosplayed as another 90s…”
17 Likes, 3 Comments - Abel Wyndom (@keikuncosplay) on Instagram: “Time for #theancientmagusbride by @crunchyroll at Marcus Theaters. Much excite! #crunchyroll #anime…”
13 Likes, 0 Comments - Abel Wyndom (@keikuncosplay) on Instagram: “Just finished watching @wonderwomanfilm and it was amazing. While I have some qualms with the…”
51 Likes, 2 Comments - Abel Wyndom (@keikuncosplay) on Instagram: “Somehow a hall shot turned out amazing 😻Photo by Maria Emerson. #ardawigs #gaymer #cowslipglaceon…”
45 Likes, 0 Comments - Abel Wyndom (@keikuncosplay) on Instagram: “This had definitely been a week! I am excited to start showing these fantastic photos by Seckora…”
The latest Tweets from Abel Wyndom (@keikuncosplay). Anime and gamer geek who likes to dress up once in a while. Constantly striving to improve my craft and learn new techniques
Graduates of University of Wisconsin-La Crosse - the names, photos, skill, job, location. Information on the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse - contacts, students, faculty, finances.
I told a friend about the weeb wars and he said how could anyone accuse the Ned Flanders of Anime of anything sexual? And even if Vic did any of what was saying then he really needs help in deciding why he'd want to touch hambeasts.
Soooo...Still no news ?
Nick is still grifting ?
Lawtwitter is still circlejerking and doing victory laps ?
Are we still going full circle concerning Lawtwitter's behaviours and possible correlations between these individuals with multiple accounts ?
Are we still here, just to suffer ?
I expect nothing but lies from these scum, but it still aggravates me to see such utterly stupid lying, which relies entirely on the audience being so stupid that they're guaranteed to have no clue about the actual facts, and so lazy they would never even consider looking for themselves, as well as a platform, like Twitter, where anyone who made a practice of introducing facts to these fucking idiots would soon be banned.
Lmao this fuckin guy, he looks like a Lego dude. They grow these fuckers in a vat or something. Maybe squirt them into an injection mold. Literal NPCs.
Can't find the exact source because it was a sponsored ad on Facebook. It was an ad for author Dan Willis' book. He hired Vic to do an audio narration for his book and it was advertising that.
Soooo...Still no news ?
Nick is still grifting ?
Lawtwitter is still circlejerking and doing victory laps ?
Are we still going full circle concerning Lawtwitter's behaviours and possible correlations between these individuals with multiple accounts ?
Are we still here, just to suffer ?
Considering that one lawtwitter apologist is back on the Farms and lawtwitter only bothers to run over here when they want to control the narrative, I maintain my earlier assessment: Lawtwitter and the defense are sweating. They keep boasting that 0% chance....but they know better. They've known it since Chupp failed to actually provide a reason for any of his decisions.
There aren't even any claims here? It's complete nonsense, the usual generic 'we heard that Vic was bad, so we totally assigned more security, also he had underaged girls going to his room, trust me' but without even the decency to make up a specific story like Jennifer Hunt does. The rest it stupid talking points and ad hominem "WE ONLY WANTED HIM TO APOLOGIZE" "ONLY SOMEONE WHO WAS SINNING SUPER HARDCORE WOULD EVER APOLOGIZE"
it's nothing but some irrelevant wannabe clinging to kickvic in the hopes of being relevant.
Don't know what you guys are talking about. This story makes complete sense. The con knew Vic was inviting masses of underage girls to his hotel room to fuck them, so they did the sensible thing and hired an off duty cop to stand around near an elevator. They didn't call the cops, they didn't uninvite Vic from future conventions. They clearly made the right decision here.
I remind everyone as I do every time this kind of bogus accusation about Vic comes up, that the first non-chan accusation of Vic touching underage fans was in some random reddit thread in 2013, where a nobody claimed that 'everyone knows he has sex with Edward and Winry cosplayers, even if they're underage' and then in 2014 tumblr started claiming that he'd been accused of pedophilia and rape in the con scene 'for over 10 years'.
Which would only be accurate if the source of those rumors starting in 2003 were Sabat telling con runners lies about Vic.
Don't know what you guys are talking about. This story makes complete sense. The con knew Vic was inviting masses of underage girls to his hotel room to fuck them, so they did the sensible thing and hired an off duty cop to stand around near an elevator. They didn't call the cops, they didn't uninvite Vic from future conventions. They clearly made the right decision here.
You just don't get it. Remember, according to the latest accusations, he has more name recognition than God. They couldn't stop him. Nobody could, not even the police. It's pointless to even bother calling them. Vic is so powerful that he's been raping underage girls for 15 years and nobody could do a thing about it. They were so threatened by him that they were forced to act like close friends for years and years. They were forced to reinvite him to conventions, fearing what he might do to them. I mean, he openly and obviously sexually propositioned a 5 year old cosplaying girl in front of dozens while cameras were rolling, and yet nobody could stop him. He's just so...powerful.
Thank God that the Defendants and all the other Twitter heroes were able to finally end over a decade of his reign. Even now, the police and Homeland Security can do nothing to him despite his many years of 100% proven crimes. No wonder they want this terrible evil serial rapist dead. It's the only way they can put a stop to this unstoppable ugly-girl loving menace. He's just too powerful for something like "calling the police". You just don't get it.
You are correct that the second set of damages don't kick in until the appeal is decided, but since I peg the chances of this getting sent back on appeal at near 0 for anything other than breach of an existing contract for Rial/Toye the remainder of that $500k is nearly a foregone conclusion.
Despite lawtwitter circlejerking about it, judges have no say in how an appeal court can and cannot overrule their decisions.
Chupp doesn't get to decide to increase the fees in the appeal process, that's not his prerogative, the appeal court alone get to decide on that.
The numbers that Chupp wrote on his ruling, ultimately they mean nothing, they bear as much weight as Nick's amicus brief.
And theoretically speaking, the very idea that a judge could do such a thing sounds quite unethical, akin to hindering people's right to appeal.
Despite lawtwitter circlejerking about it, judges have no say in how an appeal court can and cannot overrule their decisions.
Chupp doesn't get to decide to increase the fees in the appeal process, that's not his prerogative, the appeal court alone get to decide on that.
The numbers that Chupp wrote on his ruling, ultimately they mean nothing, they bear as much weight as Nick's amicus brief.
And theoretically speaking, the very idea that a judge could do such a thing sounds quite unethical, akin to hindering people's right to appeal.
At the outset, its fairly important to note that fee shifting is not the default. Most causes of action don't allow fee shifting, although Texas has a broader than average fee shifting statute, Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. 38.001 that does allow fee shifting in many contract cases. Because contract cases are relatively common it has become standard practice in Texas for judges to estimate fees in the event of an appeal. Contrary to what you seem to think, these fee estimates are not just allowed they are something Texas courts do literally all the time.
Second, you seem to think that the court's fees order does something that it absolutely doesn't purport to do: attempt to bind the appeals court. It states only what the fees will be if the order isn't overturned by the appeals court. Because appeals courts overturn trial courts in fewer than 5% of cases in Texas the chances that the fees order will be the final amount Vic owes is very, very high.
Third, Vic is actually quite lucky that the TCPA version of fee shifting operates the way that it does. Contrary to your apparent expectations, it is normally quite expensive to initiate an appeal. In order to appeal you ordinarily have to put up a bond in the amount of the judgment. This can sometimes make appealing very, very expensive to even file. However, the rule doesn't require that a bond be put up for fees and court costs. Fortunately for Vic, the courts have interpreted TCPA attorneys fees awards to be a form of fee or cost rather than the kind of money judgment requiring a bond. This appeal would otherwise have been a very expensive one to file.
twitter.com
www.instagram.com
www.instagram.com
archive.fo
wcca.wicourts.gov
www.youtube.com
www.deviantart.com
www.anime-planet.com
www.crunchyroll.com
www.pinterest.com
www.linkedin.com
alumnius.net
